Vesku wrote:
Aberaeron wrote:
Vesku wrote:
Aberaeron wrote:
Compare this video posted some time ago in the posts above
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMTIDEJpiT8
With one I did earlier this evening just after reading the latest missives in this topic.
Straight out of the camera and compacted for upload with HandBrake with the only editing to the music, because I had Shania Twaine on the ute's radio and Youtube didn't like it [copyright issues].
https://youtu.be/c_rRY88fuss Hope that link works. If not I'll get back to it tomorrow.
I just set the camera to Impressive Art monochrome and shot it completely naturally as any family video would be taken by Joe Blogs. Held it relatively still to mimic the link at the top, did a bit of panning at different rates and a bit of quick zooming. For most of the time I was holding the camera with one hand, as you can see [my other hand] in part of the video.
Its is nothing like the one in the link at the top and I have NEVER seen anything remotely like that with either lens or with either in any combination with my cameras.
Camera is G7 and lens 14/140 MkII
In your example there is just few seconds when you hold the camera still enough to see that jittering. The quality of that video is also soft and the Youtube 720/50P smooths away the little fast jittering. I would like to see a sharp very stationary (not moving) hand held video shooted with 4k 30P. If there is then no jittering I would say your hands are super steady. The OIS of the 14-140mm II gives quite good results if the user can hold the camera super steady like a sniper rifle.
You are in cloud-cuckoo-land. There is no jitter in that video on Youtube or original. There are several points where the camera is held relatively still and also panned to follow an animal and there is NO jitter. It was shot in 1080 50p and only downsized slightly for uploading. NO Youtube smoothing has been applied.
Youtube 720/50P has very poor video quality. It smooths and pixelates any movement.
I shot it at 1080 50P not 720. The video is just as steady at 1080 but took me an hour to upload even when compressed by HandBrake.
There is no jitter. Get over it.
All my videos with that lens are equally smooth within practical expectations.
I don't use 4K and it is irrelevant to the critics of this lens who have never previously mentioned isolating the issue to 4K which is not available on most cameras that are likely to be in the field.
Almost all new Panasonic cameras record 4k. If the 4k quality with that lens is poor it is an issue. Old 14-42mm has no vibration in 4k. It is so good that the vibration with 14-140mm II was a big surprise and disappointment..
New cameras do, but until very recently they didn't and you have complained about this since before 4K. The reason I don't shoot 4k is that my iMac can't handle it well and I have no 4K monitoring facility and am quite satisfied with HD quality.
You are obviously obsessed with this issue, seeing as you bring it up without prompting regularly every few months. Your latest post prompted me to take the combination out with no preparation whatsoever and just hand hold it and post it up to prove that I don't have this issue. The video posted shows this 100% and no amount of your scratching around to say that it has jitter actually makes it so. It just doesn't have any jitter. The contrast with the top link, which you provided, cannot be more plain.
The 14-140mm II OIS works some times well. In movements it is good. It is only when I am trying to keep camera still (not moving) the small fast vibration is there all the time. When I keep my left hand in the lens hood the OIS gives less vibration. Some times with tele shots the lens goes absolutely crazy. It settless eventually but it may go some kind of "vibration loop" or uncontrolled state. I have double checked this phenomenom with another copies.
I do also use the Sony A57 for video, as well as occasionally, on the spur of the moment, all my other cameras, so I can and do compare.
All I can say is that it should be obvious that my sample video was taken handheld, on my feet, one handed and while I was dealing with animals, some inquisitive that I had to deal with. There was no effort whatsoever to hold the camera more still than normal and there are several instances where the camera is obviously held relatively still and I can assure you that the OIS helped steady those sections. With no jitter.
I responded once or twice before about this, a good while ago in other topics you started on this subject, which you do quite regularly, but this time I just got hold of my camera and shot a short video on the hoof [pun intended] to see if I could detect that alleged jitter. You see the result. I could go out now and shoot another one in colour and the result would be the same. I have one somewhere of an excavator working, again hand held, which is far more static and in which a much longer focal length is used. There are plenty of static vertical and horizontal lines to judge how steady it records and it is again fine.
I just don't understand how you seem to consistently get such awful results from this lens when I have no problem with two of them and in combination with any of the compatible cameras I use.
Further, I cannot understand why you keep bringing the same thing up month after month and not generally in response to anyone else asking about it.