How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

Started Apr 19, 2013 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
The Jacal
The Jacal Senior Member • Posts: 1,268
How badly is this photo breaking the rules?
8

Hi all,

I quite like this photo, I was lucky with the timing, lack of people, the weather; the cloudburst that finished about two minutes before gives a nice reflection, and lucky with the 'antenna'.

I know that it doesn't follow traditional rules. I tried to get a bit of symmetry, a bit of balance without having too much dead space.

Insect man.

It's an 'old' pic from the summer; I mislaid the memory card and found it recently, which was nice.

Anyway, what do you think?

Constructive criticism is good, if you're going to be 'mean-spirited', no problem, just say what is wrong, 

Thanks.

Jon.

-- hide signature --

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7467981@N05/
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." Richard Dawkins.

 The Jacal's gear list:The Jacal's gear list
Olympus SH-50 Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Nikon D80 Olympus PEN E-P1 Olympus PEN E-P2 +17 more
Bob Tullis
Bob Tullis Forum Pro • Posts: 31,526
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?
6

I see nothing about rules here that are flagrantly in conflict.   I like it very much.

I'd have toyed with it further myself, mainly trying to get the 'horizon' level for more balance, but that's a typical back seat driver type comment.

YOu know the rules, but you can trust your vision for when it feels right.  Use the rules to determine what might be wrong when it feels wrong.

-- hide signature --

...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com
"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.

 Bob Tullis's gear list:Bob Tullis's gear list
Sony Alpha 7S Sony Alpha 7R II Voigtlander 28mm F2 Ultron Sony RX1R II Sony Alpha 7 II +16 more
PC Wheeler
PC Wheeler Forum Pro • Posts: 16,136
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?
2

Rules? You mean you didn't get a release from the subject?

We learn the rules of composition, but they are not dogma. Breaking them (and I'm not sure you did) creatively is common and often essential.

1/4000 sec at f/9 and ISO 320: Must have been very bright!  But it worked well.

-- hide signature --

Phil

 PC Wheeler's gear list:PC Wheeler's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 Sony Alpha a6300 Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* E 24mm F1.8 ZA Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS +5 more
walkaround Senior Member • Posts: 2,551
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

The Jacal wrote:

I quite like this photo

Then why worry about "rules"?

Prairie Pal Senior Member • Posts: 2,472
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?
1

It depends on whether or not you're entering it in a color or b/w class. 

The Jacal
The Jacal OP Senior Member • Posts: 1,268
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?
2

Bob Tullis wrote:

I see nothing about rules here that are flagrantly in conflict.   I like it very much.

Thanks.

I'd have toyed with it further myself, mainly trying to get the 'horizon' level for more balance, but that's a typical back seat driver type comment.

I only noticed the level after I posted.

YOu know the rules, but you can trust your vision for when it feels right.  Use the rules to determine what might be wrong when it feels wrong.

Sure, thanks, I just wondered if it worked in a general concensus.

Thanks,

Jon.

-- hide signature --

...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com
"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.

-- hide signature --

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7467981@N05/
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." Richard Dawkins.

 The Jacal's gear list:The Jacal's gear list
Olympus SH-50 Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Nikon D80 Olympus PEN E-P1 Olympus PEN E-P2 +17 more
The Jacal
The Jacal OP Senior Member • Posts: 1,268
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

PC Wheeler wrote:

Rules? You mean you didn't get a release from the subject?

Living in France, that's a contentious subject...

We learn the rules of composition, but they are not dogma. Breaking them (and I'm not sure you did) creatively is common and often essential.

I agree totally, as I do with Bob also,  but for some they are dogma, I was interested what people would think.

1/4000 sec at f/9 and ISO 320: Must have been very bright!  But it worked well.

Yes, I'm not too sure how that happened. It was probably because I was with my wife, so any kind of 'fiddling' becomes a real nuisance to her.  She has a sony point n shoot, always in iAuto, or whatever Sony calls it.

And, yes, it was bright, especially after the rain; no clouds and lots of reflection.

-- hide signature --

Phil

Thanks, Jon.

-- hide signature --

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7467981@N05/
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." Richard Dawkins.

 The Jacal's gear list:The Jacal's gear list
Olympus SH-50 Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Nikon D80 Olympus PEN E-P1 Olympus PEN E-P2 +17 more
The Jacal
The Jacal OP Senior Member • Posts: 1,268
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

walkaround wrote:

The Jacal wrote:

I quite like this photo

Then why worry about "rules"?

As I said above, I was interested to see how it fits in with others' ideas on 'rules'.

Thanks.

-- hide signature --

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7467981@N05/
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." Richard Dawkins.

 The Jacal's gear list:The Jacal's gear list
Olympus SH-50 Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Nikon D80 Olympus PEN E-P1 Olympus PEN E-P2 +17 more
Cliff Reiter Regular Member • Posts: 163
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?
2

I think the photo is beautiful and I assume your broken "rule" is the rule of two thirds. It seems to me that 2/3 is to provide a subject with relationship or context. Your photo coveys isolation and symmetry beautifully with the ever so slight asymmetries conveying progression of time. Is the focal plane in the foreground? Is that intentional? I think having the subject unfocussed works here. Well done.

Best, Cliff

The Jacal
The Jacal OP Senior Member • Posts: 1,268
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

Prairie Pal wrote:

It depends on whether or not you're entering it in a color or b/w class. 

Absolutely!!  I did actually umm and ahh about whether to leave it in colour or not!

Thanks.

-- hide signature --

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7467981@N05/
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." Richard Dawkins.

 The Jacal's gear list:The Jacal's gear list
Olympus SH-50 Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Nikon D80 Olympus PEN E-P1 Olympus PEN E-P2 +17 more
The Jacal
The Jacal OP Senior Member • Posts: 1,268
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

Cliff Reiter wrote:

I think the photo is beautiful and I assume your broken "rule" is the rule of two thirds.

Thanks, and yes, I ' broke' the rules of thirds;

It seems to me that 2/3 is to provide a subject with relationship or context. Your photo coveys isolation and symmetry beautifully with the ever so slight asymmetries conveying progression of time. Is the focal plane in the foreground? Is that intentional?

Having the subject in the dead centre can sometimes sap the life out of an image, but i think it works here.

I was with my wife (see reply above), the weather had just changed, summer shower which led to a bright spell, I saw this guy walking along, i got off a few shots quickly, and  I think I missed focus, so to answer your question, it was unintentional.

I think having the subject unfocussed works here. Well done.

Thanks, it kind of leads into it.

Best, Cliff

Thanks agian,

Jon.

-- hide signature --

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7467981@N05/
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." Richard Dawkins.

 The Jacal's gear list:The Jacal's gear list
Olympus SH-50 Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Nikon D80 Olympus PEN E-P1 Olympus PEN E-P2 +17 more
richarddd
richarddd Senior Member • Posts: 2,982
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

Very nice photo.

The only "rule" it seems to break is the rule of thirds, but there's an exception for reflections. The common example is a landscape photo with body of water reflecting the upper portion of the photo across a centered horizon.

Compositional rules are suggestions, nothing more.

 richarddd's gear list:richarddd's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 UMC Fisheye MFT +3 more
s_grins
s_grins Forum Pro • Posts: 10,380
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

Well, I have not found this photo appealing to my senses. It is very calculated and lacks of 'twist' and surprise.

Also I'd crop this photo all over to bring the center closer and to eliminate 2 black triangles on the left and right where floor and 'raising sun' meet together

-- hide signature --

Looking for equilibrium...

 s_grins's gear list:s_grins's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G Vario 45-200mm F4-5.6 OIS Sigma 30mm F2.8 EX DN +3 more
Ulric Senior Member • Posts: 3,595
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?
1

You could have placed the person a bit to the left or right to "comply" with the rule of thirds. But I think that rule deserves to be broken. It is amusing when someone posts a bunch of pictures and you can almost see the 3x3 grid in each one.

 Ulric's gear list:Ulric's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH +9 more
oeoek Contributing Member • Posts: 502
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

Rules are just guideline, I would not worry about it too much.

Having said that, I would, like others mentioned, level the horizontal line in the middle, and I would also crop the bottom a little to remove the dryer floor stones and the 3 heavy black lines.

Uhm... Drats, drats and double drats! Foiled again, now it is a 2/3 1/3 composition

 oeoek's gear list:oeoek's gear list
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.8 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus PEN E-PM2 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm 1:4-5.6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 +4 more
LincolnB Veteran Member • Posts: 4,144
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

The Jacal wrote:

Bob Tullis wrote:

I see nothing about rules here that are flagrantly in conflict.   I like it very much.

Thanks.

I'd have toyed with it further myself, mainly trying to get the 'horizon' level for more balance, but that's a typical back seat driver type comment.

I only noticed the level after I posted.

YOu know the rules, but you can trust your vision for when it feels right.  Use the rules to determine what might be wrong when it feels wrong.

Sure, thanks, I just wondered if it worked in a general concensus.

Thanks,

Jon.

I agree with Bob about the leveling. One of the "rules" is that it's okay to make a symmetrical composition but it has to be as symmetrical as possible, otherwise it looks out of sorts. There are more composition types than just the "rule of thirds"; symmetry is one.

 LincolnB's gear list:LincolnB's gear list
Olympus PEN E-P1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 Fujifilm X-E1 Sony Alpha 7 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 +7 more
GeorgianBay1939
GeorgianBay1939 Senior Member • Posts: 3,644
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

The Jacal wrote:

Hi all,

I quite like this photo, I was lucky with the timing, lack of people, the weather; the cloudburst that finished about two minutes before gives a nice reflection, and lucky with the 'antenna'.

I know that it doesn't follow traditional rules. I tried to get a bit of symmetry, a bit of balance without having too much dead space.

Insect man.

It's an 'old' pic from the summer; I mislaid the memory card and found it recently, which was nice.

Anyway, what do you think?

Constructive criticism is good, if you're going to be 'mean-spirited', no problem, just say what is wrong, 

Thanks.

Jon.

-- hide signature --

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7467981@N05/
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." Richard Dawkins.

Being a newbie, my rules aren't well burned in.

When I look at that image I see great left/right symmetry and very little up/down symmetry, in spite of the very nice high contrast reflection.   I was bothered by the foreground and the little corner triangles and decided to download and play with it.  I only do that with images that I really like and find challenging.

Here is what works best for me.

LR4: Crop maintaining AR, Autotone to make the Jack discernable.

Trying to put that into words is difficult for me.... maybe the lead-ins of the upper surface is more powerful when symmetrical, the triangles and earlier foreground are distracting, the slight brightening of shadow will cause the viewer to linger a little longer on the image and notice other things about it ... like the beautiful geometrical figures on the right.  And of course the title is a great prod in the right direction!!

General Douglas MacArthur: "Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind."

Seemed to have worked for him.   I don't know if it applies to photographers. 

t

 GeorgianBay1939's gear list:GeorgianBay1939's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH +9 more
PStu Regular Member • Posts: 338
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

GeorgianBay1939 wrote:

The Jacal wrote:

Hi all,

I quite like this photo, I was lucky with the timing, lack of people, the weather; the cloudburst that finished about two minutes before gives a nice reflection, and lucky with the 'antenna'.

I know that it doesn't follow traditional rules. I tried to get a bit of symmetry, a bit of balance without having too much dead space.

Insect man.

It's an 'old' pic from the summer; I mislaid the memory card and found it recently, which was nice.

Anyway, what do you think?

Constructive criticism is good, if you're going to be 'mean-spirited', no problem, just say what is wrong, 

Thanks.

Jon.

-- hide signature --

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7467981@N05/
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." Richard Dawkins.

Being a newbie, my rules aren't well burned in.

When I look at that image I see great left/right symmetry and very little up/down symmetry, in spite of the very nice high contrast reflection.   I was bothered by the foreground and the little corner triangles and decided to download and play with it.  I only do that with images that I really like and find challenging.

Here is what works best for me.

LR4: Crop maintaining AR, Autotone to make the Jack discernable.

Trying to put that into words is difficult for me.... maybe the lead-ins of the upper surface is more powerful when symmetrical, the triangles and earlier foreground are distracting, the slight brightening of shadow will cause the viewer to linger a little longer on the image and notice other things about it ... like the beautiful geometrical figures on the right.  And of course the title is a great prod in the right direction!!

General Douglas MacArthur: "Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind."

Seemed to have worked for him.   I don't know if it applies to photographers. 

t

This version is stronger.  The triangles didn't bother me so much as the dark foreground that was slightly sharper in the original.  Yes, the eye goes to light areas, but it also goes to sharp areas.  This slight tweaking of the levels improves the shot.

 PStu's gear list:PStu's gear list
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Canon EOS 450D Olympus PEN E-PL2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II +9 more
Peter Bendheim
Peter Bendheim Senior Member • Posts: 2,190
Re: How badly is this photo breaking the rules?

There are no rules. An image should look good to the eye and not be jarring. Most of all it should say something and not be meaningless. Without meaning an image has no value, it's just a recording.

Rules are things perpetuated by camera technophiles and photo clubs. Silly judges in neighbourhood photo contests judge images by technical rules, not by content.

Shoot images from the heart and soul. Photography is a language. Say something meaningful using the language of photography. All the matters is content!!!  Ask yourself  why you want to take a particular shot. When you have understood why, tell that through the medium of the image. Express it. The rest will fall into place. Really. I promise.

-- hide signature --

--
Peter Bendheim
www.peterbendheim.com

--

 Peter Bendheim's gear list:Peter Bendheim's gear list
Canon PowerShot G1 X Fujifilm X100T Fujifilm X-Pro1 Canon EOS M Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 +1 more
G1Houston Senior Member • Posts: 2,582
It does not work for me
2

The two halves are sectioned right in the middle resulting in an image in which its elements are broken and un-united.  The tilted horizon did not help.

 G1Houston's gear list:G1Houston's gear list
Olympus PEN E-PL5 Nikon D7100 Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm F1.8G Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +8 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads