Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete Locked

Started Jul 31, 2013 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
This thread is locked.
seilerbird666
seilerbird666 Senior Member • Posts: 1,101
Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

Quite a while ago in fact.

However there still are a few people who watch Betamax tapes, listen to records and use a land line so there will always be a few people who refuse to come into the modern world. They hang on to past technologies like it is a winning lottery ticket. They refuse to admit that new technology is better and they refuse to even try it.

High ISO cameras, advanced shooting modes, Photoshop, and image stabilization have all contributed to making fast lenses a thing of the past.

The economics are amazing. A Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS lens is $2500. The exact same lens in f4 costs $1000. While there might be a few people in the world that can justify spending $1500 for one more stop, the overwhelming majority would laugh at such an idea.

-- hide signature --

My photos:
picasaweb.google.com/seilerbird

Manip16 Contributing Member • Posts: 515
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

I didn't realise better ISO performance also allowed for shallower depth of field. Today I learned...

James Pilcher Veteran Member • Posts: 8,654
rather amusing

seilerbird666 wrote:

Quite a while ago in fact.

However there still are a few people who watch Betamax tapes, listen to records and use a land line so there will always be a few people who refuse to come into the modern world. They hang on to past technologies like it is a winning lottery ticket. They refuse to admit that new technology is better and they refuse to even try it.

High ISO cameras, advanced shooting modes, Photoshop, and image stabilization have all contributed to making fast lenses a thing of the past.

The economics are amazing. A Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS lens is $2500. The exact same lens in f4 costs $1000. While there might be a few people in the world that can justify spending $1500 for one more stop, the overwhelming majority would laugh at such an idea.

It never ceases to amuse me the kind of tripe that is served up here by the experts.

Jim Pilcher
Summit County, Colorado, USA

 James Pilcher's gear list:James Pilcher's gear list
Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Fujifilm X70 Olympus PEN-F +7 more
jeffharris
jeffharris Veteran Member • Posts: 6,968
Re: rather amusing

James Pilcher wrote:

seilerbird666 wrote:

Quite a while ago in fact.

However there still are a few people who watch Betamax tapes, listen to records and use a land line so there will always be a few people who refuse to come into the modern world. They hang on to past technologies like it is a winning lottery ticket. They refuse to admit that new technology is better and they refuse to even try it.

High ISO cameras, advanced shooting modes, Photoshop, and image stabilization have all contributed to making fast lenses a thing of the past.

The economics are amazing. A Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS lens is $2500. The exact same lens in f4 costs $1000. While there might be a few people in the world that can justify spending $1500 for one more stop, the overwhelming majority would laugh at such an idea.

It never ceases to amuse me the kind of tripe that is served up here by the experts.

Absolutely!

 jeffharris's gear list:jeffharris's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Voigtlander Nokton 25mm F0.95 Voigtlander Nokton 42.5mm F0.95 Voigtlander Nokton 17.5mm F0.95 Aspherical +25 more
s_grins
s_grins Forum Pro • Posts: 11,024
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

Quite a while ago...

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51890830

You're late, buddy

-- hide signature --

Looking for equilibrium...

 s_grins's gear list:s_grins's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Sigma 30mm F2.8 EX DN Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN Art Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-140mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH. / Power O.I.S +2 more
rpm40
rpm40 Senior Member • Posts: 2,240
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

Its deja vu all over again...

Morgs222 Regular Member • Posts: 101
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

Fast lenses will never be obsolete, its just that the better sensors give you better options.

If you you shoot scenes in low light using a great dof the faster lens is a waste of hard earnt money, yet its always the same.

Someone comes on here asking what are the best lenses for low light, and its always the fast lenses that get recommended, its not always good advice.

DLBlack Forum Pro • Posts: 12,207
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

For you maybe fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete.  For others it hasn't.  Both slow lenses for reduce size, weight and cost have there place; and fast lenses for low light and dof control, have here place in a photographers toolbox ox lenses.

In your example, if I was an Canon shooter and I have the money I would have both versions of the lens.  If I coukdn't afford both I will save my money for the f2.8 version.

Anyhow, there is another thread concerning the same topic.

Dave

 DLBlack's gear list:DLBlack's gear list
Pentax K-7 Pentax K-5 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-M5 II +31 more
Ulric Senior Member • Posts: 3,688
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

Does this also mean that faster lenses would make fast sensors obsolete?

 Ulric's gear list:Ulric's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH +9 more
s_grins
s_grins Forum Pro • Posts: 11,024
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

Morgs222 wrote:

Fast lenses will never be obsolete, its just that the better sensors give you better options.

If you you shoot scenes in low light using a great dof the faster lens is a waste of hard earnt money, yet its always the same.

Someone comes on here asking what are the best lenses for low light, and its always the fast lenses that get recommended, its not always good advice.

For me it means that I need only one fast prime lens.

-- hide signature --

Looking for equilibrium...

 s_grins's gear list:s_grins's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Sigma 30mm F2.8 EX DN Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN Art Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-140mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH. / Power O.I.S +2 more
PC Wheeler
PC Wheeler Forum Pro • Posts: 16,374
Re: rather amusing

James Pilcher wrote:

It never ceases to amuse me the kind of tripe that is served up here by the experts.

Really!  But what "expert"?

-- hide signature --

Phil

 PC Wheeler's gear list:PC Wheeler's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 Panasonic FZ1000 Panasonic ZS100 Sony Alpha a6300 Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* E 24mm F1.8 ZA +6 more
jimoyer
jimoyer Senior Member • Posts: 1,869
Re: rather amusing

James Pilcher wrote:

seilerbird666 wrote:

Quite a while ago in fact.

However there still are a few people who watch Betamax tapes, listen to records and use a land line so there will always be a few people who refuse to come into the modern world. They hang on to past technologies like it is a winning lottery ticket. They refuse to admit that new technology is better and they refuse to even try it.

High ISO cameras, advanced shooting modes, Photoshop, and image stabilization have all contributed to making fast lenses a thing of the past.

The economics are amazing. A Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS lens is $2500. The exact same lens in f4 costs $1000. While there might be a few people in the world that can justify spending $1500 for one more stop, the overwhelming majority would laugh at such an idea.

It never ceases to amuse me the kind of tripe that is served up here by the experts.

Jim Pilcher
Summit County, Colorado, USA

THIS

 jimoyer's gear list:jimoyer's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Nikon 1 V2 Nikon D7100 Olympus E-M1 Nikon D4S +14 more
mpgxsvcd Veteran Member • Posts: 8,092
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

I think it is the other way around. Modern sensors have made the slow lenses useful now. That doesn’t mean that you don’t need fast lenses anymore. You still need shallow depth of field, EXTREMELY low light capabilities, and better optics.

Lenses like the 14-140mm, 7-14mm, and 100-300mm are actually quite useful in a lot of situations that they were not useful in before.

However, that doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t spend an arm and a leg on a good 100-200mm F2.8 lens even though the 45-200mm would probably get me 80% of the way there now.

 mpgxsvcd's gear list:mpgxsvcd's gear list
Panasonic LX100 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Olympus PEN E-PM2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 +4 more
Art_P
Art_P Veteran Member • Posts: 9,875
We just covered this...

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51890830

-- hide signature --

Art P
"I am a creature of contrast,
of light and shadow.
I live where the two play together,
I thrive on the conflict"

 Art_P's gear list:Art_P's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 +2 more
areichow Senior Member • Posts: 1,584
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

I disagree with the statement that they've made fast lenses obsolete, but it has made them let important. Putting the obvious DOF objection aside, there are still times when I want the light a fast lens can give me even with the best crop sensors. If you can get me a sensor that performs at ISO 51200 like the E-PL5/NEX does at ISO 3200 I'll be bothered less by a lack of fast lenses- but it'll never happen, at least not without a FF or larger sensor.

 areichow's gear list:areichow's gear list
Canon PowerShot SD1000 Sony RX100 NEX5R Sony Alpha 7
mpgxsvcd Veteran Member • Posts: 8,092
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

No matter what Higher ISO is a lossy process and faster glass is lossless. Lossy will never replace lossless for those who want absolute best quality.

 mpgxsvcd's gear list:mpgxsvcd's gear list
Panasonic LX100 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Olympus PEN E-PM2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 +4 more
amalric
amalric Forum Pro • Posts: 10,839
Re: Fast sensors have made fast lenses obsolete

seilerbird666 wrote:

Quite a while ago in fact.

However there still are a few people who watch Betamax tapes, listen to records and use a land line so there will always be a few people who refuse to come into the modern world. They hang on to past technologies like it is a winning lottery ticket. They refuse to admit that new technology is better and they refuse to even try it.

High ISO cameras, advanced shooting modes, Photoshop, and image stabilization have all contributed to making fast lenses a thing of the past.

The economics are amazing. A Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS lens is $2500. The exact same lens in f4 costs $1000. While there might be a few people in the world that can justify spending $1500 for one more stop, the overwhelming majority would laugh at such an idea.

Well, there's no doubt that something momentous is happening with smart phones.

One must be a bit unconventional to take the consequences. There are also the new devices for lifelogging, which are not much more than a fisheye and a hardisk. When you are back at home you magnify at will.

But even on Oly cameras you have a digital teleconverter that is suprisingly good. The SW uprezzes the crop. Now this means that in case of need you have s second lens twice the focal!. Of course you must have a sensor with good resolution and fast processing power - but that's happening!

People don't take the consequences of Computational Photography, because they are invested in expensive lenses, often without need, since they don't earn a living with it.

Never touch the luxury items of the rich, otherwise they'll shoot you in some wild countries.

I can see that this thread is going to be another  150 replies roallercoaster...

Am.

PS please note that I always specified that slower less expensive lenses can have the same or better resolution than the faster ones, like it happened for the first rangefinders that needed small lenses.

So better adapted lenses for small size, with no loss of resolution.

sigala1 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,724
Fast lenses will just be expensive special effects lenses

seilerbird666 wrote:

Quite a while ago in fact.

However there still are a few people who watch Betamax tapes, listen to records and use a land line so there will always be a few people who refuse to come into the modern world. They hang on to past technologies like it is a winning lottery ticket. They refuse to admit that new technology is better and they refuse to even try it.

High ISO cameras, advanced shooting modes, Photoshop, and image stabilization have all contributed to making fast lenses a thing of the past.

The economics are amazing. A Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS lens is $2500. The exact same lens in f4 costs $1000. While there might be a few people in the world that can justify spending $1500 for one more stop, the overwhelming majority would laugh at such an idea.

-- hide signature --

My photos:
picasaweb.google.com/seilerbird

Agreed!

As sensors become better and better, the only use for fast lenses will be as very expensive special effects lenses, giving a shallow depth of field look that can't easily be duplicated in Photoshop.

String
String Senior Member • Posts: 1,685
Ding, ding, ding...

We have a winner in the Idiotic Post of the Week Award!

 String's gear list:String's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro +3 more
dougjgreen1 Senior Member • Posts: 2,317
A long thread from 2-3 days ago made this thread obsolete

All of this was covered recently

 dougjgreen1's gear list:dougjgreen1's gear list
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Olympus PEN E-PL5 Nikon 1 V2 Olympus E-M1 Olympus Zuiko Digital 11-22mm 1:2.8-3.5 +11 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads