Viewer 3 : Good and bad...

Started Apr 7, 2013 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Kevin Sutton
Kevin Sutton Contributing Member • Posts: 943
Viewer 3 : Good and bad...
3

Hi

Just tried out Viewer 3.  A lot faster than Viewer 2 and much sleeker interface - all good.

Bad news is that 16-bit TIFF's are still stripped of their EXIF metadata. Shame they couldn't get that right.

Cheers Kevin

 Kevin Sutton's gear list:Kevin Sutton's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 Olympus E-M1 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm 1:2.8 Macro Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 +11 more
Andy Hewitt Veteran Member • Posts: 3,108
Re: Viewer 3 : Good and bad...

I dunno, it just looks like mutton dressed up as lamb to me. It's still as cumbersome to use, and still shows jagged edges to previews. There's little there to drag me away from Aperture.

-- hide signature --

Andy Hewitt
Using Olympus E-420 and Apple Mac Mini '09.

 Andy Hewitt's gear list:Andy Hewitt's gear list
Nikon D5100 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR Topaz Adjust Apple iPhone 5c +3 more
goblin Veteran Member • Posts: 3,189
Re: Viewer 3 : Good and bad...
1

The bad on my side is that it would simply not install on my xp machine. Googled the error - found explanations here on dpreview about installation problems with every single Olympus program at one time or the other. Something about the installer being written by someone with a negative iq.

 goblin's gear list:goblin's gear list
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sigma DP1 Merrill Sigma DP2 Merrill Sigma DP3 Merrill Olympus E-1 +41 more
joergzielosko Regular Member • Posts: 383
Re: Viewer 3 : Good and bad...

goblin wrote:

The bad on my side is that it would simply not install on my xp machine.

Installation worked flawlessly on XP here. Because the test was in a VM, I cannot judge the performance yet...

 joergzielosko's gear list:joergzielosko's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Panasonic 12-35mm F2.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm 1:1.8 +13 more
Baladam Regular Member • Posts: 173
How about tethered shooting ?

I wonder if it is available on Viewer 3 .

mpeman
mpeman Senior Member • Posts: 1,855
It is just OK

A little bump in speed is great.  The interface and operation have all remained pretty much the same in the raw area...except that maybe the large-ish interface looks like it needs a blacklight to use :).

-- hide signature --

Regards,
Kevin
--

Ulfric M Douglas Veteran Member • Posts: 4,629
Re: Viewer 3 : Good and bad...

goblin wrote:

The bad on my side is that it would simply not install on my xp machine. Googled the error - found explanations here on dpreview about installation problems with every single Olympus program at one time or the other. Something about the installer being written by someone with a negative iq.

I'm using XP Pro with SP2, not SP3 and it installed really fast and worked fine.

Just saying.

But ... 25 seconds to process a RAW into dramatic tone Jpeg!

Mesolithic.

klaas-Rotterdam
klaas-Rotterdam Regular Member • Posts: 294
Re: Viewer 3 : Good and bad...

Down loaded the viewer 3 yesterday after reading the treads, start working with it today.

Have to get used to the new software but after you get used to it it seems to be ok!

I will not go back to the viewer 2!

-- hide signature --

Groet/Regards.
Klaas

 klaas-Rotterdam's gear list:klaas-Rotterdam's gear list
Olympus D-595 Zoom Olympus E-620 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 70-300mm 1:4.0-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 18-180mm 1:3.5-6.3 +11 more
AccidntlTourist Contributing Member • Posts: 675
Will You Go Back to 2?

"I will not go back to the viewer 2!"

That's the bottom line answer I'm interested in.

I often use Viewer 2.  I don't find it very intuitive, but it's free and its designed to use Olympus filters.

For more sophisticated image processing I use GIMP (powerful and free); UFraw for the ORF.

klaas-Rotterdam wrote:

Down loaded the viewer 3 yesterday after reading the treads, start working with it today.

Have to get used to the new software but after you get used to it it seems to be ok!

I will not go back to the viewer 2!

-- hide signature --

Groet/Regards.
Klaas

-- hide signature --

Will -

AussieAndo Regular Member • Posts: 151
Re: Viewer 3 : Good and bad...
2

goblin wrote:

The bad on my side is that it would simply not install on my xp machine. Googled the error - found explanations here on dpreview about installation problems with every single Olympus program at one time or the other. Something about the installer being written by someone with a negative iq.

As you will read here many people can get it to install on XP.

The big question is - if it doesn't so what? Why expect the latest photo software to work on an outdated 12 yr old OS like XP? It would be like expecting XP software to install on Windows 2.1

Time to upgrade the OS.

If the PC can't handle the newer operating systems then chances are it won't handle the photo software anyway and you will always be upset that it runs too slowly or takes an age to convert a RAW to jpg.

klaas-Rotterdam
klaas-Rotterdam Regular Member • Posts: 294
Re: Will You Go Back to 2?

Hi Will,

I always use the “Viewer” software for first processing of my pictures and if I have to do a little bit more to it I will use “PSP 4 pro” for editing (Not free but not to expensive)

It’s just like every software update, you have to get familiar with the options.

After working and getting familiar with the “Viewer 3” I have seen that the software works for me so I will not go back to Viewer “2”.

I use the software on Windows7 and Windows8

-- hide signature --

Groet/Regards.
Klaas

 klaas-Rotterdam's gear list:klaas-Rotterdam's gear list
Olympus D-595 Zoom Olympus E-620 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 70-300mm 1:4.0-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 18-180mm 1:3.5-6.3 +11 more
jkrumm Veteran Member • Posts: 9,208
Re: Viewer 3 : Good and bad...
1

I like most of the changes. Seems more intuitive. But they clearly have the same underlying "engine" powering the edits, as they are slow to update changes. The menu items are nice and snappy, however. The fact that it remembers edits is great. It's good to see they have some folks still putting work into this.

-- hide signature --

John Krumm
Juneau, AK

OlyChamp
OlyChamp Veteran Member • Posts: 4,449
System Requirements

Would it also be fair to say that if using XP the software will lag because that specific system has a graphics card that is old and slower and also the Viewer 3 is geared for a system that has a 1Gb + RAM requirement and faster processor?

I have Viewer 2 on my system but never use it (All processing done using Picasa3) so can someone sell me the reason to use either version please?

Thane

-- hide signature --

The digital image is a dozen or so words
positioned carefully to paint a picture
that challenges the eye
and tricks the mind
into thinking, light is a title
and the palette a taste bud
worth tasting.

 OlyChamp's gear list:OlyChamp's gear list
Olympus E-500 Olympus E-620 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 70-300mm 1:4.0-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4.0-5.6 +2 more
jkrumm Veteran Member • Posts: 9,208
Re: System Requirements

The basic reason to use Viewer is to have a way to make in-camera jpegs from raw after the fact, including the art filters. It also allows further raw editing while keeping the out-of-camera look. And if you shoot a different aspect ratio on the new cameras like the EM5, you can change it in Viewer (Lightroom just shows the raw as the chosen ratio with no option to change it back).

-- hide signature --

John Krumm
Juneau, AK

OlyChamp
OlyChamp Veteran Member • Posts: 4,449
Re: System Requirements

Thanks for that mate  I wasn't aware of that process with RAW.  Sounds like a lot of work., do I have the time??

Thane

-- hide signature --

The digital image is a dozen or so words
positioned carefully to paint a picture
that challenges the eye
and tricks the mind
into thinking, light is a title
and the palette a taste bud
worth tasting.

 OlyChamp's gear list:OlyChamp's gear list
Olympus E-500 Olympus E-620 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 70-300mm 1:4.0-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4.0-5.6 +2 more
Gregm61 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,660
Re: How about tethered shooting ?

Baladam wrote:

I wonder if it is available on Viewer 3 .

Forget it. Nope.

-- hide signature --

"There's shadows in life, baby.." Jack Horner- Boogie Nights

 Gregm61's gear list:Gregm61's gear list
Leica M9 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Olympus E-M1 Leica M (Typ 262) Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50mm 1:2.0 Macro +21 more
Rolfens Forum Member • Posts: 58
Re: Viewer 3 : Good and bad...
2

Software isn't exactly Olympus' thing, is it? And I don't mean PC software only...

Still gets the job done, essentially, like the camera. I don't understand people who think that this is aimed at competing or luring them away from other more advanced (and paid) products. It's a freebie to make sure that you have all you need to get started.

 Rolfens's gear list:Rolfens's gear list
Olympus PEN E-PM2 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 II R Panasonic 20mm F1.7 II Samyang 12mm F2 NCS CS
Kevin Sutton
Kevin Sutton OP Contributing Member • Posts: 943
My original complaint has been fixed now...

Hi

The updates to version 3 have included transfer of EXIF data in 16-bit mode.

Thanks to Olympus for listening and fixing it.

Cheers Kevin 

 Kevin Sutton's gear list:Kevin Sutton's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 Olympus E-M1 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm 1:2.8 Macro Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 +11 more
Pete_CSCS Veteran Member • Posts: 3,580
I just noticed this last night

Kevin Sutton wrote:

Hi

The updates to version 3 have included transfer of EXIF data in 16-bit mode.

Thanks to Olympus for listening and fixing it.

Cheers Kevin

I started working with 16-bit files in Viewer 3 until I noticed that the metadata was stripped, so I switched to saving files as Exif-TIFF which are only 8-bit. I've kept Viewer abreast with the latest updates but it wasn't until last night when I went back to using the 16-bit files that I noticed the EXIF info was put back into the file. Yea!

Didn't realize it was a past update. Was wondering if I was hallucinating.  

I'm only using Oly Viewer 3 for the RAW conversion and the automatic distortion correction with my 12-40mm f/2.8. I've only started working with RAW files recently. Since so many users over the years have complimented Master/Studio/Viewer for it's conversion ability while complaining about the clunckiness of the software, I've been doing all the editing in my main program, PSP X6 Ultimate.

-- hide signature --

'When nothing seems to help, I go and look at a stonecutter hammering away at
his rock perhaps a hundred times without as much as a crack showing in it.
Yet at the hundred and first blow it will split in two,
and I know it was not that blow that did it,
but all that had gone before.'
-- Jacob Riis (1849 - 1914)

Stay Well,
Pete K.

 Pete_CSCS's gear list:Pete_CSCS's gear list
Kodak EasyShare Z612 Olympus E-500 Olympus E-M1 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 +6 more
fcheh
fcheh Regular Member • Posts: 214
Re: I just noticed this last night

I have been using both V2 and V3 the later is much improved version with a better interface and much faster. BUT they left out e-Portrait bummer if you wanted to post process. As previously stated before there IS a difference in processing RAW & JPG between V3 and LR5 even after they added a profile for Olympus (Natural). If V2 had a copyright capability I would be a happy camper:)

-- hide signature --
 fcheh's gear list:fcheh's gear list
Olympus Zuiko Digital 1.4x Teleconverter EC-14 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro Olympus 7-14mm F2.8 Pro +2 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads