DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

First impressions Oly 40-150mm f2.8

Started Apr 6, 2015 | User reviews
(unknown member) Veteran Member • Posts: 3,098
First impressions Oly 40-150mm f2.8
8

Last week I was able to buy this lens 'cheap', because of an error on a website of a camera store. They mis-priced it by 400 euro's, I was the only one to react in time. I did not complain. This weekend I had my first outing. Took it to the streets of Amsterdam. All on an EM-1, raw processed in Lightroom.

Shooting down from a dock on a frantically moving swan in a feeding frenzy. Stopped down a bit to acquire a bit more depth-of-field to increase chances of the head being in focus. The detail of the water droplets on the head is great.

Out of focus areas nicely have low contrast, good texture on the seahorse. Zoom in on the head and notice the spider webbing... No abberations.

Excellent natural color rendering. Would have liked a bit more DoF here, and the out of focus areas a little less contrasty. Great sharpness.

A good example why shallow DoF is nice, but not always good. The guy on the left is in focus, the other one isn't. Distance, some 8 meters. Slightly cropped image. Nice color rendering!

Don't know if this shot tells anything about this lens... just a fun shot... reflection of the banana-bar in the red light district  (flipped and rotated in post).

Again nice color rendering. Texture on the coat is nicely preserved. The fence is slightly out of focus, again shallow DoF. Distance was some 15 meters. Cropped image, 2/3's.

A nice example of the amount of detail this lens is able to resolve. Just pixel peep the bottom of the red neon letters. This lens will be great for landscapes! And... It answers most 'M4/3 good for landscape?' threads

Nice sharpness across the frame, see the people and street lamps. Focus was on the couple at the right. The out of focus tree branches are a bit to busy (bokeh) for my taste though.

Focus was around the center on the shadows. The two sitting, in the corner, are reasonably sharp! So no problem with corner sharpness.

Focus was on the girl looking right at me. Nice contrast, sharp enough. Would have liked a little less contrast in out of focus areas.

Look at the detail in his face through the dreads, and his hand.

Focused on the sun flower. Nice shallow DoF. Smooth bokeh. Distance was about 6 to 7 meters.

Nice contrast (increased a tiny bit in post).

Had some more shots with my wife in the picture, she did not like the lens... it was to sharp, showed to much detail of here face (pores, hair, etc.)

I find the lens to be tack sharp. You can get shallow DoF if you need to. Getting close to your subject helps of course.

Of course, shooting street with this lens, it is difficult to capture images that tell a story, most of the times the FoV is to narrow. But it is great for portraits. It costs an arm and a leg, but I think I will be happy with it.

Will be shooting some more the next couple of weeks.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 Pro
Telephoto zoom lens • Micro Four Thirds • V315050BU000
Announced: Sep 15, 2014
pocoloco's score
4.5
Average community score
4.8
Dabbler
Dabbler Senior Member • Posts: 2,038
Re: First impressions Oly 40-150mm f2.8

Thanks for all these samples, I've been thinking of getting this lens. I like the focal range of the 14-140mm but the lens lacks sharpness in a big way.

They size and weight of the lens is tough to swallow too. The price is par for the course given the IQ from this lens.

-- hide signature --

Michael

 Dabbler's gear list:Dabbler's gear list
Sony RX10 III Nikon D800 Sony a6000 Nikon 1 V3 Sony a7S +16 more
Hen3ry
Hen3ry Forum Pro • Posts: 18,218
Excellent set and commentary, loco

Demonstrating the lens's performance -- and your ability! -- nicely. Looks like we can look forward to some interesting pix from this combination.

-- hide signature --

Geoffrey Heard
Down and out in Rabaul in the South Pacific
http://rabaulpng.com/we-are-all-traveling-throug/i-waited-51-years-for-tavur.html

 Hen3ry's gear list:Hen3ry's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic G85 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Panasonic Lumix G X Vario PZ 45-175mm F4.0-5.6 ASPH OIS +7 more
OP (unknown member) Veteran Member • Posts: 3,098
Re: First impressions Oly 40-150mm f2.8
1

Dabbler wrote:

Thanks for all these samples, I've been thinking of getting this lens. I like the focal range of the 14-140mm but the lens lacks sharpness in a big way.

They size and weight of the lens is tough to swallow too. The price is par for the course given the IQ from this lens.

If you are coming from a dslr, it probably is not that big/heavy. I carry it around using black-rapid shoulder strap. The strap comes across my chest, the camera hangs at one if my sides. I find it easy to carry, and I do not notice the wait.

If money/weight are a concern, their are some cheaper and lighter alternatives. Without pixelpeeping, it may be difficult to tell the difference. The Oly 40-150R ( i forgot the aperture ) is a lens others are happy with, I myself first bought the Panny 45-150, even lighter and smaller. I am very satisfied with its performance. If performances like this are okay for you :

OM10, 1600 iso, panny 45-150 at 150mm, cropped image.

... then one of the lighter cheaper lenses is definitely an option as well.

Unless you have a GAS attack like I did and you just need to have the big one

OP (unknown member) Veteran Member • Posts: 3,098
Ooops... forgot the...

... obligatory new-gear-cat-shot

Roger Engelken
Roger Engelken Veteran Member • Posts: 5,558
Re: Ooops... forgot the...

Well then why not the obligatory (or not so much) dog shot!

Thank you for the time and effort on the review.  That lens is a joy to have, to be sure.  

 Roger Engelken's gear list:Roger Engelken's gear list
Olympus PEN E-P5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 Olympus E-M1 II +29 more
boxerman Senior Member • Posts: 1,946
Re: First impressions Oly 40-150mm f2.8

Well, totally convincing on the sharpness issue. Also convincing that you have to think a fair amount about depth of field.

I wonder what you think about lightening up some of your subjects, like the swan, the people on bridge, and the dreadlocks (possibly even seahorse)? In cases where you have a lighter background, you could squeeze a little contrast out of it (e.g., via flattening curves at the high end of brightness) for a better emphasis on the subject. I left these images in (below) so that people don't have to look back

With that discount, I might be temped, too. But, at the moment, I'm considering it a specialty lens that I might rent for trips where it would be extremely valuable (big game).

pocoloco wrote:

This one seems perfect for lightening both subjects and background (hence more backgrounding the background. Easily accomplished with curves, I think.

Like some others, the subject looks a little dark to me (though I'm using a not-great laptop screen). Again, worth a try to background the background even more by pushing it to a high key.

Thanks much.

-- hide signature --

The BoxerMan

 boxerman's gear list:boxerman's gear list
Olympus E-M1 III Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Pro +4 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads