DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky

Started Dec 2, 2016 | Discussions
KennyHO New Member • Posts: 6
NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky

Hello .... Could anyone advise me on the lens NX3000? I want to take pictures of the night sky and the Milky Way. I'd buy in a reduction in the Canon. I am looking to start something cheap that I try it. Thank you for answers and advice

Samsung NX3000
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Kisaha Senior Member • Posts: 2,300
Re: NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky
2

The most common are Samyang 12mm, and Samsung NX 16mm, but I don't know much about the subject, in general you need something wide, and fast (apperture wise).

TillmanB
TillmanB Contributing Member • Posts: 501
Re: NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky
1

I've used the Samyang/Rokinon 12mm f2 on both a Sony NEX and my current Samsung NX300, it is a superb lens that is sharp wide open and very affordable as far as that sort of lens goes.  Manual focus for infinity can be a little tricky as the infinity mark isn't a guarantee and there isn't a hard stop so best bet is to use the focus magnification on a bright star and adjust until the fuzzy dot comes into focus.  Once you've established the true infinity point if it is different than the lens, a little bit of glow in the dark paint is handy.  I have been continually impressed with this lens and use it for milky way photos at f2 with good results.  My only criticism (and it's a pretty weak one at that) is that 12mm can be a little too wide for some situations, but the distortion isn't too bad and it can be cropped with good results.

I haven't used the Samsung ultra wide zoom but I understand some have had problems with the mount breaking.  I haven't seen one in person for comparison but I can say the Samyang seems quite durable and I haven't had any reason to doubt that it is built to last.

Kisaha Senior Member • Posts: 2,300
Re: NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky

You mean the 12-24? I use it for some time now, and still works (also, it was lost in the post between southern Europe and Canada for 3 months).

It is an excellent "cheap" ultra wide zoom, very sharp wide open and the zoom range (18-36mm equiv) is very useful, but the wide open apperture is 4f, so the 12mm/2f  has an advantage on that.

TillmanB
TillmanB Contributing Member • Posts: 501
Re: NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky
1

I haven't heard any negative comments on the image quality, but I do recall hearing some accounts of the mount breaking which is the only reason I mentioned that.  I think if the OP is primarily wanting to get shots of the milky way, the 12mm f2 is the only way to go, the brighter the better.

OP KennyHO New Member • Posts: 6
Re: NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky

which would you choose you?

Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC

Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

the last two are not all the same lens but another brand?

thx

markyboy81 Veteran Member • Posts: 4,778
Re: NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky

KennyHO wrote:

which would you choose you?

Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC

Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

the last two are not all the same lens but another brand?

thx

Last 2 are the same lens. I went for the 12mm but I've yet to try it out for astrophotography, though I've heard it's one of the best ones for that.

 markyboy81's gear list:markyboy81's gear list
Sony ZV-1 Samsung NX1000 Samsung NX3000 Samsung NX1 Samsung NX500 +9 more
Kisaha Senior Member • Posts: 2,300
Re: NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky

markyboy81 wrote:

KennyHO wrote:

which would you choose you?

Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC

Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

the last two are not all the same lens but another brand?

thx

Last 2 are the same lens. I went for the 12mm but I've yet to try it out for astrophotography, though I've heard it's one of the best ones for that.

I am using the 14mm in Canon cameras, nothing to do with the 12mm.

For crop sensors the 12mm is a must. I do not have it ( I am covered somehow with the 12-24 zoom and the 10mm fisheye), but if I found a good offer I am definitely buying this one.

It is the same lens, Bower is another name, and there are a few more. Same lens though.

OP KennyHO New Member • Posts: 6
Re: NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky

Kisaha wrote:

markyboy81 wrote:

KennyHO wrote:

which would you choose you?

Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC

Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

the last two are not all the same lens but another brand?

thx

Last 2 are the same lens. I went for the 12mm but I've yet to try it out for astrophotography, though I've heard it's one of the best ones for that.

I am using the 14mm in Canon cameras, nothing to do with the 12mm.

For crop sensors the 12mm is a must. I do not have it ( I am covered somehow with the 12-24 zoom and the 10mm fisheye), but if I found a good offer I am definitely buying this one.

It is the same lens, Bower is another name, and there are a few more. Same lens though.

OK, so the 12 mm lens is even fisheye? It is a big difference between F/2.8 and f/2.0?

I buy Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS ? ....better choice ?

Kisaha Senior Member • Posts: 2,300
Re: NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky
1

KennyHO wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

markyboy81 wrote:

KennyHO wrote:

which would you choose you?

Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC

Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

the last two are not all the same lens but another brand?

thx

Last 2 are the same lens. I went for the 12mm but I've yet to try it out for astrophotography, though I've heard it's one of the best ones for that.

I am using the 14mm in Canon cameras, nothing to do with the 12mm.

For crop sensors the 12mm is a must. I do not have it ( I am covered somehow with the 12-24 zoom and the 10mm fisheye), but if I found a good offer I am definitely buying this one.

It is the same lens, Bower is another name, and there are a few more. Same lens though.

OK, so the 12 mm lens is even fisheye? It is a big difference between F/2.8 and f/2.0?

I buy Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS ? ....better choice ?

How much did you got that?

Yes, Rokinon is just fine, these are all the same lenses. Samyang, Bower, Rokinon, it doesn't matter. For mirrorless I consider the 12mm being a better buy than the 14mm (which is huge by the way, for a mirrorless at least), and slower (2.8 to 2) and less wide (21mm to 18mm, quite a difference).

No, the 12 is not fish eye, but I have the 12-24, which is ultra sharp at 12mm and wide open (4f) and the fish eye is obviously wider than 12mm and brings something different to wide photography (astro as well, because it reminds spheres, planets, and the such), while it is the widest for NX500 4K crop.

Lawrence Norman
Lawrence Norman Regular Member • Posts: 437
Re: NX3000 Lens on the Night Sky

Kisaha wrote:

KennyHO wrote:

Kisaha wrote:

markyboy81 wrote:

KennyHO wrote:

which would you choose you?

Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC

Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS

the last two are not all the same lens but another brand?

thx

Last 2 are the same lens. I went for the 12mm but I've yet to try it out for astrophotography, though I've heard it's one of the best ones for that.

I am using the 14mm in Canon cameras, nothing to do with the 12mm.

For crop sensors the 12mm is a must. I do not have it ( I am covered somehow with the 12-24 zoom and the 10mm fisheye), but if I found a good offer I am definitely buying this one.

It is the same lens, Bower is another name, and there are a few more. Same lens though.

OK, so the 12 mm lens is even fisheye? It is a big difference between F/2.8 and f/2.0?

I buy Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS ? ....better choice ?

How much did you got that?

Yes, Rokinon is just fine, these are all the same lenses. Samyang, Bower, Rokinon, it doesn't matter. For mirrorless I consider the 12mm being a better buy than the 14mm (which is huge by the way, for a mirrorless at least), and slower (2.8 to 2) and less wide (21mm to 18mm, quite a difference).

No, the 12 is not fish eye, but I have the 12-24, which is ultra sharp at 12mm and wide open (4f) and the fish eye is obviously wider than 12mm and brings something different to wide photography (astro as well, because it reminds spheres, planets, and the such), while it is the widest for NX500 4K crop.

Yes!!!
I know 2 fish eye lens choices [wider then 12 mm] for Milky Way i.e. stars (not moon)
1. Samsung's Native 10mm F/3.5 -Requires motor-drive tripod for tracking; slow lens requires long exposure time of 50+ seconds.

2. Samy/Rok/Bow 8mm fish-eye F/2.8.  Similarities to it's 12mm cousin:
-Manufactured for mirror-less camera.
-Similar pricing e.g. $299 USD.
-Manual; focus, aperture ring.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1039942-REG/rokinon_rk8mbk28_nx_8mm_f_2_8_umc_fish_eye.html

-- hide signature --

"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science." -Albert Einstein

 Lawrence Norman's gear list:Lawrence Norman's gear list
Samsung NX1 Samsung NX500 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 50-200mm F4-5.6 OIS Samyang 85mm F1.4 Aspherical IF +18 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads