Intervalometer BS from Canon- may switch to a value added brand!!!
Every company preaches they are "Focused on the Customer "
Every company preaches they are "Focused on Safety"
Every company preaches they are "Focused on Quality"
Every company preaches they are "Focused on Employee Satisfaction"
Every company preaches they are "Focused on Yada, Yada, Yada"
Of course we all know what they are really focused on and that is making money.
They are all the same. Canon, Nikon, Fuji, Walmart, GM, etc.. All of the top focuses take a back seat to the last focus.. That's the way it has always been and that's the way it'll always be..
And if they aren't focused on making money, they can focus on sending out layoff slips when they go out of business, leaving employees without jobs and users with orphaned cameras.
Canon, Nikon etc. are not running social programs though many people seem to think they should be.
It's nice to say that nice pictures are nice.
DotCom Editor wrote:
If I don't see some firmware updates for the 5D and later bodies that include the intervalometer, I'm gone and gonna pawn my Canon S#!t for somthing [sic] more reasonably supported.
Yes, I'm sure Canon is now rushing to develop a solution. Good luck with whatever you buy. John James Audobon didn't even need a camera.
Odd that someone who would invest so much in a system camera would suddenly declare the whole thing s#!t over something so freaking piddly. Anyone who has spent any time with Canon DSLR's knows what Magic Lantern is, that it is free, that it won't void the warranty, and that it will solve this little problem much more easily, quickly and certainly than will throwing a hissy fit.
It's nice to say that nice pictures are nice.
... And I feel fine!
I was going to reply: Go to your room and stop playing with your dad's camera! But hey, we all have cranky days.
EOS Utility is the reason why it's not built-in.
So...we have a hummingbird nest on our back porch with 2 eggs and a faithful mom, we are trying our best to not disturb her, I've been able to setup my tripod in a way she tolerates, but my 5D, 10D, and LX5 all lack a built in intervalometer. I dug through an old drawer and found our Powershot S40, charged up the batt, and checked the menu, it has a built-in intervalometer which allows for 1-100 shots from 1 min to 60min apart. wtf Canon, why does my 11 year old digicam have this feature and my $7K worth of later bodys do not? There's no excuse for this, there's no reason to force people to buy the f#*king electronic shtter release, especially now that Nikon, Pany, and Sony have the intervalometer built in like the ole S40.
I'd like to post some 5D 100 2.8 Macro photos of the little nest, but instead I'll post some S40 intervalometer pics.
To be fair I'm going to post something similar in the Pany forum because my LX5 lacks this feature also, wheras the LX7 includes it- also BS.
If I don't see some firmware updates for the 5D and later bodies that include the intervalometer, I'm gone and gonna pawn my Canon S#!t for somthing more reasonably supported. Behind on sensor tech, behind on priceing models, that may be new, but screwing your customers out of basic features not so new.-- hide signature --
Summit County Photog
Isn't this the way to go for this sort of problem?
When faced with doing time lapses of ice crystal growth, a simple USB link and EOS Utility enabled me to run for 24 hours or more, though I needed a mains unit (available from 3rd parties at low cost). Using software such as Photolapse made it easy to create time lapse movies too!
I agree it would be good to have in camera, but there are advantages to having a remote release as a separate accessory, such as stopping vibrations or movement associated with pressing the shutter button.
Also, you can get a cheap copy of the Canon intervalometer from eBay or Amazon for around $10 or so, no big deal.
pete zeugma wrote:
obviously went waaaayy over the top of your head..
Nope...not at all. Obviously the original intent of the post is lost on you....that is why your analogy failed. Wow...two failures in one thread. Why don't you try for a hat track?
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%