inane prattle

Started Apr 8, 2013 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
James Pilcher Veteran Member • Posts: 8,500
inane prattle
8

In a current large thread, one of our own wrote this:

"Big aperture lenses for m4/3 are not really needed because of improvement in sensitivity - and IBIS in Oly. [S]o again, a form of snobbishness."

[insert expletive here] By his measure, the Nikkor 200mm f/2 VR is not really needed on Nikon's ultra-sensitive DSLR bodies. Put that VR in a 200mm f/6.3 and that's all those Nikon folks really need. Own anything faster and they are snobs.

How many of you are now going to toss your f/2 and faster "snob" lenses? Apparently you don't really need them.

Jim Pilcher

Summit County, Colorado, USA

 James Pilcher's gear list:James Pilcher's gear list
Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Fujifilm X70 Olympus PEN-F +7 more
Ollie 2 Senior Member • Posts: 1,530
Re: inane prattle
4

That's just like, his opinion, man.

I see his point.

But I'm keeping my 0.95's.

 Ollie 2's gear list:Ollie 2's gear list
Sigma DP1 Merrill Sigma DP2 Merrill Sigma DP3 Merrill Olympus PEN E-P2 Fujifilm X-Pro1 +19 more
James Pilcher OP Veteran Member • Posts: 8,500
opinions and paper weights

Ollie 2 wrote:

That's just like, his opinion, man.

Yes, I agree that everyone is entitled to an opinion, no matter how uninformed or misguided.

I see his point.

But I'm keeping my 0.95's.

I'm not sure, but if you see his point, I think the rules stipulate that you must use only kit zooms from this point forward. Those 0.95's will make very solid paper weights, though.

Jim Pilcher
Summit County, Colorado, USA

 James Pilcher's gear list:James Pilcher's gear list
Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Fujifilm X70 Olympus PEN-F +7 more
Great Bustard Forum Pro • Posts: 33,754
For sure, but...
3

James Pilcher wrote:

In a current large thread, one of our own wrote this:

"Big aperture lenses for m4/3 are not really needed because of improvement in sensitivity - and IBIS in Oly. [S]o again, a form of snobbishness."

[insert expletive here] By his measure, the Nikkor 200mm f/2 VR is not really needed on Nikon's ultra-sensitive DSLR bodies. Put that VR in a 200mm f/6.3 and that's all those Nikon folks really need. Own anything faster and they are snobs.

How many of you are now going to toss your f/2 and faster "snob" lenses? Apparently you don't really need them.

...such comments are to be expected from someone who "loathes bokeh", feels that deep DOF and sharpness across the frame represent the epitome of photography, and anything else is "snobbery".

JeanPierre Martel Senior Member • Posts: 2,859
Re: inane prattle
1

James Pilcher wrote:

In a current large thread, one of our own wrote this:

"Big aperture lenses for m4/3 are not really needed because of improvement in sensitivity - and IBIS in Oly. [S]o again, a form of snobbishness." (...)

How many of you are now going to toss your f/2 and faster "snob" lenses? Apparently you don't really need them.

Look at it the other way. I already have a cheap and very sharp telelens. But its widest aperture is F/4,0.

Since I don't care when ISO reach 3,600, will I pay a thousand of dollars to get a heavy and faster telezoom with razor thin DOF when its diaphragm is fully open? Probably not.

I'm not suggesting that such a lens is useless. I'm just saying that if I was unable to take picture above 800 ISO, I would desperately need faster lenses.

 JeanPierre Martel's gear list:JeanPierre Martel's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm 1:2.8 Macro Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Leica Nocticron 42.5mm Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro +24 more
zxaar Veteran Member • Posts: 3,944
what is not expected ..
2

Great Bustard wrote:

James Pilcher wrote:

In a current large thread, one of our own wrote this:

"Big aperture lenses for m4/3 are not really needed because of improvement in sensitivity - and IBIS in Oly. [S]o again, a form of snobbishness."

[insert expletive here] By his measure, the Nikkor 200mm f/2 VR is not really needed on Nikon's ultra-sensitive DSLR bodies. Put that VR in a 200mm f/6.3 and that's all those Nikon folks really need. Own anything faster and they are snobs.

How many of you are now going to toss your f/2 and faster "snob" lenses? Apparently you don't really need them.

...such comments are to be expected from someone who "loathes bokeh", feels that deep DOF and sharpness across the frame represent the epitome of photography, and anything else is "snobbery".

what is not expected from such person is his investment in m43 sensor rather than pentax Q or smaller sensor cams or cellphones. Nothing could beat pentax Q with 50mm F1.8 etc lens when deeper DOF is needed.

-- hide signature --

::> Knowledge is mother of efficiency.

dgnelson Contributing Member • Posts: 818
Re: inane prattle
10

Whereas I might not agree with what the person you are talking about said, I don't think it's fair to start a thread to pick on him.  Let it go.

Dan

PC Wheeler
PC Wheeler Forum Pro • Posts: 16,092
Re: inane prattle

Lots of inane prattle to be found in any forum, Jim. You cited one of the lesser examples

At least it wasn't nasty like some I've found.

-- hide signature --

Phil

 PC Wheeler's gear list:PC Wheeler's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 Sony Alpha a6300 Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* E 24mm F1.8 ZA Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS +5 more
Dave Sanders Senior Member • Posts: 1,797
Re: inane prattle
3

Ollie 2 wrote:

That's just like, his opinion, man.

The dude abides.

-- hide signature --

Dave Sanders

Landscapephoto99 Senior Member • Posts: 2,736
Re: inane prattle

James Pilcher wrote:

In a current large thread, one of our own wrote this:

"Big aperture lenses for m4/3 are not really needed because of improvement in sensitivity - and IBIS in Oly. [S]o again, a form of snobbishness."

[insert expletive here] By his measure, the Nikkor 200mm f/2 VR is not really needed on Nikon's ultra-sensitive DSLR bodies. Put that VR in a 200mm f/6.3 and that's all those Nikon folks really need. Own anything faster and they are snobs.

How many of you are now going to toss your f/2 and faster "snob" lenses? Apparently you don't really need them.

Jim Pilcher

Summit County, Colorado, USA

This may be a common feeling amongst those who are used to taking snapshots with a point and shoot and suddenly find themselves with Oly's nice IBIS / great high ISO.  They don't understand composition, DoF, etc. but will likely learn the craft of photography over time if they keep at it.

Paul De Bra
Paul De Bra Forum Pro • Posts: 12,083
That statement is wrong for a different reason...

It is true that sensors have become better and IBIS is very good as well. But there is another reason for still wanting faster lenses:

- Typically a lens is at its best when stopped down at least 1 stop but in most cases 2 stops.

- With the smaller m43 sensor (relative to 35mm) diffraction sets in earlier. The optimal f-stop for m43 seems to be f/4, with f/5.6 still quite usable but f/8 starting to show diffraction.

These two factors combined mean that unless a lens is already at its best wide open you need at least an f/2.8 lens (1 stop down means f/4 and 2 stops down means f/5.6 so that just does it) and that f/2 is actually a safer bet (with 2 stops down reaching the optimal f/4 stop).

So the only really valid argument that says we don't need faster lenses (except for shallow DoF) would say that we don't need lenses faster than f/2.

If you would translate this story to APS-C it would say that f/4 lenses are acceptable and f/2.8 is better, and for 35mm f/5.6 is acceptable and f/4 is better.

-- hide signature --

Slowly learning to use the Olympus OM-D E-M5.
Public pictures at http://debra.zenfolio.com/.

 Paul De Bra's gear list:Paul De Bra's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 +5 more
richarddd
richarddd Senior Member • Posts: 2,982
Re: inane prattle
4
 richarddd's gear list:richarddd's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 UMC Fisheye MFT +3 more
Detail Man
Detail Man Forum Pro • Posts: 16,492
Sharpness is not everything, absolutely, ...

... but resolution perhaps is.

s_grins
s_grins Forum Pro • Posts: 10,338
Re: inane prattle

James Pilcher wrote:

In a current large thread, one of our own wrote this:

"Big aperture lenses for m4/3 are not really needed because of improvement in sensitivity - and IBIS in Oly. [S]o again, a form of snobbishness."

[insert expletive here] By his measure, the Nikkor 200mm f/2 VR is not really needed on Nikon's ultra-sensitive DSLR bodies. Put that VR in a 200mm f/6.3 and that's all those Nikon folks really need. Own anything faster and they are snobs.

How many of you are now going to toss your f/2 and faster "snob" lenses? Apparently you don't really need them.

Jim Pilcher

Summit County, Colorado, USA

Even so I agree with you, the reason to respond is your snobbish - "Nikon's ultra-sensitive DSLR bodies"

It stinks too.

Regards.

S.

-- hide signature --

Looking for equilibrium...

 s_grins's gear list:s_grins's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G Vario 45-200mm F4-5.6 OIS Sigma 30mm F2.8 EX DN +3 more
(unknown member) Veteran Member • Posts: 3,348
Re: inane prattle

I'm obviously a snob.

I don't own anything slower than 2.8 and never will.

tt321 Senior Member • Posts: 7,391
Re: what is not expected ..

zxaar wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

James Pilcher wrote:

In a current large thread, one of our own wrote this:

"Big aperture lenses for m4/3 are not really needed because of improvement in sensitivity - and IBIS in Oly. [S]o again, a form of snobbishness."

[insert expletive here] By his measure, the Nikkor 200mm f/2 VR is not really needed on Nikon's ultra-sensitive DSLR bodies. Put that VR in a 200mm f/6.3 and that's all those Nikon folks really need. Own anything faster and they are snobs.

How many of you are now going to toss your f/2 and faster "snob" lenses? Apparently you don't really need them.

...such comments are to be expected from someone who "loathes bokeh", feels that deep DOF and sharpness across the frame represent the epitome of photography, and anything else is "snobbery".

what is not expected from such person is his investment in m43 sensor rather than pentax Q or smaller sensor cams or cellphones. Nothing could beat pentax Q with 50mm F1.8 etc lens when deeper DOF is needed.

You don't need a Pentax Q to have the kind of DoF he wants. Just stop your FF wide angle (or even standard lens) to about F8 (or your M43 to F4) and you are there in the vast majority of cases.

Just Having Fun Veteran Member • Posts: 3,869
Partially true

As others and I have discussed in the Nikon forums, since I can shoot fast action sports at 1/2000+ sec shutter speeds at F/5.6 and higher with my D600 (and still have virtually no noise), the only reason to use F/2.8 would be to get a shallower DoF.

olliess Senior Member • Posts: 1,163
Re: Partially true

Just Having Fun wrote:

As others and I have discussed in the Nikon forums, since I can shoot fast action sports at 1/2000+ sec shutter speeds at F/5.6 and higher with my D600 (and still have virtually no noise), the only reason to use F/2.8 would be to get a shallower DoF.

An f/2.8 lens will help your AF for fast action sports, though.

Anders W Forum Pro • Posts: 21,466
Re: That statement is wrong for a different reason...

Paul De Bra wrote:

It is true that sensors have become better and IBIS is very good as well. But there is another reason for still wanting faster lenses:

- Typically a lens is at its best when stopped down at least 1 stop but in most cases 2 stops.

That's true as a purely descriptive empirical generalization, although if we are talking FF lenses rather than MFT lenses, you'd have to add another stop or two. With such lenses, at least if they are pretty fast, it is not unusual that you have to stop down three or even four stops before the optimum is reached.

But why is it that you have to stop down to reach optimal performance? Is it because it is impossible to design an f/4-lens that is just as good wide open at f/4 as an f/2-lens stopped down two stops? I think not. Rather, I think it is because it is easier to keep optical aberrations at bay at f/4 than at f/2.

Personally, I'd much rather have f/2-lenses that peak at f/4 than f/4-lenses that peak wide open even if the performance from f/4 on is just the same. But there is no doubt in my mind that the f/4-lenses we are talking about could be built.

- With the smaller m43 sensor (relative to 35mm) diffraction sets in earlier. The optimal f-stop for m43 seems to be f/4, with f/5.6 still quite usable but f/8 starting to show diffraction.

These two factors combined mean that unless a lens is already at its best wide open you need at least an f/2.8 lens (1 stop down means f/4 and 2 stops down means f/5.6 so that just does it) and that f/2 is actually a safer bet (with 2 stops down reaching the optimal f/4 stop).

So the only really valid argument that says we don't need faster lenses (except for shallow DoF) would say that we don't need lenses faster than f/2.

If you would translate this story to APS-C it would say that f/4 lenses are acceptable and f/2.8 is better, and for 35mm f/5.6 is acceptable and f/4 is better.

-- hide signature --

Slowly learning to use the Olympus OM-D E-M5.
Public pictures at http://debra.zenfolio.com/.

 Anders W's gear list:Anders W's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH +28 more
String
String Senior Member • Posts: 1,580
Re: Partially true

And you are not going to shoot hockey at 1/2000 and f5.6 on any current camera.

 String's gear list:String's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro +3 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads