DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

[550D + EF 50mm F1.8] Back-lit Moth Orchid

Started Mar 6, 2019 | Photos
Wave forest Regular Member • Posts: 356
[550D + EF 50mm F1.8] Back-lit Moth Orchid
5

The moth orchid sit on the window sill. The narrow view angle of the 50mm @ 550D works fine.

 Wave forest's gear list:Wave forest's gear list
Sony RX100 Canon EOS 550D Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM | C Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM +2 more
Comment & critique:
Please provide me constructive critique and criticism.
Canon EOS 550D (EOS Rebel T2i / EOS Kiss X4)
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
brightcolours Forum Pro • Posts: 15,885
try to...

Try to underexpose the flowers less (and of course, as a result, the sky more), easily achieved in M mode. The end result will be much nicer.

Digirame Forum Pro • Posts: 41,857
Re: [550D + EF 50mm F1.8] Back-lit Moth Orchid

Those are pretty flowers.  I like that the background helps the flowers stand out separately.

OP Wave forest Regular Member • Posts: 356
Re: [550D + EF 50mm F1.8] Back-lit Moth Orchid

Thanks, Digirame.

Indeed, the neighbour's house and a birch tree were washed away. Also the back-light gave the moth orchid a kind of 3D effect.

Digirame wrote:

Those are pretty flowers. I like that the background helps the flowers stand out separately.

 Wave forest's gear list:Wave forest's gear list
Sony RX100 Canon EOS 550D Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM | C Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM +2 more
OP Wave forest Regular Member • Posts: 356
Re: try to...

Thanks for your comments. Actually, it was indeed in M mode with spot metering to achieve an accurate exposure of the moth orchid.

If it were underexposed to get sky, then trees outside would show off and the whole frame would be very messy with an underexposed flower.

If you really want to get a clear background and the subject in back-light, flash is inevitable.

brightcolours wrote:

Try to underexpose the flowers less (and of course, as a result, the sky more), easily achieved in M mode. The end result will be much nicer.

 Wave forest's gear list:Wave forest's gear list
Sony RX100 Canon EOS 550D Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM | C Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM +2 more
brightcolours Forum Pro • Posts: 15,885
Re: try to...
1

Wave forest wrote:

Thanks for your comments. Actually, it was indeed in M mode with spot metering to achieve an accurate exposure of the moth orchid.

The orchid still is seriously underexposed... The stem is an almost midtone green, but towards blck in your image, the orchid colour itself also way too dark. You appear to not have metered correctly.

If it were underexposed to get sky, then trees outside would show off and the whole frame would be very messy with an underexposed flower.

Not talking about the sky.

If you really want to get a clear background and the subject in back-light, flash is inevitable.

No, i want the orchid to not look that underexposed.

brightcolours wrote:

Try to underexpose the flowers less (and of course, as a result, the sky more), easily achieved in M mode. The end result will be much nicer.

OP Wave forest Regular Member • Posts: 356
Re: try to...
1

Nice examples! Thanks.

I think I misread your first reply - missed the word "less". My apology.

I should have indeed used the orchid stem or leaves to meter, instead the petals.

This is another try as you suggested.

brightcolours wrote:

Wave forest wrote:

Thanks for your comments. Actually, it was indeed in M mode with spot metering to achieve an accurate exposure of the moth orchid.

The orchid still is seriously underexposed... The stem is an almost midtone green, but towards blck in your image, the orchid colour itself also way too dark. You appear to not have metered correctly.

If it were underexposed to get sky, then trees outside would show off and the whole frame would be very messy with an underexposed flower.

Not talking about the sky.

If you really want to get a clear background and the subject in back-light, flash is inevitable.

No, i want the orchid to not look that underexposed.

brightcolours wrote:

Try to underexpose the flowers less (and of course, as a result, the sky more), easily achieved in M mode. The end result will be much nicer.

 Wave forest's gear list:Wave forest's gear list
Sony RX100 Canon EOS 550D Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM | C Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM +2 more
brightcolours Forum Pro • Posts: 15,885
Re: try to...

Wave forest wrote:

Nice examples! Thanks.

I think I misread your first reply - missed the word "less". My apology.

It was mostly my fault, as I left out a word ("and as a result overexpose the sky more"). Sorry for the confusion!

I should have indeed used the orchid stem or leaves to meter, instead the petals.

This is another try as you suggested.

Very nice! I like this result better than your 1st image, the flowers now show their true beauty! The slight contrast issue with the lens I find less obtrusive than underexposure.

brightcolours wrote:

Wave forest wrote:

Thanks for your comments. Actually, it was indeed in M mode with spot metering to achieve an accurate exposure of the moth orchid.

The orchid still is seriously underexposed... The stem is an almost midtone green, but towards blck in your image, the orchid colour itself also way too dark. You appear to not have metered correctly.

If it were underexposed to get sky, then trees outside would show off and the whole frame would be very messy with an underexposed flower.

Not talking about the sky.

If you really want to get a clear background and the subject in back-light, flash is inevitable.

No, i want the orchid to not look that underexposed.

brightcolours wrote:

Try to underexpose the flowers less (and of course, as a result, the sky more), easily achieved in M mode. The end result will be much nicer.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads