DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

How good is the Samsung 16-50mm f/2-2.8 S really?

Started Feb 24, 2015 | Questions
Grabbe New Member • Posts: 2
How good is the Samsung 16-50mm f/2-2.8 S really?

Based on the NX1 reviews and the latest firmware news I am interested in this camera. My first lens would be the 16-50mm S. My main concern is that while the 16-50mm lens received mainly positive reviews, several reviewers (e.g. slrgear) noticed chromatic aberrations beyond what comparable lenses show. I have been looking at the Samsung forum from time to time, but this topic was either not discussed or I missed it.
So, what are your experiences? How much sharpness is lost due to the corrections? And in Lightroom, is any manual post-processing necessary to deal with CAs, or do I simply enable the correction?

Thank you very much in advance.

ANSWER:
Samsung 16-50mm F2.0-2.8 Samsung NX1
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
arbuz Senior Member • Posts: 2,247
Re: How good is the Samsung 16-50mm f/2-2.8 S really?

Grabbe wrote:

Based on the NX1 reviews and the latest firmware news I am interested in this camera. My first lens would be the 16-50mm S. My main concern is that while the 16-50mm lens received mainly positive reviews, several reviewers (e.g. slrgear) noticed chromatic aberrations beyond what comparable lenses show. I have been looking at the Samsung forum from time to time, but this topic was either not discussed or I missed it.
So, what are your experiences? How much sharpness is lost due to the corrections? And in Lightroom, is any manual post-processing necessary to deal with CAs, or do I simply enable the correction?

Thank you very much in advance.

I'm using DXO Optics pro 10 and 16-50S on NX30. There is no profile for this lens but DXO has some automatic correction even if there is no lens profile. With this in mind, I see very little to no abberations. So removing is definitely possible.

Regarding sharpness, is not as sharp as 30mm f2 (sharpest lens samsung made). But is way sharper than e.g. 16mm 2.4.

I think sharpness is not a problem esp. wide open. What I find troubling on occassion is high field curvate on longet focal lenghts. Sometimes even when I stop down to 5.6 to take pciture of some more distant subject (e.g. 100m) at e.g. 40mm, objects away from the center are definitely not in focus even when they're in the similar same distance from me that object in the center.

 arbuz's gear list:arbuz's gear list
Nikon D600 Samsung NX300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Samsung NX30 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS +14 more
selected answer This post was selected as the answer by the original poster.
Tugela Contributing Member • Posts: 755
Re: How good is the Samsung 16-50mm f/2-2.8 S really?
1

Objects far from the observer would be in an arc if of equal distance, not a plane. Objects in a plane are actually at different distances.

 Tugela's gear list:Tugela's gear list
Nikon Coolpix P900 Sony RX100 V Nikon Coolpix P1000 Samsung NX1
viking79
viking79 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,157
Re: How good is the Samsung 16-50mm f/2-2.8 S really?
1

The least interesting lens issue is lateral chromatic aberration, it can so easily be removed in post processing.

I would also point out that there was a time period where Lightroom was actually adding chromatic aberrations into the NX1 images, so depending on what version was used for the review could impact how much they saw.

Eric

 viking79's gear list:viking79's gear list
Sony a7R Samsung NX1 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 85mm F1.4 ED SSA Samsung NX 60mm F2.8 Macro ED OIS SSA +5 more
Krish K New Member • Posts: 13
Re: How good is the Samsung 16-50mm f/2-2.8 S really?
1

Hi,

Is there a lens profile for correction in lightroom for S lenses? I only see 4 lenses for samsung.

Please let me know how to add 16-50mm to that list. Thanks!

 Krish K's gear list:Krish K's gear list
Samsung NX1 Samsung NX 50-200mm F4-5.6 OIS Samsung NX 85mm F1.4 ED SSA Samsung 16-50mm F2.0-2.8 Samsung 50-150mm F2.8 S
STexan Contributing Member • Posts: 657
Re: How good is the Samsung 16-50mm f/2-2.8 S really?

No Adobe lens profiles for any of the Samsung "S" lenses as of today.

-- hide signature --

Robert K

 STexan's gear list:STexan's gear list
Samsung NX1 Samsung 16-50mm F2.0-2.8 Samsung 50-150mm F2.8 S +2 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads