DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

17-40L too soft for my 5Ds. What should I get instead?

Started Sep 13, 2015 | Questions
canon35l Regular Member • Posts: 115
17-40L too soft for my 5Ds. What should I get instead?

Hi all,

I use my 17-40L for daylight shooting mostly during hikes/trips/vacation in the city and nature, but it's really too soft for my taste. Because of that I've been taking lately my 35L instead of the 17-40, but too many times the 35 is not wide enough...

The natural candidate is the 16-35 f/4L IS, however it is quite heavy and big, so I wondered if anyone has in mind other options I should consider?

I don't mind getting a prime in the wide side of this range, since the 5Ds allows plenty of cropping.However, I would still appreciate a zoom, since I couple this lens with the 70-300L when I travel light.

Note that I am interested in AF lenses only. Thanks in advance for sharing your opinion!

 canon35l's gear list:canon35l's gear list
Canon EF 35mm F1.4L USM Canon EF 85mm F1.2L II USM Canon EF 135mm F2L USM Canon EOS 5DS Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM +1 more
ANSWER:
Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM Canon EOS 5DS
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
mclaren777
mclaren777 Regular Member • Posts: 257
Re: 17-40L too soft for my 5Ds. What should I get instead?

The 16-35mm f/4 is the most logical choice.

It's foolishly sharp!

selected answer This post was selected as the answer by the original poster.
José B
José B Forum Pro • Posts: 20,497
Re: 17-40L too soft for my 5Ds. What should I get instead?

canon35l wrote:

Hi all,

I use my 17-40L for daylight shooting mostly during hikes/trips/vacation in the city and nature, but it's really too soft for my taste. Because of that I've been taking lately my 35L instead of the 17-40, but too many times the 35 is not wide enough...

The natural candidate is the 16-35 f/4L IS, however it is quite heavy and big, so I wondered if anyone has in mind other options I should consider?

I don't mind getting a prime in the wide side of this range, since the 5Ds allows plenty of cropping.However, I would still appreciate a zoom, since I couple this lens with the 70-300L when I travel light.

Note that I am interested in AF lenses only. Thanks in advance for sharing your opinion!

I agree with mclaren-----the 16-35/4 L IS is awesome! Extremely sharp and I don't think it is heavy and big. The 24-105/4 L IS used to be my fave walkabout lens but now I like the 16-35 even more for my 5DS.

cheers,

José

 José B's gear list:José B's gear list
Canon EOS R6 Mark II Canon EOS-1D Mark III Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 5DS Sony a6500 +16 more
Don Lacy
Don Lacy Senior Member • Posts: 2,181
Re: 17-40L too soft for my 5Ds. What should I get instead?

canon35l wrote:

Hi all,

I use my 17-40L for daylight shooting mostly during hikes/trips/vacation in the city and nature, but it's really too soft for my taste. Because of that I've been taking lately my 35L instead of the 17-40, but too many times the 35 is not wide enough...

The natural candidate is the 16-35 f/4L IS, however it is quite heavy and big, so I wondered if anyone has in mind other options I should consider?

17-40 1.05 lb

16-35 1.35 lb

It is worth every one of those extra ounces over the 17-40, the first time I open the images from the 16-35 it's sharpness was clearly evident over my 17-40 it cured me of my Zeis infatuation.

I don't mind getting a prime in the wide side of this range, since the 5Ds allows plenty of cropping.However, I would still appreciate a zoom, since I couple this lens with the 70-300L when I travel light.

Note that I am interested in AF lenses only. Thanks in advance for sharing your opinion!

 Don Lacy's gear list:Don Lacy's gear list
Canon EOS-1D Mark III Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EOS M100 Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II +11 more
BlueRay2 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,816
Re: 17-40L too soft for my 5Ds. What should I get instead?

mclaren777 wrote:

The 16-35mm f/4 is the most logical choice.

It's foolishly sharp!

+1

and if you really want to go crazy, go for the new canon 11-24 f4.0 bad-boy

salamander1 Senior Member • Posts: 1,427
Re: 17-40L too soft for my 5Ds. What should I get instead?

The natural candidate is the 16-35 f/4L IS, however it is quite heavy and big,

what, you're joking, right?

BlueRay2 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,816
Re: 17-40L too soft for my 5Ds. What should I get instead?

salamander1 wrote:

The natural candidate is the 16-35 f/4L IS, however it is quite heavy and big,

what, you're joking, right?

indeed, these guys crack me up when they consider a 16-35 f4.0IS "heavy" i guess they drink their beer through straw now because beer cans are too heavy to lift

OP canon35l Regular Member • Posts: 115
Re: 17-40L too soft for my 5Ds. What should I get instead?

Well, maybe I have a physical disability you are not aware of? maybe heavier lens means for me less photos and more pain?

I wrote that I use zoom lenses when light weight is important for me, so the weight is an important factor in my decision.

 canon35l's gear list:canon35l's gear list
Canon EF 35mm F1.4L USM Canon EF 85mm F1.2L II USM Canon EF 135mm F2L USM Canon EOS 5DS Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM +1 more
OP canon35l Regular Member • Posts: 115
Re: 17-40L too soft for my 5Ds. What should I get instead?

Thanks all, seems like the 16-35 IS is the way to go.

Thanks

 canon35l's gear list:canon35l's gear list
Canon EF 35mm F1.4L USM Canon EF 85mm F1.2L II USM Canon EF 135mm F2L USM Canon EOS 5DS Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM +1 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads