HS50EXR and F900EXR reviews ...
will also love to see the NR -2 HS50 vs F900/F770 comparison at higher ISO when you have a chance. Thanks Kim!
I think I tested them against each other did I not? The NR-2 to NR0 different in decent light is almost non-existent.
I would like to repeat the "bad light" test, though, as I think that one went very badly for the HS50. Too much NR there. Maybe that's the one you meant ...
I take it you wont be doing the long exposure starry field test though? 30 sec at ISO 100 is still the limit for the HS series I think.
Clouded over just before I walked outside last night to try it out ... was perfectly clear about half an hour before. So now we wait for sunny skies again ... prediction says a few days. Remind me next week.
Beautiful and crisp images from the HS50 ...
yep that's the test I meant, thanks Kim
Looks like the weather will be nice tomorrow, hopefully you can do it tomorrow night. Expecting rain by the end of the week, so the best window would be early to mid week.
Nice and very detailed- this lens looks to resolve better than the HS20/30 lens!
I forgot to ask you about the flash- do you remember when Michy said that the flash was overpowered and did not properly account for exposure? Were you able to confirm that, Kim? I expect he had a bad sample.
I've been having some weirdness with the flash still, but i've discovered awb is not always recognising number 3 flourescent lights properly. Good thing i can set it myself, but i went my daughters ballet recital the other night, and we had two different coloured temp for flourescent, one set of halogen, incandescent at one end, and a massive picture window with cool evening light. The camera really keeled over at that one! I had to turn the flash up, and use the custom white balance to 'tune' things. I'm never trying that again!
The flash still was underpowered at 8 feet away. It works fine in total darkness, but some lights seem to fool it badly. Not sure what's going on there. I've got a couple of slave flashes coming next week, so i'll be able to play around a bit better.
BiCubic upsizing? How is that not comparing faux pixels to real ones? Why not take a 100% crop of each image and compare those??
Kim Letkeman wrote:
Beautiful and crisp images from the HS50 ...-- hide signature --
To me seems that Sharpness High and NR Low did a great job. I will wait to do my test with Sharpness High and NR high too.
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sunflower Field by GrannyMeg|
from An impressionist piece
|Flag from Staten Island Ferry by wam7|
|SAND SCULPTURE by duskman|
from Landscape - Black and White #4