Fantastic wide-angle for the price!
I have been using the 16mm f/2.8 E-mount Sony lens for about two years now and for the latter year coupled with the great wide-angle adapter VCL-ECU1 that essentially converts the 16mm to 12mm.
There are many detractors concerning this lens, however, few seem to account for the cost vs. performance. Basically, for less than 150$ one gets a 24mm equiv. (35mm format) wide-angle lens that is small, light weight and pocketable. Certainly, wide open at f/2.8, the optical performance shows deficiency, such as chromatic aberration and edge distorsion, but the fact is one has f/2.8 available for low-light situations. I would not use f/2.8 in good lighting or for landscapes. Considering the package one gets for the price, I would say the lens is unbeatable. It is essentially a pancake wide-angle lens with f/2.8 aperture! It is implied that there would be drawbacks in a package such as this but considering the low sums it goes for, it is truly spectacular.
The lens shines from f/5.6 to about f/8 and it is very usable for family snapshots, landscape and even cityscape work. The focus is pretty fast but not always very accurate (especially in low light), although, using the DMF mode, it generally works consistently. At all apertures, the center is fairly sharp, a feature that works out in many shooting scenarios.
Coupled with the wide-angle adapter, the optical performance seems to improve, as many have noticed. To add to that, the adapter only doubles the length of the overall package, which is a feat in itself, keeping a low profile for the combination.
I like the lens so much that it is the only Sony E-mount lens I currently own. I like the size and the fact it makes for a truly take-anywhere combination with any NEX, especially with the 5/N/R.
I would have enjoyed a less plastic-fantastic build, although, to be fair, the lens mount is metal. I would buy a black version of this lens, if they ever decided to make it, for the simple reason it would make the combination with a black camera body even more unobtrusive. Perhaps the optical quality could be slightly improved, especially on the chromatic aberration side, which, at times, especially in strong back lighting, can be somewhat annoying.
|Average community score||
|See all 3 reviews »|
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sunflower Field by GrannyMeg|
from An impressionist piece
|Flag from Staten Island Ferry by wam7|
|Windswept juniper by Kreber|
from Wind power
|SAND SCULPTURE by duskman|
from Landscape - Black and White #4