DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Played at Yodobashi Camera today :)

Started Feb 16, 2017 | Discussions
zuikowesty
zuikowesty Veteran Member • Posts: 4,158
Played at Yodobashi Camera today :)
2

While in Hachioji today, I discovered there is a Yodobashi Camera store - a small one, only 7 floors - so I took some time to try out a few lenses and cameras that I haven't seen before, or haven't had time to try. I mounted a dozen or so lenses on my E-PM2 for a quick trial run, and also popped an SD into a GX-8 for later examination. Hardly scientific, I know. I loved how demo units were laid out so I could mount lenses at my leisure and try them out - nobody bothered me at all.

GX8 - love the EVF! Feels ok, I could probably get used to the size.

G8 - Also a nice EVF, grip felt too deep, shutter very smooth

35-100/2.8 - love the size, but I'd probably go with the 12-100/4 for the one lens solution

60/2.8 - tried both the Oly macro and the Sigma, both were nice. The Oly I thought was a toy at first! I had no idea it was so small and narrow - looks like a stretched 45/1.8...

300/4 and 100-400 - tried both. I was surprised they had both of these on demo, but not the 42.5/1.2 - about the only lens I wanted to try but could not.

The 15/1.7 was also very nice; just wish it were the size of the 20/1.7 and I'd be sold.

The Panasonic 14-140 was mounted on a GX8, and felt very nice. Seemed to focus a bit closer to than the 14-150II that I've been borrowing the past few days, but I could be wrong.

The silver E-M10II looked really cheap, with a different finish than the silver E-M5s I've seen. Felt ok though, and the EVF was better than my E-M5 for sure. No sign of the E-M1 m I/II , and I didn't have time to ask. I plan on visiting another store next week in Tokyo so hope to see the mark II then.

I also picked up an A7 with a 24-240 or some such on it, and was appalled at how bad the focus was. It simply could not focus at ALL at the long end in the store, while none of the MFT lenses had any issues, even the 100-400 at the long end. The A7II with Zeiss 24-70 was better, but still slower than any of the MFT combos I tried.

A week of borrowing an E-M5II really has me sold on the larger EVF, so this and the GX8 are on the horizon for me, I think. My eyesight is not getting any better, and the larger, higher res EVF just makes things much more enjoyable.

 zuikowesty's gear list:zuikowesty's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus PEN E-PM2 Olympus E-M5 II Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50mm 1:2.0 Macro Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 Fisheye +11 more
tt321
tt321 Forum Pro • Posts: 13,854
Sony's appalling AF

zuikowesty wrote:

I also picked up an A7 with a 24-240 or some such on it, and was appalled at how bad the focus was. It simply could not focus at ALL at the long end in the store, while none of the MFT lenses had any issues, even the 100-400 at the long end. The A7II with Zeiss 24-70 was better, but still slower than any of the MFT combos I tried.

I had this eye-opening (-watering?) experience myself with the A6000. Maybe newer cameras fare better? Or maybe after owning for a while you learn how to use them properly?

Yodobashi is an experience for sure.

zuikowesty
OP zuikowesty Veteran Member • Posts: 4,158
Re: Played at Yodobashi Camera today :)

Had a look through the photos I took, and forgot to mention two more items I tried out:

The Tamron 14-150, a lens I'd never seen before, felt very nice, and exactly the same size as the Oly 14-150. And I checked, the Pan 14-140 does focus closer than either the Oly or Tamron, down to 30cm vs 50cm, which is noticeable.

I also tried the GX7II (or GX80/85) and was not impressed. It felt too small, and the EVF was not nearly as good as the GX8 - something just seemed off with it. I guess this is the sequential scan LCD at play.

 zuikowesty's gear list:zuikowesty's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus PEN E-PM2 Olympus E-M5 II Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50mm 1:2.0 Macro Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 Fisheye +11 more
Kszchopstix Contributing Member • Posts: 527
Re: Played at Yodobashi Camera today :)

Hi Shawn.

Be wary that these Sony demo units and lenses have never had a firmware upgrade since thier initial release. The a7r when it hits the market had atrociously slow AF . It has had several firmware upgrades to make it a more usable experience compared to the em5mkii albeit very slightly slower AF.

 Kszchopstix's gear list:Kszchopstix's gear list
Panasonic LX100 II Olympus E-M1 II Pentax KP Pentax smc DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited Olympus Zuiko Digital 14-54mm 1:2.8-3.5 II +12 more
Rich K
Rich K Senior Member • Posts: 1,006
,,, and playtime it is!
1

I go through Tokyo every couple of years to visit my wife's relatives in Kyushu.  While she cruises through the Mitsukoshi department store, I'm delightfully occupied in the camera shops in Shinjuku.  Yodobashi and BIC both have wonderful selections of all of the latest gear.  It's like Toys R Us for camera geeks.  My advice to all is that if you're on a visit to Tokyo for whatever reason, carve out a couple of hours for a little "hands on" time.

-- hide signature --

Rich in Reno

 Rich K's gear list:Rich K's gear list
Sony RX100 III Olympus PEN E-P5 Olympus E-M5 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 Panasonic 12-35mm F2.8 +5 more
MFiftysomething Senior Member • Posts: 1,075
Re: Played at Yodobashi Camera today :)

Great stores I visited kyoto branch; you would think they would have all the latest gear in the camera shops in Japan ..but they don't.

 MFiftysomething's gear list:MFiftysomething's gear list
Sony RX100 V Fujifilm X100V Sony a7C Fujifilm X-E4 Sony a7 IV
Ulfric M Douglas Veteran Member • Posts: 4,828
Re: Played at Yodobashi Camera today :)
1

zuikowesty wrote:

... I mounted a dozen or so lenses on my E-PM2 for a quick trial run, ...

...

A week of borrowing an E-M5II really has me sold on the larger EVF, ...

Your own e-pM2 will work nicely with the VF-4 viewfinder ... just a suggestion.

-- hide signature --

Cheksa wrote:
You're evil Ulfric.

jalywol
jalywol Forum Pro • Posts: 12,302
Re: Played at Yodobashi Camera today :)

zuikowesty wrote:

While in Hachioji today, I discovered there is a Yodobashi Camera store - a small one, only 7 floors - so I took some time to try out a few lenses and cameras that I haven't seen before, or haven't had time to try. I mounted a dozen or so lenses on my E-PM2 for a quick trial run, and also popped an SD into a GX-8 for later examination. Hardly scientific, I know. I loved how demo units were laid out so I could mount lenses at my leisure and try them out - nobody bothered me at all.

GX8 - love the EVF! Feels ok, I could probably get used to the size.

That was my take on it when I first tried one on display at B&H in NY right after they first came out.  I was expecting a behemoth, but it was surprisingly comfortable in hand, and did not feel like a big clunky camera at all.

G8 - Also a nice EVF, grip felt too deep, shutter very smooth

I thought the grip was too deep for me on this one, too.

I also picked up an A7 with a 24-240 or some such on it, and was appalled at how bad the focus was. It simply could not focus at ALL at the long end in the store, while none of the MFT lenses had any issues, even the 100-400 at the long end. The A7II with Zeiss 24-70 was better, but still slower than any of the MFT combos I tried.

Yeah, I had the A7, and even after all the firmware updates, it was slooowww, compared to any M43 I have ever had.  Also, Sony's low light focusing ability is really awful compared to especially Panasonic M43s (except on the A7S, if I recall).  It was one of the things about that camera that took me a long time to get used to, after coming from speedy-focusing M43 land.

A week of borrowing an E-M5II really has me sold on the larger EVF, so this and the GX8 are on the horizon for me, I think. My eyesight is not getting any better, and the larger, higher res EVF just makes things much more enjoyable.

If you get a GX8, also get the accessory eye cup. It makes the very good EVF even better.

I had a similar reaction to the variety on display when I went to B&H in NYC for the first time.  I have family down in the area, and had some medical appts in the city, so I stopped in to the store when I was in the neighborhood, just to see what they had for M43 and for Sony.  Holy cow!  They had everything on display, and you could handle and try it all.  I probably never would have ended up with a GX8 if I hadn't have been able to handle the thing in person there.  From the reviews and the complaints about it on this site (by non-owners), you'd think the thing was the size of a bathtub. However, when I picked it up in person, the grip felt great, and it was balanced really well.  It also, while not a diminutive camera, just didn't handle like a big piece of gear, so I knew I'd be ok with it, much to my surprise.

It's too bad the option to do this has vanished in most places in the US now....

-J

MOD Tom Caldwell Forum Pro • Posts: 46,356
The human interface
2

tt321 wrote:

zuikowesty wrote:

I also picked up an A7 with a 24-240 or some such on it, and was appalled at how bad the focus was. It simply could not focus at ALL at the long end in the store, while none of the MFT lenses had any issues, even the 100-400 at the long end. The A7II with Zeiss 24-70 was better, but still slower than any of the MFT combos I tried.

I had this eye-opening (-watering?) experience myself with the A6000. Maybe newer cameras fare better? Or maybe after owning for a while you learn how to use them properly?

Yodobashi is an experience for sure.

I presume that the camera body was the (old) A7 MkI? The MkI CDAF AF was nothing to write home about as far focus speed was concerned as anyone who has continued to persevere with EF lens adaption to Sony EF can understand.

The MkII AF is said to be much better and AF should have been good.

However I can't make myself find AUD$4,200 to upgrade my MkI body just so that I can correct Sony's mistakes myself by rewarding them with even more of my money for not getting it nearly right in the first place.  All I could look forward to is the upcoming even more refined upgrade to the A7RIII to make an A7RII purchase look foolish.

This is the same expensive re-cycling of product that put me off the dslr churn in the first place.  Sony says "great idea for making money in the camera business" - let's do it too.

I never have been very tolerant of using my full price purchase as a beta tester for a product still quite raw and unpolished. Make it right first time around so that I can enjoy it for many years - the actual cost of such wonders soon fades into insignificance.

Maybe I could do this but I have found M4/3 quite rewarding, more sophisticated, and much more economical with my investment money.

I am not unhappy in perservering with my E-M1, GX7 & GM5 combo.  Add the cost of this up and it is still far short of the cost buying an A7RII. All are now "old hat" but were so well conceived that there is no rush to replace them before they wear out.

There is a certain element of Raplph Nader's planned obsolescence when corporations take years to refine a product and I am not necessarily talking about technical advances - the human interface element has little to do with technology and depends more on their ability to get used to steam engine like controls.  If I stump up a lot of money to buy a product I expect that I can immediately enjoy using it and in that regard my fuse is obviously shorter than most.

And of course the M4/3 AF is very fast and sharp as a tack.  Of course if M4/3 bodies can be pleasant to use and will last for years then whilst it makes them good guys for the consumer it does not do a real lot for their bottom line.

-- hide signature --

Tom Caldwell

3dwag
3dwag Veteran Member • Posts: 4,674
Re: ,,, and playtime it is!
1

Rich K wrote:

I go through Tokyo every couple of years to visit my wife's relatives in Kyushu. While she cruises through the Mitsukoshi department store, I'm delightfully occupied in the camera shops in Shinjuku. Yodobashi and BIC both have wonderful selections of all of the latest gear. It's like Toys R Us for camera geeks. My advice to all is that if you're on a visit to Tokyo for whatever reason, carve out a couple of hours for a little "hands on" time.

Yep, one of my old favorites in Tokyo as well.  My wife is from Kagoshima prefecture in Kyushu, but schedule the last few trips would not allow for my Yodobashi Camera "fix" 💴 💸.  We've also lived in Tokyo and I've had countless short and extended business trips there, so over the years my share of Camera Sakuraya, Yodobashi Camera, and BIc Camera visits in the Kanto and Kansai areas.

Come to think of it, my last time to the Shinjuku West store (my favorite) was probably in December 2004 😢, though I've been through Tokyo several times since.

Do Yodobashi Camera stores still continuously play that catchy, monotonous jingle over their PA system?  Every time something like this thread reminds me of it, I can't get it out of my head for the rest of the day! 🎼😳

-- hide signature --
 3dwag's gear list:3dwag's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 OM-1 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R +19 more
zuikowesty
OP zuikowesty Veteran Member • Posts: 4,158
Re: ,,, and playtime it is!

3dwag wrote:

Rich K wrote:

I go through Tokyo every couple of years to visit my wife's relatives in Kyushu. While she cruises through the Mitsukoshi department store, I'm delightfully occupied in the camera shops in Shinjuku. Yodobashi and BIC both have wonderful selections of all of the latest gear. It's like Toys R Us for camera geeks. My advice to all is that if you're on a visit to Tokyo for whatever reason, carve out a couple of hours for a little "hands on" time.

Yep, one of my old favorites in Tokyo as well. My wife is from Kagoshima prefecture in Kyushu, but schedule the last few trips would not allow for my Yodobashi Camera "fix" 💴 💸. We've also lived in Tokyo and I've had countless short and extended business trips there, so over the years my share of Camera Sakuraya, Yodobashi Camera, and BIc Camera visits in the Kanto and Kansai areas.

Come to think of it, my last time to the Shinjuku West store (my favorite) was probably in December 2004 😢, though I've been through Tokyo several times since.

I assume you mean 2014? 10 years is far too long to stay away...

Do Yodobashi Camera stores still continuously play that catchy, monotonous jingle over their PA system? Every time something like this thread reminds me of it, I can't get it out of my head for the rest of the day! 🎼😳

I didn't notice any music, but will pay attention next time. The visual stimuli were enough to overwhelm my senses for hours!

-- hide signature --
 zuikowesty's gear list:zuikowesty's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus PEN E-PM2 Olympus E-M5 II Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50mm 1:2.0 Macro Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 Fisheye +11 more
zuikowesty
OP zuikowesty Veteran Member • Posts: 4,158
Re: Played at Yodobashi Camera today :)

Ulfric M Douglas wrote:

zuikowesty wrote:

... I mounted a dozen or so lenses on my E-PM2 for a quick trial run, ...

...

A week of borrowing an E-M5II really has me sold on the larger EVF, ...

Your own e-pM2 will work nicely with the VF-4 viewfinder ... just a suggestion.

Good point, I haven't thought of the VF-4 option for a while. I like that it offers me the same IQ as the E-M5 in a pocketable package, but the rear "dial" is fiddly and starting to act up, so it would be frustrating as a primary camera for any serious use. But, it's ideal as a walkaround body, and having a VF would be nice for bright days. I will keep my eyes open for a cheap VF-4. And a cheap 14/2.5 would make it even more pocketable. I kind of botched my 12-32 loose ring fix, so don't have a lot of faith in that lens anymore. I used too much adhesive tape, so the ring didn't quite slide on all the way, and now it will never come off without destroying the lens - I tried, and the outer barrel started to separate from the rest of it. Since I used it primarily as a 12mm lens, a cheap 14/2.5 would probably be a good enough replacement and not require extending the lens every time.

-- hide signature --

Cheksa wrote:
You're evil Ulfric.

 zuikowesty's gear list:zuikowesty's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus PEN E-PM2 Olympus E-M5 II Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50mm 1:2.0 Macro Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 Fisheye +11 more
Bhima78 Senior Member • Posts: 2,850
Only one really responsive Sony FF
1

tt321 wrote:

zuikowesty wrote:

I also picked up an A7 with a 24-240 or some such on it, and was appalled at how bad the focus was. It simply could not focus at ALL at the long end in the store, while none of the MFT lenses had any issues, even the 100-400 at the long end. The A7II with Zeiss 24-70 was better, but still slower than any of the MFT combos I tried.

I had this eye-opening (-watering?) experience myself with the A6000. Maybe newer cameras fare better? Or maybe after owning for a while you learn how to use them properly?

Yodobashi is an experience for sure.

I've tried quite a few FF Sony's in my local camera shop. The only one that actually felt as responsive as my m43's cameras was the A7Rii. The others just felt a bit pokey, with the original A7 being so dang slow, I'd probably just use adapted MF glass on it.

 Bhima78's gear list:Bhima78's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Panasonic G85 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 35-100mm F2.8 OIS +12 more
ahaslett
ahaslett Forum Pro • Posts: 12,662
Re: Only one really responsive Sony FF

Bhima78 wrote:

tt321 wrote:

zuikowesty wrote:

I also picked up an A7 with a 24-240 or some such on it, and was appalled at how bad the focus was. It simply could not focus at ALL at the long end in the store, while none of the MFT lenses had any issues, even the 100-400 at the long end. The A7II with Zeiss 24-70 was better, but still slower than any of the MFT combos I tried.

I had this eye-opening (-watering?) experience myself with the A6000. Maybe newer cameras fare better? Or maybe after owning for a while you learn how to use them properly?

Yodobashi is an experience for sure.

I've tried quite a few FF Sony's in my local camera shop. The only one that actually felt as responsive as my m43's cameras was the A7Rii. The others just felt a bit pokey, with the original A7 being so dang slow, I'd probably just use adapted MF glass on it.

The A7R has a rather charming habit of giving up after a bit and reporting focus lock anyway.  Found the OOF shots a bit puzzling until this became obvious.

Andrew

-- hide signature --

Infinite are the arguments of mages. Truth is a jewel with many facets. Ursula K LeGuin

 ahaslett's gear list:ahaslett's gear list
Sigma DP1 Merrill Sigma DP3 Merrill Olympus E-M1 Sony a7R Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 +33 more
MOD Tom Caldwell Forum Pro • Posts: 46,356
Re: Only one really responsive Sony FF

ahaslett wrote:

Bhima78 wrote:

tt321 wrote:

zuikowesty wrote:

I also picked up an A7 with a 24-240 or some such on it, and was appalled at how bad the focus was. It simply could not focus at ALL at the long end in the store, while none of the MFT lenses had any issues, even the 100-400 at the long end. The A7II with Zeiss 24-70 was better, but still slower than any of the MFT combos I tried.

I had this eye-opening (-watering?) experience myself with the A6000. Maybe newer cameras fare better? Or maybe after owning for a while you learn how to use them properly?

Yodobashi is an experience for sure.

I've tried quite a few FF Sony's in my local camera shop. The only one that actually felt as responsive as my m43's cameras was the A7Rii. The others just felt a bit pokey, with the original A7 being so dang slow, I'd probably just use adapted MF glass on it.

The A7R has a rather charming habit of giving up after a bit and reporting focus lock anyway. Found the OOF shots a bit puzzling until this became obvious.

Andrew

I am so happy that I am not alone and we don't have Sony defensive here.

I will acknowledge that the A7RII might be starting to get the act together but the A7 MkI was a half-finished poorly designed camera with awful ergonomics that was sold in the squillions simply because it had a FF sensor inside.

What worries me about the Sony A7 series MkII is that the price Sony puts on its "sorry about that, will this one do?"  Model is quite substantial for something that is still (better but) not sorted out ergonomically and is likely to be superseded by the next one after the next which will have finally have graduted from ergonomics school.

I might have AUD$4,200 in me to update my A7R for a later model but I want it to be perfect and keepable - I am not into playing expensive regular update games along the way to this Nirvana. I would be very happy to have one such camera that I can find enjoyable to use and will last me a long long time.

Book me in for an A7R MkIV.

-- hide signature --

Tom Caldwell

TN Args
TN Args Forum Pro • Posts: 10,687
Re: The human interface

Tom Caldwell wrote:

zuikowesty wrote:

I also picked up an A7 with a 24-240 or some such on it, and was appalled at how bad the focus was. It simply could not focus at ALL at the long end in the store, while none of the MFT lenses had any issues, even the 100-400 at the long end. The A7II with Zeiss 24-70 was better, but still slower than any of the MFT combos I tried.

I presume that the camera body was the (old) A7 MkI? The MkI CDAF AF was nothing to write home about as far focus speed was concerned ...

It actually has CDAF+PDAF, but I guess it still wasn't enough.

 TN Args's gear list:TN Args's gear list
Sigma dp0 Quattro Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Olympus E-M5 II Sony a7R III Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 +10 more
Jeremy C Junior Member • Posts: 45
Re: Only one really responsive Sony FF

Tom Caldwell wrote:

I am so happy that I am not alone and we don't have Sony defensive here.

Haha, I'm always hanging around. I'm also not wedded to any particular system.

that was sold in the squillions simply because it had a FF sensor inside.

I don't think there has actually been that meany A7R's sold. I believe it's only a fraction compared to the A7(no R) and even that is a drop in the ocean compared to the APS-C and SLR competitors.

What worries me about the Sony A7 series MkII ... and is likely to be superseded by the next one after the next

All the manufacturers keep pumping out models. I think it's the reality of the post-film era where they're all trying to make money. The A7Rii did appear to be a quick fix on the A7Ri being released around 600 days after the first (2013-2015), but the A7Rii has now been out for longer than that now without any release information. I suspect they will keep stretching out the release cycles for the higher end cameras now.

Dr Hal Senior Member • Posts: 2,186
Fell in Love with GX8
1

I also was visiting NYC and went to B and H.  Just out of curiosity tried the GX8 and fell in love.  Never even thought of owning one until I tried it then had to have it.  Love the camera.

Hal

 Dr Hal's gear list:Dr Hal's gear list
Canon EOS M6 II Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Canon EF-M 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM +3 more
Jeremy C Junior Member • Posts: 45
Sony AF performance

zuikowesty wrote:

I also picked up an A7 with a 24-240 or some such on it, and was appalled at how bad the focus was.

The contrast detection on the A7R is more or less useless. In extremely good light it will usually hit the focus but even then it's slow and often unreliable.

That said in my opinion the imaging sensor blows the m4/3 sensors out of the water for resolution and dynamic range. Taking the same photos side by side with the various m4/3 cameras I've used the big Sony files are more pleasing IF you can get the shot.

I tend to use my A7R with manual Contax Zeiss lenses or A-mount lenses on the Lea4 adapter which more or less transforms the camera into a SLT body with phase detection autofocus. In this configuration it performs quite well, but my solitary 55mm native lens is reduced to an expensive focus by wire manual focus lens. You cannot rely on the native e-mount lenses with contrast autofocus.

I think the main downside to the A7(i) series was releasing it without phase detection.

berni29 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,119
Re: Only one really responsive Sony FF

I've tried quite a few FF Sony's in my local camera shop. The only one that actually felt as responsive as my m43's cameras was the A7Rii. The others just felt a bit pokey, with the original A7 being so dang slow, I'd probably just use adapted MF glass on it.

I use an A7 exclusively with adapted MF lenses and I very much enjoy it when I want to shoot in that manner. For everything else its m43 all the way.

-- hide signature --

Berni29
EM1, EM-10mkII, 12-32mm, 35-100mm f2.8, 20mm f1.7, Voigt 17.5mm f0.95, Oly 12-40mm, 50mm F2 macro, (prev GM1/5 PanaEM10, EM5, GH1, E30, E510, E1, E300, LX3). Also Sony A7 + Voigt 40mm f 1.4 & 15mm f4.5 vIII

 berni29's gear list:berni29's gear list
Ricoh GR II Olympus E-M1 Sony a7R II Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50mm 1:2.0 Macro +13 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads