New to m4/3, little dissapointed

hindesite wrote:

...what on earth is wrong with people round here?

1. username, check
2. number of posts, check
3. exaggerated claims, check
4. lack of information,check
5. dissing on m4/3, check

Yet, despite all that, almost all the replies in the thread are serious?

Yep, all posters like this should be advised to sell everything and buy Medium Format.

though it is amusing to read the serious replies that barely touch on the original question, 800% in any format will look soft......

hindesite wrote:

...what on earth is wrong with people round here?

1. username, check
2. number of posts, check
3. exaggerated claims, check
4. lack of information,check
5. dissing on m4/3, check

Yet, despite all that, almost all the replies in the thread are serious?

Well, some are a bit critical... We try to remain polite, don't we?

AussiePhil wrote:

hindesite wrote:

...what on earth is wrong with people round here?

1. username, check
2. number of posts, check
3. exaggerated claims, check
4. lack of information,check
5. dissing on m4/3, check

Yet, despite all that, almost all the replies in the thread are serious?

Yep, all posters like this should be advised to sell everything and buy Medium Format.

One of my recommendations to the OP. Although maybe not big enough...

though it is amusing to read the serious replies that barely touch on the original question, 800% in any format will look soft......

-- hide signature --

Cheers and best wishes
Phil
Galleries at
https://www.flickr.com/photos/byphilg/

I blew up one of my images shot at ISO 12000, Aperture F22 and when blown up to billboard size when looked at with a 15 power loupe, it is not perfectly sharp!

hindesite wrote:

...what on earth is wrong with people round here?

1. username, check
2. number of posts, check
3. exaggerated claims, check
4. lack of information,check
5. dissing on m4/3, check

Yet, despite all that, almost all the replies in the thread are serious?

We are assuming the OP is serious.  I certainly realized, that, that he may well be someone with no life who has to resort to trolling for his kicks.  If so, then that's on him.

Gary from Seattle wrote:

I blew up one of my images shot at ISO 12000, Aperture F22 and when blown up to billboard size when looked at with a 15 power loupe, it is not perfectly sharp!

Obviously your enlargement software isn't up to snuff.

hindesite wrote:

...what on earth is wrong with people round here?

1. username, check
2. number of posts, check
3. exaggerated claims, check
4. lack of information,check
5. dissing on m4/3, check

Yet, despite all that, almost all the replies in the thread are serious?

I do prints in local one hour photo and their max is 40x30cm for 5,99 euros and then I did a two test images and they are great and sharp but the file just lacks the punch.

hindesite wrote:

...what on earth is wrong with people round here?

1. username, check
2. number of posts, check
3. exaggerated claims, check
4. lack of information,check
5. dissing on m4/3, check

Yet, despite all that, almost all the replies in the thread are serious?

Yes.  TROLL.

800%?

I think you need to stop doing photography. Perhaps take up testing callipers as a hobby.

First post + bad username =troll

Now that's good math.....

Photo Pete wrote:

I wish that people replying to this sort of thread would change the title of their post. I don't know if the OP is a troll or not, but if they are then they have successfully multiplied the chances of a search engine finding hits which indicate disatisfaction with the camera format due to the fact that the title is repeated in each response.

OMG, I have not thought about this. Thanks for the lesson

I like your thinking, Pete ...

Looking at the trolls images, I'd just suggest he sell all of his cameras and find something else to do:)

Haha, this is obviously a joke.

Cell phone of your choice and some Instagram filters should do the trick. ...or a Hasselblad.