DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)

Started Jun 29, 2015 | User reviews
Marco Nero
Marco Nero Veteran Member • Posts: 7,582
REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)
41

My EOS-M with the EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens this morning...
.
The Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens is a decent lens and well worth the small, reasonable price that it retails for. In fact it ought to receive an award for the price alone. It weighs a mere 105 grams and that's a mere fraction the weight of some of the lenses I've been using on the EOS-M camera body. In fact, at $105 per lens, that's just $1 per gram!  On the EOS-M, which has an APS-C sized sensor with a 1.6x crop factor, the 22mm lens equates to around a 35mm wide field of view.  This makes it an obvious choice for a walkabout lens so that's exactly how I approached it when I took these photographs over a two day period prior to writing this review. The lens barrel is metal (good!) but the lens doesn't come with a lend hood (bad!) and that seems to be a new routine for Canon these days. But the new lens is a fun lens... and on the EOS-M, which is already a fun camera to use, it's like having an all new camera to play with again.
.
I've been using the Canon EOS-M daily since the day of release! - with my much larger Canon EF lenses.  I bought the Camera Body with no lenses (Body Only + EF-M/EF adapter) and it was a great decision because I've never enjoyed photography as much as when using this camera. It's a fantastic camera but without a native EF-M lens mounted, it was heavy, large and unwieldy. Now that I've migrated my EF lenses to a Full Frame DSLR, I thought it was time to revisit the EOS-M with a smaller native lens and the EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens was an obvious choice.  Quite a few forum members here have been asking me why I didn't get this lens sooner.  The answer is simple:  I didn't have a need for it.  But now I do.  Now I need a SMALL camera with a SMALL lens that takes a good picture in any typical lighting situation.  I bought three different jackets with an EOS-M sized pocket to carry this camera in and over the last few days I've attended all manner of events with this camera accompanying me without anyone noticing it. To avoid lint getting into the camera, I bag it in a zip-lock baggie before pocketing it. I've since removed the camera strap (something I've never bothered to do before) and it's VERY handy to have such a powerful little camera in my pocket and on hand.  The following images are all JPEGS from the camera with minimal editing.
.

EOS-M + EF-M 22mm f/2 STM (Wireless Flash and Tripod used ONLY for this shot).
.
HANDLING THE LOW LIGHT:
This is a fairly bright lens at f/2.0 and it's especially useful if you want something to carry to dinner, a day trip to the fair or a dinner party.  I found that I could comfortably shoot in Manual mode with this lens to control shutter speed and aperture but it was also a great, low-profile lens to be walking around in the city at night with.  With an external flash, it performs admirably and I could easily capture sharp, clean images with a narrow aperture if desired. This lens produces some pleasant bokeh at wider apertures, much more than a compact camera is capable of.  Headshots and portraits in low light or at night will always offer some degree of bokeh with this lens.  Image Stabilization isn't really needed on an f/2 lens when it's on an APS-C sensor because there's plenty of light coming through the lens and the larger sensor soaks it up... as these picture below demonstrate.  Camera phones can now capture great low light shots but they tend to be noisy with less dynamic range to play with.  i watched people I was with (including my wife) trying to take similar shots in the same light with varying degrees of success. 
.

EOS-M + EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens (handheld)

EOS-M + EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens (handheld) - some nice detail here.

EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens (resting on a pier)

EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens (handheld)

LOWLIGHT/NIGHT SHOTS with the EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens
.
Auto Focus SPEED and ACCURACY:
The 22mm lens is not the fastest lens I've used on the EOS-M but it's generally faster than Canon compact cameras and it appears to have little trouble shooting in very low light if you aim for something that has a little bit of contrasting detail.  Out of 3,000 pictures taken over the weekend, I had about 4 that were out of focus.  Only one was inexplicable.  In one instance the camera/lens focused on the reflections in a shop window.  On another occasion I was shooting from a moving car window at passing objects in the DARK so that made sense to me.  So generally speaking, the lens was fast enough and quite accurate.  In a dimly lit room that was not dark but with all the window shutters closed, I have a consistent 3/4 second (three quarters of a second/ 0.65 second) delay in achieving AF lock... which was very good.  I had no trouble focusing on a couple smooching halfway down a dark alley in Chinatown at night (I asked them to stand there, so don't worry, I wasn't being a voyeur) and I've since raised the shadow details in Lightroom before posting the picture here (above).  I had just a small amount of trouble focusing on fireworks that were going off nearby until I focused on the lights in the distance and then recomposed.  AF accuracy was actually very good.
.
Using Manual Focus requires this feature to be engaged on your EOS-M camera Menu.  I set mine so that I can focus using AF and then I can turn the outer ring of the lens to manually focus the shot (I photographed the Amethyst crystals this way coupled with the Magnify Feature).
.
BURST MODE:
Burst mode with this lens is similar to using the EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro USM lens on the EOS-M - I could hold my finger down on the shutter-release button and the EOS-M would fire off three (3) shots in quick succession before immediately slowing down considerably to something closer to 2 shots per second until I stopped shooting.  The Specs for the EOS-M state 4.3fps but it never seems to feel that fast.
.
It sounds kinda like this: "CHICK-CHICK-CHICK... KER-CHUNK KER-CHUNK KER-CHUNK" etc.
This is clearly a camera limitation but I do get variations of this depending on the lens being used on the camera at the time. 
.

CLOSEUP PHOTOGRAPHY:
The lens can physically focus if you're closer than 6 inches from your subject.  But considering the APS-C sensor size on the EOS-M camera, I suppose this is to be expected.  I could have gotten closer to the Dandelion, Cat and Amethyst Crystals but was prevented by distance from getting any closer to the Vase and tree Leaves.  The dew drops on the Rose were at the minimum focusing distance limitation of 5.9 inches.
.

CLOSEUPS with the EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens
.
AFTERTHOUGHTS:
In retrospect, I'm enjoying this lens.  It produces good results in most environments.  The only challenge I had was photographing a black cat alongside a white cat that was sitting in the sunlight streaming into a darkened room (using P-Mode) ... and again, that wasn't really the lens but a limitation in the camera.  Such a small lens on such a tiny camera means it can be handled with one hand and you can use your thumb to shift the AF reticule.  One thing I experienced with this lens was that I accidentally touched the One-Touch-Shutter release button on the touch screen several times.  In my years using the EOS-M with larger lenses, I'd never previously bumped this button and always wondered why others complained about accidentally doing it themselves.  Obviously I used to hold my camera differently with the larger EF lenses.
.
I used to find the tiny lens element (one of the smallest in the world!) to be a little odd at first sight.  But it grows on you.  It's also extremely well protected and much easier to clean if required.  I feel that this lens is rather 'contrasted' compared to other Canon lenses, especially those featuring faster glass.  The contrast on this lens is decent and the images are generally crisp.  I did experience some slight banding in the shadows when lifting them during editing. Then again, I shot all of these images in JPEG so perhaps some minor noise was to be expected.  On the other hand, the color from this lens appeared very slightly muted but only compared to my other lenses.  It was so slight that I was easily able to tweak this when processing.
.

ARCHITECTURE with the EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens.
.
I tend to cover a lot of subject types with my individual lenses and wide Prime lenses are almost always more practical (and flexible) for all-purpose photography than specialist lenses.  I tend to photograph landscapes, architecture, food (see below!) and nature with wider lenses. I'm actually THAT GUY in the fine restaurant that will embarrass everyone by pulling out an enormous DSLR camera with an ENORMOUS lens from under the table to snap a shot of my meal if it looks good enough.  Most of that embarrassment can now be avoided with this 22mm f/2 lens on the EOS-M.  It's VERY subtle with this lens and it's fantastic value for money.
.
All in all, the EF 22mm f/2 STM lens is a great LITTLE lens that, much like the EOS-M itself, punches way above its weight and still wins.  I'm giving this lens 4 STARS out of five. Optically there's no much they can do to improve this lens but a MF/AF switch would have been useful and the lack of an included Lens Hood in the box is my main reason for knocking it down a star from 5.  I think Canon deliberately held off supplying one to keep the price down and it's hard to argue with that logic when you see people selling this lens for close to USD $105. Image quality is excellent and the images are always of a consistent quality. The 43mm diameter filter threads might prove challenging although this is the first lens I have no intention of mounting a filter to.
.
It's made my EOS-M fun to use all over again!
.

FOOD!  Various images of food that I had an opportunity to photograph with this lens.
.

-
Regards,
Marco Nero.

 Marco Nero's gear list:Marco Nero's gear list
Canon EOS M6 Canon EOS Ra Canon EOS R6 Canon EF-M 32mm F1.4 Canon RF 85mm F1.2L USM +20 more
Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM
Wideangle prime lens • Canon EF-M • 5985B002
Announced: Jul 23, 2012
Marco Nero's score
4.0
Average community score
4.2
HaroldC3
HaroldC3 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,067
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)
3

Thank you for taking the time to write such a thorough and thoughtdul review.

I tend to not use the 22mm lens enough since I have the 18-55mm but I will force myself to use it and am very happy with the results when I do.
--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/photosbyharold/

 HaroldC3's gear list:HaroldC3's gear list
Canon EOS M6 Nikon Z7 Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Canon EF-M 15-45mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Nikon Z 14-30mm F4 +3 more
Abu Mahendra Veteran Member • Posts: 5,312
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)
2

Not sure about the "muted colours"...

-- hide signature --

>> I love the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II lens! <<

 Abu Mahendra's gear list:Abu Mahendra's gear list
Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM +5 more
(unknown member) Forum Pro • Posts: 11,521
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)
1

You do these so well, you really do need a blog on your reviews.

excellent writeup and wonderful examples - once again.

JRET
JRET Contributing Member • Posts: 840
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)
3

I'm not sure whether I'm more impressed with your thorough & very informative reviews or with the outstanding results you achieve with the M system. You truly have been an inspiration to me (and probably many others) as I attempt to get the very best images from my M (and other cameras, too).

Thanks for sharing and please keep doing so.

 JRET's gear list:JRET's gear list
Canon EOS M6 II Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Canon EF-M 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Canon EF-M 32mm F1.4 +7 more
Markintosh
Markintosh Senior Member • Posts: 1,970
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)

Great review, Marco!

I knew you will like this lens:) Next one is 11-22:)) You will have so much fun with it!

-- hide signature --

Thanks,
Markintosh.

 Markintosh's gear list:Markintosh's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS M Voigtlander 40mm F2 Ultron SL II Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC HSM Art +8 more
Jefenator
Jefenator Senior Member • Posts: 2,866
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)
1

This lens is the reason I bought into the EOS-M system. No one else seems to have anything quite like it.

Sony's SEL24 is much bigger and more expensive. (FWIW all that bulk and money gets you slightly more character, better sunstars, faster AF and a higher quality "feel".)

IMHO Canon's 22/2 realizes the true potential for APS-C mirrorless to be compact, with very little IQ compromise.

I would love to see more lenses like this.

 Jefenator's gear list:Jefenator's gear list
Sony a7 Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Sony FE 90mm F2.8 macro Sony Alpha NEX-7 +8 more
adventurer69
adventurer69 Senior Member • Posts: 1,938
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)

With these photos , all I can say is wow !

 adventurer69's gear list:adventurer69's gear list
Canon PowerShot A590 IS Canon PowerShot SD880 IS Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Canon EOS M Canon EOS M50 +11 more
Cameleon
Cameleon Regular Member • Posts: 267
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)

Good review. Another great EFM lens is 11-22mm f/4-f/5.6. I am sure you would love it too. In EOS-M3,there is a MF button,you can use manual focus in EFM's lenses.

Markintosh
Markintosh Senior Member • Posts: 1,970
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)

Cameleon wrote:

Good review. Another great EFM lens is 11-22mm f/4-f/5.6. I am sure you would love it too. In EOS-M3,there is a MF button,you can use manual focus in EFM's lenses.

In both cameras (M and M3, pretty sure M2 is the same) if you half press shutter button and turning focusing ring on EFM lens — it switches to MF automatically

-- hide signature --

Thanks,
Markintosh.

 Markintosh's gear list:Markintosh's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS M Voigtlander 40mm F2 Ultron SL II Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC HSM Art +8 more
HSantosa
HSantosa New Member • Posts: 4
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)
1

Nice piece of Writing Marco,

I Noticed some snapshots indicate asian region, dont spose ur in the neighborhood eh?

Just had my M3 + 18-55MM set last night, no bag to boot...sigh

Havent had a chance to test out the camera but from the minimum amount of exploring last night at the store, the menus are very welcomed dslr layout and it makes me feel right at home.

the only thing that makes it feel awkward is the missing viewfinder which for a mirrorless seems a bit stretching it thin, especially when the eyepiece can be bought for an astronomical price here in Indonesia.

Keep writing, keep exemplifying

-- hide signature --

To Click...or Not to Click

 HSantosa's gear list:HSantosa's gear list
Canon EOS 350D Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II Canon EF-S 10-22mm F3.5-4.5 USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM +7 more
sueanne
sueanne Forum Pro • Posts: 21,078
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)

Beautiful

 sueanne's gear list:sueanne's gear list
Canon PowerShot A510 Canon PowerShot A650 IS Canon PowerShot SD880 IS Canon PowerShot S3 IS Canon PowerShot S110 +3 more
hmayle Junior Member • Posts: 28
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)

Fantastic lens. Price has more than doubled though....:-(

beagle1 Forum Pro • Posts: 11,740
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)

hmayle wrote:

Fantastic lens. Price has more than doubled though....:-(

right, Canon realized they had a winner and jacked up the price, you can still get it refurbished (sometimes) for $199

www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless

Ben Herrmann
Ben Herrmann Forum Pro • Posts: 21,163
Ditto, ditto, ditto...
1

Well stated (even though this post is 2 years old) - both about the lens and the M. I love the little 22 MM, but alas, I don't use it much anymore. For me personally, I need IS so I tend to use the other lenses that have IS (getting older now myself and I need the stability). But when I bring a tripod or monopod, then the 22 comes with me.

As for the M, for general photography scenarios, this one camera still punches far above its weight. I realize it's all very subjective, but to me the M feels great (I added the 3rd party metal grip) and looks attractive. But it's that gorgeous color tonality which makes me smile (along with the M2 - which is a tad smaller than the M).

That's why the M (and 22) are stayin' in my vast collection of goodies.

You know, as an aside, it's funny in that many folks shoot with different brands of cameras - me definitely included within that demographic. And I love shooting with them all as each brand something unique to the table. And if you're of the mindset that evaluates everything with the "glass is half empty" mindset, then yes, you can find many things wrong with the M (like with many other cameras also).

But when you just go out and start shooting - again, in general photography whether it be scenic, street, family gatherings, architectural and real estate, etc - you come to appreciate the M for being the gem it still is.

Another inexpensive model that really has surprised me in a most positive way is the M10. Although considered an entry level model, I am amazed at the gorgeous imagery it can capture - albeit the color tonality has shifted more towards more yellowish/greenish hues in certain environments (the M3 also). Not having the M5 of M6, I can't attest to how much the color tonality has changed with those models.

Now if only Canon could translate all those EF-M patents they've submitted over the past few years into actual releases, then lots more folks would enter the fold (IMO, that is). Heck, I'm still crossing my fingers about Canon releasing a reasonably priced, yet quality lens that has roughly a 24-120 MM equivalent as I've found that focal length to be outstanding for a "leave it on your camera all the time" lens.

-- hide signature --

Sincerely,
Bernd ("Ben") Herrmann
Fuquay Varina, North Carolina USA

 Ben Herrmann's gear list:Ben Herrmann's gear list
Canon EOS M Fujifilm X-E2S Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-T20 Canon EOS M6 +4 more
Doug_PS
Doug_PS Contributing Member • Posts: 812
Re: Ditto, ditto, ditto...

Ben Herrmann wrote:

....Another inexpensive model that really has surprised me in a most positive way is the M10. Although considered an entry level model, I am amazed at the gorgeous imagery it can capture....

I’ve seen various posts of yours Ben where you express how much you’ve enjoyed the M10 for it’s small size, simplicity, image quality, etc... I just purchased the M100 deal on Canon’s site (M100, 15-45, Adapter for $50). I’m looking forward to having a small lightweight camera that’s easy to take anywhere (travel, hiking, etc...) and that will also work beautifully with my various FF lenses....if I so choose.

 Doug_PS's gear list:Doug_PS's gear list
Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EOS M6 Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM +9 more
Ben Herrmann
Ben Herrmann Forum Pro • Posts: 21,163
Here's "da thang..."
4

...and it's not that the M10 and M100 should be called absolute entry level models. Whenever I read this in some type of review, I just shake my head because if you go into the menu setup, you will see plenty of options to tailor the camera the way you want it go. The fun part is that once you've got your settings locked in, you just start shooting and it garners so much more enjoyment.

And then, if you've done everything right (after all, 50% of all IQ successes are a result of the Photographer), you will be amazed at the IQ you can achieve. That's why of all cameras - that M10 - really just threw me for a loop. And I can only imagine that the M100 will be in the same boat. As an aside, I wonder what this pending (rumored) M50 is going to be all about that Canon is supposedly going to release over the next several months.

Yes, I plan on eventually getting the M100 because just about all of the reviews so far have been very very positive. In the end, it's the quality of the images that I'm aiming for and the samples I've seen (well-taken images, that is) looked surprisingly good. The thing for me though is that every time (anymore) if I elect to get another friekin' camera, I look at all that I have and I decline to do so.

The other day I went "Autumn colors" peeping.  I took the M2 with EF-S 10-18 f4.5-5.6 IS with me, along with the M10 and kit 15-45.  Here are some of those M10 images that I didn't post.  I had created a separate thread about Autumn colors in which I posted the M2 photos of the same things.  Click on the "Original Size" link below each image to bring up sharper, larger versions.

-- hide signature --

Sincerely,
Bernd ("Ben") Herrmann
Fuquay Varina, North Carolina USA

 Ben Herrmann's gear list:Ben Herrmann's gear list
Canon EOS M Fujifilm X-E2S Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-T20 Canon EOS M6 +4 more
beagle1 Forum Pro • Posts: 11,740
Re: Ditto, ditto, ditto...

Doug_PS wrote:

Ben Herrmann wrote:

....Another inexpensive model that really has surprised me in a most positive way is the M10. Although considered an entry level model, I am amazed at the gorgeous imagery it can capture....

I’ve seen various posts of yours Ben where you express how much you’ve enjoyed the M10 for it’s small size, simplicity, image quality, etc... I just purchased the M100 deal on Canon’s site (M100, 15-45, Adapter for $50). I’m looking forward to having a small lightweight camera that’s easy to take anywhere (travel, hiking, etc...) and that will also work beautifully with my various FF lenses....if I so choose.

right,  both small but I'd pick the newer M100

(unknown member) Regular Member • Posts: 266
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)
2

Great combo- I use it all the time when travelling.

Vila Real de Santo Antonio, Portugal

Barcelona, Spain

Bavaria, Germany

All in all, I like the EOSM with the 22mm for a walk around combo on holiday.

I bought the 50mm and adaptor, which I use too.

I also have the 70-200mm f2.8II which is amazing.

I haven't felt the need to update my digital camera since I bought the M (fire sale price purchase with the 22/ zoom combo), and as I shoot mainly on 4x5 inch film for exhibitions, only really use the M for holiday snaps, and teaching (my students love it, and a few have bought the M10 as a result). I'll use it until it dies, and then see what is available. The M replaced a Fuji F30, which was retired after many years of service, and only ceased to be useful when a bug flew into the lens and decomposed on the sensor (yuk).

-- hide signature --

jfa3000
www.fredfoto.net

HeyItsJoel
HeyItsJoel Senior Member • Posts: 1,206
Re: REVIEW: EF-M 22mm f/2 lens on my aging EOS-M (PICS)
1

Marco Nero wrote:
It sounds kinda like this: "CHICK-CHICK-CHICK... KER-CHUNK KER-CHUNK KER-CHUNK" etc.

I call dibs on a trademark for this mating call!

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads