DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Minimalist lense choice for travel

Started Dec 29, 2013 | Questions
duartix Veteran Member • Posts: 3,613
Re: Minimalist lense choice for travel

berni29 wrote:

The problem with the GM1 is going to be battery life IMHO. I would just use some snap wrap around the body to keep dust out and some sort of cloth tube or bandage around the lens if it were me taking one.

Yes but, 1 extra battery = 1 less snack.

-- hide signature --

Duarte Bruno

 duartix's gear list:duartix's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix F40fd Olympus PEN E-P1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS +4 more
OP Thin_Ice Regular Member • Posts: 426
Italian Dolomites @ 12 and 45 mm
1

I went for the lenses I already own.  Pleace C&C.

Mt Cristallo from Lagazoi @ 12 and 45 mm.   The movie "Cliffhanger" was filmed there.

 Thin_Ice's gear list:Thin_Ice's gear list
Olympus E-420 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 +5 more
Paulmorgan Veteran Member • Posts: 9,499
Re: Minimalist lense choice for travel

Thin_Ice wrote:

Hello,

What lense would you recommend for:

* ski traverse of a week through the Italian Dolomites (OMD with the prime attached)

* travel to Katmandu, short trekking in Nepal of the beaten track and a tiger safari in India

I have an OMD with the 12 and 45 mm primes and an E420 with the 14-42 and 40-150 kit zooms. I really like the 45 mm for mountain landscapes and the 12 mm for social pictures indoors and outdoors. I use the 12 mm as walk around most of the time. I hope to buy the upcoming oly 40-150 fast zoom for sport and wildlife, but this one won't be available before the Nepal/India trip. Most of the time i take no spare lense on a trip.

Would a 17 mm prime be an advantage over the 12 mm for adventure travel/mountain scenes? Before buying the 12 mm, i checked the flickr groups of th 12, 17 and 9-18. I concluded that the results of the 12 mm on flickr really stand out and went for the 12mm.

I would use the 12 mm in Kathmandu streets and the 45 mm in the dolomites on the ski 's and on trek in Nepal. For a panorama i would stitch when needed.

What can be expected of the current mFT 40-150 and 70-300? Is there much difference with the results of my FT equipment in daylight? Since i use my primes, i am underwhelmed by the image quality of my FT lenses...

I use to travel light. My current camera bag is a lowepro dashpoint 30. My ski backpack is a 30 liter mountaineering backpack stowed with gear,clothes and snacks for 5 days... For a second prime, i have to trade in 3 snickers :-(.

Thanks for your advise,

Steven

If it had to be just one lens, leave the primes at home, and add one of these, Panasonic 12-35, Olympus 12-50mm or Olympus 12-40mm.

WhiteBeard
WhiteBeard Senior Member • Posts: 2,944
Re: 17 or 20mm if you want to travel light.

australopithecus wrote:

ulfie wrote:

If the OP really wants minimalist, s/he should choose just one lens. For that I'd recommend either the Oly 17/1.8 or Panny 20/1.7. Versatile, small total package, and well above average IQ.

I'd second that ! Zooms can be handy but are slower and lumpy.

Yes but the Oly 12-40 F2.8 should cover every situation and is weather-sealed, so great for this type of travel.

PS:  BTW, I wonder about that "Australopithecus" avatar of yours; manual focus only, right? 

 WhiteBeard's gear list:WhiteBeard's gear list
Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G Vario 45-200mm F4-5.6 OIS +4 more
mh2000 Senior Member • Posts: 2,813
17

Traditionally, a 35mm eq. lens for 135 was the travel lens of choice for most because it turns out being very versatile and kind of in between. 17+45 would really work out well for me... in fact when I travel, I typically bring both, but only carry my body + the 17/2.8 for travel photos. Sure you would prefer the 17/1.8, but for small travel lens, stopped down, the 17/2.8 is pretty great.

-- hide signature --
mh2000 Senior Member • Posts: 2,813
Re: Influential e-article

jpds wrote:

I apologize first to the OP for this little digression...

So in film days, you had a 64 ISO capable full-frame sensor on a camera that could be held with just two fingers.... With several versions of it, and the S suffix indicated a Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/40mm lens?
It still had a flash shoe, on the bottom, because the top of the camera was alreay too busy...

That camera, and the likes Leica CL, Minolta CLE have fascinated me by their small size, when I was a boy, in a time when the motto was "Small is beautiful". As that motto seems to regain some interest today, because of it economical foundation, great (small) things are yet to come in Digital Photography

Cheers,
Jean-Pierre
Happy New Year to all of you!

As beautiful as my Rollei 35S was, I really prefered my Minox GL and Olympus XA... both of which were much smaller and lighter and fitted with a 35mm lens. Was never thrilled with the tween-ness of a 40mm-ish lens... and I've had plenty. So really, I find from my experience that it's better (for me) to pick either a 35mm or 50mm lens and work with it. For scenics I find 35mm better, for more detail shots 50mm... I prefer more detail shots overall, but sometimes the wider scenic shots are called for.

Best!

-- hide signature --
amipal
amipal Senior Member • Posts: 1,275
Re: Minimalist lense choice for travel

I've just received delivery of my final lens kit for an upcoming three-week holiday in Japan and Hong Kong. My camera bag will have the following lenses in it:

  • Panasonic 25mm f/1.4
  • Panasonic 14-140mm Mk.II
  • Olympus 9-18mm
  • Olympus 45mm

Plus various filters, spare battery and a shutter remote. I've just tested the weight on my shoulder, and it's barely anything. This is what m43 is all about.

Cheers,
Paul

-- hide signature --
 amipal's gear list:amipal's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 +7 more
.Sam.
.Sam. Veteran Member • Posts: 3,199
backup

I would imagine 12 & 45 could be all the lenses you'd need. However, I would take along a backup body.

How about a Panny GM1+kit lens (12-32) as a backup for both body and lenses.

-- hide signature --

.Sam.
GF1+20+45 Sigma DP2 & Pentax K20D - ist* DS - ZX-5 - LX
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/shadzee/

 .Sam.'s gear list:.Sam.'s gear list
Sigma DP2 Pentax *ist DS Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Olympus PEN E-P5 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +7 more
OP Thin_Ice Regular Member • Posts: 426
Re: backup

Hello,

My samsung phone proofed to be a good enough backup for a ski trip. Quick stop, phone out of the zip pocket et voila!  OK for snapshots.

FOV is about 35 mm I guess.  During the day, the light on snow is horrible, whatever camera you use.  In the evening the oly primes are way better than any kit zoom...

I also used the 12 + 2X digital teleconverter to avoid changing lenses in snowdrift.  Basically I used the 12 mm for ski around/people and environmental portrait and the 45 in the evening for panorama and mountain scenes.

Yes, I wonder if I should get the 17 or 25 mm f1.8, but this would make the choice of what lense to bring on a trip more difficult...

12+45+ Samsung might be a good solution.

Steven

 Thin_Ice's gear list:Thin_Ice's gear list
Olympus E-420 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 +5 more
dougjgreen1 Veteran Member • Posts: 4,068
My minimum travel kit:

Thin_Ice wrote:

Hello,

What lense would you recommend for:

* ski traverse of a week through the Italian Dolomites (OMD with the prime attached)

* travel to Katmandu, short trekking in Nepal of the beaten track and a tiger safari in India

I have an OMD with the 12 and 45 mm primes and an E420 with the 14-42 and 40-150 kit zooms. I really like the 45 mm for mountain landscapes and the 12 mm for social pictures indoors and outdoors. I use the 12 mm as walk around most of the time. I hope to buy the upcoming oly 40-150 fast zoom for sport and wildlife, but this one won't be available before the Nepal/India trip. Most of the time i take no spare lense on a trip.

Would a 17 mm prime be an advantage over the 12 mm for adventure travel/mountain scenes? Before buying the 12 mm, i checked the flickr groups of th 12, 17 and 9-18. I concluded that the results of the 12 mm on flickr really stand out and went for the 12mm.

I would use the 12 mm in Kathmandu streets and the 45 mm in the dolomites on the ski 's and on trek in Nepal. For a panorama i would stitch when needed.

What can be expected of the current mFT 40-150 and 70-300? Is there much difference with the results of my FT equipment in daylight? Since i use my primes, i am underwhelmed by the image quality of my FT lenses...

I use to travel light. My current camera bag is a lowepro dashpoint 30. My ski backpack is a 30 liter mountaineering backpack stowed with gear,clothes and snacks for 5 days... For a second prime, i have to trade in 3 snickers :-(.

Thanks for your advise,

Steven

I travel with the E-PL5 and the 14mm, the Panasonic 25mm, and either the Sigma 60mm or the Panasonic 45-175mm. For close-up work, I'd use the Sigma 60mm with a good achromat diopter lens.

From your kit, you could easily sub the 12mm for my 14mm. But I think you'd benefit from some other lens in the 19mm to 30mm range (for me right now, I'd go with the Oly 25mm for quality speed and small size) - as well as any one of the longer zoom lenses. My pick would be the Panasonic 45-150mm, for build quality and small size.

But depending upon your shooting style, maybe you could get by with the 12mm and 45mm alone.  For me, for a once in a lifetime event, I'd want something longer, as well as something closer to normal perspective.

 dougjgreen1's gear list:dougjgreen1's gear list
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Nikon 1 V2 Olympus PEN E-P5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-PL7 +17 more
Day Hiker Forum Pro • Posts: 10,829
two lenses do the job

Smart move on your part. The best equipment is that which you have with you. I have learned over the years to make the most of what I have rather than fret over what I do not have. I also have the 12mm f/2 + 45mm f/1.8 combo and it is extremely versatile as a two-lens lightweight set.

Thin_Ice wrote:

I went for the lenses I already own. Pleace C&C.

Mt Cristallo from Lagazoi @ 12 and 45 mm. The movie "Cliffhanger" was filmed there.

Jim Pilcher
Summit County, Colorado, USA

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads