DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

do I have a defective E-PM2?

Started May 25, 2014 | Discussions
jalywol
jalywol Forum Pro • Posts: 12,302
Re: Guy...

Definitely leave the 1/8 sec anti shock on all the time.  The first round of shots I took the first day I had the camera were a fuzzy mess until I remembered to do that and also turn off the IBIS.  After that I really had no complaints with the output.

-J

.Sam.
OP .Sam. Veteran Member • Posts: 3,199
same after FW updated.

Updated the FW to 1.2, I'm still getting these artifacts ;-(

-- hide signature --

.Sam.
GF1+20+45 Sigma DP2 & Pentax K20D - ist* DS - ZX-5 - LX
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/shadzee/

 .Sam.'s gear list:.Sam.'s gear list
Sigma DP2 Pentax *ist DS Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Olympus PEN E-P5 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +7 more
Guy Parsons
Guy Parsons Forum Pro • Posts: 40,000
Re: do I have a defective E-PM2?

.Sam. wrote:

thanks. I'm gonna update the firmware and see what happens. I won't try other RAW converters, since they are not part of my workflow. If the RAW's are having issues with Lightroom, then the camera will be going back... ;-(

I strongly suggest trying Olympus Viewer 3 as that will count more when writing the fault report. It will do a default conversion using the jpeg settings found in the RAW so may/not reveal what is happening.

If OV3 does not show the fault then Olympus would tend to blame Lightroom and not think the camera is at fault. If OV3 can be pushed to show the fault then you have a better chance of getting some action.

It certainly is a weird effect, like you turned on an optional "let's add lens flare" feature in the converter.

Oh yes, thanks for the kind words re my pages. They are only intermittently worked on, I seem to be busier doing concreting at the moment at home right now.

Regards....... Guy

photohounds
photohounds Senior Member • Posts: 1,156
Re: do I have a defective E-PM2?

.Sam. wrote:

I use lightroom, and these images are exported from lightroom to a smaller JPG file that I've uploaded.

So far, my understanding is this behavior is NOT normal ?

But is it actually the camera?  It is very odd given that "shooting raw" is merely keeping the unprocessed file.  The JPG engine makes the JPG from that file.
...  as I understand the process, and and then (usually) discards it. Presumably this is because as it takes more space, takes far longer to write to a card and is useful to fewer people as JPGS are instantly viewable on any device that can display images.

-- hide signature --

Well designed gear performs better for longer than well marketed gear.
Odd that people complain a lens is not sharp enough,
and then proceed to make pics where 95% is OOF ..
General Pics:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/
Oly and other .. Gear test samples - even RB-67!:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Gear-tests
How DO OMDs cope with dim-light action and smoke?
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Performing-arts

 photohounds's gear list:photohounds's gear list
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus OM-D E-M1X +7 more
photohounds
photohounds Senior Member • Posts: 1,156
Re: Wow!

Jim Salvas wrote:

photohounds wrote:

Intriguing ..
Changing/fixing the cam made a difference?
What was it, software?

My problem was not the same as the OP's. I was just relating that the warranty service was very fast.

I wish they'd say how this happened.

-- hide signature --

Well designed gear performs better for longer than well marketed gear.
Odd that people complain a lens is not sharp enough,
and then proceed to make pics where 95% is OOF ..
General Pics:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/
Oly and other .. Gear test samples - even RB-67!:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Gear-tests
How DO OMDs cope with dim-light action and smoke?
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Performing-arts

 photohounds's gear list:photohounds's gear list
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus OM-D E-M1X +7 more
photohounds
photohounds Senior Member • Posts: 1,156
Re: do I have a defective E-PM2?

The rear display on cameras displays an embedded thumbnail to speed up chimping operations, I believe.

-- hide signature --

Well designed gear performs better for longer than well marketed gear.
Odd that people complain a lens is not sharp enough,
and then proceed to make pics where 95% is OOF ..
General Pics:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/
Oly and other .. Gear test samples - even RB-67!:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Gear-tests
How DO OMDs cope with dim-light action and smoke?
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Performing-arts

 photohounds's gear list:photohounds's gear list
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus OM-D E-M1X +7 more
photohounds
photohounds Senior Member • Posts: 1,156
Re: How do you transfer the images to the computer?

.Sam. wrote:

I use my MBP retina's built-in SD card reader.

Importing to lightroom, I normally convert RAWs to DNG during import. In this case, either the DNG or ORF files behave similarly, and both have/display the odd artifacts.

What does the OLY software do?

-- hide signature --

Well designed gear performs better for longer than well marketed gear.
Odd that people complain a lens is not sharp enough,
and then proceed to make pics where 95% is OOF ..
General Pics:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/
Oly and other .. Gear test samples - even RB-67!:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Gear-tests
How DO OMDs cope with dim-light action and smoke?
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Performing-arts

 photohounds's gear list:photohounds's gear list
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus OM-D E-M1X +7 more
photohounds
photohounds Senior Member • Posts: 1,156
Re: do I have a defective E-PM2?

.Sam. wrote:

thanks. I'm gonna update the firmware and see what happens. I won't try other RAW converters, since they are not part of my workflow. If the RAW's are having issues with Lightroom, then the camera will be going back... ;-(

If OLY software works correctly, then it is NOT the camera.
It would mean that those 3rd party programs have bugs that are manufacturing what you're seeing.

-- hide signature --

Well designed gear performs better for longer than well marketed gear.
Odd that people complain a lens is not sharp enough,
and then proceed to make pics where 95% is OOF ..
General Pics:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/
Oly and other .. Gear test samples - even RB-67!:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Gear-tests
How DO OMDs cope with dim-light action and smoke?
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Performing-arts

 photohounds's gear list:photohounds's gear list
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus OM-D E-M1X +7 more
EarthQuake Veteran Member • Posts: 3,240
Re: do I have a defective E-PM2?
1

photohounds wrote:

.Sam. wrote:

I use lightroom, and these images are exported from lightroom to a smaller JPG file that I've uploaded.

So far, my understanding is this behavior is NOT normal ?

But is it actually the camera? It is very odd given that "shooting raw" is merely keeping the unprocessed file. The JPG engine makes the JPG from that file.
... as I understand the process, and and then (usually) discards it. Presumably this is because as it takes more space, takes far longer to write to a card and is useful to fewer people as JPGS are instantly viewable on any device that can display images.

I doubt the camera writes the raw to the card, then reads that raw to create the jpeg file, in all likelihood the camera stores the shot in the buffer (RAM) and then writes both the jpeg and raw file. If there is something is corrupt in the saving pipeline (RAM, drive controller, file system, etc) then it is more likely to show up in the RAW file as raw files are much larger and involve writing significantly more bits to the card. Its also possible that jpeg files can survive more data corruption than a RAW file, so the issue simply may not be apparent there. My best guess would be corrupt sectors in the ram/buffer, but I am not a camera engineer so its only a guess.

If the same problem happens with different cards, its almost certainly not the card (as that would mean all the cards are defective in the same way - highly unlikely) which would point to the camera as the culprit. At which point I would send it back ASAP.

.Sam.
OP .Sam. Veteran Member • Posts: 3,199
Re: do I have a defective E-PM2?

I'm gonna try to get a replacement. We'll see how Egghead handles it.

-- hide signature --

.Sam.
GF1+20+45 Sigma DP2 & Pentax K20D - ist* DS - ZX-5 - LX
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/shadzee/

 .Sam.'s gear list:.Sam.'s gear list
Sigma DP2 Pentax *ist DS Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Olympus PEN E-P5 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +7 more
photohounds
photohounds Senior Member • Posts: 1,156
Re: do I have a defective E-PM2?

EarthQuake wrote:

photohounds wrote:

.Sam. wrote:

I use lightroom, and these images are exported from lightroom to a smaller JPG file that I've uploaded.

So far, my understanding is this behavior is NOT normal ?

But is it actually the camera? It is very odd given that "shooting raw" is merely keeping the unprocessed file. The JPG engine makes the JPG from that file.
... as I understand the process, and and then (usually) discards it. Presumably this is because as it takes more space, takes far longer to write to a card and is useful to fewer people as JPGS are instantly viewable on any device that can display images.

I doubt the camera writes the raw to the card, then reads that raw to create the jpeg file, in all likelihood the camera stores the shot in the buffer (RAM) and then writes both the jpeg and raw file. If there is something is corrupt in the saving pipeline (RAM, drive controller, file system, etc) then it is more likely to show up in the RAW file as raw files are much larger and involve writing significantly more bits to the card. Its also possible that jpeg files can survive more data corruption than a RAW file, so the issue simply may not be apparent there. My best guess would be corrupt sectors in the ram/buffer, but I am not a camera engineer so its only a guess.

If the same problem happens with different cards, its almost certainly not the card (as that would mean all the cards are defective in the same way - highly unlikely) which would point to the camera as the culprit. At which point I would send it back ASAP.

I did not say the camera writes RAW to the card and the reprocesses it to make a JPG. Cameras have RAM.
.
Here's how I see it happening:
As I understand it a RAW image (the relatively unprocessed sensor data) will be in RAM, and the JPG is created from this - with the camera settings applied.
.
The RAW is only written to the card IF you are "shooting RAW".

.
One other point, if this weirdness does not happen with The Oly software or other RAW processor, it is NOT the camera.  The fact that the JPG is OK, makes that even less likely.  A pity they didn't SAY what they "fixed".

-- hide signature --

Well designed gear performs better for longer than well marketed gear.
Odd that people complain a lens is not sharp enough,
and then proceed to make pics where 95% is OOF ..
General Pics:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/
Oly and other .. Gear test samples - even RB-67!:
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Gear-tests
How DO OMDs cope with dim-light action and smoke?
http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Performing-arts

 photohounds's gear list:photohounds's gear list
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus OM-D E-M1X +7 more
.Sam.
OP .Sam. Veteran Member • Posts: 3,199
nothing is fixed

I tried different cards, and the problem is still there. It can not be Lightroom either, since I've never seen this issue reported anywhere. I'm getting a couple of new cards to make sure it's not the SD cards.

-- hide signature --

.Sam.
GF1+20+45 Sigma DP2 & Pentax K20D - ist* DS - ZX-5 - LX
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/shadzee/

 .Sam.'s gear list:.Sam.'s gear list
Sigma DP2 Pentax *ist DS Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Olympus PEN E-P5 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +7 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads