Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens

Started May 23, 2013 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
sjprintz Regular Member • Posts: 382
Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
6

I bought this about 1 week ago to use for wildlife on my D800e.  The reviews I read were quite good and I was looking forward to replacing my 70-200mm F2.8 + 1.7 TC with this lens.

I did some comparisons and the 80-400mm is a little sharper than my combination.  At 5.6, the 80-400mm is quite sharp and at F8, it's even better.  When I use the 70-200mm VR + TC, I usually stop down to F2.8 as well.

Unfortunately, the 80-400mm was just a little better in my opinion. Only when I pixel peeped did I really see the difference.  However, it was not enough of a difference to justify the $3000 cost of this lens (BTW I am saying $3000 because you need to buy a new foot for this lens.  Nikon should really give us a good support rather than a nice carrying case).   The lens is also quite wide and hard to hand hold for long.

I think if the lens were priced below $2000 it would be worth it to me.  It just seems overpriced for my needs.  Just my 2 cents.

SJPrintz

 sjprintz's gear list:sjprintz's gear list
Nikon D800E Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR +1 more
Nikon D800E
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
paulski66
paulski66 Senior Member • Posts: 2,760
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
19

I'm not sure how Nikon is supposed to keep costs down if people buy their products and, despite being satisfied with overall performance, return them for no good reason.

 paulski66's gear list:paulski66's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G +2 more
fPrime
fPrime Senior Member • Posts: 1,036
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
8

Agreed.  There's something about buying a lens just to compare it and then returning it that's a bit sickening.  If you do this, don't brag about.  It's bad enough that you don't exercise enough research and analysis before ordering a lens and returning it fully functional.  That only raises the buying costs for the rest of us and exposes the lens to potential shipping & handling damage before a more forthright buyer gets the lens.

 fPrime's gear list:fPrime's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Nikon D1X Nikon D200 Nikon D700
Mark den Hartog Veteran Member • Posts: 3,675
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens

Let's not forget that the 70-200 will probably be sharper in the 70-to-200 range, it's the TC that takes down the quality.

the OP doesn't talk about that... but I am quite interested to hear how it holds up.

any links to trustworthy reviews?

btw I don't see how returning a lens makes it more expensive for everyone?

I think you should check when you buy and if it doesn't deliver return it.

On the other hand you should only buy if you are really interested.

fPrime
fPrime Senior Member • Posts: 1,036
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens

Mark den Hartog wrote:

btw I don't see how returning a lens makes it more expensive for everyone?

Consider the time and money wasted by the vendor to process and ship the lens and then the time wasted again to RMA, inspect, and return the product to inventory.

 fPrime's gear list:fPrime's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Nikon D1X Nikon D200 Nikon D700
trend1 Contributing Member • Posts: 975
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
4

On the other hand you should only buy if you are really interested.

Agreed, I could never purchase an expensive lens, play around with it and return it, if it was defective yes return it. Call me crazy.

TeamTQ Forum Member • Posts: 67
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens

I believe if you buy something with a return policy and you are not happy with your expenditure you should return..... He did feel it was worth the money... I hope this does not sicken anyone???

-- hide signature --

I bought this about 1 week ago to use for wildlife on my D800e.  The reviews I read were quite good and I was looking forward to replacing my 70-200mm F2.8 + 1.7 TC with this lens.

I did some comparisons and the 80-400mm is a little sharper than my combination.  At 5.6, the 80-400mm is quite sharp and at F8, it's even better.  When I use the 70-200mm VR + TC, I usually stop down to F2.8 as well.

Unfortunately, the 80-400mm was just a little better in my opinion. Only when I pixel peeped did I really see the difference.  However, it was not enough of a difference to justify the $3000 cost of this lens (BTW I am saying $3000 because you need to buy a new foot for this lens.  Nikon should really give us a good support rather than a nice carrying case).   The lens is also quite wide and hard to hand hold for long.

I think if the lens were priced below $2000 it would be worth it to me.  It just seems overpriced for my needs.  Just my 2 cents.

SJPrintz

Mark den Hartog Veteran Member • Posts: 3,675
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens

fPrime wrote:

Mark den Hartog wrote:

btw I don't see how returning a lens makes it more expensive for everyone?

Consider the time and money wasted by the vendor to process and ship the lens and then the time wasted again to RMA, inspect, and return the product to inventory.

Ok I hear ya. but doesn't every vendor run into this?

bflood Senior Member • Posts: 1,088
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
2

Walmart sees it all the time. Just not at $3,000 per item.

In the 1990s, my wife worked for a few months in a store that sold what I call fine breakables - upscale dishes, glassware, etc. It was common for local women to buy pieces on Wed or Thu and return them on Monday - following the party. Some didn't even bother to wash them. Lots of people buy things with no real intent on keeping them.

 bflood's gear list:bflood's gear list
Nikon D70 Nikon D80 Nikon D7000 Nikon D610 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR +8 more
Mark den Hartog Veteran Member • Posts: 3,675
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens

bflood wrote:

Walmart sees it all the time. Just not at $3,000 per item.

In the 1990s, my wife worked for a few months in a store that sold what I call fine breakables - upscale dishes, glassware, etc. It was common for local women to buy pieces on Wed or Thu and return them on Monday - following the party. Some didn't even bother to wash them. Lots of people buy things with no real intent on keeping them.

that's bad indeed...

Walmart still cheap though 

overniteman Contributing Member • Posts: 842
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens

paulski66 wrote:

I'm not sure how Nikon is supposed to keep costs down if people buy their products and, despite being satisfied with overall performance, return them for no good reason.

+1

yray
yray Senior Member • Posts: 1,498
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
2

fPrime wrote:

Mark den Hartog wrote:

btw I don't see how returning a lens makes it more expensive for everyone?

Consider the time and money wasted by the vendor to process and ship the lens and then the time wasted again to RMA, inspect, and return the product to inventory.

To buy, try, and return is simply a modus operandi for a lot of people, no matter whether they buy clothing, electronics, or anything else. The US retail industry is pretty much built on the premise that anything can be returned. Why? -- because they end up selling more this way as buying becomes "risk free". Think about it.

Besides, in some cases restocking fee is charged, so those companies that feel strongly that they should directly recoup the extra handling cost are already doing it.

sjprintz OP Regular Member • Posts: 382
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
4

My post was not intended to be bragging about testing a lens and returning it nor did I buy the lens with the intent to return it.  I purchased it based on the good reviews with the hope that it would add a tool to my lens collection . However I was merely pointing out that, in my opinion, the value was not there for this lens.   It is a very good lens but I did not feel the value was there after testing it for several days.

 sjprintz's gear list:sjprintz's gear list
Nikon D800E Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR +1 more
BassFisher
BassFisher Regular Member • Posts: 349
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
1

sjprintz wrote:

My post was not intended to be bragging about testing a lens and returning it nor did I buy the lens with the intent to return it.  I purchased it based on the good reviews with the hope that it would add a tool to my lens collection . However I was merely pointing out that, in my opinion, the value was not there for this lens.   It is a very good lens but I did not feel the value was there after testing it for several days.

Your lucky that your not in Australia as to return something to a retailer it has to have a fault, not buyers remorse or just don't like it.

Personally I feel sorry for the shop owner now with lots of unboxed 'second hand' equipment. No wonder your having a hard time over there.

-- hide signature --

BillD
Sydney, Australia
Time is the only thing I don't have enough of.

 BassFisher's gear list:BassFisher's gear list
Nikon D810 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8G ED +2 more
tiko Regular Member • Posts: 163
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
1

While user and site reviews are great sources of information I find that sometimes an item just doesn't live up to the hype. If based on my research I have built a certain expectation and I decide to go out and buy it with the intention of keeping it but then it doesn't meet that expectation, then I don't see why I wouldn't return it. That's one of the reasons return policies exist. And companies/brands that don't want to see buyers doing this would either charge a restocking fee or offer no returns on opened/used products. I would not consider that poor judgement on my side, buyer's remorse or failure to research. However as many of us have experienced that real world use of an item may reveal aspects that were not covered by reviews.

And that's what I think the OP is trying to point out, assuming he intended to keep it rather than just test it and then decide.

-- hide signature --

@AT

 tiko's gear list:tiko's gear list
Nikon D810 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.4G +2 more
jjnik Senior Member • Posts: 1,319
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
2

tiko wrote:

While user and site reviews are great sources of information I find that sometimes an item just doesn't live up to the hype. If based on my research I have built a certain expectation and I decide to go out and buy it with the intention of keeping it but then it doesn't meet that expectation, then I don't see why I wouldn't return it. That's one of the reasons return policies exist. And companies/brands that don't want to see buyers doing this would either charge a restocking fee or offer no returns on opened/used products. I would not consider that poor judgement on my side, buyer's remorse or failure to research. However as many of us have experienced that real world use of an item may reveal aspects that were not covered by reviews.

And that's what I think the OP is trying to point out, assuming he intended to keep it rather than just test it and then decide.

-- hide signature --

@AT

Or you could rent one to do your testing...

Leonard Shepherd
Leonard Shepherd Forum Pro • Posts: 10,674
Re: It depends how you look at it.

I am sure the new 80-400 cannot quite match my 70-200 f2.8 II and 200-400, but it is smaller, lighter and costs 60% less (UK prices) than buying the 2 faster aperture lenses.

-- hide signature --

Leonard Shepherd
Many problems turn out to be a lack of intimate knowledge of complex modern camera equipment.

 Leonard Shepherd's gear list:Leonard Shepherd's gear list
Nikon Coolpix P7700 Nikon D800 Nikon D7100 Nikon D810 Nikon D750 +24 more
nunatak Senior Member • Posts: 2,736
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
2

jjnik wrote:

tiko wrote:

While user and site reviews are great sources of information I find that sometimes an item just doesn't live up to the hype. If based on my research I have built a certain expectation and I decide to go out and buy it with the intention of keeping it but then it doesn't meet that expectation, then I don't see why I wouldn't return it. That's one of the reasons return policies exist. And companies/brands that don't want to see buyers doing this would either charge a restocking fee or offer no returns on opened/used products. I would not consider that poor judgement on my side, buyer's remorse or failure to research. However as many of us have experienced that real world use of an item may reveal aspects that were not covered by reviews.

And that's what I think the OP is trying to point out, assuming he intended to keep it rather than just test it and then decide.

-- hide signature --

@AT

Or you could rent one to do your testing...

but that would cost the consumer money — doh!

it's much better to dump buyers remorse on the retailer and back up the chain.

btw, to date, there have no official (IMATEST) reviews i'm aware of — only informal KR style opinions. i still prefer the IQ of my 300mm f4 AF-S better at 300mm. however, performance and convenience are to me just as important as IQ. especially if i miss the shot while changing out the glass. currently, there is no better safari alternative. if one is going to buy a lens in the first place, it's more efficient to know why one wants it before they buy it. people who collect lenses simply on the basis of their IQ musrt do a very limited range of shooting. still, as long as these retail rentals remain risk free — let the retailer beware.

i'm less sympathetic to the double standards of an argument where someone whines about the price of the same merchandise their own behavior helped inflate. they're selfishly making it more difficult for people that follow behind them to afford the next iteration of glass.

-- hide signature --

design guy

Geomaticsman
Geomaticsman Senior Member • Posts: 1,845
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens
1

Sorry to hear the 80-400VR didn't meet your needs, but I can understand why you wanted to try it. For me, the 80-400VR is good enough to replace my 70-200VRII -- mostly because I need to shoot longer than 200mm most times and don't need f2.8. IMO the 80-400VR IQ beats most 70-200+TC combos, and at half the cost of a used 200-400VR, the 80-400VR provides good value.

But don't pay any mind to the "detractors" about your decision to return it. No lens is perfect and no matter how many reviews you read it's almost impossible to know whether a lens will meet personal expectations until you get it on your camera.

Good luck!

-- hide signature --

Gary -- Some Nikon stuff -- and a preference for wildlife in natural light
www.pbase.com/garyirwin

 Geomaticsman's gear list:Geomaticsman's gear list
Nikon D810 Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR +4 more
ScottRH
ScottRH Senior Member • Posts: 1,712
Re: Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens

paulski66 wrote:

I'm not sure how Nikon is supposed to keep costs down if people buy their products and, despite being satisfied with overall performance, return them for no good reason.

+1

People buy things and can't afford them.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads