DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Do you think the video quality of the OMD EM5 is better than the E-PM2?

Started Jul 3, 2013 | Questions
Virhua Junior Member • Posts: 40
Do you think the video quality of the OMD EM5 is better than the E-PM2?

I have just purchased the E-PM2 as a back up for my OMD EM5 for an upcoming African safari. I plan on putting my 75-300 mm Olympus lens in the EM5 and the 12-35 mm Panasonic lens on the E-PM2.  In trying the E-PM2 out, I love the quality of the stills (same sensor as EM5), however, I was somewhat disappointed with the video (I was shooting in the JPEG format). I believe I am seeing the compression artifacts described in an Imaging Resources review where they stated: "Heavy compression artifacts can be seen at all video resolutions, especially in 1080p whenever there are moving subjects or the camera moves. It's not as bad in Motion JPEG format, but it's still noticeable. Moiré patterns are also prevalent."

I am planning on shooting mostly still photos but I do like to shoot some short video clips. I know from perusing the reviews that Panasonic has superior video quality but I don't want to buy the Panasonic as a back up camera since I am already familiar with the Olympus menus, etc. Imaging resources had this to say about the video quality of the E-PM2:

This is what Imaging Resources said about the EM5's video performance: "Shooting in the daytime, the Olympus E-M5 is capable of providing quite clean and detailed video, with excellent detail in areas of subtle contrast. This is shown nicely in the bushy grasses at the beginning of our Full HD day video, which shows excellent detail where a lot of cameras dissolve to mush. Unfortunately, we saw some odd, sharp-edged and quite strong compression artifacts in the face of rapid motion"

If both cameras use the same sensor, shouldn't the video quality be equivalent?

In doing some limited testing on my own, I do feel that the OMD EM5's video quality is sharper than the E-PM2. I have been using the Panasonic 12-35 mm F 2.8 lens on both cameras in my testing.

I am not sure if I want to keep the E-PM2 because of the mediocre video quality. My other option is to look for a used OMD EM5 for my backup camera (much more expensive!)

What has been your experience shooting video with the OMD EM-5 and the E-PM2?

ANSWER:
This question has not been answered yet.
Barry Stewart
Barry Stewart Veteran Member • Posts: 9,147
5-axis stabilizer

The OM-D has the better stabilizer, which should influence your end-result.

Panasonic (GH-2?) may be a better solution for your video needs, as Olys don't have optimal options for video.

-- hide signature --

Barry

 Barry Stewart's gear list:Barry Stewart's gear list
Olympus E-1 Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-M5 II Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50mm 1:2.0 Macro Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 SWD +6 more
OP Virhua Junior Member • Posts: 40
Re: 5-axis stabilizer

Hi Barry,

Thanks for your reply.  That is a very good suggestion.  I will check it out

007peter
007peter Forum Pro • Posts: 12,933
Can you upload your E-M2 video

Can you upload your E-M2 video, the one that you find disappointing.  Perhaps, you can ADD a note, on what time frame in which area has those nasty artifacts

 007peter's gear list:007peter's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF6 Panasonic 20mm F1.7 II
Just Having Fun Veteran Member • Posts: 3,869
Yes

If there is little subject movement the E-M5 video is highly detailed even at higher ISOs.  The 5 axis IBIS makes it look even better too.  Both suffer from a low bit rate though.

I currently have the E-PM2 and even when turning off the electronic IS never think the video looks as good (it is still OK).  I've tried changing all the contrast, sharpness, etc. settings too.

OP Virhua Junior Member • Posts: 40
Re: Yes

Good points. I think I will just have to live with the video quality.  Can't beat the quality of the still shots which is my primary focus on the safari.  The videos are nice additions to the vacation pictures but they don't have to be of stellar quality.

I am a newbie and still haven't figured out how to post video clips. I am getting results very similar to those posted on the Image Resource sight: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-epm2/olympus-epm2VIDEO.HTM

What I may end up doing is bringing a small camcorder with me.   It is so hard to find the perfect camera system that does it all!

jalywol
jalywol Forum Pro • Posts: 12,302
Re: Yes

Virhua wrote:

Good points. I think I will just have to live with the video quality. Can't beat the quality of the still shots which is my primary focus on the safari. The videos are nice additions to the vacation pictures but they don't have to be of stellar quality.

I am a newbie and still haven't figured out how to post video clips. I am getting results very similar to those posted on the Image Resource sight: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-epm2/olympus-epm2VIDEO.HTM

What I may end up doing is bringing a small camcorder with me. It is so hard to find the perfect camera system that does it all!

You really might want to get the G5....Panasonic video codecs are really much better than the ones in the Olympus cameras.  I know you want to use the same menu system, but honestly, it's not that big an adjustement going from one to the other...and the G5 can be had on special for some very appealing prices lately....

-J

Abrak Veteran Member • Posts: 4,211
Re: Yes

As people have mentioned the EPM2's video quality sucks using the in-camera IBIS producing a sort of jello stabilising effect while the EM5's IBIS works well.

This shouldnt however be a problem with the EPM2 and 12-35mm as you can use the OIS of the Panasonic lens with the EPM2.

De D New Member • Posts: 5
Re: 5-axis stabilizer

It' s not only the image stabilizer.

The Pl5 and Pm2 have a reduced or even removed aa filter, vs omd em5

During video this gives more moire.

all olympus camera's have more moire then panasonic camera's in video, because of a weaker aa filter.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads