DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400

Started Jun 1, 2017 | Discussions
abe4652 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,147
Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400

I am comparing IQ at overlapping focal lengths, on a EM1 Mark 2, and  am having a lot of trouble seeing a difference, even with pixel peeping to the max.

Are my samples unusual, or do others have similar experiences?

Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Leica 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 ASPH
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
john isaacs Veteran Member • Posts: 8,441
Re: Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400
9

I'm having trouble seeing the difference, as well.

Perhaps because you didn't post anything to look at.

drj3 Forum Pro • Posts: 12,633
Re: Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400
1

abe4652 wrote:

I am comparing IQ at overlapping focal lengths, on a EM1 Mark 2, and am having a lot of trouble seeing a difference, even with pixel peeping to the max.

Are my samples unusual, or do others have similar experiences?

I would expect a zoom lens with a TC14 to lose a considerable amount of resolution, so I would be somewhat surprised if the 100-400 were not somewhat better in the overlapping focal lengths.  How are they between 100-150 without the TC14 on the 40-150?

-- hide signature --

drj3

 drj3's gear list:drj3's gear list
Olympus E-510 Olympus E-5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus E-M1 II +13 more
OP abe4652 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,147
Re: Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400

I meant my lens samples.

Stizzu68 Regular Member • Posts: 483
Re: Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400
2

abe4652 wrote:

I meant my lens samples.

That was clear but if you want people to make statements about your lenses you better upload some sample and give some details about how you compared the lenses

More in general I do not see  any  visible difference in quality  between these two lenses in the 140-210mm range. They are both very good.

So if both your lenses deliver good results there is nothing strange. If not better to post some picture to get some advise.

Stefano

(unknown member) Veteran Member • Posts: 7,274
Re: Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400
1

drj3 wrote:

abe4652 wrote:

I am comparing IQ at overlapping focal lengths, on a EM1 Mark 2, and am having a lot of trouble seeing a difference, even with pixel peeping to the max.

Are my samples unusual, or do others have similar experiences?

I would expect a zoom lens with a TC14 to lose a considerable amount of resolution, so I would be somewhat surprised if the 100-400 were not somewhat better in the overlapping focal lengths. How are they between 100-150 without the TC14 on the 40-150?

TC doesn't always drop resolution a much. There are some Nikon converters that has excellent output by specs. The Olympus I have doesn't drop the IQ that you could pixel peep. Instead you will get the extended range with better IQ than cropping.

By specs the image circle is cropped and enlarged by the magnification ratio (1.4x, 1.7x or 2x) so the resolution should drop by the same amount. But when lens is already better than the sensor can capture by its output, you can enlarge the image circle more. After all the 1.4x is like going from a 16Mpix to 22Mpix so around 15% increase in resolution.

And if you think that 40-150mm is limited by 16Mpix sensor or 20Mpix sensor and can't be used with 24Mpix sensor, then....

Martin.au
Martin.au Forum Pro • Posts: 14,339
Re: Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400
1

I own both those lenses.

I wouldn't expect to see much difference in the overlapping focus range either.

Actually, I think the 100-400 would be better. The 40-150 as a bare lens would be similar (IMO - no testing done).

 Martin.au's gear list:Martin.au's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G Fisheye 8mm F3.5 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ +7 more
mchnz
mchnz Senior Member • Posts: 1,949
Re: Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400

The only reason I have the 40-150 f/2.8 and the MC-14 is because it's brighter, and it's weather sealed, I wasn't convinced that it had an extraordinary advantage in other respects. I get the impression that a lot of the lenses covering this zoom range are pretty good.

cf782 Contributing Member • Posts: 928
Re: Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400

Well said. I agree with what you said.

 cf782's gear list:cf782's gear list
Leica Q Panasonic S1 Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R Leica SL2-S Panasonic S 24-105mm F4 Macro OIS +4 more
Albert Valentino Veteran Member • Posts: 9,762
Re: Oly 40-150 2.8 w/1.4x extender vs. Panasonic 100-400

Tommi K1 wrote:

drj3 wrote:

abe4652 wrote:

I am comparing IQ at overlapping focal lengths, on a EM1 Mark 2, and am having a lot of trouble seeing a difference, even with pixel peeping to the max.

Are my samples unusual, or do others have similar experiences?

I would expect a zoom lens with a TC14 to lose a considerable amount of resolution, so I would be somewhat surprised if the 100-400 were not somewhat better in the overlapping focal lengths. How are they between 100-150 without the TC14 on the 40-150?

TC doesn't always drop resolution a much.

There is a drop in resolution and it was measured by photozone. Scroll down towards the bottom of this page to see the numbers with the TC

http://www.photozone.de/m43/945_olympus40150f28pro?start=1

-- hide signature --

If you don't get older and wiser, than you just get older.

 Albert Valentino's gear list:Albert Valentino's gear list
Olympus E-M1 III Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.8 +10 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads