Did Nikon screw up?

Started May 22, 2013 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
jacobwhite Forum Member • Posts: 50
Did Nikon screw up?
 jacobwhite's gear list:jacobwhite's gear list
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D +1 more
Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 5D Mark III Nikon D4 Nikon D600 Nikon D700 Nikon D800
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
landw Junior Member • Posts: 46
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

The D800's image quality is certainly not worse than the 5D's. You get a higher resolution and a much better dynamic range, cleaner shadows, more leeway in post processing.

The high ISO performance is very similar. You need to compare using the same output sizes.

So, yeah... I don't see the issue at all.

 landw's gear list:landw's gear list
Sony Alpha 7R
Bruce sawle Regular Member • Posts: 359
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

You can't go wrong with either brand. It really comes down to preference. I shoot both d800 and 5d mk III each has there strengths and weakness in the end they both capture what I need.

chlamchowder Senior Member • Posts: 2,083
Several things to consider

As a D700 user requiring an update, I somehow feel screwed...

Right now, what's the D700 not doing that you need? That's probably the most important thing to consider when looking for a new camera. If you can isolate the specific improvements or new features that you're looking for, the search will be far easier.

1. Switch to Canon and buy a 5DIII (too expensive to switch; what to do with all that glass)? 
2. Buy a D800 - from what I can see it seems that compared to the 5D, the D800 seems comparable on paper - but unless I'm totally wrong it seems in reality its auto-focusing is slower, file sizes annoyingly huge at lesser image quality, in particular colours and noise, and slower.

People have said that the D800's AF is fine. Big file sizes, yeah, but noise is up there with the 5D III up to ISO 6400 or so. Above that, you can still get pretty close with some post processing.

3. Buy a D600, which is a step backwards in most things except the sensor, and size. It could almost work, if it wasn't for the ridiculous AF area - all crammed in the middle, whaaaat??? And its AF speed is sloooow!

AF is definitely not slow. I have a D600, and use it to shoot sports all the time. The AF area is is a bit if a problem for off center compositions, but for action it's a non-issue (I usually don't even have all 39 points active when shooting sports. 9 pt, or 21 pt dynamic area if my tracking technique is really not working out, typically works best).

4. Buy a D4, which is heavier, bulkier, and too expensive. I'd go for this option if it wasn't so bulky, if at least I could get it without the battery grip - I never got the use of the battery grip. Changing a battery isn't that much of a problem that it would mean that the grip absolutely needs to be built-in!

Somehow the D800 is a lesser camera than the D700 - as a D700 shooter I find myself stuck with unpleasing choices

It's not a lesser camera. It's a camera designed for a different purpose. It beats the D700's image quality in every situation at the expense of speed (but not responsiveness), and brings in a few extra features like video recording.

And as a final note, the D600's AF is definitely not slow, even before the firmware update.

 chlamchowder's gear list:chlamchowder's gear list
Sony Alpha DSLR-A580 Nikon D600 Sony DT 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 SAM +8 more
shaunly Contributing Member • Posts: 542
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

You need to check your sources again. Not sure where you're getting these rubbish info.

-- hide signature --


leicaman Veteran Member • Posts: 3,778
Nikon's design is great. Service is the real problem

Both D600 & D800 are better in many ways than their Canon counterparts... especially for fine-art work... but the D600 has a serious contamination problem which Nikon seems loath to address,  This gives the edge to Canon on the service and support and quality areas... and these are VERY important!

 leicaman's gear list:leicaman's gear list
Nikon D810
narddogg81 Senior Member • Posts: 1,029
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

this post is so full of fail its hard to know where to start

harold1968 Veteran Member • Posts: 4,687
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

you are badly misinformed
the IQ of the D800 is far superior to the current canon FF range.

-- hide signature --


 harold1968's gear list:harold1968's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 Sony RX1R Olympus E-M1 Sony Alpha 7 Sony FE 35mm F2.8 +1 more
bills_pix Contributing Member • Posts: 541
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

"As a D700 user requiring an update"

I find it hard to believe you have outgrown the capabilities of the D700.  I use mine as a complement to my D800 and the image quality from the D700 still amazes me.

-- hide signature --

'There is only one success - to be able to spend your life your own way.' -- Christopher Morley

 bills_pix's gear list:bills_pix's gear list
Nikon D2X Nikon D700 Nikon D800 Nikon D800E Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED +8 more
Jane79 Regular Member • Posts: 428
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

The OP is not interested in photography but something completely different. Do not waste your time.

Reilly Diefenbach
Reilly Diefenbach Forum Pro • Posts: 10,326
Jake, you really screwed up.

Come on, man, stop your whining.

trend1 Contributing Member • Posts: 975
Re: Nikon's design is great. Service is the real problem

leicaman wrote:

Both D600 & D800 are better in many ways than their Canon counterparts... especially for fine-art work... but the D600 has a serious contamination problem which Nikon seems loath to address,  This gives the edge to Canon on the service and support and quality areas... and these are VERY important!

+2 Well put!

Silverstreaks Regular Member • Posts: 252
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

>>>>>> lesser image quality, in particular colours and noise<<<<<<

D800 lesser image quality. Personally I think the D800 would be toooooo much camera for you.

Better if you stick with the D700 or even better switch to Canon

ScottnLaguna Contributing Member • Posts: 719
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

Interesting first post, Jacob. You may catch a few.

 ScottnLaguna's gear list:ScottnLaguna's gear list
Nikon D300 Nikon D800 Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II
Darrelll Senior Member • Posts: 2,208
Re: Did Nikon screw up?


-- hide signature --


 Darrelll's gear list:Darrelll's gear list
Nikon D70 Nikon D200 Nikon 1 J1 Nikon D800
Scott Oberle Regular Member • Posts: 255
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

I would agree with those who support the D700. What can't it do that you need. I upgraded from the D700 to the D800 and am sorry. The D800 takes exceptional images if you need to either do large crops or make very, very large prints. But the D700 also takes exceptional images, and is not nearly as finicky when used...

-- hide signature --

Scott Oberle

 Scott Oberle's gear list:Scott Oberle's gear list
Nikon D810
Frozencpu Forum Member • Posts: 74
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

This guy with his D600 and D800 non sense I don't even think canon comes anywhere close to d800 in form of res and video. The OP should stick to point and shoot.

AllMankind Contributing Member • Posts: 564

One post and it's to complain that Nikon screwed up?

Pradipta Dutta
Pradipta Dutta Veteran Member • Posts: 9,781
Trolling with your first post?

Trying to stir up the storm, buddy? Got a troll assignment from somewhere?

I won't be surprised if your post is taken down pretty soon.

-- hide signature --

My Online Gallery - http://www.pbase.com/pradipta

 Pradipta Dutta's gear list:Pradipta Dutta's gear list
Nikon D2X Nikon D3 Nikon D800 Nikon D3200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF +5 more
ultimitsu Veteran Member • Posts: 6,630
Re: Did Nikon screw up?

jacobwhite wrote:

Nikon seemed to be getting it right with the d700/d3 duo - but now I'm not so sure...

your intuition was correct - nikon did in fact screw it up with D700, all was corrected with D600 and D800.


D700 had a cult following, but outside that it was a commercial failure.

I'm thinking long term and it seems that Canon has been more reliable for professional needs over all...

100,000 clicks is more reliable than 200,000?

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads