tt321
•
Forum Pro
•
Posts: 13,854
Re: a little off topic but related
1
Allan Brown wrote:
Skeeterbytes wrote:
Allan Brown wrote:
So, I was playing with my 45-200 and a set of extension tubes that have the electrical contacts.
The problem is that the camera still sees the lens as 45-200 rather than the, lets say, "equivalent" focal length - i.e. the higher magnification. The IBIS was totally useless.
There does not seem to be any way to adjust the focal length setting for this combination.
Any suggestions other than taping over the contacts?
If taping over the contacts, anyone know which one?
I used to tape over contacts with my Pentax Kx and some lenses.
Allan
Oly or Panny body? Is it possible the IBIS and OIS were "fighting"? What happens when you select either IS system by itself?
Have use the Oly EX25 tube with various 4/3 lenses and IBIS has no issues with the close focusing distances--focal length remains the same of course.
Good luck!
Rick
It is an EM5 II and I have it set to ignore OIS and use IBIS all the time. Also, the OIS switch on the lens was OFF.
I realise that the lens focal length remains the same with the tubes but the magnification increases. Setting the IBIS to, say, 500mm, probably would work.
I do this all the time with my Nikkor 105mm f2.5 and close-up lenses and it works. However, this is an all-manual setup with no electrical contacts.
Allan
I understand what you are trying to do. You still want the AF, aperture, etc. to function properly, but want to disable the auto-IS but instead set the IS focal length manually.
Then it is natural to think that by selectively taping off some of the pin(s) this might do the trick.
However, data comms between lens and body tends to share wires/pins esp. for digital information, kind of like a serial connection with data sent in packets. If that is the case, this tack would not work. See link below for the non-micro FT as a reference (mFT has more pins). All lens comms protocols I have seen have shared single wires in the same transfer direction. In that case, you need to chip your adapter to selectively interpret the data. If you can chip your adapter, you might as well program it so that the right correction is always translated anyway.
This kind of smart adapter to maintain IS correctness only for macro is not worth building commercially, because it's too much hassle to license the IP from Olympus just to gain such a very small market.
http://preamp.org/revenge/four-thirds-communication-protocol
I'm now very tempted to just get a real macro lens so that IS can work properly.