DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

If you are a pro, do you use two card slots for backup? Locked

Started Feb 3, 2019 | Polls
This thread is locked.
Rock and Rollei Senior Member • Posts: 2,899
Re: Be prepared for “what if!”

PAntunes wrote:

lawny13 wrote:

Holscen wrote:

What if ...your card failed, what if it was your camera, your lens? Could you get the job done? Would your client like it if you failed to get the shots, your name and business would be tarnished

I always do paid jobs with 2 bodies, which was just as well because failure happens.

First big assignment I did for an international music magazine had me going to New York from London to shoot a band. I shot it on 2 Nikon F100 film cameras. Guess what, my motordrive failed on frame 1. No worries as I had a backup F100 otherwise my career might have ended before it began.

I used to shoot transparency then too, you had to be spot on with exposure and have perfect development. You wouldn’t always put all your rolls in processing at the same time, in case of an issue, and you’d run a clip test if you were a perfectionist.

The bottom line is that things fail and accidents happen. I’ve had cards fail, shutters fail, aperture blades fail, lenses get smashed and stolen, but I’ve always had a way round because I had a backup.

If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid problems with one camera, card, lens or flash...well that’s good..but luck can run out.

I believe if a pro prepares for the worst “what if” scenarios, then they can just roll on through any problems without breaking a sweat and deliver the job successfully.

I use 2 cameras, both with dual cards, many lenses, 2 flashes. The only thing I don’t have room for in my bag is excuses or apologies.

Ok, get what you are saying.
But in your case since you have 2 bodies and multiple lenses, shooting through out an event with bodies that only have 1 card slot would work, as long as you change things up, but not only shooting 1 perspective on 1 body.
Just as you implied shooting an event with just one body just cause it has 2 card slots assuming that it is the only thing to worry about would be silly, cause the body, lenses, shutter, hot shoe etc etc can all fail, and most of those things don't have backups short of a second body.
For events of course I think 2 card slots are better than one, but I think it is far more important to have a backup body over a backup card slot. Generally since the card slots are actually electronically connected on the same circuit, if the unit fails in the body itself then 2 cards wouldn't save you either.
Anyway, things go wrong, and it is up to the professional to determine how to handle it.

But the second body doesn't save the picture you took on the first body. If you're running with a 35mm and a 85mm, you won't get the group photo you took at 35mm on the camera that had the 85mm. Card failures can happen when you're taking the photo, but most of the time is when you're trying to copy the images to the computer. And by then, you can't go back and take a photo with a second camera.

I used to shoot weddings back in the 90s as a weekend warrior (I don't, these days, as a proper pro). I never carried 2 bodies - always 3 and sometimes 4.  One body each for Portra 160NC and 400NC, one spare loaded with whichever I was shooting at the time (outdoor and indoor films), and sometimes the 4th with the other film in.
I would try to get every shot that mattered on 2 cameras, and I had 2 lenses to do each job, pretty much. I used to take my films to my local pro lab, and on different days, to reduce the risk of a problem there. I was always paranoid about losing a film, even more than any other risk - and that still holds true with memory cards.
Anyway, these days I shoot conferences and small business stuff. For conferences, I get my shots in the first minute or two of each speaker, review and copy what I have to disk, then shoot any additional stuff. That means I don't need a second card, in effect. Most of my location shooting can be duplicated. Portraits are generally shot tethered, to show the client.
So although I really get the idea of redundancy, I just don't particularly need it. Of course most of my shooting IS done with twin cards, but not all of it, and I'm no longer worried about it.

 Rock and Rollei's gear list:Rock and Rollei's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EOS R Canon EOS M6 II Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM +29 more
(unknown member) Regular Member • Posts: 363
JPG is Never a Back Up to RAW nt

No text.

(unknown member) Regular Member • Posts: 363
Your Reasoning is a False Economy

The truth is, the reason most cards fail is NOT that they fall apart...its because the media gets corrupted and often beyond repair.

What is so, so, so inhibiting for you to just slam an extra card in the 2nd slot?  Your reasoning is crazy.

Larawanista
Larawanista Veteran Member • Posts: 4,736
Re: Be prepared for “what if!”

Holscen wrote:

What if ...your card failed, what if it was your camera, your lens? Could you get the job done? Would your client like it if you failed to get the shots, your name and business would be tarnished

I always do paid jobs with 2 bodies, which was just as well because failure happens.

First big assignment I did for an international music magazine had me going to New York from London to shoot a band. I shot it on 2 Nikon F100 film cameras. Guess what, my motordrive failed on frame 1. No worries as I had a backup F100 otherwise my career might have ended before it began.

I used to shoot transparency then too, you had to be spot on with exposure and have perfect development. You wouldn’t always put all your rolls in processing at the same time, in case of an issue, and you’d run a clip test if you were a perfectionist.

The bottom line is that things fail and accidents happen. I’ve had cards fail, shutters fail, aperture blades fail, lenses get smashed and stolen, but I’ve always had a way round because I had a backup.

If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid problems with one camera, card, lens or flash...well that’s good..but luck can run out.

I believe if a pro prepares for the worst “what if” scenarios, then they can just roll on through any problems without breaking a sweat and deliver the job successfully.

I use 2 cameras, both with dual cards, many lenses, 2 flashes. The only thing I don’t have room for in my bag is excuses or apologies.

Two cameras is also my preference, sometimes three. Only one needs to have dual cards. Most often two cameras with single cards is more than enough for me for paid gigs. Two cameras are less likely to fail. Therefore the argument that the only way to go is dual cards and to arrogantly insist such as the standard is flawed.

-- hide signature --

"Photography is therapeutic."
http://www.pbase.com/joshcruzphotos

 Larawanista's gear list:Larawanista's gear list
Canon EOS M3 Canon EOS R Canon EOS RP Canon EOS R6 Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM +10 more
(unknown member) Regular Member • Posts: 363
Your Logic is Wrong

Noogy wrote:

Holscen wrote:

What if ...your card failed, what if it was your camera, your lens? Could you get the job done? Would your client like it if you failed to get the shots, your name and business would be tarnished

I always do paid jobs with 2 bodies, which was just as well because failure happens.

First big assignment I did for an international music magazine had me going to New York from London to shoot a band. I shot it on 2 Nikon F100 film cameras. Guess what, my motordrive failed on frame 1. No worries as I had a backup F100 otherwise my career might have ended before it began.

I used to shoot transparency then too, you had to be spot on with exposure and have perfect development. You wouldn’t always put all your rolls in processing at the same time, in case of an issue, and you’d run a clip test if you were a perfectionist.

The bottom line is that things fail and accidents happen. I’ve had cards fail, shutters fail, aperture blades fail, lenses get smashed and stolen, but I’ve always had a way round because I had a backup.

If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid problems with one camera, card, lens or flash...well that’s good..but luck can run out.

I believe if a pro prepares for the worst “what if” scenarios, then they can just roll on through any problems without breaking a sweat and deliver the job successfully.

I use 2 cameras, both with dual cards, many lenses, 2 flashes. The only thing I don’t have room for in my bag is excuses or apologies.

Two cameras is also my preference, sometimes three. Only one needs to have dual cards. Most often two cameras with single cards is more than enough for me for paid gigs. Two cameras are less likely to fail. Therefore the argument that the only way to go is dual cards and to arrogantly insist such as the standard is flawed.

Properly backed up files demand redundancy. Having redundancy on 1 of multiple bodies only means that that one body is protected.

And your stance is exceedingly silly because, for the cost of a 2nd card for each body, you think it "arrogant" to spend that $$.

Thank God you do not work in IT...your thinking would never make it at Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, nor any even 3rd rate IT company.

My God, spend the $35 already!!

lawny13 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,132
Re: Be prepared for “what if!”

PAntunes wrote:

lawny13 wrote:

Holscen wrote:

What if ...your card failed, what if it was your camera, your lens? Could you get the job done? Would your client like it if you failed to get the shots, your name and business would be tarnished

I always do paid jobs with 2 bodies, which was just as well because failure happens.

First big assignment I did for an international music magazine had me going to New York from London to shoot a band. I shot it on 2 Nikon F100 film cameras. Guess what, my motordrive failed on frame 1. No worries as I had a backup F100 otherwise my career might have ended before it began.

I used to shoot transparency then too, you had to be spot on with exposure and have perfect development. You wouldn’t always put all your rolls in processing at the same time, in case of an issue, and you’d run a clip test if you were a perfectionist.

The bottom line is that things fail and accidents happen. I’ve had cards fail, shutters fail, aperture blades fail, lenses get smashed and stolen, but I’ve always had a way round because I had a backup.

If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid problems with one camera, card, lens or flash...well that’s good..but luck can run out.

I believe if a pro prepares for the worst “what if” scenarios, then they can just roll on through any problems without breaking a sweat and deliver the job successfully.

I use 2 cameras, both with dual cards, many lenses, 2 flashes. The only thing I don’t have room for in my bag is excuses or apologies.

Ok, get what you are saying.
But in your case since you have 2 bodies and multiple lenses, shooting through out an event with bodies that only have 1 card slot would work, as long as you change things up, but not only shooting 1 perspective on 1 body.
Just as you implied shooting an event with just one body just cause it has 2 card slots assuming that it is the only thing to worry about would be silly, cause the body, lenses, shutter, hot shoe etc etc can all fail, and most of those things don't have backups short of a second body.
For events of course I think 2 card slots are better than one, but I think it is far more important to have a backup body over a backup card slot. Generally since the card slots are actually electronically connected on the same circuit, if the unit fails in the body itself then 2 cards wouldn't save you either.
Anyway, things go wrong, and it is up to the professional to determine how to handle it.

But the second body doesn't save the picture you took on the first body. If you're running with a 35mm and a 85mm, you won't get the group photo you took at 35mm on the camera that had the 85mm. Card failures can happen when you're taking the photo, but most of the time is when you're trying to copy the images to the computer. And by then, you can't go back and take a photo with a second camera.

I always transfer images using USB C since I learned that card failures are most generally due to taking the card in and out of the camera. Makes sense since most fo the time built in memory never fails... So I have a 64 GB card or larger in the camera and I might take it out once in a blue moon for a FW update or something like that.

PAntunes Senior Member • Posts: 1,279
Re: Be prepared for “what if!”

lawny13 wrote:

PAntunes wrote:

lawny13 wrote:

Holscen wrote:

What if ...your card failed, what if it was your camera, your lens? Could you get the job done? Would your client like it if you failed to get the shots, your name and business would be tarnished

I always do paid jobs with 2 bodies, which was just as well because failure happens.

First big assignment I did for an international music magazine had me going to New York from London to shoot a band. I shot it on 2 Nikon F100 film cameras. Guess what, my motordrive failed on frame 1. No worries as I had a backup F100 otherwise my career might have ended before it began.

I used to shoot transparency then too, you had to be spot on with exposure and have perfect development. You wouldn’t always put all your rolls in processing at the same time, in case of an issue, and you’d run a clip test if you were a perfectionist.

The bottom line is that things fail and accidents happen. I’ve had cards fail, shutters fail, aperture blades fail, lenses get smashed and stolen, but I’ve always had a way round because I had a backup.

If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid problems with one camera, card, lens or flash...well that’s good..but luck can run out.

I believe if a pro prepares for the worst “what if” scenarios, then they can just roll on through any problems without breaking a sweat and deliver the job successfully.

I use 2 cameras, both with dual cards, many lenses, 2 flashes. The only thing I don’t have room for in my bag is excuses or apologies.

Ok, get what you are saying.
But in your case since you have 2 bodies and multiple lenses, shooting through out an event with bodies that only have 1 card slot would work, as long as you change things up, but not only shooting 1 perspective on 1 body.
Just as you implied shooting an event with just one body just cause it has 2 card slots assuming that it is the only thing to worry about would be silly, cause the body, lenses, shutter, hot shoe etc etc can all fail, and most of those things don't have backups short of a second body.
For events of course I think 2 card slots are better than one, but I think it is far more important to have a backup body over a backup card slot. Generally since the card slots are actually electronically connected on the same circuit, if the unit fails in the body itself then 2 cards wouldn't save you either.
Anyway, things go wrong, and it is up to the professional to determine how to handle it.

But the second body doesn't save the picture you took on the first body. If you're running with a 35mm and a 85mm, you won't get the group photo you took at 35mm on the camera that had the 85mm. Card failures can happen when you're taking the photo, but most of the time is when you're trying to copy the images to the computer. And by then, you can't go back and take a photo with a second camera.

I always transfer images using USB C since I learned that card failures are most generally due to taking the card in and out of the camera. Makes sense since most fo the time built in memory never fails... So I have a 64 GB card or larger in the camera and I might take it out once in a blue moon for a FW update or something like that.

At the same time, plugging and unplugging usb cables on a camera may break the usb connector... If you shoot in studio, that connector is kind of a big deal. On the new FF sony cameras they have two usb connectors that can be used.

lawny13 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,132
Re: Be prepared for “what if!”

PAntunes wrote:

lawny13 wrote:

PAntunes wrote:

lawny13 wrote:

Holscen wrote:

What if ...your card failed, what if it was your camera, your lens? Could you get the job done? Would your client like it if you failed to get the shots, your name and business would be tarnished

I always do paid jobs with 2 bodies, which was just as well because failure happens.

First big assignment I did for an international music magazine had me going to New York from London to shoot a band. I shot it on 2 Nikon F100 film cameras. Guess what, my motordrive failed on frame 1. No worries as I had a backup F100 otherwise my career might have ended before it began.

I used to shoot transparency then too, you had to be spot on with exposure and have perfect development. You wouldn’t always put all your rolls in processing at the same time, in case of an issue, and you’d run a clip test if you were a perfectionist.

The bottom line is that things fail and accidents happen. I’ve had cards fail, shutters fail, aperture blades fail, lenses get smashed and stolen, but I’ve always had a way round because I had a backup.

If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid problems with one camera, card, lens or flash...well that’s good..but luck can run out.

I believe if a pro prepares for the worst “what if” scenarios, then they can just roll on through any problems without breaking a sweat and deliver the job successfully.

I use 2 cameras, both with dual cards, many lenses, 2 flashes. The only thing I don’t have room for in my bag is excuses or apologies.

Ok, get what you are saying.
But in your case since you have 2 bodies and multiple lenses, shooting through out an event with bodies that only have 1 card slot would work, as long as you change things up, but not only shooting 1 perspective on 1 body.
Just as you implied shooting an event with just one body just cause it has 2 card slots assuming that it is the only thing to worry about would be silly, cause the body, lenses, shutter, hot shoe etc etc can all fail, and most of those things don't have backups short of a second body.
For events of course I think 2 card slots are better than one, but I think it is far more important to have a backup body over a backup card slot. Generally since the card slots are actually electronically connected on the same circuit, if the unit fails in the body itself then 2 cards wouldn't save you either.
Anyway, things go wrong, and it is up to the professional to determine how to handle it.

But the second body doesn't save the picture you took on the first body. If you're running with a 35mm and a 85mm, you won't get the group photo you took at 35mm on the camera that had the 85mm. Card failures can happen when you're taking the photo, but most of the time is when you're trying to copy the images to the computer. And by then, you can't go back and take a photo with a second camera.

I always transfer images using USB C since I learned that card failures are most generally due to taking the card in and out of the camera. Makes sense since most fo the time built in memory never fails... So I have a 64 GB card or larger in the camera and I might take it out once in a blue moon for a FW update or something like that.

At the same time, plugging and unplugging usb cables on a camera may break the usb connector... If you shoot in studio, that connector is kind of a big deal. On the new FF sony cameras they have two usb connectors that can be used.

Now you are starting to pick at straws. I am quite satisfied with USB-C. The feel I have of it is more secure and robust than regular USB-A or any of the micro USB stuff. And on the R it access is not fidelity or anything like that, like it is on the A7III. So unless I purposefully yank it or do something funny I don't foresee any issues. 
I owned the A7III and the latches never fully get out of the way of the USB-C connector always making me feeling uneasy using it. And the USB-C never went in fully leaving a little wiggle possible. Not to mention the door latches are of poor design, eventually they will likely break off. The R is definitely better in this respect.

Astrophotographer 10 Forum Pro • Posts: 13,911
Re: If you are a pro, do you use two card slots for backup?

Oh dear, this is a touchy subject!

A bit like reading a thread on the Fuji film about X cameras worms in landscape effect!

I think its safe to say many are divided on this issue. Some would not consider a camera for paid work without a back up and those who feel safe without it.

I think its also safe to say Canon would have been smarter to include dual cards of the EOS R than leave it off. Same with Nikon where there is a similar storm of disagreement.

I am not a pro but I did have a card corrupt on me once. It was not my card either and I was borrowing it from my daughter in law. She had some photos on it she wanted to save.

As I put the CF card in a reader I could see on the computer the directory name wrote itself in a weird way and you could no longer get photos off the card.

I took it to a data retrieval specialist and $120 later he managed to get I think it was either all or the vast majority of the photos back.

That was in the handling of the card not in the camera at the time and it was using an external card reader.

Greg.

 Astrophotographer 10's gear list:Astrophotographer 10's gear list
Sony a7R III Canon EOS Ra +1 more
Larawanista
Larawanista Veteran Member • Posts: 4,736
Re: Your Logic is Wrong
  1. LensSodomist wrote:

Noogy wrote:

Holscen wrote:

What if ...your card failed, what if it was your camera, your lens? Could you get the job done? Would your client like it if you failed to get the shots, your name and business would be tarnished

I always do paid jobs with 2 bodies, which was just as well because failure happens.

First big assignment I did for an international music magazine had me going to New York from London to shoot a band. I shot it on 2 Nikon F100 film cameras. Guess what, my motordrive failed on frame 1. No worries as I had a backup F100 otherwise my career might have ended before it began.

I used to shoot transparency then too, you had to be spot on with exposure and have perfect development. You wouldn’t always put all your rolls in processing at the same time, in case of an issue, and you’d run a clip test if you were a perfectionist.

The bottom line is that things fail and accidents happen. I’ve had cards fail, shutters fail, aperture blades fail, lenses get smashed and stolen, but I’ve always had a way round because I had a backup.

If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid problems with one camera, card, lens or flash...well that’s good..but luck can run out.

I believe if a pro prepares for the worst “what if” scenarios, then they can just roll on through any problems without breaking a sweat and deliver the job successfully.

I use 2 cameras, both with dual cards, many lenses, 2 flashes. The only thing I don’t have room for in my bag is excuses or apologies.

Two cameras is also my preference, sometimes three. Only one needs to have dual cards. Most often two cameras with single cards is more than enough for me for paid gigs. Two cameras are less likely to fail. Therefore the argument that the only way to go is dual cards and to arrogantly insist such as the standard is flawed.

Properly backed up files demand redundancy. Having redundancy on 1 of multiple bodies only means that that one body is protected.

And your stance is exceedingly silly because, for the cost of a 2nd card for each body, you think it "arrogant" to spend that $$.

Thank God you do not work in IT...your thinking would never make it at Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, nor any even 3rd rate IT company.

My God, spend the $35 already!!

I never said I don't back up. There are multiple wireless options to do back ups, while shooting, during breaks in some gigs, etc. Where do you work? Is it a Fortune 100 company like where I work?

IT as experts in backing up, that's why teams are built to manage Sev1s? Never assume your field is superior to anyone's. My original stand is pro cameras don't automatically must have dual cards. I am never against the idea of having a back up like having two cameras. Removing an SD card after taking 80 to 100 shots so that it can be downloaded and using a fresh one thereafter is also a back up strategy.

The worst and costliest outages in the corporate world were triggered by the failure of IT to be proactive.

-- hide signature --

"Photography is therapeutic."
http://www.pbase.com/joshcruzphotos

 Larawanista's gear list:Larawanista's gear list
Canon EOS M3 Canon EOS R Canon EOS RP Canon EOS R6 Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM +10 more
IR1234 Senior Member • Posts: 1,891
Yes no maybe

This is another yes no maybe scenario.

If i’m in the studio, why would I need two card slots when I’m tethered?

When I’m working for a client, of course I need two card slots.

When I’m doing a sports event I’ll use the second card in S3 for fast publishing when I’m done.

It’s all about the right tool for the job.

 IR1234's gear list:IR1234's gear list
Canon EOS-1D Mark III Canon EOS-1Ds Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 550D +13 more
Larawanista
Larawanista Veteran Member • Posts: 4,736
Re: Yes no maybe

IR1234 wrote:

This is another yes no maybe scenario.

If i’m in the studio, why would I need two card slots when I’m tethered?

When I’m working for a client, of course I need two card slots.

When I’m doing a sports event I’ll use the second card in S3 for fast publishing when I’m done.

It’s all about the right tool for the job.

Amen. You won't always need dual card slots.

-- hide signature --

"Photography is therapeutic."
http://www.pbase.com/joshcruzphotos

 Larawanista's gear list:Larawanista's gear list
Canon EOS M3 Canon EOS R Canon EOS RP Canon EOS R6 Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM +10 more
andyus08 Contributing Member • Posts: 641
Re: If you are a pro, do you use two card slots for backup?

I photograph the wedding. So, dual card slot is a MUST.

(unknown member) Regular Member • Posts: 363
You Are Confused

Noogy wrote:

  1. LensSodomist wrote:

Noogy wrote:

Holscen wrote:

What if ...your card failed, what if it was your camera, your lens? Could you get the job done? Would your client like it if you failed to get the shots, your name and business would be tarnished

I always do paid jobs with 2 bodies, which was just as well because failure happens.

First big assignment I did for an international music magazine had me going to New York from London to shoot a band. I shot it on 2 Nikon F100 film cameras. Guess what, my motordrive failed on frame 1. No worries as I had a backup F100 otherwise my career might have ended before it began.

I used to shoot transparency then too, you had to be spot on with exposure and have perfect development. You wouldn’t always put all your rolls in processing at the same time, in case of an issue, and you’d run a clip test if you were a perfectionist.

The bottom line is that things fail and accidents happen. I’ve had cards fail, shutters fail, aperture blades fail, lenses get smashed and stolen, but I’ve always had a way round because I had a backup.

If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid problems with one camera, card, lens or flash...well that’s good..but luck can run out.

I believe if a pro prepares for the worst “what if” scenarios, then they can just roll on through any problems without breaking a sweat and deliver the job successfully.

I use 2 cameras, both with dual cards, many lenses, 2 flashes. The only thing I don’t have room for in my bag is excuses or apologies.

Two cameras is also my preference, sometimes three. Only one needs to have dual cards. Most often two cameras with single cards is more than enough for me for paid gigs. Two cameras are less likely to fail. Therefore the argument that the only way to go is dual cards and to arrogantly insist such as the standard is flawed.

Properly backed up files demand redundancy. Having redundancy on 1 of multiple bodies only means that that one body is protected.

And your stance is exceedingly silly because, for the cost of a 2nd card for each body, you think it "arrogant" to spend that $$.

Thank God you do not work in IT...your thinking would never make it at Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, nor any even 3rd rate IT company.

My God, spend the $35 already!!

I never said I don't back up. There are multiple wireless options to do back ups, while shooting, during breaks in some gigs, etc. Where do you work? Is it a Fortune 100 company like where I work?

IT as experts in backing up, that's why teams are built to manage Sev1s? Never assume your field is superior to anyone's. My original stand is pro cameras don't automatically must have dual cards. I am never against the idea of having a back up like having two cameras. Removing an SD card after taking 80 to 100 shots so that it can be downloaded and using a fresh one thereafter is also a back up strategy.

The worst and costliest outages in the corporate world were triggered by the failure of IT to be proactive.

A second camera is NOT a backup, hello?  Spend the $35 already and get a 2nd card.

Larawanista
Larawanista Veteran Member • Posts: 4,736
Re: You Are Confused

LensSodomist wrote:

Noogy wrote:

  1. LensSodomist wrote:

Noogy wrote:

Holscen wrote:

What if ...your card failed, what if it was your camera, your lens? Could you get the job done? Would your client like it if you failed to get the shots, your name and business would be tarnished

I always do paid jobs with 2 bodies, which was just as well because failure happens.

First big assignment I did for an international music magazine had me going to New York from London to shoot a band. I shot it on 2 Nikon F100 film cameras. Guess what, my motordrive failed on frame 1. No worries as I had a backup F100 otherwise my career might have ended before it began.

I used to shoot transparency then too, you had to be spot on with exposure and have perfect development. You wouldn’t always put all your rolls in processing at the same time, in case of an issue, and you’d run a clip test if you were a perfectionist.

The bottom line is that things fail and accidents happen. I’ve had cards fail, shutters fail, aperture blades fail, lenses get smashed and stolen, but I’ve always had a way round because I had a backup.

If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid problems with one camera, card, lens or flash...well that’s good..but luck can run out.

I believe if a pro prepares for the worst “what if” scenarios, then they can just roll on through any problems without breaking a sweat and deliver the job successfully.

I use 2 cameras, both with dual cards, many lenses, 2 flashes. The only thing I don’t have room for in my bag is excuses or apologies.

Two cameras is also my preference, sometimes three. Only one needs to have dual cards. Most often two cameras with single cards is more than enough for me for paid gigs. Two cameras are less likely to fail. Therefore the argument that the only way to go is dual cards and to arrogantly insist such as the standard is flawed.

Properly backed up files demand redundancy. Having redundancy on 1 of multiple bodies only means that that one body is protected.

And your stance is exceedingly silly because, for the cost of a 2nd card for each body, you think it "arrogant" to spend that $$.

Thank God you do not work in IT...your thinking would never make it at Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, nor any even 3rd rate IT company.

My God, spend the $35 already!!

I never said I don't back up. There are multiple wireless options to do back ups, while shooting, during breaks in some gigs, etc. Where do you work? Is it a Fortune 100 company like where I work?

IT as experts in backing up, that's why teams are built to manage Sev1s? Never assume your field is superior to anyone's. My original stand is pro cameras don't automatically must have dual cards. I am never against the idea of having a back up like having two cameras. Removing an SD card after taking 80 to 100 shots so that it can be downloaded and using a fresh one thereafter is also a back up strategy.

The worst and costliest outages in the corporate world were triggered by the failure of IT to be proactive.

A second camera is NOT a backup, hello? Spend the $35 already and get a 2nd card.

I won't take it from an IT guy who has zero experience in Fortune 100.

-- hide signature --

"Photography is therapeutic."
http://www.pbase.com/joshcruzphotos

 Larawanista's gear list:Larawanista's gear list
Canon EOS M3 Canon EOS R Canon EOS RP Canon EOS R6 Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM +10 more
P10004K
P10004K Senior Member • Posts: 1,417
my GH5 with dual UHS-II slots works great for 4K 60p on one and stills on the other

Or as backup

-- hide signature --

Nikon Coolpix P1000 4K 125x Superzoom

 P10004K's gear list:P10004K's gear list
Sony a7R Samsung NX1 Sony a6300 Panasonic GH5 Nikon Coolpix P1000 +26 more
(unknown member) Regular Member • Posts: 363
And You Know That How? nt

No text.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads