Your "money is no object" lens

Started Feb 23, 2014 | Discussions
eths
eths Contributing Member • Posts: 775
Zeiss Distagon T* 2,8/15 with a Nikon mount (nt)
 eths's gear list:eths's gear list
Nikon D600 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony Alpha 7R Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art +18 more
john-photoguy Regular Member • Posts: 470
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

hmm there are so many!  But one I would NEVER purchase for myself, but have always looked at as being SOOO cool is the Sigma 200-500 F2.8  WOW!  Now wouldn't I be the cat's Meow at all the kids sporting events   I might just need to get a few more jobs at SI if I did

-- hide signature --

Let just all take more photographs!

 john-photoguy's gear list:john-photoguy's gear list
Nikon D300S Nikon D200 Sony Alpha NEX-3 Nikon D5000 Sony Alpha 7 +19 more
V1V1D
V1V1D Contributing Member • Posts: 669
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

Pre-order the A6000 and get a 24 1.8 for a good walk around combo and second body.

 V1V1D's gear list:V1V1D's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony a6300 Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Sony E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS +4 more
KwhyChang Veteran Member • Posts: 4,769
Re: Leica 35mm f/1.4 Summilux-M n/t

KwhyChang wrote:

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

Tone Row wrote:

I just got a very nice bonus and have decided to use part of it on a lens that I would never have otherwise bought and am looking for ideas. I am completely open to native or adapted lenses AF or MF. So, if money were no object, what would be the one lens you either have or would get for your NEX?

+1 for a Leica M 35/1.4

-- hide signature --

Dave

Since this post lasted so long...I've decided to change my original choice.

I have a prime at 35mm that I like already, but if money were no object I might opt for the 35mm lens in front of the Sony RX1R. Of course, it's permanently attached to the RX1R body so that would have to be part of the deal.

I've wanted this cam for some time and have come close to justifying it to myself  a couple of times. Thank you Sony for the A7, which in my case has stymied my lust for the RX1R.... but if money were no object.

-- hide signature --

--

Dave

captura Forum Pro • Posts: 23,344
Re: re: primes that no money can buy

jpr2 wrote:

primes that no money can buy in E-mount, esp. with fast AF'ing:

  • 85/1.4,
  • or 100/2,
  • or 135/2,

jpr2

Those, in Canon, adapt very easily. RJ or Metabones.

 captura's gear list:captura's gear list
Canon EOS 500D Sony FE 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Google Nexus 5
captura Forum Pro • Posts: 23,344
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

V1V1D wrote:

Pre-order the A6000 and get a 24 1.8 for a good walk around combo and second body.

Or the 35 FE 2.8?

 captura's gear list:captura's gear list
Canon EOS 500D Sony FE 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Google Nexus 5
Section10
Section10 Senior Member • Posts: 1,468
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

ohh......well then...Otus.

I'm in love the Touits but a full frame one that handles even larger...thats gotta be a pleasure.

 Section10's gear list:Section10's gear list
Sony Alpha 7 II Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Nikon D800E Nikon D4 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR +8 more
jpr2 Forum Pro • Posts: 15,153
re: E-primes that no money can buy

captura wrote:

jpr2 wrote:

primes that no money can buy in E-mount, esp. with fast AF'ing:

  • 85/1.4,
  • or 100/2,
  • or 135/2,

Those, in Canon, adapt very easily. RJ or Metabones.

don't I know it? the EF 135/2L virtually lives on my N7, either through SA or through SB (making in EF 95/1.4 LL lens = yes, double L).

But... what I want is the same FL, the same aperture and... the same AF speed as I enjoy form the 135L on my Eos'es... and this will only be possible from the mythical E-mount 135/2 (presumably Zeiss) equipped with top-notch AF as well !!

jpr2

andre700 Regular Member • Posts: 380
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

Well, you did say money no object, and you say it did not need to be uesful, so here it is:

http://www.japancamerahunter.com/2012/06/the-remarkable-nikon-6mm-f2-8-fisheye/

Good luck finding one, an when you do, that money will be gone, believe me ...

-- hide signature --

André F

 andre700's gear list:andre700's gear list
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony Alpha a99 Sony Alpha 7 II Sony 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* +17 more
andre700 Regular Member • Posts: 380
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

wrong link, should be this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um5yR3I_P-c

-- hide signature --

André F

 andre700's gear list:andre700's gear list
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony Alpha a99 Sony Alpha 7 II Sony 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* +17 more
captura Forum Pro • Posts: 23,344
Re: re: E-primes that no money can buy

jpr2 wrote:

captura wrote:

jpr2 wrote:

primes that no money can buy in E-mount, esp. with fast AF'ing:

  • 85/1.4,
  • or 100/2,
  • or 135/2,

Those, in Canon, adapt very easily. RJ or Metabones.

don't I know it? the EF 135/2L virtually lives on my N7, either through SA or through SB (making in EF 95/1.4 LL lens = yes, double L).

But... what I want is the same FL, the same aperture and... the same AF speed as I enjoy form the 135L on my Eos'es... and this will only be possible from the mythical E-mount 135/2 (presumably Zeiss) equipped with top-notch AF as well !!

jpr2

I'll be getting the EF 85/1.8 with RJ focal reducer; that should end up giving me maybe 60mm/f1.4 or so. Good lens, been around forever and they still make it. I'll use3 it on my EOS too.

But yes it's about time Sony gave us an 85.

Steve

 captura's gear list:captura's gear list
Canon EOS 500D Sony FE 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Google Nexus 5
OP Tone Row Regular Member • Posts: 334
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

andre700 wrote:

Well, you did say money no object, and you say it did not need to be uesful, so here it is:

http://www.japancamerahunter.com/2012/06/the-remarkable-nikon-6mm-f2-8-fisheye/

Good luck finding one, an when you do, that money will be gone, believe me ...

-- hide signature --

André F

I also said a lens that you would purchase. Is this one you would like to have? Honestly though, thanks everyone for the suggestions so far. I didn't necessarily mean for this to be a list of the most expensive lenses produced, I could have googled that, but was looking for ideas on a lens that mortals without extensive budgets like me pine for but never get around to getting. FWIW the current lens I'm thinking about is the Leica 35mm Summilux.

 Tone Row's gear list:Tone Row's gear list
NEX5R Sony SLT-A55
S3ZAi
S3ZAi Contributing Member • Posts: 885
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

If I'd have the money, I'd definitely go for the wide tri-elmar to use on my A7r:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/wa-tri-elmar.shtml

-- hide signature --

Sezai E., philosophy geek, bibliophile and creative photographer.
Cheers!

 S3ZAi's gear list:S3ZAi's gear list
Sony Alpha 7R Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS Sony FE 55mm F1.8
Curtis Khan
Curtis Khan Senior Member • Posts: 1,163
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

135 STF. That is my dream lens but can never justify buying it...even if I could afford to.

 Curtis Khan's gear list:Curtis Khan's gear list
Sony RX100 Sony Alpha a99 Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 Sony a6000 Olympus OM-D E-M10 +36 more
john-photoguy Regular Member • Posts: 470
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

andre700 wrote:

Well, you did say money no object, and you say it did not need to be uesful, so here it is:

http://www.japancamerahunter.com/2012/06/the-remarkable-nikon-6mm-f2-8-fisheye/

Good luck finding one, an when you do, that money will be gone, believe me ...

-- hide signature --

André F

OOhh,  good idea, the lens that sees behind itself.  Any other fisheye is just a toy!

-- hide signature --

Let just all take more photographs!

 john-photoguy's gear list:john-photoguy's gear list
Nikon D300S Nikon D200 Sony Alpha NEX-3 Nikon D5000 Sony Alpha 7 +19 more
jcharding Senior Member • Posts: 2,304
Nikon 800mm [nt]

Nothing here

-- hide signature --
 jcharding's gear list:jcharding's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix X100 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Fujifilm X-Pro1 Fujifilm X-T1 Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D +12 more
jackdan Contributing Member • Posts: 896
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

Well if money were no object I would take advantage of that and switch to Pentax, but that is just me.

ravinj Contributing Member • Posts: 587
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

Let me know if you already have this. If yes, I will suggest another one.

Leica 28-90

 ravinj's gear list:ravinj's gear list
Sony Alpha 7 +1 more
drmak67 Junior Member • Posts: 32
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

35mm or 50mm Summilux.

andre700 Regular Member • Posts: 380
Re: Your "money is no object" lens

Sorry, couldn't resist ...

35mm summilux is a great lens, personally I would consider the Tri elmar WAIT, wider and more useful for my kind of photography, a dreamlens for the Nex7. I might also consider the RX1r instead of a lens only.

-- hide signature --

André F

 andre700's gear list:andre700's gear list
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony Alpha a99 Sony Alpha 7 II Sony 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* +17 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads