Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

Started Mar 6, 2013 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
dpyy Contributing Member • Posts: 892
Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

I'm not sure I understand. I thought everyone loved the E35, so why are we duplicating lens at this time when we desperately needed more choices?

Olympus E-3
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
shibbs
shibbs Regular Member • Posts: 170
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

So I wounder if sony will bring out a 24mm

 shibbs's gear list:shibbs's gear list
Sony FE 70-200 F4 Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS Sony Alpha 7 II Sony FE 24-70mm F4 OSS Sony FE 28mm F2 +4 more
daddyman Regular Member • Posts: 181
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

It makes absolutely no sense to me. Zeiss is also making this for Fuji X-mount, but they have a 35/1.4 already that is an excellent lens. I guess they think people will buy it just because it's a Zeiss.

Mike

 daddyman's gear list:daddyman's gear list
Fujifilm X-E2 Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS +2 more
dpyy OP Contributing Member • Posts: 892
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

daddyman wrote:

It makes absolutely no sense to me. Zeiss is also making this for Fuji X-mount, but they have a 35/1.4 already that is an excellent lens. I guess they think people will buy it just because it's a Zeiss.

Mike

For 4x the price?

Ed B
Ed B Veteran Member • Posts: 7,712
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

That's a good question but remember one thing: Zeiss doesn't make the "Zeiss" lenses for Sony cameras.

Sony makes the Zeiss branded lenses for Sony cameras.

According to Sony & Zeiss these lenses are built to Zeiss specifications (whatever that means) but they aren't made by Zeiss.

Section10
Section10 Senior Member • Posts: 1,367
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

$450 vs $1000 for the Zeiss.

We won't know the IQ till after its out, we can expect it to be at least as good as SEL35 but probably without OSS. Zeiss has always been the expensive competition. Some of their lenses will just not be worth the price increase though...SEL35 is really great enough..

 Section10's gear list:Section10's gear list
Sony Alpha 7 II Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Nikon D4 Nikon D800E Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR +6 more
J Yohan Regular Member • Posts: 133
12, 16, 19, 20, 24, 30, 32, 35, etc.

The 35mm is definitely a good lens, especially for the price, size, and OSS. However, I don't think it's ever a bad thing to have third party manufacturers to add some competition and provide more options to Sony native lenses. With Sigma and Zeiss, Sony will have 12, 16, 19, 20, 24, 30, 32, 35, etc covered. If I didn't have the 24mm already, I will likely make 32mm my go-to lens. I'd rather be in the slightly wider side of 50mm FOV.

As far as I understand, the existing Sony Carl Zeiss 24mm is a Sony-manufactured lens that borrowed Zeiss design and QC. The upcoming Zeiss lenses are Zeiss designed and manufactured. This is to say, Zeiss is independent of Sony with these lenses and can do whatever they want.

 J Yohan's gear list:J Yohan's gear list
Sony Alpha 7 Carl Zeiss Planar T* 2/50 ZM
random78 Regular Member • Posts: 284
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

Ed B wrote:

That's a good question but remember one thing: Zeiss doesn't make the "Zeiss" lenses for Sony cameras.

Sony makes the Zeiss branded lenses for Sony cameras.

According to Sony & Zeiss these lenses are built to Zeiss specifications (whatever that means) but they aren't made by Zeiss.

You are right that his is the case for lenses like the 24mm 1.8 for NEX or all the ZA lenses for Sony alpha. But these new lenses are different, they are not being released by Sony, they are going to be released by Zeiss themselves and they target both Sony and Fuji X system. These are not Sony lenses.

 random78's gear list:random78's gear list
Nikon D7000 Canon EOS M Sony a6000
nevercat Senior Member • Posts: 3,193
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

I think some (rich) people want the best IQ they can buy and they want all their lenses have the same"feel"to the picture (color rendering, micro contrast etc). So when Zeiss can give that, they will buy it.

And remember Zeiss is not after larfge numbers of sail, they are after high quality...(that is why they don't put OSS in their lenses as it may have bad influence on the IQ....

dpyy OP Contributing Member • Posts: 892
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

I think some (rich) people want the best IQ they can buy and they want all their lenses have the same"feel"to the picture (color rendering, micro contrast etc). So when Zeiss can give that, they will buy it.

And remember Zeiss is not after larfge numbers of sail, they are after high quality...(that is why they don't put OSS in their lenses as it may have bad influence on the IQ....

How much better IQ can you realistically expect from E35 without OSS?

Ed B
Ed B Veteran Member • Posts: 7,712
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

random78 wrote:

Ed B wrote:

That's a good question but remember one thing: Zeiss doesn't make the "Zeiss" lenses for Sony cameras.

Sony makes the Zeiss branded lenses for Sony cameras.

According to Sony & Zeiss these lenses are built to Zeiss specifications (whatever that means) but they aren't made by Zeiss.

You are right that his is the case for lenses like the 24mm 1.8 for NEX or all the ZA lenses for Sony alpha. But these new lenses are different, they are not being released by Sony, they are going to be released by Zeiss themselves and they target both Sony and Fuji X system. These are not Sony lenses.

Then I stand corrected. Thank You.

blue_skies
blue_skies Veteran Member • Posts: 9,809
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?
2

dpyy wrote:

I think some (rich) people want the best IQ they can buy and they want all their lenses have the same"feel"to the picture (color rendering, micro contrast etc). So when Zeiss can give that, they will buy it.

And remember Zeiss is not after larfge numbers of sail, they are after high quality...(that is why they don't put OSS in their lenses as it may have bad influence on the IQ....

How much better IQ can you realistically expect from E35 without OSS?

A lot, it all depends on the sensor, the aperture, the distance to subject, the subject itself, the photog.

Zeiss is known for ultra-sharpness, and probably closest to Leica lens' renderings.

The Zeiss formula has held up over time.



13 lenses covering 28mm to 35mm

-- hide signature --

Cheers,
Henry

 blue_skies's gear list:blue_skies's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sony a6000 Sony a5100 Sony Alpha 7 II Sony DT 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 SAM +33 more
jk2l Regular Member • Posts: 183
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

Got a question how do OSS affect the IQ?

nrcole Regular Member • Posts: 411
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

To come at it from a slightly different angle, I'm actually glad Zeiss isn't breaking new ground in the E-mount lineup with these lenses. Because it would be "redundant" there isn't an affordable large aperture 24mm lens that competes with the Sony-Zeiss which is really frustrating if you don't have over a thousand dollars to drop on a single lens. I'm glad the premium options are there, but I really can't afford them. All these new lenses have reasonably priced alternatives already within the NEX system.

teseg
teseg Senior Member • Posts: 2,188
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

dpyy wrote:

I think some (rich) people want the best IQ they can buy and they want all their lenses have the same"feel"to the picture (color rendering, micro contrast etc). So when Zeiss can give that, they will buy it.

And remember Zeiss is not after larfge numbers of sail, they are after high quality...(that is why they don't put OSS in their lenses as it may have bad influence on the IQ....

How much better IQ can you realistically expect from E35 without OSS?

If it is anything like the Zeiss 2/35 on the RX1 that does not have IS, it will be amazing with both color and sharpness, including corner to corner at the widest aperture.

See what DXO says.

 teseg's gear list:teseg's gear list
Sony RX1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
SQLGuy Veteran Member • Posts: 4,244
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

Are the Zeiss E-mounts designed for full frame or APS-C?

-- hide signature --

Nex-7 with kit lenses, Contax G 35, and a number of legacy lenses (mostly Canon FD)

 SQLGuy's gear list:SQLGuy's gear list
Canon PowerShot G9 Nikon D200 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony Alpha 7 II Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm F1.8G +2 more
dpyy OP Contributing Member • Posts: 892
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

SQLGuy wrote:

Are the Zeiss E-mounts designed for full frame or APS-C?

-- hide signature --

Nex-7 with kit lenses, Contax G 35, and a number of legacy lenses (mostly Canon FD)

It's e mount, I'm not sure why is that even a question? Unless you are implying FF NEX?

cptrios Senior Member • Posts: 1,352
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

Well I know it sounds silly, but that 3mm difference does make a...well, difference. I like the Sigma 30/2.8's FoV better than the E35's, so I'll probably like 32mm better as well. Also, we can reasonably expect better sharpness and microcontrast from the Zeiss, which will make it worth the extra money for some people.

I'd never drop that much on a 50mm equivalent, so it doesn't appeal to me, but I can definitely see the point of it. I really wish Sigma would make a 28-30mm f/1.4 lens, though!

nrcole Regular Member • Posts: 411
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

There was a rumour going around a few months ago that to maintain compatibility with the in-the-works FF NEX these lenses had been re-tooled to cover full frame. This has been debunked and the story these days is that Zeiss is working on three new full-frame primes for June 2014 for the full-frame NEX.

martindesu
martindesu Senior Member • Posts: 1,245
Re: Why is Zeiss creating a 32/1.8 when there's already a sony one?

blue_skies wrote:

dpyy wrote:

I think some (rich) people want the best IQ they can buy and they want all their lenses have the same"feel"to the picture (color rendering, micro contrast etc). So when Zeiss can give that, they will buy it.

And remember Zeiss is not after larfge numbers of sail, they are after high quality...(that is why they don't put OSS in their lenses as it may have bad influence on the IQ....

How much better IQ can you realistically expect from E35 without OSS?

A lot, it all depends on the sensor, the aperture, the distance to subject, the subject itself, the photog.

Zeiss is known for ultra-sharpness, and probably closest to Leica lens' renderings.

The Zeiss formula has held up over time.



13 lenses covering 28mm to 35mm

-- hide signature --

Cheers,
Henry

Why do you have so much lens duplication?

 martindesu's gear list:martindesu's gear list
Sony RX1 Sony Alpha NEX-C3 Voigtlander 35mm F1.4 Nokton Sony FE 55mm F1.8 +1 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads