Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Started Apr 1, 2013 | Questions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Alex Akai Regular Member • Posts: 403
Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

I am about to place an order for SIGMA APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM.  Can somebody with experience with this lens give me some feedback as to how it compares with the Nikon Version.  There is a lot of price difference and I am wondering if it really justifies going with Nikon version ?  Thanks..

-- hide signature --

Alex

 Alex Akai's gear list:Alex Akai's gear list
Nikon D7000 Nikon D5200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR +5 more
ANSWER:
nirvana0001 Contributing Member • Posts: 902
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Look up the Tarmron 70-200 VC, it's better than the Sigma 70-200 OS and almost as good as the Nikon 70-200 VRII IQ wise.

Nikonfan99 Senior Member • Posts: 1,411
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200
1

Yes the ranking IMHO is:

1- Nikon- If you try this lens you will know why the price is what it is. I just bought this lens a week or so ago while it was still on sale for $2099. It is AMAZING glass. Great contrast, great colors and very very fast AF. VR is amazing (hand held down to 1/6 and no blur for me). Built like a tank. Hold it and use it and you will want one!

2-Tamron- Tried the new 70-200 2.8 VC in the store. Not as sharp as the nikon 2.8 but did get better at f4. VC is great. Build is not solid as nikon. AF not as fast to me.

3-SIGMA- Not as sharp as the tamron at 2.8 and not close to the nikon at 2.8. Would buy the tamron if you cant affoard the nikon.

At the end of the day, I would save up for the nikon if I was on a budget.

 Nikonfan99's gear list:Nikonfan99's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM
selected answer This post was selected as the answer by the original poster.
Alex Akai OP Regular Member • Posts: 403
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Sigma is a Full frame version, Not sure about Tamron, is it also full frame or DX format ? I ve got a D600.

Nikonfan99 wrote:

Yes the ranking IMHO is:

1- Nikon- If you try this lens you will know why the price is what it is. I just bought this lens a week or so ago while it was still on sale for $2099. It is AMAZING glass. Great contrast, great colors and very very fast AF. VR is amazing (hand held down to 1/6 and no blur for me). Built like a tank. Hold it and use it and you will want one!

2-Tamron- Tried the new 70-200 2.8 VC in the store. Not as sharp as the nikon 2.8 but did get better at f4. VC is great. Build is not solid as nikon. AF not as fast to me.

3-SIGMA- Not as sharp as the tamron at 2.8 and not close to the nikon at 2.8. Would buy the tamron if you cant affoard the nikon.

At the end of the day, I would save up for the nikon if I was on a budget.

-- hide signature --

Alex

 Alex Akai's gear list:Alex Akai's gear list
Nikon D7000 Nikon D5200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR +5 more
Alex Akai OP Regular Member • Posts: 403
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Ok I did find out it was an FX lens.  Though it's about $250 more than the Sigma DxO marke gives it a very good mark for sharpness. So I will think about it some more.

-- hide signature --

Alex

 Alex Akai's gear list:Alex Akai's gear list
Nikon D7000 Nikon D5200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR +5 more
Nikonfan99 Senior Member • Posts: 1,411
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Yes all three are FX glass. The Tamron "NIKON" version has not been rated yet by DXOMARK. The nikon version did take longer to come out and I would not base a purchase on the canon rating. My two tamrons both backfocus on all three of my nikons (during focal test) and need the most adjustment. Not saying that this is the case with this lens but that you cant use canon ratings to apply to nikon.

 Nikonfan99's gear list:Nikonfan99's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM
bocajrs
bocajrs Senior Member • Posts: 1,634
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

I had the Siggy and sold it for the Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR1 ( Found the Siggy soft and not as sharp as the Nikon)

 bocajrs's gear list:bocajrs's gear list
Nikon 1 J4 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF-S Teleconverter TC-20E III Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR +2 more
Alex Akai OP Regular Member • Posts: 403
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

I ordered the Tamron as per your recommendation.  At least it's more compact than Sigma.

-- hide signature --

Alex

 Alex Akai's gear list:Alex Akai's gear list
Nikon D7000 Nikon D5200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR +5 more
jmcminn1076 Regular Member • Posts: 383
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Nikonfan99 wrote:

Yes the ranking IMHO is:

1- Nikon- If you try this lens you will know why the price is what it is. I just bought this lens a week or so ago while it was still on sale for $2099. It is AMAZING glass. Great contrast, great colors and very very fast AF. VR is amazing (hand held down to 1/6 and no blur for me). Built like a tank. Hold it and use it and you will want one!

2-Tamron- Tried the new 70-200 2.8 VC in the store. Not as sharp as the nikon 2.8 but did get better at f4. VC is great. Build is not solid as nikon. AF not as fast to me.

3-SIGMA- Not as sharp as the tamron at 2.8 and not close to the nikon at 2.8. Would buy the tamron if you cant affoard the nikon.

At the end of the day, I would save up for the nikon if I was on a budget.

Its a little late to be of use to the OP, but another thing to ask, is how much you need f/2.8.  The Nikon 70-200mm f/4 VR is very good on the IQ side of things.  You lose f/2.8, and the "built like a tank", but the f/4r is half the weight, and in the same price range as the third party f/2.8 lenses.

Obviously if you need/want f/2.8, this isn't an option, but for many people looking at this type of lens, it's something to consider -- the ISOs cameras shoot these days lessen the need to get a super fast zoom in this class quite a bit.

I own the 70-200mm VRII from before this was an option, but find that I rarely shoot it below f/4, and my dad has the new f/4 lens which I like a lot having shot with it some -- the ONLY reason I'd still get the f/2.8 lens over the lighter and less expensive f/4 is that I eventually would like to get a TC-20E III for it.

 jmcminn1076's gear list:jmcminn1076's gear list
Nikon D800 Sigma SD1 Merrill Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Sigma 8-16mm F4.5-5.6 DC HSM Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM +7 more
dwa1 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,169
Tamron - USA 6-year warrnty vs. Sigma 4-year...
1

Alex Akai wrote:

I ordered the Tamron as per your recommendation.  At least it's more compact than Sigma.

-- hide signature --

Alex

With Tamron, if you are in the USA you get a 6-year warranty.

Wayne

Nikonfan99 Senior Member • Posts: 1,411
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Enjoy the lens and please post back and let us know what you think

I would still suggest getting reikan focal software or some other way to check for or adjust the AF fine tune. That is if you notice any back or front focus. Some free ways of testing for it also online. Take care

 Nikonfan99's gear list:Nikonfan99's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM
hikerdoc
hikerdoc Senior Member • Posts: 1,176
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Nikonfan99 wrote:

Yes all three are FX glass. The Tamron "NIKON" version has not been rated yet by DXOMARK. The nikon version did take longer to come out and I would not base a purchase on the canon rating. My two tamrons both backfocus on all three of my nikons (during focal test) and need the most adjustment. Not saying that this is the case with this lens but that you cant use canon ratings to apply to nikon.

I do not think the current model Nikon 70-200 VR II f/2.8 has not  been tested yet by DxOmark either. They are using the 2002 VRI version in their tests.

 hikerdoc's gear list:hikerdoc's gear list
Nikon D4 Nikon D810 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II +5 more
Nikonfan99 Senior Member • Posts: 1,411
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Yes I know about that. Seems odd for as long as it has been out.

 Nikonfan99's gear list:Nikonfan99's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM
ohcello Senior Member • Posts: 1,599
I just bought the Sigma 70-200mm OS

It can be had for under $1000 used if you look around... I got mine used for $900 from Unique photo.  I would have preferred the Tamron, but there really is not much of a used market yet for that lens.

 ohcello's gear list:ohcello's gear list
Panasonic LX100 Nikon D600 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR +2 more
Alex Akai OP Regular Member • Posts: 403
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

That's a good point though it's too late to change.  Oh well there may be situations where I will need the F/2.8 like indoor shooting for sports.

-- hide signature --

Alex

 Alex Akai's gear list:Alex Akai's gear list
Nikon D7000 Nikon D5200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR +5 more
Alex Akai OP Regular Member • Posts: 403
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

I will run some tests and see about the focus when I get the lens. Hopefully it will be spot on.

-- hide signature --

Alex

 Alex Akai's gear list:Alex Akai's gear list
Nikon D7000 Nikon D5200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR +5 more
Alex Akai OP Regular Member • Posts: 403
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

hikerdoc wrote:

Nikonfan99 wrote:

Yes all three are FX glass. The Tamron "NIKON" version has not been rated yet by DXOMARK. The nikon version did take longer to come out and I would not base a purchase on the canon rating. My two tamrons both backfocus on all three of my nikons (during focal test) and need the most adjustment. Not saying that this is the case with this lens but that you cant use canon ratings to apply to nikon.

I do not think the current model Nikon 70-200 VR II f/2.8 has not  been tested yet by DxOmark either. They are using the 2002 VRI version in their tests.

They have tested the Canon version.  How different would it be with Nikon version?

-- hide signature --

Alex

 Alex Akai's gear list:Alex Akai's gear list
Nikon D7000 Nikon D5200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR +5 more
hikerdoc
hikerdoc Senior Member • Posts: 1,176
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Alex Akai wrote:

hikerdoc wrote:

Nikonfan99 wrote:

Yes all three are FX glass. The Tamron "NIKON" version has not been rated yet by DXOMARK. The nikon version did take longer to come out and I would not base a purchase on the canon rating. My two tamrons both backfocus on all three of my nikons (during focal test) and need the most adjustment. Not saying that this is the case with this lens but that you cant use canon ratings to apply to nikon.

I do not think the current model Nikon 70-200 VR II f/2.8 has not  been tested yet by DxOmark either. They are using the 2002 VRI version in their tests.

They have tested the Canon version.  How different would it be with Nikon version?

-- hide signature --

Alex

I was referring to Nikon's 70-200 f/2.8 offerings, not the Sigma or Tamron offerings in Nikon mount. I believe DxO uses the Nikon 70-200 VR I released in 2002 in their comparison tests. This lens was replaced by Nikon with the VR II version in 2009, generally felt to be a superior lens. I was suggesting that the difference between the Nikon and the Sigma/Tamron options may be greater than one would see from the DxO tests which used the discontinued Nikon version.

If you are referring to proprietary lenses, I do not think you can assume test results on a Canon lens and a Nikon lens are interchangeable for comparison purposes with a third party lens.

Sigma does make some excellent lenses. I have the 85 f/1.4 which is close to the G in many respects, and the 35 f/1.4 which equals or exceeds the G. I have no experience with the Sigma/Tamron 70-200's though.

Whichever you choose, enjoy your new lens!

 hikerdoc's gear list:hikerdoc's gear list
Nikon D4 Nikon D810 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II +5 more
Mark K
Mark K Veteran Member • Posts: 5,312
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

I have two Sigma 70 200s, and both are very sharp at 200mm, f2.8 and sharper than my Nikon 80 200, Nikon 70 200 VR, Canon 70 200f2.8 IS.and Sony, Minolta 70 200s. Here is evidence supporting my findings. http://petapixel.com/2015/03/28/just-the-lenses-the-great-200mm-shoot-out/

-- hide signature --

Mark K

 Mark K's gear list:Mark K's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Sony SLT-A77 Nikon D800 Canon EOS 5D Mark III NEX5R +65 more
ormdig
ormdig Senior Member • Posts: 1,287
Re: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS lens vs. Nikon 70-200

Mark K wrote:

I have two Sigma 70 200s, and both are very sharp at 200mm, f2.8 and sharper than my Nikon 80 200, Nikon 70 200 VR, Canon 70 200f2.8 IS.and Sony, Minolta 70 200s. Here is evidence supporting my findings. http://petapixel.com/2015/03/28/just-the-lenses-the-great-200mm-shoot-out/

-- hide signature --

Mark K

Since you are letting Roger do the talking here was his conclusion,

"The third-party lenses and Canon Non IS are cheaper, and probably good enough for many uses. But don’t kid yourself: they aren’t as good."

My gripe with the Sigma isn't sharpness but autofocus. I shoot sports with people who use (some "did" use) the Sigmas, 70-200 and 120-300. On fast moving erratic subjects they are so hit and miss you can't count on getting the shot which is why the Nikon and Canon f/2.8s are worth their cost.

One other problem with the Sigma 70-200 is the busy bokeh on subjects with lights or bright reflections in the background at 200mm and f/2.8 which makes it unattractive for portraiture,

-- hide signature --

Pete

 ormdig's gear list:ormdig's gear list
Nikon D7000 Nikon D800 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED VR +6 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads