alcelc
•
Forum Pro
•
Posts: 19,006
Re: Panasonic Lumix G7 lighning problem
1
Dominik67483 wrote:
alcelc wrote:
In order to enable us to diagnosis your issue, it seems that an image taken in day time with full exif would be needed.
It is hard to think how in day time (good lighting condition) will also exhibit similar light stripe(?) as per your response.
I just tested it one time with the sun and there were also some strips but I don't have the effect with for example the led's in day time.

Dear friend, it is quite a common effect to shoot at the light source, e.g. the sun. It is generally classified as "Lens Flare" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_flare).
A few things we cold and had been done. On the lenses, have all sort of multiple coating on the lens surface to reduce the flare. Therefore some lens can have higher flare resist than others. 14-42, if the version-II (H-FS1442A), could be a good kit lens (not the Version-I H-FS014042) such that the flare issue should not be worse than most other lenses.
When really very strong light directly enter into the lens, flare could not be completely avoided no matter how good would be the lens. Usually change the angle of shooting slightly (can observe it in live view) to reduce or completely avoid flare.
Something interesting that under your shooting condition and angle, if we can stop down the lens to use smaller aperture like f/11~22, the flare would appear as using a star light filter.
Downloaded the original, crop to nearly 1:1 view:
Likely some stabilization issue on using 1/8" (handheld?) shooting.
Yes, I held the camera in my hand but how do you now that there is a stabilization issue?
On closer examination of the edges, can see >1 pixel formation (i.e. movement of some kind be evidenced). For Pany cameras I used (older than G7 and newer than it), when it is perfectly focused and no shaking, it should be very sharp *clearly defined edges) although noise might affect it slightly under high ISO.
Might I also ask did those LED lights are actually shining upward to the sky? I asked because of 2 considerations.
No that is a led strip which is taped around the lantern so they are shining in every direction. That's why it looks oval. I didn't shake the camera probably but I'll take another picture in the evening
Edit: here is another picture

How are your low light results? I am not satisfied. Could that hang together with this light problem?
Unlike the previous posted image, this one has no noticeable stability issue (from the perfect square shape of the lamp largely remaining intact):

And would that degree of light booming ("ghost flare" in exact terms, light radiated from the center of the lamp?) made you unhappy? This is similar to shooting directly into the sun, flare will be happened. If we wish to shoot a picture showing the dark interior, we must use a higher exposure at a cost of severe light booming around the light source.
If you have a dirty lens (greases/smudge etc, same effect to have put on a poor quality filter) the problem will be further amplified.
If you can shoot that again, might try to underexpose the shot (you can see the amount of light booming reduced according to your setting in live view. BTW, use EC would be the easiest tool). You can capture the lamp itself with good detail, but at a cost of very dark room.
A compromise (decision) we must have to make depending on what we want.
I hoped the following 2 snapshots from my trip might demonstrate the point:
To show the detail of the chandelier
or to show the room (chandelier overexposed)
Also if you can avoid the light vertically hitting on the lens (change the shooting angle slightly that you should be able to see in live view) might also reduced the flare.
1) Possible hand shake might cause the usual round shape lighting source into oval shape. The light booming (expected) size would therefore be enlarged (likely a double in your sample).
2) If the light are actually shining upward, under a 1/8" slow shutter speed it might capture the light path and so those light strips.

I had shot a local Lantern Carnival recently (LED light, in the dark) and if it was in perfect focus and no shaking, the LED light source should be captured in perfect circle and each be identifiable.
I am happy with this shot.
For a missed focus/shaking (very minor) image, the LED light would appear oval shape as blow (hanging lighting on the left).
Small hand shaking in this shot.
IMHO shooting the light source directly, when no other lighting around, would be quite challenge. Normally I shall either choose to show the light itself, or the environment. To show the light, shall underexpose it (monitor the brightness condition in live view) to keep min flare/booming effect. If choose to show the background likely an overexposed light source (spoil the detail of the LED light) and serious flare/booming be expected. If wish to show both, HDR be required.
Yes, I know. I took the photo to show the issue.
Would your lens or body has problem, I suppose more samples would be required.