Going Full Frame
I have been thinking of going full frame for some time now. My main interest is landscape and not much else. I have been trying to decide on what would be the best way to get into it. I can't decide between the 6D and 5D3. If i go the 6D i can use the savings towards better glass. If i go 5D3 then it's a nicer body but does it have any advantages over the 6D for landscape photography? Also, if i went with a 5D3 i may not get as high end glass (at least to start with).
What would you guys recommend in a situation like this. Thanks ion advance for your input.
If your ONLY interest is landscape, then the 6D would probably be the better choice. You wouldn't need the AF of the 5D3. Just be sure that you never intend to shoot moving subjects. You can do that with the 6D, but not as well as you could with the 5D3.
Don't forget that the 6D has built in wifi, which lets you, among other things, set up and shoot while using an iphone (or ipad, or ipod) as a monitor. (There's an android version too, I think.) Don't know anything about it, and I don't shoot landscapes much, but many who do seemed excited about that particular function.
Then there's the integrated GPS of the 6D. I'm not excited about that at all, but, again, many are.
Love my 6D so far, otherwise. It's the right price, and the bundled 24-105 L is ridiculously cheap.
Have fun, whatever you choose. Full frame is sweeeeeet.
For the price, the 6D is excellent plus you have the money to invest in good glass like me.
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
I've only had my 6D for a couple days and I didn't think I'd use the GPS much but it's useful in telling someone where you were standing when you took this shot of the Olympic Mts:
Using the software provided by Canon, you can say Edmonds WA and here's a map:
I'm going 5D mkIII. After wasting a lot of money on APS-C and EF-S lenses, I'm not skimping again.
Dumping all my EF-S (have almost all of them), and getting 5D mkIII.
These features have not much to do with landscape - but the wheel, joystick and AF system would push me to the 5DMIII. As a matter of fact I am seriously considering selling my 5DC and 7d to fund the 5dmIII.
i am not sure of the tech differences - but the 6D didn't feel as good I handling as the 5d to my hands....
"I may be a geek, but it pays for the car...!"
Purely for landscape the advantage would be what??? 2mp? Doesn't seem like much, other than that I think the 6D would be fine here. It's really a matter of features for anything else you might want to shoot. For most purposes it's probably great.
I have the 5diii and love it but use it mostly for sport. For landscape I don't think there are any advantages over the 6d so I would get that and spend the difference on better glass. Also the wifi and gps should be nice to have as well.
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sadiqur_Rahman by Sadiqur Rahman|
from Ain't Going to Work on Maggie's Farm no More
|Airborne by John Beavin|
from - How to respect the Flag and Anthem - (Portrait in Full Colours + A Border)