Got an X-T1 and 23mm f/1.4 today. My first Fuji. I'm impressed and disappointed at the same time.

Started Feb 23, 2014 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
The Photo Ninja OP Senior Member • Posts: 2,242
And the insults fly...
1

Here's some of my more professional stuff:

Aotearoaman
Aotearoaman Junior Member • Posts: 34
Its a relative thing I suspect
1

If you come at this from a MFT perspective the AT-1 AF is going to be perceived as slow - accurate but slow(er).  That was my impression after spending (admittedly only) an hour with the camera.  If, however, you are in the Fuji camp, then the reports I have read have all said the AT -1 is going to seem a much more positive experience in this respect.  I think our MFT experience has spoilt us...but it wont stop me buying the camera.

 Aotearoaman's gear list:Aotearoaman's gear list
Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm X-T2 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 12-60mm 1:2.8-4.0 SWD Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 SWD Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro +5 more
kewlguy
kewlguy Senior Member • Posts: 1,822
Re: Got an X-T1 and 23mm f/1.4 today. My first Fuji.

You shot mostly in low light and 23/1.4 is probably not the fastest in term of AF. In my experience, 27/2.8 is faster than 23/1.4 when it comes to AF.

that said, I still use Canon DSLR with a bunch of L lenses - but I was hardly disappointed with X-E1 AF.  I mean, X-E1 is not fast - but not unusable. It gets the job done. Then I got the X-E2, it's actually fast and reliable.

I can't imagine X-T1 AF disappointing - I mean, give it a try for at least a week, and use other Fuji lenses, too.

But in the end, I'm sure the IQ will compensate for whatever disappointed you in the first place

 kewlguy's gear list:kewlguy's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS 5DS R Nikon 1 J5 Fujifilm X-Pro2 Pentax K-1 +89 more
The Photo Ninja OP Senior Member • Posts: 2,242
The image quality is awesome - no doubt about it.

I actually even like the NR.  It smooths out the skin and makes people a little more flattering.

35mm f/1.4 on order and then I'm done.

Those are my most used focal lengths, and other stuff I have on Canon.

Davidgilmour Senior Member • Posts: 1,417
Got an X-T1 and 23mm f/1.4 today. My first Fuji. I'm impressed and disappointed at the same time.
8

The Photo Ninja wrote:

The autofocus speed is sub par.

That is Fujis definition of "the worlds fastest"

 Davidgilmour's gear list:Davidgilmour's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix X100 Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro Sony RX1 Fujifilm X-M1 +2 more
ZTJ Regular Member • Posts: 278
Re: Got an X-T1 and 23mm f/1.4 today. My first Fuji. I'm impressed and disappointed at

I had a similar impression of the 18-55mm lens on my first Fuji X camera. Then later I realized I was being stupid and using it wrong. The trick is, keep your focus area size slightly larger than the thing you're trying to focus on.

The 23mm f/1.4 is absolutely not slow to focus. I'm pretty sure the only faster lens is the 14mm f2.8 and they both use the same focus motor anyway.

It is noisy though, and if you are going to just focus without ever pushing the damn shutter button and actually exposing the shot, you might get the wrong idea that it's slow since it will rack to double check focus in many situations when it's already focused.

Just point that camera and mash the shutter and watch magic happen in 1/10th of a second

 ZTJ's gear list:ZTJ's gear list
Fujifilm X100T Sony RX10 III Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R
57LowRider Senior Member • Posts: 3,793
Re: Maybe it's because I was in very low light???
1

That's a good point about shooting like it was film. I more or less came from an OM-10 to the X-E1 and the habits carried over, although I've given way to more automation in general.

This was also advantageous when interchanging between the X-E1, GW690 and an FM2 last year, the interfaces had enough in common to feel comfortable.

 57LowRider's gear list:57LowRider's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS +10 more
Marco1971
Marco1971 Regular Member • Posts: 343
Re: Got an X-T1 and 23mm f/1.4 today.

Why did you choose this combo ? I'm thinking of buying this set also.

 Marco1971's gear list:Marco1971's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm X-M1 Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 +1 more
Phil1 Senior Member • Posts: 1,181
Reply/question to/for Eric

Hi Eric

Thanks for your long and very useful post - much appreciated!

One thing you said was very interenting : "Turn off image review so you can get your viewfinder back instantly after taking a shot....". I am really interested to hear this as, on a X-E2 I tried, once the shot was taken there was a short but annoying delay (blackout) before the EVF showed the view again.

I was hoping that the X-T1 with its improvements would reduce this EVF blackout to negligible levels so your post was most encouraging. Although for a different reason (mirror flip) my 5Dii shows a momentary but totally inconsequential VF blackout after taking a shot.

So my question is just how quick is the EVF of the X-T1 to show the view again once the shutter has been pressed? Is it really as quick as a DSLR VF i.e. of no practical significance or, if not, how close does it come?

Thanks

Phil

Spaceshipps New Member • Posts: 2
Re: Reply/question to/for Eric

I have noticed absolutely no post shot lag, I have image review off.

Bill Robb Senior Member • Posts: 3,332
Re: Maybe it's because I was in very low light???

The Photo Ninja wrote:

Another thing that occurs to me, is that all of these pictures were shot in very low light at an average of ISO 6400. Perhaps that is why my focusing experience was less than optimal.

Sure, lets just set the camera up to fail and then smack it down for failing.

The Photo Ninja OP Senior Member • Posts: 2,242
The 35mm equivalent focal length is my favorite

Also, I typically use my mirrorless when I don't want to lug my full frame around:

1) a restaurant with family and friends
2) a birthday party
3) casual snaps

The 17mm f/1,8 olympus is similar, but not as nice optically.

SaltLakeGuy
SaltLakeGuy Forum Pro • Posts: 12,096
Re: Got an X-T1 and 23mm f/1.4 today.

I do think this lens has some special mojo. It is going to be a "classic" for sure. It incorporates some pretty heavy glass elements so you can at times, when racking it's full travel in autofocus, feel it work. But quite frankly with focus times under a second it's hard to complain. I suspect it will get more use on my X-T1 than I might have thought. Typically for me, this focal length prime would tend to spend most of it's time in my bag and not on the camera. I tend to prefer a competent or faster zoom like a 18-55. But there is just "something" about the output of this lens that is enticing, so I think it may well find it's way on the body more often than not.

 SaltLakeGuy's gear list:SaltLakeGuy's gear list
Sony RX10 III Epson Stylus Pro 3880 +5 more
Robert Garcia NYC Senior Member • Posts: 1,836
Re: Got an X-T1 and 23mm f/1.4 today. My first Fuji.

kewlguy wrote:

You shot mostly in low light and 23/1.4 is probably not the fastest in term of AF. In my experience, 27/2.8 is faster than 23/1.4 when it comes to AF.

that said, I still use Canon DSLR with a bunch of L lenses - but I was hardly disappointed with X-E1 AF. I mean, X-E1 is not fast - but not unusable. It gets the job done. Then I got the X-E2, it's actually fast and reliable.

I can't imagine X-T1 AF disappointing - I mean, give it a try for at least a week, and use other Fuji lenses, too.

But in the end, I'm sure the IQ will compensate for whatever disappointed you in the first place

So the 27 2.8 is faster than 23 1.4 at AF and low light? that's interesting. Can anyone else confirm this?

Jake21 Contributing Member • Posts: 526
Re: caf vs pdaf ?
1

Given the light level; my guess is it was using caf instead of pdaf; how is focus speed when there is more light ?

The Photo Ninja wrote:

I blogged about it here with samples: http://www.bershatsky.com/blog/2014/2/x-t1

Bottom line. Camera controls and layout are fine. The images are superb. The autofocus speed is sub par. Is it the lens itself? How are the other Fuji lenses. Or, is this just the way it is?

The birthday girl.

DVT80111 Senior Member • Posts: 2,354
Re: Maybe it's because I was in very low light???

There were lights in the room, not that low to me.  The Canon 70D would have no problem.

Oh well, I will wait for the next world faster AF body.

 DVT80111's gear list:DVT80111's gear list
Sony RX100 Fujifilm X-E1 Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS 70D Sony Alpha 7R II
Ulfric M Douglas Veteran Member • Posts: 4,549
My first Fuji. I'm impressed and disappointed at the same time.
1

The Photo Ninja wrote:

... The autofocus speed is sub par. Is it the lens itself? How are the other Fuji lenses.

Relax.

As you say "sub par", but only because "ON-Par" is so ridiculously fast and reliable with a certain other unmentionable format.

(I cannot believe the trolling going on at you in this thread!)

On the other hand ... of course it could simply be the lens. Try the original bright kit zoom post-firmware-upgrade.

-- hide signature --

Cheksa wrote:
You're evil Ulfric.

Chris Dodkin
Chris Dodkin Veteran Member • Posts: 6,979
Low Light AF

Low light AF - you said in your blog that you shot most of the images in low light.

You can change the AF box size on the camera and see if that assists in low light - this is a feature that often gets overlooked as it's not obvious, and is not a feature that is common to DSLRs for example.

I'd also go play with the camera & lens in decent light and see what you think of the AF then.

-- hide signature --

http://f-sunny.com
The future is just a click away...

 Chris Dodkin's gear list:Chris Dodkin's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix X100 Canon EOS-1D Canon EOS-1D Mark II Canon EOS 5D Mark II Fujifilm X-Pro1 +35 more
The Photo Ninja OP Senior Member • Posts: 2,242
Lights on? How would you know?

It was in a dark and dreary coffee shop in downtown Tacoma with barely a few light bulbs on and some natural gray, rainy day lighting coming in from the front.  When was the last time you needed ISO 6400 f/1.4 for a well lit room?

Give me a break!

The Photo Ninja OP Senior Member • Posts: 2,242
It seems better...I'll be doing more testing today

More to come...

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads