DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

panasonic 14mm f2.5

Started May 3, 2015 | Discussions
ianastronomy Regular Member • Posts: 286
panasonic 14mm f2.5

Hi What is the difference between the panasonic 14mm f2.5 and the newer 14mm f2.5ii . You can buy the mark i version for a lot less  . Is it worth the extra money for the mark 2 . Thanks  Ian

 ianastronomy's gear list:ianastronomy's gear list
Olympus E-M5 III +1 more
Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 II ASPH
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ajendus
ajendus Regular Member • Posts: 189
Re: panasonic 14mm f2.5

I believe it is the same lens internally but the new 14 and 20mm (mk2's) are of metal construction and other cosmetic changes.

-- hide signature --

-A

 ajendus's gear list:ajendus's gear list
Nikon D700 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Nikon D500 Fujifilm X-T20 Fujifilm X-H1 +17 more
C Sean Veteran Member • Posts: 3,423
Re: panasonic 14mm f2.5

Far as I am aware the mark II is just an up to date exterior to match the modern G lenses. Where before they used to be grey with black manual rings(zoom + focus), now most Panasonic lenses are completely black.

The true successor to the 14mm 2.5 is the 15mm 1.7 IMO but it only worth getting if you're doing low light wide shots or otherwise you will be wasting your money. The 14mm 2.5 is a great and practical lens. If you have a small MFT camera then with this lens, it make an light traveling camera.

AdamT
AdamT Forum Pro • Posts: 62,285
Re: panasonic 14mm f2.5

As the others have said, absolutely Buggerall of any consequence , unless you desperately need a Panasonic GM1 to sit straight on the desk with it on (the Mk1 is a bit larger so it tilts the cam)

There is a bit of sample variation with the 14mm F2.5, mine is very sharp wideopen edge to edge , in fact the edges are a lot better than any of the 20mm F1.7s I`ve owned (about 4 over the years) both lenses wideopen and just as good both set at F2.8 !! . I find Focus accuracy is better than the 20mm too and considerably faster . The lens isn`t as sharp as the 20mm overall but its damn sharp enough .

This is an underrated lens, it makes the GM1 into a true pocket compact .. prob is that both the Panny 12-32 Pancake zoom and even more so the 14-42-IIHD are almost as good wideopen , and although almost a stop slower , they do have OIS ......

I find the 14 F2.5 more at home on Olympus bodies which have IBIS , it makes a fantastic Bodycap for the EM1

-- hide signature --

** Please ignore the Typos, I'm the world's worst Typist **

 AdamT's gear list:AdamT's gear list
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Nikon D3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 Nikon Z7 Nikon Z9
Paulmorgan Veteran Member • Posts: 9,499
Re: panasonic 14mm f2.5

ianastronomy wrote:

Hi What is the difference between the panasonic 14mm f2.5 and the newer 14mm f2.5ii . You can buy the mark i version for a lot less . Is it worth the extra money for the mark 2 . Thanks Ian

Its the same lens but its iven a new outer shell, its now metal opposed to the older black/grey, all black, plastic lenses.

OP ianastronomy Regular Member • Posts: 286
Re: panasonic 14mm f2.5

Thanks for your replies . I have a panny gx7 with the 14-42 lens . I may just stick with it or maybe 154mm f2.5 version 1

 ianastronomy's gear list:ianastronomy's gear list
Olympus E-M5 III +1 more
Paulmorgan Veteran Member • Posts: 9,499
Re: panasonic 14mm f2.5

ianastronomy wrote:

Thanks for your replies . I have a panny gx7 with the 14-42 lens . I may just stick with it or maybe 154mm f2.5 version 1

Do you mean the 14mm.

The 14mm is a very useful little lens on a GX7, excluding the body cap lenses the 14mm is still the smallest currently made for M4/3.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads