DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Hey gang - don't even consider selling your NX gear...

Started Aug 4, 2018 | Discussions
Ben Herrmann
Ben Herrmann Forum Pro • Posts: 21,163
Hey gang - don't even consider selling your NX gear...
10

I'm sure many of you have noticed the trends - that is, we tend to go after the latest and greatest.  It's a common habit - we're all guilty of it to some degree.

What I'm seeing lately however, are postings - and in some cases belated reviews - about Samsung NX cameras (specifically the NX1, NX500, and NX300).  I found this unusual in that the reviewer (whether just a personal review, or a more professional oriented piece) found the cameras to be still quite relevant to what is available today - in particular with regards to how colors are rendered.

Additionally, whenever I post images on other forums - whether it be to make a point, or for the purposes of comparisons between brands, I almost always receive remarks about how gorgeous the Samsung images looked - and in some cases, before they even knew they came from a Samsung NX camera.

OK - so many of you (us) have long since sought other brands of gear.  After all, we can't sit still and somehow hope that Samsung will reenter the advanced camera market.  And then there's those of us who have purchased other brands, yet still maintained the Samsung gear that have brought us to much pleasure in the past.

And this is what I'm alluding to.  I've now conversed with over a dozen folks (PM'd from this forum) over the past year or so - who have sold their NX gear, only to later have regretted it severely.  And some of them made the effort to once again try and find the model cameras that they parted with - but found that they are few and far between.  and if they did find them, the prices were still fairly high even for used gear.  And of course, the expected, "Oh, why did I get rid of that gear because I now feel so bad about it" mindset takes hold.

I don't know about you, but I'm going to keep my NX500, NX300, NX30, and EX2F for as long as they function.  The images these instruments can capture are still very much relevant today with a dynamic color tonality that I believe, will stand the test of time.

Think, think, think first before you begin selling off your gear.  I can just about guarantee you that you will be quite regretful, in particular, when you begin reviewing past images captured with them - whether on trips, family functions, or what have you.

Don't do it 'cause I'm tired of having folks inform me that I and others were correct in this regard.  OK, so I warned you...

-- hide signature --

Sincerely,
Bernd ("Ben") Herrmann
Fuquay Varina, North Carolina USA

 Ben Herrmann's gear list:Ben Herrmann's gear list
Canon EOS M Fujifilm X-E2S Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-T20 Canon EOS M6 +4 more
Samsung EX2F Samsung NX1 Samsung NX30 Samsung NX300M Samsung NX500
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
viking79
viking79 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,157
Re: Hey gang - don't even consider selling your NX gear...

The NX1 gear is great, I took advantage of the high used prices and sold all mine. I miss the equipment, but can't say I regret my decision. It is still great gear, but for the price I was able to get I was able to downsize my camera collection (enough that I don't feel obligated to shoot weddings if asked).

It will be up to each individual. Again, I couldn't say no to the high values that surely won't be around forever so it was simply a matter of economics, sell when there was still demand and prices were hight. Obviously if everyone sells the demand will plummet so it is a sensitive market.

I wouldn't have regretted keeping the gear either. I prefer it in most ways to my used Fuji XT1 I picked up, and only got 2 lenses for that so my system is very small now (15-45 and 56/1.2) but the fuji fits my very reduced camera needs (don't shoot much anymore) and I was able to pocket a lot of spare cash. The Fuji feels clunky and slow in comparison, but had the lenses I needed and more than enough pixels for what I do. I didn't want the big f/2-2.8 zooms when I am not shooting much so went with a couple small lenses.

 viking79's gear list:viking79's gear list
Sony a7R Samsung NX1 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 85mm F1.4 ED SSA Samsung NX 60mm F2.8 Macro ED OIS SSA +5 more
kypfer Contributing Member • Posts: 985
Re: Hey gang - don't even consider selling your NX gear...
1

"... a dynamic color tonality ..." yeah, right!

Please define "dynamic color tonality".

In the meantime I'll continue to use my second-hand NX5 because it was cheap!

 kypfer's gear list:kypfer's gear list
Pentax *ist D Pentax *ist DS Pentax *ist DL2 Pentax K200D Samsung NX5 +7 more
Kisaha Senior Member • Posts: 2,300
Re: Hey gang - don't even consider selling your NX gear...
1

There isn't one current body so complete right now, and especially for us that consider full frame cameras unnecessary.

A7iii is very good spec wise, but I will pass (easily) this generation too, and a6xxx ia not even close. Rather keep my NX500.

The real good mirrorless cameras are coming, and they are from the old players, Canon and Nikon. BUT, they aren't out yet, we do not know their video capabilities yet and they will have new mounts, that means uncertainty and high lens prices, and limited lens options for at least half a decade.

As I have "predicted" before, NX1 will be near the top on its segment until 2020. This is still the top APS-C mirrorless camera to beat.

Ben Herrmann
OP Ben Herrmann Forum Pro • Posts: 21,163
Dynamic color tonality...
3

At one time one could often (not always) identify what camera brands captured an image by looking at how the colors were rendered.  I can recall (over a decade ago) that folks often remarked about the Canon look, a Nikon look, an Olympus look, etc.  As time went on and technological adjustments to image processors were made, the differences were blurred somewhat - but there were still hints in how those colors were rendered.

Now enter Samsung.  Initially, as you may or may not know, Samsung's color tonality was an offshoot of how Pentax rendered colors.  The early NX line of cameras had color renderings were similar or exactly the same as Pentax.  As Samsung continued, they began to refine their own way of rendering colors.

So what is meant by "dynamic color tonality?"  Quite simply, colors that stand out of a crowd with an image (when correctly taken or correct post processed of course) that often have that palpable, "you-are-there" look to the scenes.  Now I can't attest to the NX5 - but I can attest to the likes of the NX1, NX500, NX30, and NX300.  And because I've have the luxury of extensively using the likes of various Micro 4/3 cameras (both Panny and Oly), Canon EOS M models, Fuji X-Trans (and Fuji Bayer) offerings, along with various Samsung NX offerings, I can make some interesting comparisons.

In most cases, in particular for scenic scenarios, the NX camera images stand out of the crowd with a color rendering that beckons you into the scene.

-- hide signature --

Sincerely,
Bernd ("Ben") Herrmann
Fuquay Varina, North Carolina USA

 Ben Herrmann's gear list:Ben Herrmann's gear list
Canon EOS M Fujifilm X-E2S Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-T20 Canon EOS M6 +4 more
kypfer Contributing Member • Posts: 985
Re: Dynamic color tonality...

Ben Herrmann wrote:

At one time one could often (not always) identify what camera brands captured an image by looking at how the colors were rendered. I can recall (over a decade ago) that folks often remarked about the Canon look, a Nikon look, an Olympus look, etc. As time went on and technological adjustments to image processors were made, the differences were blurred somewhat - but there were still hints in how those colors were rendered.

Now enter Samsung. Initially, as you may or may not know, Samsung's color tonality was an offshoot of how Pentax rendered colors. The early NX line of cameras had color renderings were similar or exactly the same as Pentax. As Samsung continued, they began to refine their own way of rendering colors.

So what is meant by "dynamic color tonality?" Quite simply, colors that stand out of a crowd with an image (when correctly taken or correct post processed of course) that often have that palpable, "you-are-there" look to the scenes. Now I can't attest to the NX5 - but I can attest to the likes of the NX1, NX500, NX30, and NX300. And because I've have the luxury of extensively using the likes of various Micro 4/3 cameras (both Panny and Oly), Canon EOS M models, Fuji X-Trans (and Fuji Bayer) offerings, along with various Samsung NX offerings, I can make some interesting comparisons.

In most cases, in particular for scenic scenarios, the NX camera images stand out of the crowd with a color rendering that beckons you into the scene.

Thank you ... that all sounds like a comprehensive answer, just not to the question I asked!

"colors that stand out of a crowd with an image (when correctly taken or correct post processed of course) that often have that palpable, "you-are-there" look" !?!

 kypfer's gear list:kypfer's gear list
Pentax *ist D Pentax *ist DS Pentax *ist DL2 Pentax K200D Samsung NX5 +7 more
Ben Herrmann
OP Ben Herrmann Forum Pro • Posts: 21,163
Actually, I did...
2

You just choose not to accept it...and continue the sarcasm!

-- hide signature --

Sincerely,
Bernd ("Ben") Herrmann
Fuquay Varina, North Carolina USA

 Ben Herrmann's gear list:Ben Herrmann's gear list
Canon EOS M Fujifilm X-E2S Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-T20 Canon EOS M6 +4 more
Clyde Thomas Senior Member • Posts: 1,717
My NX more fun than my Sony
10

I own and use professionally:

a7RIII (had NEX7, a7R, a7RII)

a99II (had a900, a99, a77II)

But I've held on to my two NX-1's because they're so much fun to use by comparison to the Sony's. a7RIII touch screen is a joke by comparison to NX-1. Can't do anything except tap on a focus point... That's it, with no indication of where you tapped.

NX-1 always highlights AF point. a7RIII focus points always grey and hard to see. a99II has illuminated yellow AF points but only in a special mode that must often be reset.

NX-1 formats cards ten times faster than any Sony. It's so fast, and the buffer clears faster than a7RIII even when it's in 18mp crop mode.

NX-1 is always ready for stills and movie simultaneously. I have front button set for movie preview mode for instant access. The Sony's require turning the mode dial 180degree just to see movie preview. And the Sony mode dial requires holding down center lock button while turning. NX-1 mode dial convenient with spring lock on or off for safety or quick turn.

NX-1 with battery grip allows hot swapping battery while recording movie. Sony's use the smoke stack battery grip, which holds two batts, but no hot swap because no battery remains in the body. Handy for extended time lapse.

Speaking of time lapse, the NX-1 has sophisticated time lapse built right into the body. Sony's lost stills time lapse because they no longer support their own Play Memories app store. Many users very miffed.

NX-1 movie time lapse retains 4K ability, and let me tell you it is phenomenal. The Sony's ramp down to 1080HD for movie time lapse with no 4K available.

Sony still doesn't make 16-50/2.8 for Emount. That's crazy, but they make a nice one for AMount. The NX 16-60 is better than the Sony AMount version because it doesn't wobble the frame when focusing.

NX-1 AF is equal to a7RIII, and very close to the a99II which is better than all of them.

NX-1 Gamma Control gets close to emulating Sony SLog2 mode.

NX-1 allows both manual and/or auto gain control for external microphones. Sony is ridiculously stupid in this regard, with only manual gain for built in mic, or forced to auto gain with any mic attached to fancy MIS shoe. It should be the other way around. You spend an extra $100 on matched MIS mic and are forced into auto audio gain. It's so frustrating.

NX-1 hack beyond 30 minutes is super cool, and makes movie time lapse a real joy and so easily managed.

Never once an overheating warning or shut down from NX-1. The Sony's run hot, but at least a7RIII doesn't shut down like the a7RII did.

NX-1 Remote Camera Control allows use of both stills and video from same screen. Sony's Remote Camera Control are dependent upon and locked into whatever mode the camera is set for. Can't shoot movies and stills from same screen.

NX-1 startup from off is wicked fast compared to any Sony. NX-1 ready to go before I get camera to my eye. Sony's have to wake up, but a7RIII has gotten better. NX-1 still faster.

NX-1 grip still more comfy than a7RIII, and doesn't have any knuckle cramping. a7RIII with some fatter lenses is painful to hold at side because the sharp edge of lens bites into knuckles. Forget using gloves with the Sony EMount. Not going to happen. AMount a99II grip is awesome with better vertical grip comfort too. but NX-1 still more comfy in horizontal.

NX-1 video sharpness is noticeably better than either Sony.  NX-1 video is so sharp that it's hard to describe by comparison.  No problem stealing still screen shots from NX-1 video.  I'm still amazed every time I see it.  Best when converted by Samsung Movie Converter, which is far better than importing h.265 directly into Premiere Pro.  I always go through the conversion because the black point is much better.

-

Yes, there are some things and quirks that I'd like to see refined on NX-1, but all could be accomplished in FW. NX-1 still far ahead of the game than the latest cameras can provide for.

I'd be tempted to sell the Sony's if the Samsung could support Flashpoint HSS strobe system. And the Sony Cine lenses are unmatched.

-- hide signature --

Here to help. Here to learn.

Clyde Thomas Senior Member • Posts: 1,717
Re: Hey gang - don't even consider selling your NX gear...

kypfer wrote:

Please define "dynamic color tonality".

I can't.  But I will say that my Sony's seem orange biased.  I'm consistently toning them down to a cooler render.  Most apparent with Adobe RAW.  Capture ONE plays them cooler, so it could be the software.

NX-1 color naturally cooler, and seemingly more neutral from Adobe RAW.  My Capture ONE won't process the NX-1 RAW so I can't compare fully.

I can't say one is better than the other.  But they are different.

-- hide signature --

Here to help. Here to learn.

Ben Herrmann
OP Ben Herrmann Forum Pro • Posts: 21,163
Well, that's the thing...
1

...at least for me - meaning the orange bias.  I personally just am not attracted to Sony's way of rendering colors.  That doesn't make me right as the next person may enjoy Sony's offerings very much.  And who am I to disagree?

-- hide signature --

Sincerely,
Bernd ("Ben") Herrmann
Fuquay Varina, North Carolina USA

 Ben Herrmann's gear list:Ben Herrmann's gear list
Canon EOS M Fujifilm X-E2S Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-T20 Canon EOS M6 +4 more
Bixbe Junior Member • Posts: 49
Re: My NX more fun than my Sony
1

Here is how screenshots (frame captures) look like from my NX1 with the 16-50mm S lens. You need a 4K UHD display to see the details.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkBdf2JNVLM

 Bixbe's gear list:Bixbe's gear list
Panasonic LX100 Samsung NX1 Samsung 16-50mm F2.0-2.8
Kisaha Senior Member • Posts: 2,300
Re: My NX more fun than my Sony
1

Clyde Thomas wrote:

I own and use professionally:

a7RIII (had NEX7, a7R, a7RII)

a99II (had a900, a99, a77II)

But I've held on to my two NX-1's because they're so much fun to use by comparison to the Sony's. a7RIII touch screen is a joke by comparison to NX-1. Can't do anything except tap on a focus point... That's it, with no indication of where you tapped.

NX-1 always highlights AF point. a7RIII focus points always grey and hard to see. a99II has illuminated yellow AF points but only in a special mode that must often be reset.

NX-1 formats cards ten times faster than any Sony. It's so fast, and the buffer clears faster than a7RIII even when it's in 18mp crop mode.

NX-1 is always ready for stills and movie simultaneously. I have front button set for movie preview mode for instant access. The Sony's require turning the mode dial 180degree just to see movie preview. And the Sony mode dial requires holding down center lock button while turning. NX-1 mode dial convenient with spring lock on or off for safety or quick turn.

NX-1 with battery grip allows hot swapping battery while recording movie. Sony's use the smoke stack battery grip, which holds two batts, but no hot swap because no battery remains in the body. Handy for extended time lapse.

Speaking of time lapse, the NX-1 has sophisticated time lapse built right into the body. Sony's lost stills time lapse because they no longer support their own Play Memories app store. Many users very miffed.

NX-1 movie time lapse retains 4K ability, and let me tell you it is phenomenal. The Sony's ramp down to 1080HD for movie time lapse with no 4K available.

Sony still doesn't make 16-50/2.8 for Emount. That's crazy, but they make a nice one for AMount. The NX 16-60 is better than the Sony AMount version because it doesn't wobble the frame when focusing.

NX-1 AF is equal to a7RIII, and very close to the a99II which is better than all of them.

NX-1 Gamma Control gets close to emulating Sony SLog2 mode.

NX-1 allows both manual and/or auto gain control for external microphones. Sony is ridiculously stupid in this regard, with only manual gain for built in mic, or forced to auto gain with any mic attached to fancy MIS shoe. It should be the other way around. You spend an extra $100 on matched MIS mic and are forced into auto audio gain. It's so frustrating.

NX-1 hack beyond 30 minutes is super cool, and makes movie time lapse a real joy and so easily managed.

Never once an overheating warning or shut down from NX-1. The Sony's run hot, but at least a7RIII doesn't shut down like the a7RII did.

NX-1 Remote Camera Control allows use of both stills and video from same screen. Sony's Remote Camera Control are dependent upon and locked into whatever mode the camera is set for. Can't shoot movies and stills from same screen.

NX-1 startup from off is wicked fast compared to any Sony. NX-1 ready to go before I get camera to my eye. Sony's have to wake up, but a7RIII has gotten better. NX-1 still faster.

NX-1 grip still more comfy than a7RIII, and doesn't have any knuckle cramping. a7RIII with some fatter lenses is painful to hold at side because the sharp edge of lens bites into knuckles. Forget using gloves with the Sony EMount. Not going to happen. AMount a99II grip is awesome with better vertical grip comfort too. but NX-1 still more comfy in horizontal.

NX-1 video sharpness is noticeably better than either Sony. NX-1 video is so sharp that it's hard to describe by comparison. No problem stealing still screen shots from NX-1 video. I'm still amazed every time I see it. Best when converted by Samsung Movie Converter, which is far better than importing h.265 directly into Premiere Pro. I always go through the conversion because the black point is much better.

-

Yes, there are some things and quirks that I'd like to see refined on NX-1, but all could be accomplished in FW. NX-1 still far ahead of the game than the latest cameras can provide for.

I'd be tempted to sell the Sony's if the Samsung could support Flashpoint HSS strobe system. And the Sony Cine lenses are unmatched.

Thank you Clyde. This is an excellent comparison. Really spot on.

I am using most of the newer cameras every year, and NX1 still surprises me everytime.

In my opinion best ergonomics and (touch) UI ever.

I still can't believe how they did it with their first try, it is truly astonishing if you think about it.

My worst flaw is the lack of zoom to focus ability while recording video, that was a silly mistake to do on such a powerful camera.

GXAlan Regular Member • Posts: 223
Re: Dynamic color tonality...

Samsung has great colors and the NX1 was remarkable.  I had the full set of NX gear but exited.

Fuji is the new bearer of all of those wonderful Samsung characteristics but with actual support and reliability.

I believed in the “there’s no reason to upgrade” until my NX500 got stuck in the boot loop with no way to reset the camera. A true brick that stopped taking pictures for no good reason and no longer had any support from Samsung whatsoever.

If Samsung was going out of business, I probably would not be as upset but for a conglomerate, it is unacceptable in comparison to Kyocera and Contax which provided a decade of support after deciding to pull out of the camera market.

Pick up a Fuji X-H1.  It have not have h265 4K but it’s the best transition from Samsung.

Kisaha Senior Member • Posts: 2,300
Re: Dynamic color tonality...
1

GXAlan wrote:

Samsung has great colors and the NX1 was remarkable. I had the full set of NX gear but exited.

Fuji is the new bearer of all of those wonderful Samsung characteristics but with actual support and reliability.

I believed in the “there’s no reason to upgrade” until my NX500 got stuck in the boot loop with no way to reset the camera. A true brick that stopped taking pictures for no good reason and no longer had any support from Samsung whatsoever.

If Samsung was going out of business, I probably would not be as upset but for a conglomerate, it is unacceptable in comparison to Kyocera and Contax which provided a decade of support after deciding to pull out of the camera market.

Pick up a Fuji X-H1. It have not have h265 4K but it’s the best transition from Samsung.

Did you try a servicing center? They are still servicing the 30s and the 300s here.

H1 is far far away from an NX1, the only thing it has is IBIS, in everything else is inferior in any way, and the proof will be when the X-T3 will be out, your H1 will be almost obsolete!

norman shearer Senior Member • Posts: 1,418
Keeping my NX500's that's for sure
1

I bought a 2nd NX500 to be sure I can use one of them for some years ahead.

I accidentally went on a street shoot the other day and shot all my pics in jpeg by mistake. I was surprised at how accurate the white balance was on reviewing the pics - damn well nailed it. Now I'm dissatisfied with my RAW files!

I'll probably sell my NX1 though because it hardly gets used. I have better lenses for my GX8 for sports/action and if I'm after quality the A7R2 is always available albeit manual focus only at present.

 norman shearer's gear list:norman shearer's gear list
Samsung EX2F Nikon Coolpix A Sony RX1R Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 5D Mark II +10 more
Ben Herrmann
OP Ben Herrmann Forum Pro • Posts: 21,163
No need to tell me about Fuji...

I've got 6 different Fuji cameras - love them - that's for sure.

-- hide signature --

Sincerely,
Bernd ("Ben") Herrmann
Fuquay Varina, North Carolina USA

 Ben Herrmann's gear list:Ben Herrmann's gear list
Canon EOS M Fujifilm X-E2S Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-T20 Canon EOS M6 +4 more
M43ForMe
M43ForMe Contributing Member • Posts: 516
Re: No need to tell me about Fuji...

I've got an X-T2 and never use it. My NX1 is just a much better tool for me. 
I sold all my NX gear right when the A7III was announced because I feared the bottom would fall out of the pricing and I could circle back and pick it up when the prices settled.
And that's exactly what I did. You can get an NX1 with a 16-50S for around $1200 if you're patient. The comparable A7III would be around $4000.
And I still haven't found anything that's nearly as enjoyable to use.

GXAlan Regular Member • Posts: 223
Re: Dynamic color tonality...

Kisaha wrote:

Did you try a servicing center? They are still servicing the 30s and the 300s here.

where is “here” for you?  In the US, they dropped all support.

H1 is far far away from an NX1, the only thing it has is IBIS, in everything else is inferior in any way, and the proof will be when the X-T3 will be out, your H1 will be almost obsolete!

I had the NX1, a Luca NX-L, 10, 12-24, 30, 45, 16-50S, 50-150, 85 and a pair of SEF 580 flashes.  Also the NX500 and kit lens.  So I was very familiar with the NX line up and even wrote about it for SLRLounge.

Fuji X-H1 in use is not a major “upgrade” from NX1 but it is a good replacement if you need actual warranty support and service in the US.  It is impressive that Samsung has such a lead but the rest of the industry has caught up enough, except for H265.

Sensor wise it is a lateral move (fewer MP better DR). Fuji’s S lens equivalents are good.  More lens options with Fuji.  Longer focal lengths with Fuji.  Very good video with Fuji (at costlier storage).  More reliable iOS support.

I am not convincing you to drop your NX1.  I am just letting the crowd know that when you no longer can get your NX1 serviced where you live, look into the XH1 and ignore the random blogs that complain that it is not as good as the A7 III.  We all stuck with Samsung for Samsung-colors—- if you appreciate Samsung color, it is hard to work with Sony.

Hienc Junior Member • Posts: 32
Re: Dynamic color tonality...

Did you buy a new gimbal yet Kisaha? Ive settled on the crane 2 to accomodate the nx1 with the 16-50mm S. And yes the nx1 video is why i bought another. Here’s a quick test i did with the 60mm lens https://youtu.be/sZSEo-I3ZRI

Kisaha Senior Member • Posts: 2,300
Re: Dynamic color tonality...

Hienc wrote:

Did you buy a new gimbal yet Kisaha? Ive settled on the crane 2 to accomodate the nx1 with the 16-50mm S. And yes the nx1 video is why i bought another. Here’s a quick test i did with the 60mm lens https://youtu.be/sZSEo-I3ZRI

No, I was waiting for the DJI one, but it seems too big and heavy.

Crane 2 seems like the best option right now, but not optimal for my needs, so I will be waiting for a new smaller Crane I guess (I am trying to keep my equipment fairly mobile).

Most of my shots consist of tripod shots anyway!

Not a big fun of IBIS either.

With a steady hand, and/or the use of a monopod, or even the camera strap on your neck, one can achieve very stable shots in slow motion.

My next imaging-buy (I am spending most of my budget for sound these days) will probably be the new Mavic Pro 2 with the 1" sensor. Can't wait for its release!

Nice images and lovely dogs, by the way!

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads