DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

The lens to get started on wide angle photography

Started Oct 30, 2015 | User reviews
cberry Senior Member • Posts: 1,127
The lens to get started on wide angle photography
2

I bought this lens because I hadn't shot wide before. Typically, I fill the frame. nail the focus and the moment - I like things tight but I was missing something and I knew it.

I don't mind overlapping focal lengths, carrying primes and having too many choices - not a gear head as such but dropping a small lens for the sake of a lighter bag - not really my thing. Suffer in silence rather.

So I got the 10-18 for an absolute steal and decided I'd tame the differences in perspective - sure, there were the moments where I just had to have the widest field of view but that's not what intrigued me most - and here we get to the specifics of the lens itself.

IS is necessary on this lens - especially in low light as it does vignette quite a bit unless you stop it down.

This weakness means that you'll be losing colour depth. The tiny aperture means that nearly everything is in focus so there's no weakness possible in terms of focus accuracy.10/10 considering it's a consumer grade zoom - 8/10 when compared to L series glass - because of the smaller aperture needed to get rid of vigneting.

Distortion is 90% controlled in-camera or with DPP. No problems here.

Sharpness is excellent overall - an absolute steal for the money - even better for what I paid. 8/10

Ergonomics are excellent too - unless you're struggling to get used to focus by wire. 9/10

For video, it's a no-brainer.  10/10

I'd rate construction at 9/10 - even if it's plastic. Maybe it's the quality of the plastic or how light the lens is that makes me give it such a high rating - it feels right.

Yes, there are faster lenses this wide, there are sharper ones, there are more solid ones - but this must be the best balanced APS-C wide angle on the market - and certainly the best for the money and probably the only one an APS-C shooter needs - unless you just have to have wider apertures.

Value: 10/10

Overall: 8/10 - Why? It's a bit predictably boring. Everything's good about it but it doesn't have the extra little bit of something to make you want to pull it out of the bag in the same way that say the 50mm f/1.4 does, The 60mm, the 24mm STM or the 70-200 f/4 IS. Yes, it complements the 18-135 STM perfectly - maybe even being one up on that lens but then again, that lens had the same lack of WHAM about it. Useful, incredibly so but not as inspiring.

 cberry's gear list:cberry's gear list
Canon PowerShot G7 X Canon EOS 70D Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS STM Canon EF-S 24mm F2.8 STM +3 more
Canon EF-S 10-18mm F4.5–5.6 IS STM
Wideangle zoom lens • Canon EF-S • 9519B002
Announced: May 13, 2014
cberry's score
4.0
Average community score
4.6
Canon EF-S 10-18mm F4.5–5.6 IS STM Canon EF-S 24mm F2.8 STM
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
davel33 Senior Member • Posts: 2,978
Re: The lens to get started on wide angle photography

Nice review  and I agree with you about both the 10-18 and 18-135 stm

Thanks

-- hide signature --

"Just one more Lens, I promise....."
Dave

 davel33's gear list:davel33's gear list
Canon EOS R Canon EOS R6 Canon RF 35mm F1.8 IS STM Macro Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM +29 more
3Percent
3Percent Senior Member • Posts: 1,045
Re: The lens to get started on wide angle photography

Quite a good review here.

 3Percent's gear list:3Percent's gear list
Ricoh GR Digital IV Fujifilm X-S1 Canon PowerShot S120 Panasonic FZ1000 Ricoh GR II +39 more
John Sheehy Forum Pro • Posts: 26,698
Re: The lens to get started on wide angle photography

cberry wrote:

Overall: 8/10 - Why? It's a bit predictably boring. Everything's good about it but it doesn't have the extra little bit of something to make you want to pull it out of the bag in the same way that say the 50mm f/1.4 does, The 60mm, the 24mm STM or the 70-200 f/4 IS. Yes, it complements the 18-135 STM perfectly - maybe even being one up on that lens but then again, that lens had the same lack of WHAM about it. Useful, incredibly so but not as inspiring.

Could that be your taste, where you like blurred backgrounds and the subject standing out against the background?  The 10-18 has a much smaller entrance pupil than those other lenses you mentioned.  To have a 10-18 with a large pupil on a DSLR would require lots of big, inefficient glass.  Your lens has a pupil of 2.2mm at the wide end, and 3.2mm at the "long" end.  50/1.4, for example, has about 35mm.

-- hide signature --

Beware of correct answers to wrong questions.
John
http://www.pbase.com/image/55384958.jpg

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads