DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Impressive lense.

Started May 28, 2013 | User reviews
kOrbin
kOrbin New Member • Posts: 2
Impressive lense.

I had photography class in college but that was a long time ago. So I'm a novice to this hobby.. Anyway, to me this is an impressive lense for the money; especially, for the quality of it and the way it feels on the hand. Technically, it is a faster and quiter lense comparing the kit lense that came with my 650D, and it is a bit more heavier which is expected for this range of Luxury lense. For the 650D this lense is really good for an every day walk about which I have been doing, and it is really good for a low light condition, indoor, and up close shooting. This is a keeper for me!

-- hide signature --

Canon 650D - EF 17-40mm 1:4 L USM

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM
Wideangle zoom lens • Canon EF • 8806A002
Announced: Feb 27, 2003
kOrbin's score
5.0
Average community score
3.8
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM Canon EOS Rebel T4i (EOS 650D / EOS Kiss X6i)
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Lemming51
Lemming51 Forum Pro • Posts: 15,278
Re: Impressive lens.

kOrbin wrote:

I had photography class in college but that was a long time ago. So I'm a novice to this hobby.. Anyway, to me this is an impressive lens for the money; especially, for the quality of it and the way it feels on the hand. Technically, it is a faster and quiter lens comparing the kit lens that came with my 650D, and it is a bit more heavier which is expected for this range of Luxury lens. For the 650D this lense is really good for an every day walk about which I have been doing, and it is really good for a low light condition, indoor, and up close shooting. This is a keeper for me!

Glad your happy with it.  Excellent build.  Terrific wide angle zoom on full frame bodies.

But as "an every day walk about" it is suboptimal on 650D and other APS-C sized bodies.  For less money the EF-S 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM is much better in every respect other than ruggedness.

IMHO, YMMV

-- hide signature --

Unapologetic Canon Apologist

 Lemming51's gear list:Lemming51's gear list
Canon EOS 40D Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM +5 more
kOrbin
OP kOrbin New Member • Posts: 2
Re: Impressive lens.

Lemming51 wrote:

kOrbin wrote:

I had photography class in college but that was a long time ago. So I'm a novice to this hobby.. Anyway, to me this is an impressive lens for the money; especially, for the quality of it and the way it feels on the hand. Technically, it is a faster and quiter lens comparing the kit lens that came with my 650D, and it is a bit more heavier which is expected for this range of Luxury lens. For the 650D this lense is really good for an every day walk about which I have been doing, and it is really good for a low light condition, indoor, and up close shooting. This is a keeper for me!

Glad your happy with it.  Excellent build.  Terrific wide angle zoom on full frame bodies.

But as "an every day walk about" it is suboptimal on 650D and other APS-C sized bodies.  For less money the EF-S 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM is much better in every respect other than ruggedness.

IMHO, YMMV

Thank you so much for the tips. The lense that you mentioned actually came with the 650D and took beautiful pictures, lite and complimented the camera perfectly. After about 2000 frames I decided to upgrade to an EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS and had used it for another 2000 frames, but reallized that it was too slow at certain focal distance and not as good as the 15-85 lense, but loved the zoom though. So, I went for another upgrade and had my eye on the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM but it is on a pricey side for what it is comparing to the " L " lense that I ended up with. So, there is a method to my madness I must say, but eventually I will have to uprade my EOS to " optimize " the ' L' lense, any sugestion?

-- hide signature --

Canon 650D - EF 17-40mm 1:4 L USM

NomadMark
NomadMark Contributing Member • Posts: 610
Re: Impressive lens.

Personally, I would consider the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM to be a better lens than the 17-40mm, when used on an aps-c sized sensor camera. Brighter, sharper, more range. It only misses the L because it's an ef-s lens. Thus, it's missing the L, the red ring, and a bit of sealing. IQ however, is spot on. I'd have kept that.I would say much the same for the 15-85mm. Awesome lens as well.

 NomadMark's gear list:NomadMark's gear list
Sony a7 III Canon EOS R Canon EF 135mm F2L USM Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM +10 more
olsem007 Forum Member • Posts: 93
Re: Impressive lens.
1

IMHO the only advantage EF 17-40mm f/4 L has over EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 on an APS-C body is lower price and better weather sealing. On a FF it is a mediocre wide zoom that gives low IQ in the corners. Your 650D + EF 17-40mm f/4 L is a good combination but even EF-S 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM will definitely give you better IQ and flexibility. In this case 15mm is substantially 'wider' than 17mm. As for EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IQ... This lens is one of the reasons I still keep Canon APS-C bodies. 

If I were you I would try to test EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 on your 650D body before upgrading this body 'to be good enough for EF 17-40mm f/4 L'. Don't be hypnotized by the beautiful red ring! Not all 'red ring lenses' are created equal!

-- hide signature --

Most lenses and cameras are better than most photographers...

epozar
epozar Senior Member • Posts: 1,969
Re: Impressive lens.

olsem007 wrote:

IMHO the only advantage EF 17-40mm f/4 L has over EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 on an APS-C body is lower price and better weather sealing. On a FF it is a mediocre wide zoom that gives low IQ in the corners. Your 650D + EF 17-40mm f/4 L is a good combination but even EF-S 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM will definitely give you better IQ and flexibility. In this case 15mm is substantially 'wider' than 17mm. As for EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IQ... This lens is one of the reasons I still keep Canon APS-C bodies. 

If I were you I would try to test EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 on your 650D body before upgrading this body 'to be good enough for EF 17-40mm f/4 L'. Don't be hypnotized by the beautiful red ring! Not all 'red ring lenses' are created equal!

Yep! 17-40 is nice made lens useful on crop sensor camera but rather bad for FF - even series 1 Sigma 12-24 is better as regards corner performance (on FF).

Emil Pozar, http://emil-pozar.photoshelter.com

 epozar's gear list:epozar's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-M1 II Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 OM-1 Olympus Zuiko Digital 2.0x Teleconverter EC-20 +10 more
(unknown member) Veteran Member • Posts: 5,590
Re: Impressive lens.

kOrbin wrote:

Lemming51 wrote:

kOrbin wrote:

I had photography class in college but that was a long time ago. So I'm a novice to this hobby.. Anyway, to me this is an impressive lens for the money; especially, for the quality of it and the way it feels on the hand. Technically, it is a faster and quiter lens comparing the kit lens that came with my 650D, and it is a bit more heavier which is expected for this range of Luxury lens. For the 650D this lense is really good for an every day walk about which I have been doing, and it is really good for a low light condition, indoor, and up close shooting. This is a keeper for me!

Glad your happy with it.  Excellent build.  Terrific wide angle zoom on full frame bodies.

But as "an every day walk about" it is suboptimal on 650D and other APS-C sized bodies.  For less money the EF-S 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM is much better in every respect other than ruggedness.

IMHO, YMMV

Thank you so much for the tips. The lense that you mentioned actually came with the 650D and took beautiful pictures, lite and complimented the camera perfectly. After about 2000 frames I decided to upgrade to an EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS and had used it for another 2000 frames, but reallized that it was too slow at certain focal distance and not as good as the 15-85 lense, but loved the zoom though. So, I went for another upgrade and had my eye on the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM but it is on a pricey side for what it is comparing to the " L " lense that I ended up with. So, there is a method to my madness I must say, but eventually I will have to uprade my EOS to " optimize " the ' L' lense, any sugestion?

My only suggestion would be to please spell 'lens' correctly. 

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/27132943

Jeffrey Behr
Jeffrey Behr Veteran Member • Posts: 3,874
You folk sure are spending a lot of time...

...telling someone his lens choice is in not a good one.  After all, his choice is HIS CHOICE!

AND...the 17-40 is far better than youz guys indicate.  See...

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1251516

...for thousands of fine pics WITHOUT 'soft corners' taken with the 17-40.

AND...it is indeed spelled 'lens'.

 Jeffrey Behr's gear list:Jeffrey Behr's gear list
Fujifilm X-H2 Fujifilm 16-55mm F2.8R LM WR Fujifilm XF 16-80mm F4 Fujifilm XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR Fujifilm XF 70-300 F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR +4 more
olsem007 Forum Member • Posts: 93
Re: You folk sure are spending a lot of time...

This forum exists for us to discuss DIFFERENT LENS CHOICES.

-- hide signature --

Most lenses and cameras are better than most photographers...

Chez Wimpy
Chez Wimpy Veteran Member • Posts: 9,080
Re: You folk sure are spending a lot of time...

Jeffrey Behr wrote:

...telling someone his lens choice is in not a good one.  After all, his choice is HIS CHOICE!

OP reviewed the lens to 5/5 stars.  "The folk" contend there are lenses >5/5 for walk-around on crop.

-- hide signature --

-CW

 Chez Wimpy's gear list:Chez Wimpy's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 20D Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Canon EOS 550D +33 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads