Doing Samsung NX again - Mistake?

Kisaha wrote:

VisualFX wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

VisualFX wrote:

Nikon Canon all have fisheye lenses.

Not really,

EOS M's most interesting lenses are the 22mm and the UWZ, I was split between the first EOS M cameras, and NX, and I choose NX(NX300 and 30mm and 12-24mm).

I should have change 5 M cameras since then, and still I would be vastly behind the NX1 camera, while the only M lenses that worth a dime, are still those 2.

Nikon has not a mirrorless system above 1".

What do you mean "Not really"? Nikon DX 10.5mm fisheye is available. The 12-24mm is not a fisheye. Do you have the Samsung NX 10mm fisheye? I do, but only use it sparingly. Fisheye is not meant to be used for every photo.

Nikon also announced they are working on a new mirrorless system. We will see if it ever comes to light.

I only talk for mirrorless systems and native lenses,

and there isn't a native APS-C mirrorless fish eye lens on Canonikon (or Fuji, or Sony for that matter) .

You must be confused, do you mean specifically 'no native autofocus pancake at exactly 10mm fisheye'? Because there are fisheye lenses for every one of those systems, natively.

Kisaha wrote:

CCD FTW wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

VisualFX wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

VisualFX wrote:

Nikon Canon all have fisheye lenses.

Not really,

EOS M's most interesting lenses are the 22mm and the UWZ, I was split between the first EOS M cameras, and NX, and I choose NX(NX300 and 30mm and 12-24mm).

I should have change 5 M cameras since then, and still I would be vastly behind the NX1 camera, while the only M lenses that worth a dime, are still those 2.

Nikon has not a mirrorless system above 1".

What do you mean "Not really"? Nikon DX 10.5mm fisheye is available. The 12-24mm is not a fisheye. Do you have the Samsung NX 10mm fisheye? I do, but only use it sparingly. Fisheye is not meant to be used for every photo.

Nikon also announced they are working on a new mirrorless system. We will see if it ever comes to light.

I only talk for mirrorless systems and native lenses,

and there isn't a native APS-C mirrorless fish eye lens on Canonikon (or Fuji, or Sony for that matter) .

You must be confused, do you mean specifically 'no native autofocus pancake at exactly 10mm fisheye'? Because there are fisheye lenses for every one of those systems, natively.

You, must be confused.

I am talking about full auto, native APS-C lenses. Not adapted, full manual ones.

Are there any Eos M fisheye lenses? No

Does Nikon has an APS-C mirrorless system at all? No

is there a native AF capable Fuji fish eye lens? Wasn't last time I checked.

Does Sony has a native APS-C fish eye lens?

As of your other reply, I will just leave it there, it's quite long as it is, there is no need for more wasted bytes.

I am sorry that you judge a system by whether it has autofocus fisheye lenses. More than that, that you need a system to to be considered worthy. But not having any lenses over 200mm f5.6 is a-ok...

Whatever floats your boat.

As for having nothing else to say... probably pretty accurate.

Kisaha wrote:

CCD FTW wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

CCD FTW wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

VisualFX wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

VisualFX wrote:

Nikon Canon all have fisheye lenses.

Not really,

EOS M's most interesting lenses are the 22mm and the UWZ, I was split between the first EOS M cameras, and NX, and I choose NX(NX300 and 30mm and 12-24mm).

I should have change 5 M cameras since then, and still I would be vastly behind the NX1 camera, while the only M lenses that worth a dime, are still those 2.

Nikon has not a mirrorless system above 1".

What do you mean "Not really"? Nikon DX 10.5mm fisheye is available. The 12-24mm is not a fisheye. Do you have the Samsung NX 10mm fisheye? I do, but only use it sparingly. Fisheye is not meant to be used for every photo.

Nikon also announced they are working on a new mirrorless system. We will see if it ever comes to light.

I only talk for mirrorless systems and native lenses,

and there isn't a native APS-C mirrorless fish eye lens on Canonikon (or Fuji, or Sony for that matter) .

You must be confused, do you mean specifically 'no native autofocus pancake at exactly 10mm fisheye'? Because there are fisheye lenses for every one of those systems, natively.

You, must be confused.

I am talking about full auto, native APS-C lenses. Not adapted, full manual ones.

Are there any Eos M fisheye lenses? No

Does Nikon has an APS-C mirrorless system at all? No

is there a native AF capable Fuji fish eye lens? Wasn't last time I checked.

Does Sony has a native APS-C fish eye lens?

As of your other reply, I will just leave it there, it's quite long as it is, there is no need for more wasted bytes.

I am sorry that you judge a system by whether it has autofocus fisheye lenses. More than that, that you need a system to to be considered worthy. But not having any lenses over 200mm f5.6 is a-ok...

Whatever floats your boat.

As for having nothing else to say... probably pretty accurate.

My 3 most used lenses are the 16-50S the 45 and the fish eye, and after those the 12-24 and the 30. I do not understand what is your problem with that. Different people value different things in life, that is why we have so many brands/products/styles/artistic expressions/opinions etc.

Indeed. Are you helping me, in MY thread, or are you pushing why you think it's the best system based on values that you have decided on for yourself? Honest question? How are the extremely biased views you have pushed on people in this thread helping the discussion? Or are they merely to serve you and make you feel better about the choices you make?

obviously you don't want/need the NX system, so I am wondering what drives you to buy again and again bodies and lenses of something that you not value as much as most of us here, and I am wondering what Freudian urge makes you come to the NX forum and try to de-value it the unfortunate way you do.

What makes you so insecure that someone asking questions about their own gear for their own needs makes you feel like you have to push your own agenda, while putting down everything alternative without ever considering another persons needs and interests might differ from your own?

I will be working the next 10-13 hours with those 3 NX bodies and those 3 lenses, so I have no more time to waste with people that obviously "ask" for advice, only to push their agendas. My opinions are very well expressed and with great detail here in the span of a couple of years, no need to add anything new.

Adios.

This is just sad. You were the one who came along to try and 'explain' to me why your system is better than any other while also trashing every other system for being inferior.... Pretty sure there is a term for that, I wonder what it could be? If your extremely biased opinions are already expressed elsewhere, why did you feel the need to do it again? Honestly I read around different forums on NX and your name, with the same pushed agenda comes up time and time again.

Which is a shame as I think I was getting some really great, unbiased views.

But don't worry, I won't be keeping it and therefore won't be staying as part of your 'community'. Seems like if you aren’t a vehement supporter, you are essentially dirt... What a community! I'm sure I will miss it a lot.

Kisaha wrote:

My 3 most used lenses are the 16-50S the 45 and the fish eye, and after those the 12-24 and the 30. I do not understand what is your problem with that. Different people value different things in life, that is why we have so many brands/products/styles/artistic expressions/opinions etc.

obviously you don't want/need the NX system, so I am wondering what drives you to buy again and again bodies and lenses of something that you not value as much as most of us here, and I am wondering what Freudian urge makes you come to the NX forum and try to de-value it the unfortunate way you do.

I will be working the next 10-13 hours with those 3 NX bodies and those 3 lenses, so I have no more time to waste with people that obviously "ask" for advice, only to push their agendas. My opinions are very well expressed and with great detail here in the span of a couple of years, no need to add anything new.

Adios.

I will be waiting to see what types of photos you have produced and willing to share here with others. You've been registered on the forum since 2015, and only have forum posts dating back from a month ago in your history.

Care to share any of your fabulous professional photos you have taken with NX?

There are people that talk big here and people that actually share stuff. I have shared photos in the past, but it seems many that talk on dpreview have nothing to share. I did not buy an NX1 and put an investment into a camera, just to tell people I spent big money. I am using mine, and plan to build a photography business of my own.

So, you are stalking me in various forums and you use unique nick names so I can not identify you? That seriously sounds weird. Ignore the stalker.

Don’t flatter yourself. Rabid fanboys with nothing new to say after 1800 posts of the same fanboy responses tend to stand out to me.

You are one of those.

Classic pi$$ing match with no winners, only losers.

Kisaha wrote:

VisualFX wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

My 3 most used lenses are the 16-50S the 45 and the fish eye, and after those the 12-24 and the 30. I do not understand what is your problem with that. Different people value different things in life, that is why we have so many brands/products/styles/artistic expressions/opinions etc.

obviously you don't want/need the NX system, so I am wondering what drives you to buy again and again bodies and lenses of something that you not value as much as most of us here, and I am wondering what Freudian urge makes you come to the NX forum and try to de-value it the unfortunate way you do.

I will be working the next 10-13 hours with those 3 NX bodies and those 3 lenses, so I have no more time to waste with people that obviously "ask" for advice, only to push their agendas. My opinions are very well expressed and with great detail here in the span of a couple of years, no need to add anything new.

Adios.

I will be waiting to see what types of photos you have produced and willing to share here with others. You've been registered on the forum since 2015, and only have forum posts dating back from a month ago in your history.

Care to share any of your fabulous professional photos you have taken with NX?

There are people that talk big here and people that actually share stuff. I have shared photos in the past, but it seems many that talk on dpreview have nothing to share. I did not buy an NX1 and put an investment into a camera, just to tell people I spent big money. I am using mine, and plan to build a photography business of my own.

This is my 1878th post.

I am doing video professionally and I mostly use dedicated video cameras.

I live by this profession since 1999. At this moment, I just came from a 14 hour work day (and night), the least of my worries is to convince you about my studies and professional experience.

Ignore the duckman.

Again. Nothing to see here from Kisaha since he cant even take one nice photo with his NX camera to prove he even has one. Ignore Kisaha. Claiming you have done 14 hour work, with nothing to share. Anyone can "claim" they've done work. Sharing to prove it is something else. Still waiting to see some photos of your nice work....