DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

SX730 - anyone used this?

Started Jan 23, 2018 | Discussions
CMCM Veteran Member • Posts: 5,995
SX730 - anyone used this?

I'm back to contemplating an SX 730 or perhaps the Nikon A900 as little pocket walk-arounds.  Has anyone used them, and if so, any comments on them, IQ, usability, etc.?

 CMCM's gear list:CMCM's gear list
Fujifilm X30 Nikon D500 Canon G7 X II Nikon Coolpix P950 Nikon D700 +17 more
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS Nikon Coolpix A900
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
DUTCH van Atlanta Senior Member • Posts: 1,714
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?
1

CMCM wrote:

I'm back to contemplating an SX 730 or perhaps the Nikon A900 as little pocket walk-arounds. Has anyone used them, and if so, any comments on them, IQ, usability, etc.?

I have posted about this great little camera several times on this forum.  Do a Search.

 DUTCH van Atlanta's gear list:DUTCH van Atlanta's gear list
Sony RX10 IV Sony RX100 VI Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra +1 more
chrisno Contributing Member • Posts: 925
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?

CMCM wrote:

I'm back to contemplating an SX 730 or perhaps the Nikon A900 as little pocket walk-arounds. Has anyone used them, and if so, any comments on them, IQ, usability, etc.?

Build quality on SX 730 probably a little bit better than A900

A900 can shoot 4k while Canon cannot

(unknown member) Senior Member • Posts: 2,265
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?

CMCM wrote:

I'm back to contemplating an SX 730 or perhaps the Nikon A900 as little pocket walk-arounds. Has anyone used them, and if so, any comments on them, IQ, usability, etc.?

One thing is looking at some examples the 40x seems a bit of a gimmicky spec bloat and does not seem to give any more detail than a 30x which is probably stretching a pocket zoom on a 1/2.3" to its limit.

I suspect you can compare it against other 30x cameras without losing much.

(unknown member) Senior Member • Posts: 2,265
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?

DUTCH van Atlanta wrote:

CMCM wrote:

I'm back to contemplating an SX 730 or perhaps the Nikon A900 as little pocket walk-arounds. Has anyone used them, and if so, any comments on them, IQ, usability, etc.?

I have posted about this great little camera several times on this forum. Do a Search.

Could he possibly want someone else's opinion. You seem to be saying your postings on the camera are sufficient information for eternity.

It is difficult to judge when one is not allowed to open a thread on any particular camera anymore.

Are you saying there should be no more posts on the SX730? Possibly you could clarify these posting rules a bit more.

chrisno Contributing Member • Posts: 925
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?

KeepCalm wrote:

Could he possibly want someone else's opinion. You seem to be saying your postings on the camera are sufficient information for eternity.

It is difficult to judge when one is not allowed to open a thread on any particular camera anymore.

Are you saying there should be no more posts on the SX730? Possibly you could clarify these posting rules a bit more.

exactly

i find it unbelievable when people asking about the differences between 2 cameras, and he only tested one and saying its enough to make the decision

The biggest difference between two is 4k and 1080p

there are several situations you may want to record videos, and 4k definitely got a huge advantage over 1080p in terms of retaining details, reframe and crop, i would recommend to get the A900.

DUTCH van Atlanta Senior Member • Posts: 1,714
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?
1

KeepCalm wrote:

DUTCH van Atlanta wrote:

CMCM wrote:

I'm back to contemplating an SX 730 or perhaps the Nikon A900 as little pocket walk-arounds. Has anyone used them, and if so, any comments on them, IQ, usability, etc.?

I have posted about this great little camera several times on this forum. Do a Search.

Could he possibly want someone else's opinion. You seem to be saying your postings on the camera are sufficient information for eternity.

It is difficult to judge when one is not allowed to open a thread on any particular camera anymore.

Are you saying there should be no more posts on the SX730? Possibly you could clarify these posting rules a bit more.

Wow!  What galaxy did you just step out of?  We're sure speaking in different tongues!

 DUTCH van Atlanta's gear list:DUTCH van Atlanta's gear list
Sony RX10 IV Sony RX100 VI Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra +1 more
DUTCH van Atlanta Senior Member • Posts: 1,714
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?

chrisno wrote:

i find it unbelievable when people asking about the differences between 2 cameras, and he only tested one and saying its enough to make the decision

I tested the SX730HS vs the Panasonic TZ90.  The SX730HS won, and is satisfactory for me.

You guys are reading way to much into a simple post.

 DUTCH van Atlanta's gear list:DUTCH van Atlanta's gear list
Sony RX10 IV Sony RX100 VI Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra +1 more
(unknown member) Senior Member • Posts: 2,265
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?

DUTCH van Atlanta wrote:

KeepCalm wrote:

DUTCH van Atlanta wrote:

CMCM wrote:

I'm back to contemplating an SX 730 or perhaps the Nikon A900 as little pocket walk-arounds. Has anyone used them, and if so, any comments on them, IQ, usability, etc.?

I have posted about this great little camera several times on this forum. Do a Search.

Could he possibly want someone else's opinion. You seem to be saying your postings on the camera are sufficient information for eternity.

It is difficult to judge when one is not allowed to open a thread on any particular camera anymore.

Are you saying there should be no more posts on the SX730? Possibly you could clarify these posting rules a bit more.

Wow! What galaxy did you just step out of? We're sure speaking in different tongues!

A galaxy I hope where we would not dream of curtly ordering a complete stranger to do a search without a please or a thank you when they politely ask for information on an open discussion forum.

digitallollygag Senior Member • Posts: 1,338
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?

DUTCH van Atlanta wrote:

chrisno wrote:

i find it unbelievable when people asking about the differences between 2 cameras, and he only tested one and saying its enough to make the decision

I tested the SX730HS vs the Panasonic TZ90. The SX730HS won, and is satisfactory for me.

You guys are reading way to much into a simple post.

I'm curious what you didn't like about the TZ90. I've read on the Panasonic forum here and there that some users have to input some specific sharpness/contrast/color settings in order to obtain desired results. It gives me the impression the SX730HS jpeg files might be slightly better out of camera (but that of course is subjective). The TZ90 does however have RAW capability. Getting back to the OP's question though, the A900's 4k video capability makes that cam a compelling option if higher quality video is important.

DUTCH van Atlanta Senior Member • Posts: 1,714
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?

digitallollygag wrote:

I'm curious what you didn't like about the TZ90.

The OOC JPEG IQ was superior to my eyes from the SX730HS.

RAW from the Panny was not useful since my go to PP software does not recognize it, and videos are something I don't do.

 DUTCH van Atlanta's gear list:DUTCH van Atlanta's gear list
Sony RX10 IV Sony RX100 VI Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra +1 more
digitallollygag Senior Member • Posts: 1,338
Re: SX730 - anyone used this?

DUTCH van Atlanta wrote:

digitallollygag wrote:

I'm curious what you didn't like about the TZ90.

The OOC JPEG IQ was superior to my eyes from the SX730HS.

RAW from the Panny was not useful since my go to PP software does not recognize it, and videos are something I don't do.

Thanks for the reply. The SX730HS is one I'm considering.

OpticsEngineer Veteran Member • Posts: 7,822
SX720/SX730 good but A900 not so good

I have an SX720 and A900.  (SX730 will be very similar to an SX720)

I also have a Nikon P900 which is a pretty good superzoom. Lots of fun with that huge 2000 mm focal length. Pretty big camera though. Because of my positive experience with the P900 I got the A900 thinking it might be similar. Wrong. Much less control. For example no means to set the metering to be spot, center or entire sensor. No means to set ISO. No means to adjust noise reductions levels.

SX720 gives me a lot more control.  And that makes for better pictures in many situations.

But the real matter is the image quality comparing SX720 to A900. Not that long ago Canon came out with the Digic7 processor and it is fully modern and the image processing it enables results in improved images. For compact cameras Nikon is still living a generation back in image processing. We were all looking for Nikon to move up to modern times with an improved image processor to be introduced with the DL series of cameras. But Nikon said they ran into problems with the image processor and cancelled the whole DL line. So it looks like Canon is going to be ahead of Nikon for image quality in compact cameras for the foreseeable future. (A P900 successor would benefit. Good camera overall but I often see image processing artifacts in its output I don't see in my SX720)

 OpticsEngineer's gear list:OpticsEngineer's gear list
Fujifilm XF1 Olympus XZ-2 iHS Canon PowerShot G7 X Olympus Tough TG-4 Pentax *ist D +27 more
OP CMCM Veteran Member • Posts: 5,995
Re: SX720/SX730 good but A900 not so good

OpticsEngineer wrote:

I have an SX720 and A900. (SX730 will be very similar to an SX720)

I also have a Nikon P900 which is a pretty good superzoom. Lots of fun with that huge 2000 mm focal length. Pretty big camera though. Because of my positive experience with the P900 I got the A900 thinking it might be similar. Wrong. Much less control. For example no means to set the metering to be spot, center or entire sensor. No means to set ISO. No means to adjust noise reductions levels.

SX720 gives me a lot more control. And that makes for better pictures in many situations.

But the real matter is the image quality comparing SX720 to A900. Not that long ago Canon came out with the Digic7 processor and it is fully modern and the image processing it enables results in improved images. For compact cameras Nikon is still living a generation back in image processing. We were all looking for Nikon to move up to modern times with an improved image processor to be introduced with the DL series of cameras. But Nikon said they ran into problems with the image processor and cancelled the whole DL line. So it looks like Canon is going to be ahead of Nikon for image quality in compact cameras for the foreseeable future. (A P900 successor would benefit. Good camera overall but I often see image processing artifacts in its output I don't see in my SX720)

How is the image stabilization in the SX730 (or 720)?  I looked at it once way back when I saw it at BBuy, but at full zoom it seemed very difficult to hold steady.  I was interested in it as something to have along just for the big zoom (40x I think).

 CMCM's gear list:CMCM's gear list
Fujifilm X30 Nikon D500 Canon G7 X II Nikon Coolpix P950 Nikon D700 +17 more
DUTCH van Atlanta Senior Member • Posts: 1,714
Re: SX720/SX730 good but A900 not so good

CMCM wrote:

How is the image stabilization in the SX730 (or 720)? I looked at it once way back when I saw it at BBuy, but at full zoom it seemed very difficult to hold steady. I was interested in it as something to have along just for the big zoom (40x I think).

It's been A-OK for me, even at 40X zoom; and I'm doddering into my dotage, so IS is important.

 DUTCH van Atlanta's gear list:DUTCH van Atlanta's gear list
Sony RX10 IV Sony RX100 VI Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra +1 more
OpticsEngineer Veteran Member • Posts: 7,822
Re: SX720/SX730 good but A900 not so good

Image stabilization is pretty good.  Link below to a couple of handheld shots I took.

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60198800

 OpticsEngineer's gear list:OpticsEngineer's gear list
Fujifilm XF1 Olympus XZ-2 iHS Canon PowerShot G7 X Olympus Tough TG-4 Pentax *ist D +27 more
NG Resonance Forum Member • Posts: 55
Re: SX720/SX730 good but A900 not so good

OpticsEngineer wrote:

But the real matter is the image quality comparing SX720 to A900. Not that long ago Canon came out with the Digic7 processor and it is fully modern and the image processing it enables results in improved images.

The SX720 and 730 use DIGIC 6, not 7.

 NG Resonance's gear list:NG Resonance's gear list
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS Canon PowerShot S120 PowerShot SX700 Canon PowerShot SX710 Sony RX100 VII
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads