X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

Started Feb 5, 2013 | Discussions
(unknown member) Forum Member • Posts: 85
X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?
1

Hello folks,

my standard setting on my X Pro 1 is:
- manual apperture
- manual shutter speed
- Auto-ISO

This gives me best creative control while still having an exposure automation with the Auto-ISO. But the camera calls this M/manual, so the exposure compensation is being ignored.

This is strange and non sense, as the camera always chooses the ISO to match EV 0.

What's the point of this?

Thanks
Tobias

mngsmt Regular Member • Posts: 303
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

tee1000 wrote:

Hello folks,

my standard setting on my X Pro 1 is:
- manual apperture
- manual shutter speed
- Auto-ISO

This gives me best creative control while still having an exposure automation with the Auto-ISO. But the camera calls this M/manual, so the exposure compensation is being ignored.

This is strange and non sense, as the camera always chooses the ISO to match EV 0.

What's the point of this?

According to some, that's a feature.

Seriously though, that''s just the way it is for now. Some of us are still hoping it's fixable with a firmware update.

Jeff Charles Veteran Member • Posts: 7,514
It is a shortcoming

Auto exposure should always have exposure compensation.

For example, in this case, the camera's AE system may choose an ISO that pushes highlights into clipping. The photographer needs to be able to set negative EC to prevent that.

-- hide signature --

Jeff
"Please proceed..."

 Jeff Charles's gear list:Jeff Charles's gear list
Sony RX100 III Fujifilm X100T Olympus E-M1 Fujifilm X-E2 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R +5 more
(unknown member) Senior Member • Posts: 1,321
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?
4

It is not a bug or oversight. In manual exposure mode you manually adjust the aperture and/or the shutter speed to change exposure with your fingers. The using the EC dial is redundant and unnecessary.

You are confusing exposure with ISO. Only shutter speed and aperture determine exposure. In digital cameras ISO just changes the exposure index. Changing ISO lets you use higher or lower shutter speed and aperture combinations. But the only the shutter and aperture control  how much light reaches the sensor. ISO does not change how many photons are converted to voltage at each sensor site. ISO multiples the actual photon counts either  electronically or mathematically so in-camera jpeg rendering is convenient. ISO does not not make the sensor more, or less efficient.  It appears  to change the sensor efficiency  so the photographer  enjoys more flexibility.

This is explained here

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/dxomark_sensor_for_benchmarking_cameras2.shtml

but you have to scroll down to the last third if this very long article.

Auto ISO is useful. If you want to keep the shutter speed fixed to freeze motion and also maintain a constant DOF, then Auto ISO is a convenience - you don't need to go into the menus to change the exposure index.

nixda Veteran Member • Posts: 5,474
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?
5

wchutt wrote:

It is not a bug or oversight. In manual exposure mode you manually adjust the aperture and/or the shutter speed to change exposure with your fingers. The using the EC dial is redundant and unnecessary.

You are confusing exposure with ISO. Only shutter speed and aperture determine exposure. In digital cameras ISO just changes the exposure index. Changing ISO lets you use higher or lower shutter speed and aperture combinations. But the only the shutter and aperture control how much light reaches the sensor. ISO does not change how many photons are converted to voltage at each sensor site. ISO multiples the actual photon counts either electronically or mathematically so in-camera jpeg rendering is convenient. ISO does not not make the sensor more, or less efficient. It appears to change the sensor efficiency so the photographer enjoys more flexibility.

This is explained here

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/dxomark_sensor_for_benchmarking_cameras2.shtml

but you have to scroll down to the last third if this very long article.

Auto ISO is useful. If you want to keep the shutter speed fixed to freeze motion and also maintain a constant DOF, then Auto ISO is a convenience - you don't need to go into the menus to change the exposure index.

Although you are formally correct in that 'exposure' is determined by aperture and shutter speed, there are plenty of renowned photographers and photography websites who consider ISO part of the exposure 'triangle'. The point is that the intensity values written to the RAW or JPEG file depend not only on aperture and shutter speed but also on ISO, and the intensity values is what one would like to affect when carrying out exposure compensation.

So let's call it something other than 'exposure' compensation, and we can actually get to the point of the OP's complaint, namely, that there isn't a way to adjust ISO when the camera chooses a value that is not 'correct'. In the other Auto modes (shutter speed and aperture) there is a way, so there also should be one for Auto-ISO. And the EC dial is perfectly suited for that purpose and not at all redundant or unnecessary. The post by Jeff Charles points out very nicely why that is the case.

Bottom line, it's not a bug but a design choice. And a pretty bad one, judging by the current commotion over this feature. It would be so easy to allow adjusting the ISO with the EC dial, and everybody would be happy.

 nixda's gear list:nixda's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 +1 more
(unknown member) Senior Member • Posts: 1,321
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

nixda wrote:


Although you are formally correct in that 'exposure' is determined by aperture and shutter speed, there are plenty of renowned photographers and photography websites who consider ISO part of the exposure 'triangle'. The point is that the intensity values written to the RAW or JPEG file depend not only on aperture and shutter speed but also on ISO, and the intensity values is what one would like to affect when carrying out exposure compensation.

Renowned  photographers consistently deliver quality images in a business-like fashion. They are very good at marketing themselves. This doesn't mean they understand the physics of digital training.

The exposure triangle is: light, shutter speed and aperture. Sensor-signal amplification has nothing to do with exposure.

Writers at renowned websites should know better. Unfortunately even renowned web sites do not spend money employing fact checkers or consultants to insure their content is accurate.

mngsmt Regular Member • Posts: 303
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?
2

wchutt wrote:

It is not a bug or oversight. In manual exposure mode you manually adjust the aperture and/or the shutter speed to change exposure with your fingers. The using the EC dial is redundant and unnecessary.

It's neither redundant nor unnecessary. It's simply convenient.

You are confusing exposure with ISO. Only shutter speed and aperture determine exposure. In digital cameras ISO just changes the exposure index. Changing ISO lets you use higher or lower shutter speed and aperture combinations. But the only the shutter and aperture control how much light reaches the sensor. ISO does not change how many photons are converted to voltage at each sensor site. ISO multiples the actual photon counts either electronically or mathematically so in-camera jpeg rendering is convenient. ISO does not not make the sensor more, or less efficient. It appears to change the sensor efficiency so the photographer enjoys more flexibility.

This is a very theoretical, very un-practical approach and I won't argue with these "facts". It's just that I'm of the opinion that when the camera changes anything automatically which affects the exposure of the final image (call it brightness if you wish), the user should have the option to override the camera's setting.

Auto ISO is useful. If you want to keep the shutter speed fixed to freeze motion and also maintain a constant DOF, then Auto ISO is a convenience - you don't need to go into the menus to change the exposure index.

Absolutely. Unfortunately, as it is now, you have to go into the menu to change the brightness/exposure/ISO and the exposure compensation dial sits idle, does nothing and is bored to death.

mjl699
mjl699 Regular Member • Posts: 309
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

wchutt wrote:

nixda wrote:


Although you are formally correct in that 'exposure' is determined by aperture and shutter speed, there are plenty of renowned photographers and photography websites who consider ISO part of the exposure 'triangle'. The point is that the intensity values written to the RAW or JPEG file depend not only on aperture and shutter speed but also on ISO, and the intensity values is what one would like to affect when carrying out exposure compensation.

Renowned photographers consistently deliver quality images in a business-like fashion. They are very good at marketing themselves. This doesn't mean they understand the physics of digital training.

The exposure triangle is: light, shutter speed and aperture. Sensor-signal amplification has nothing to do with exposure.

Writers at renowned websites should know better. Unfortunately even renowned web sites do not spend money employing fact checkers or consultants to insure their content is accurate.

wchutt :: Although technically what you say might be correct what you say is not the full picture.

We now have a situation where the sensor amplification can be selected in the same way as aperture and shutter speed. Amplification changes the sensitivity of the sensor to incident light. Higher amplification results in higher sensitivity. This is termed and related (somewhat loosely at times) to ISO values which are also about sencitivity to light.

Amplification relates to sensitivity to light, ISO for film relates to sensitivity to light. The term ISO in modern digital cameras as related to amplification is a reasonable analogy to speed in film-based photogrpahy which were rated using ISO.

Even in the days of film, using a faster film meant a reduction in the required exposure to get a "correctly exposed" image. So even then, film speed did impact exposure, even if not technically part of exposure.

What I mean when I say I want exposure comp in manual mode is the following: Say I want to shoot at F2.0, T=1/60s, and I am using AutoISO 1600. The camera exposes for the "correct" exposure as measured by the in camera meter, choosing ISO 800. I want to achieve the result of underexposing by one stop. My options are: (1) Use F/2.8; (2) Use T=1/120s; (3) cheat and use ISO 400 (nice not to have to change films to do this). In each case the result should be the same - I should record half the count from each pixel on the sensor. I want the option to stick with F/2.0, T=1/120s, and instead of fiddling around to set ISO=400, I just want to set EC=-1 and let the camera work out the required ISO setting to produce an image with half the count (i.e. exactly the same as darker by 1 stop) than its meters would normally achieve by choosing the ISO to give the "correct" exposure.

This is what we are all meaning when we say we want EC to work in Manual Mode with AutoISO.

-- hide signature --

mjl599

 mjl699's gear list:mjl699's gear list
Canon EOS 400D Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Fujifilm X-Pro1 Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 28-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS USM +5 more
nixda Veteran Member • Posts: 5,474
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

mjl699 wrote:

wchutt wrote:

nixda wrote:


Although you are formally correct in that 'exposure' is determined by aperture and shutter speed, there are plenty of renowned photographers and photography websites who consider ISO part of the exposure 'triangle'. The point is that the intensity values written to the RAW or JPEG file depend not only on aperture and shutter speed but also on ISO, and the intensity values is what one would like to affect when carrying out exposure compensation.

Renowned photographers consistently deliver quality images in a business-like fashion. They are very good at marketing themselves. This doesn't mean they understand the physics of digital training.

The exposure triangle is: light, shutter speed and aperture. Sensor-signal amplification has nothing to do with exposure.

Writers at renowned websites should know better. Unfortunately even renowned web sites do not spend money employing fact checkers or consultants to insure their content is accurate.

wchutt :: Although technically what you say might be correct what you say is not the full picture.

We now have a situation where the sensor amplification can be selected in the same way as aperture and shutter speed. Amplification changes the sensitivity of the sensor to incident light. Higher amplification results in higher sensitivity. This is termed and related (somewhat loosely at times) to ISO values which are also about sencitivity to light.

Amplification relates to sensitivity to light, ISO for film relates to sensitivity to light. The term ISO in modern digital cameras as related to amplification is a reasonable analogy to speed in film-based photogrpahy which were rated using ISO.

Even in the days of film, using a faster film meant a reduction in the required exposure to get a "correctly exposed" image. So even then, film speed did impact exposure, even if not technically part of exposure.

What I mean when I say I want exposure comp in manual mode is the following: Say I want to shoot at F2.0, T=1/60s, and I am using AutoISO 1600. The camera exposes for the "correct" exposure as measured by the in camera meter, choosing ISO 800. I want to achieve the result of underexposing by one stop. My options are: (1) Use F/2.8; (2) Use T=1/120s; (3) cheat and use ISO 400 (nice not to have to change films to do this). In each case the result should be the same - I should record half the count from each pixel on the sensor. I want the option to stick with F/2.0, T=1/120s, and instead of fiddling around to set ISO=400, I just want to set EC=-1 and let the camera work out the required ISO setting to produce an image with half the count (i.e. exactly the same as darker by 1 stop) than its meters would normally achieve by choosing the ISO to give the "correct" exposure.

This is what we are all meaning when we say we want EC to work in Manual Mode with AutoISO.

-- hide signature --

mjl599

Correct.

Another way to to put it: in order to get an image, one needs light and a sensing medium. Light is controlled by aperture, shutter speed (and the light of the scene, of course). The sensing medium in our case is a sensor, and its response to light is controlled by adjusting ISO. All of those have an effect on the final image and thus, one needs to be able to adjust them quickly and reliably.

Just picture ISO to be a set of film rolls preloaded into the camera. When Auto-ISO choses one that isn't the right one for a given situation, it should be possible to override the camera and switch to a different film, so to say. Just like in the old days, but much faster.

 nixda's gear list:nixda's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 +1 more
nixda Veteran Member • Posts: 5,474
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

wchutt wrote:

It is not a bug or oversight. In manual exposure mode you manually adjust the aperture and/or the shutter speed to change exposure with your fingers. The using the EC dial is redundant and unnecessary.

You are confusing exposure with ISO. Only shutter speed and aperture determine exposure. In digital cameras ISO just changes the exposure index. Changing ISO lets you use higher or lower shutter speed and aperture combinations. But the only the shutter and aperture control how much light reaches the sensor. ISO does not change how many photons are converted to voltage at each sensor site. ISO multiples the actual photon counts either electronically or mathematically so in-camera jpeg rendering is convenient. ISO does not not make the sensor more, or less efficient. It appears to change the sensor efficiency so the photographer enjoys more flexibility.

This is explained here

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/dxomark_sensor_for_benchmarking_cameras2.shtml

but you have to scroll down to the last third if this very long article.

Auto ISO is useful. If you want to keep the shutter speed fixed to freeze motion and also maintain a constant DOF, then Auto ISO is a convenience - you don't need to go into the menus to change the exposure index.

Here is the behavior on the X-E1. I don't have an X-Pro1, so someone who has one needs to check this:

When Auto-ISO is selected in shutter-priority mode, EV Compensation through the EC dial changes aperture; when ISO is maxed out, then ISO changes.

When Auto-ISO is selected in aperture-priority mode, EV Compensation through the EC dial changes ISO, not shutter speed; when ISO is maxed out, then shutter speed changes.

When Auto-ISO is selected in manual mode, EV Compensation through the EC dial changes nothing.

So in fact, Fuji already allows ISO compensation through the EC dial, but only in aperture-priority mode.

This behavior is inconsistent, at best, and not what one would necessarily want. For example, when shooting HDR (in aperture priority), one would need to remember to set the ISO explicitly. Fair enough. It could be that Fuji is so confident in their sensor that they thought it would be acceptable to ramp up ISO before reducing shutter speed. However, in shutter priority, they thought it would be perfectly fine to have the EC dial adjust the aperture.

 nixda's gear list:nixda's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 +1 more
jondh Forum Member • Posts: 52
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

Off course it is like that. Auto ISO is used with the purpose of getting better ISO based on the available exposure not to change the exposure of the manual mode.

Do you expect that if you increase exposure compensation, for example, from EV0 to EV-1 the photo will be darker because ISO change from 400 to 200?

 jondh's gear list:jondh's gear list
Fujifilm X100S Fujifilm X-Pro1 Canon EOS 6D
Jeff Charles Veteran Member • Posts: 7,514
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

jondh wrote:

Off course it is like that. Auto ISO is used with the purpose of getting better ISO based on the available exposure not to change the exposure of the manual mode.

Right. ISO cannot change exposure. Only aperture and shutter speed can do that.

Do you expect that if you increase exposure compensation, for example, from EV0 to EV-1 the photo will be darker because ISO change from 400 to 200?

Yes. Assuming no change in exposure, increasing ISO makes the photo brighter, and decreasing ISO makes the photo darker.

-- hide signature --

Jeff
"Please proceed..."

 Jeff Charles's gear list:Jeff Charles's gear list
Sony RX100 III Fujifilm X100T Olympus E-M1 Fujifilm X-E2 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R +5 more
mngsmt Regular Member • Posts: 303
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

Jeff Charles wrote:

jondh wrote:

Off course it is like that. Auto ISO is used with the purpose of getting better ISO based on the available exposure not to change the exposure of the manual mode.

Right. ISO cannot change exposure. Only aperture and shutter speed can do that.

Although maybe technically correct, I think this is nitpicking. The amount of amplification applied by the camera is definitely part of the equation for calculating the "exposure".

Think of a variable ND filter that sits in front of the sensor, for example. The fact that the signal amplification (aka ISO) sits kind of "behind the sensor" is not really important in practice.

Do you expect that if you increase exposure compensation, for example, from EV0 to EV-1 the photo will be darker because ISO change from 400 to 200?

Yes. Assuming no change in exposure, increasing ISO makes the photo brighter, and decreasing ISO makes the photo darker.

Yes. That's what Auto ISO should provide. A means to manually change the brightness of the resulting photo. As any other automated exposure mode does.

hellocrowley Senior Member • Posts: 1,281
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

Jeff Charles wrote:

jondh wrote:

Off course it is like that. Auto ISO is used with the purpose of getting better ISO based on the available exposure not to change the exposure of the manual mode.

Right. ISO cannot change exposure. Only aperture and shutter speed can do that.

When your aperture and shutter speed are fixed, what do you do to get a correctly exposed photo? Do you change the ISO value?

OP (unknown member) Forum Member • Posts: 85
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

mjl699 wrote:

wchutt wrote:

nixda wrote:


Although you are formally correct in that 'exposure' is determined by aperture and shutter speed, there are plenty of renowned photographers and photography websites who consider ISO part of the exposure 'triangle'. The point is that the intensity values written to the RAW or JPEG file depend not only on aperture and shutter speed but also on ISO, and the intensity values is what one would like to affect when carrying out exposure compensation.

Renowned photographers consistently deliver quality images in a business-like fashion. They are very good at marketing themselves. This doesn't mean they understand the physics of digital training.

The exposure triangle is: light, shutter speed and aperture. Sensor-signal amplification has nothing to do with exposure.

Writers at renowned websites should know better. Unfortunately even renowned web sites do not spend money employing fact checkers or consultants to insure their content is accurate.

wchutt :: Although technically what you say might be correct what you say is not the full picture.

We now have a situation where the sensor amplification can be selected in the same way as aperture and shutter speed. Amplification changes the sensitivity of the sensor to incident light. Higher amplification results in higher sensitivity. This is termed and related (somewhat loosely at times) to ISO values which are also about sencitivity to light.

Amplification relates to sensitivity to light, ISO for film relates to sensitivity to light. The term ISO in modern digital cameras as related to amplification is a reasonable analogy to speed in film-based photogrpahy which were rated using ISO.

Even in the days of film, using a faster film meant a reduction in the required exposure to get a "correctly exposed" image. So even then, film speed did impact exposure, even if not technically part of exposure.

What I mean when I say I want exposure comp in manual mode is the following: Say I want to shoot at F2.0, T=1/60s, and I am using AutoISO 1600. The camera exposes for the "correct" exposure as measured by the in camera meter, choosing ISO 800. I want to achieve the result of underexposing by one stop. My options are: (1) Use F/2.8; (2) Use T=1/120s; (3) cheat and use ISO 400 (nice not to have to change films to do this). In each case the result should be the same - I should record half the count from each pixel on the sensor. I want the option to stick with F/2.0, T=1/120s, and instead of fiddling around to set ISO=400, I just want to set EC=-1 and let the camera work out the required ISO setting to produce an image with half the count (i.e. exactly the same as darker by 1 stop) than its meters would normally achieve by choosing the ISO to give the "correct" exposure.

This is what we are all meaning when we say we want EC to work in Manual Mode with AutoISO.

-- hide signature --

mjl599

Dear wchutt.
you are right in general, but I think you missed the point of auto-ISO. Of course I can change ISO in manual mode to alter the exposure. But what does auto-ISO do? It selects the ISO to match camera's EV0 measurement. So I think it is just a software issue to let the camera choose ISO for -let's say- EV-1.

OP (unknown member) Forum Member • Posts: 85
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

Thank you all for your input. Good to see, that there are lot of users who miss this option. 
Hopefully this will be solved in a future update.

viking79
viking79 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,137
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?
2

wchutt wrote:

It is not a bug or oversight. In manual exposure mode you manually adjust the aperture and/or the shutter speed to change exposure with your fingers. The using the EC dial is redundant and unnecessary.

You are confusing exposure with ISO. Only shutter speed and aperture determine exposure.

This is the old school film shooting with fixed ISO train of thought that no longer applies to digital.

Technically, it is correct. Only shutter speed and aperture that control "Exposure" but ISO controls image brightness and is a parameter adjustable by the camera and is critical to your final image.

This means all digital cameras need two new modes.  ISO sensitivity priority and Shutter Speed Aperture Priority.  The first isn't all that important, but the second one is critical to many styles of shooting.  These modes were not possible on film since ISO was fixed by what film you loaded in the camera.

Fuji decided to half implement Shutter Speed Aperture Priority by implementing a pseudo manual mode that allows Auto ISO but not EV +/-, making a sort of useless mode.  So although EV +/- doesn't quite make sense in a technical sense (you aren't changing "exposure") you are changing the final brightness of your image by an equivalent amount so you are in fact changing the exposure value by changing the ISO.

http://www.fredparker.com/ultexp1.htm#EXPOSURE FACTOR RELATIONSHIP CHART B

Looking at an EV chart that includes ISO, it is easy to tell that if I dialed in +1 EV of change in Shutter Speed Aperture Priority mode that the only correct solution would be to increase the ISO by a factor of 2.

This feature is half implemented on Fuji until they decide to fix it.  Technically it isn't a bug since they don't advertise that feature, but an issue with the requirements for the camera.  They need to correct the requirements.  I am sure the camera is verified against them, but it isn't validated. I.e. the camera meets internal requirements, but doesn't really fulfill the point of having auto ISO in "manual" mode.

Eric

-- hide signature --

I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object
be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it
beautiful. - John Constable (quote)
See my Blog at: http://www.erphotoreview.com/ (bi-weekly)
Flickr Photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28177041@N03/ (updated daily)

 viking79's gear list:viking79's gear list
Sony Alpha 7R Samsung NX1 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 85mm F1.4 ED SSA Samsung NX 60mm F2.8 Macro ED OIS SSA +5 more
OP (unknown member) Forum Member • Posts: 85
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

viking79 wrote:

wchutt wrote:

It is not a bug or oversight. In manual exposure mode you manually adjust the aperture and/or the shutter speed to change exposure with your fingers. The using the EC dial is redundant and unnecessary.

You are confusing exposure with ISO. Only shutter speed and aperture determine exposure.

This is the old school film shooting with fixed ISO train of thought that no longer applies to digital.

Technically, it is correct. Only shutter speed and aperture that control "Exposure" but ISO controls image brightness and is a parameter adjustable by the camera and is critical to your final image.

This means all digital cameras need two new modes. ISO sensitivity priority and Shutter Speed Aperture Priority. The first isn't all that important, but the second one is critical to many styles of shooting. These modes were not possible on film since ISO was fixed by what film you loaded in the camera.

Fuji decided to half implement Shutter Speed Aperture Priority by implementing a pseudo manual mode that allows Auto ISO but not EV +/-, making a sort of useless mode. So although EV +/- doesn't quite make sense in a technical sense (you aren't changing "exposure") you are changing the final brightness of your image by an equivalent amount so you are in fact changing the exposure value by changing the ISO.

http://www.fredparker.com/ultexp1.htm#EXPOSURE FACTOR RELATIONSHIP CHART B

Looking at an EV chart that includes ISO, it is easy to tell that if I dialed in +1 EV of change in Shutter Speed Aperture Priority mode that the only correct solution would be to increase the ISO by a factor of 2.

This feature is half implemented on Fuji until they decide to fix it. Technically it isn't a bug since they don't advertise that feature, but an issue with the requirements for the camera. They need to correct the requirements. I am sure the camera is verified against them, but it isn't validated. I.e. the camera meets internal requirements, but doesn't really fulfill the point of having auto ISO in "manual" mode.

Eric

-- hide signature --

I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object
be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it
beautiful. - John Constable (quote)
See my Blog at: http://www.erphotoreview.com/ (bi-weekly)
Flickr Photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28177041@N03/ (updated daily)

This is a very good explanation.

viking79
viking79 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,137
Re: X-Pro 1: No exposure compensation in Auto-ISO - is this a bug?

viking79 wrote:

This means all digital cameras need two new modes. ISO sensitivity priority and Shutter Speed Aperture Priority. The first isn't all that important, but the second one is critical to many styles of shooting. These modes were not possible on film since ISO was fixed by what film you loaded in the camera.

Look at the top of the Pentax K-5 Mode dial:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk5/4 image from DpReview's review of K-5

And see the modes:

P: program, full auto but shifted to taste

Sv: Sensitivity value priority, select ISO; shutter, aperture change automatically.  This mode is entirely unnecessary since other modes allow selection of ISO, i.e. if a P mode allows manually setting ISO this mode is redundant.  Ideally, you would have this mode and a P mode where you could only use auto ISO.

Tv: Shutter speed value priority; varies aperture and ISO according to program mode of camera (modes for MTF, depth of field shallow, depth of field deep, or high shutter speed).

Av: Aperture value priority; varies shutter speed and ISO according to lens focal length and camera setting, slow, normal, fast, and according to program mode of camera.

TAv: Shutter Speed Aperture value priority; varies ISO accordingly, including EV compensation.

M: manual.  You select shutter speed, ISO, and aperture values.  Auto ISO in M is not a good thing.  It is an overload which makes you forget auto ISO on when you want real manual mode.

This is one page I wish other companies would take from Pentax's book.

Eric

-- hide signature --

I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object
be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it
beautiful. - John Constable (quote)
See my Blog at: http://www.erphotoreview.com/ (bi-weekly)
Flickr Photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28177041@N03/ (updated daily)

 viking79's gear list:viking79's gear list
Sony Alpha 7R Samsung NX1 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 85mm F1.4 ED SSA Samsung NX 60mm F2.8 Macro ED OIS SSA +5 more
Clint Dunn Senior Member • Posts: 1,411
Am I the only one??
1

Am I the only one who predominantly shoots in Aperture Priority???  Shoot AP and the exposure compensation works just fine and you still have full artistic control.  For my work I find that I shoot 95% of the time in AP, and maybe 5% full manual if I am using strobes etc.

AP is sooo much quicker than full manual if you are in a setting with constantly changing light conditions.  Just sayin'.

-- hide signature --
 Clint Dunn's gear list:Clint Dunn's gear list
Sony RX100 III Leica M Typ 240 Leica SL (Typ 601) Carl Zeiss C Sonnar T* 1,5/50 ZM Voigtlander 15mm F4.5 Super Wide Heliar +3 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads