The definition of "Value For Money"

Started Jul 28, 2017 | User reviews
xfajardo
xfajardo New Member • Posts: 12
The definition of "Value For Money"
4

Oh my, I bought this camera in 2014 for around $500 USD, and it lived with me for three years it was my main camera I no longer use it after it died because of an unfortunate accident, but, let me say that it was worth every single penny. You can find it now very cheap and it's still worth it.

 xfajardo's gear list:xfajardo's gear list
Leica X1 Sigma DP1s Canon EOS M200 Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM +1 more
Olympus OM-D E-M10
16 megapixels • 3 screen • Four Thirds sensor
Announced: Jan 29, 2014
xfajardo's score
4.5
Average community score
4.7
bad for good for
Kids / pets
okay
Action / sports
bad
Landscapes / scenery
good
Portraits
excellent
Low light (without flash)
great
Flash photography (social)
excellent
Studio / still life
excellent
= community average
HRC2016 Senior Member • Posts: 6,127
Re: The definition of "Value For Money"

When I think about value I consider the quality of the output, it's durability (life) and how much I enjoy using it. The last one is a biggie.

I've bought gear that I really enjoyed using (oly 12-50 is fun) and gear that I bring reluctantly on occassion (Pan 100-400).

-- hide signature --

Another proud member of the growing Atheist
community.

 HRC2016's gear list:HRC2016's gear list
Panasonic Lumix G Vario 45-200mm F4-5.6 OIS Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm 1:4.8-6.7 II Sigma 150-600mm F5-6.3 | C Olympus 12-100mm F4.0 +2 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads