XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

Started Feb 5, 2013 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Kim Yee Regular Member • Posts: 187
XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

I did a comparison shot between XE1 with 35mm vs M Monochrom + Lux 50.

The OOC jpg from the XE1 is just amazing. On normal computer screen you can hardly tell the difference.

First shot is from XE1

XE1 + 35mm @1.4

By MM

MM + 50mm @ 1.4

But at 100%, you will notice that MM outresolve the XE1 just because of the sensor and resolution of the lens.

Left is the XE1 Right is MM

Makes me wonder why I ever need the MM

-- hide signature --

Kim

Fujifilm X-E1
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Al Valentino Senior Member • Posts: 4,724
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

Great post. What is the ISO?  I know the MM does very well at high ISO compared to regular M models since their is no color noise to worry about. That makes is a good choice for B&W shooters that want to work at high ISO. And then came fuji...

 Al Valentino's gear list:Al Valentino's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS Rokinon 8mm F2.8 UMC Aspherical Fisheye +6 more
Zardoz
Zardoz Senior Member • Posts: 1,249
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

No EXIF?

Not an ideal test since the subject has moved, so there will be differences in the plane of focus.

Having said that, you can only see the cloth weave in the 100% crop of the MM shot.  It's completely missing from the X-E1 shot.  No surprise, as in addition to the sensor size advantage, the MM has probably a 35% or more linear resolution advantage over the X-E1.

Kim Yee OP Regular Member • Posts: 187
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

Ahh, the EXIF~~ I forgot to turn it on on the export setting in my Lightroom.

Yes indeed the MM out-resolve the XE1. But to tell the truth, the OCC jpgs from the XE1 is just so good!

-- hide signature --

Kim

km25
km25 Contributing Member • Posts: 602
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

You have hit upon the most important point of all. What does the picture look like a normal viewing and normal mag. How may people will look at at the Monia Lisa with binoculars. Or a scanning electron microscope. One these LCD screens we gace on, can we really see 36MP.The depth of color, tones and accurancy ( as in chrome, like Kodachrome) is more of a factor then just line per MM or MPs or grain values. The two picture look the same because we are not test instrumnets, we are humans, whos eyes can only really see  so much detail anyway. Some of these over processed image look like cartoons. Or what it may look like to some on "Window Pain". Why I like Fuji so much is that they made the frist CCD units, a long with Kodak. They are "flim people". Say what you may about the X-Pro, only 16MP, AP-C . In the old days smaller format cameras where sharp, but the larger the negative the smoother the image was . More zones in B&W, more tones of color. The bottom line is that it image look true to life. The final image goes beyond it's format or MPs. This issue will be seen by more photographers, film is a long way from being dead! And the really great digital cameras will produce images that look like film, like Fuji. Leica to date, looks better as a film camera...like my M7. The monachrome Leica, a great idea, poorly exicuted.
kam

 km25's gear list:km25's gear list
Fujifilm X-T1 Leica Elmarit-M 24mm f/2.8 ASPH Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH Leica Summicron-M 50mm f/2 Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R +3 more
Kim Yee OP Regular Member • Posts: 187
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

Agree. However MM makes my film camera redundant and i am seriously think of selling all my film leica cause utility really does replace all of my bw needs

AlbertInFrance
AlbertInFrance Senior Member • Posts: 5,591
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

I don't want to seem picky (!) but although the two full frame images are the same size the 100% crops are very different. Are you sure you've got everything right?

-- hide signature --

Albert
Every photograph is an abstraction from reality.

 AlbertInFrance's gear list:AlbertInFrance's gear list
Canon PowerShot G15 Fujifilm X-T1 Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG Macro Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R +4 more
deednets Veteran Member • Posts: 4,894
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

Kim Yee wrote:

I did a comparison shot between XE1 with 35mm vs M Monochrom + Lux 50.

The OOC jpg from the XE1 is just amazing. On normal computer screen you can hardly tell the difference.

First shot is from XE1

XE1 + 35mm @1.4

By MM

MM + 50mm @ 1.4

But at 100%, you will notice that MM outresolve the XE1 just because of the sensor and resolution of the lens.

Left is the XE1 Right is MM

Makes me wonder why I ever need the MM

-- hide signature --

Kim

Not sure whether I need glasses here but it seems to me the Leica image is scewed, look at the dimensions of the shirt, looks like you stretched this one??

Regarding the size of the pictures I would imagine it to be very very difficult to tell the difference for web resized shots ...

Cheers

Deed

Comapedrosa Regular Member • Posts: 153
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

Kim,

Thank you so much for doing this comparison and for posting. This is very interesting - in particular since i'm in the market for a an X-E1 or X-Pro1 (that i absolutely don't need :-))

Now please don't flame me, but to my eyes the full MM shot does have a 3D quality that the X-E1 picture doesn't have - and yes, i know it's almost suicidal to bring this up, but i've been around long enough, with some Leica and non-Leica experience to venture here...

It might be that the Leica shot is slightly overexposed, a bit more contrasty, has a bit more bokeh, and the shirt is further turned towards the camera...

... therefore it would be absolutely fantastic if you were open to creating 1-2 new comparison shots - same setting but different, static, subjects.

Again,

Thank you for doing the comparison in the first place!

CP

-- hide signature --

_________________________________ www.35f2.com

Austin101 Senior Member • Posts: 1,410
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

deednets wrote:

Kim Yee wrote:

I did a comparison shot between XE1 with 35mm vs M Monochrom + Lux 50.

The OOC jpg from the XE1 is just amazing. On normal computer screen you can hardly tell the difference.

First shot is from XE1

XE1 + 35mm @1.4

By MM

MM + 50mm @ 1.4

But at 100%, you will notice that MM outresolve the XE1 just because of the sensor and resolution of the lens.

Left is the XE1 Right is MM

Makes me wonder why I ever need the MM

-- hide signature --

Kim

Not sure whether I need glasses here but it seems to me the Leica image is scewed, look at the dimensions of the shirt, looks like you stretched this one??

Regarding the size of the pictures I would imagine it to be very very difficult to tell the difference for web resized shots ...

Cheers

Deed

I was thinking that myself, looks odd

Ryan Williams
Ryan Williams Contributing Member • Posts: 598
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

If you flick between the two images it's apparent that one was shot at a different angle. The MM shot captures the shirt from a more front-on perspective.

Kim Yee OP Regular Member • Posts: 187
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

I think the shirt rotate a bit because of the wind after the xe1 shot. I didn't stretch it. However i do think the leica shot is bit overexposed cause the meter reading is more spot like and it is reading off the darker green shirt. Hence the shutter speed is slower. I think i should do a more controlled comparison of static object.

Kim Yee OP Regular Member • Posts: 187
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

Rotate by the wind...

Le Tchetche Junior Member • Posts: 41
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

Hey Kim,

Very interesting post, great comparison.

Can you share which JPEG camera settings you are using for B&W with the X-E1 ?

Thanks !

-- hide signature --
 Le Tchetche's gear list:Le Tchetche's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix X100 Fujifilm X-Pro1 Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R
Indulis Bernsteins Regular Member • Posts: 443
If you processed the XE-1 image via Lightroom you reduced the resolution

It isn't a fair comparison of the camera, if you used LR to process the photos.. LR is still lagging on good X-Trans sensor support. So a fair comparison is to use the out-of-camera JPEG vs LR processed Leica (I am assuming LR does a good job on the Leica). Or maybe Silkypix. Just to compare cameras.

Hopefully Lightroom is upgraded with decent X-Trans support soon. CaptureOne has been fixed up already.

 Indulis Bernsteins's gear list:Indulis Bernsteins's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS +4 more
Ryan Williams
Ryan Williams Contributing Member • Posts: 598
Re: If you processed the XE-1 image via Lightroom you reduced the resolution

Indulis Bernsteins wrote:

It isn't a fair comparison of the camera, if you used LR to process the photos.. LR is still lagging on good X-Trans sensor support. So a fair comparison is to use the out-of-camera JPEG vs LR processed Leica (I am assuming LR does a good job on the Leica). Or maybe Silkypix. Just to compare cameras.

Hopefully Lightroom is upgraded with decent X-Trans support soon. CaptureOne has been fixed up already.

I agree that there're too many variables in the air for this to be a particularly useful comparison, but just to be clear: the X-E1 photo was an out-of-camera JPEG that was modified in Lightroom. Lightroom's X-Trans issues are completely irrelevant in the context of JPEGs, indeed Lightroom can get a lot of out of the X-E1's particularly good JPEGs.

Chris Dodkin
Chris Dodkin MOD Veteran Member • Posts: 6,886
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

Very interesting , especially given the price differential between the two cameras.

You could buy the XE1 and all lenses in the X range, and still come in cheaper than just the Leica body!

So what do you get for the money with the Leica - how different did it feel to shoot the Leica vs the Fuji?

How did the auto-focus compare? 

-- hide signature --

http://www.dodkin.com
Chris@1D-Images.com
Mac Pro/MacBook Pro/iPods/iPhones/iPad

 Chris Dodkin's gear list:Chris Dodkin's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix X100 Canon EOS-1D Canon EOS-1D Mark II Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 30D +34 more
Al Valentino Senior Member • Posts: 4,724
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50

Prior to buying my XE1 I was lusting for a Leica, even the MM, but I knew it was not something I could possibly afford. I was not happy with Nikon not updating my D300 so I researched other camera companies and came upon the X-Pro1 and then the XE1. I now own the XE1 and post like this helped cure my 'lust for Leica' disease.

It has been mentioned a few times on this thread that Fuji shooters seems to shoot more B&W than other cameras, the above test shots help to understand why. Side-by-side one can say one is better than the other, but if either is viewed alone one can find nothing lacking.

 Al Valentino's gear list:Al Valentino's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS Rokinon 8mm F2.8 UMC Aspherical Fisheye +6 more
Asylum Photo
Asylum Photo Senior Member • Posts: 1,277
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50
1

I prefer the dynamic range of the X-E1.

-- hide signature --
 Asylum Photo's gear list:Asylum Photo's gear list
Fujifilm X-E2 Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R +2 more
Imagefoundry Regular Member • Posts: 269
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50
2

Hello,

I find that Xtrans does particularly well with B&W - no doubt because its CFA layout is designed to favor luminance detail over chroma detail (compared to Bayer, that is). And the tonal rendition is gorgeous straight out of camera.

But Monochrom is in the league of it's own, I am afraid. With no demosaicing and great glass it's just unbeatable when it comes to large prints. I am in a process of printing a show for a major artist, and everyone involved (artist, gallerist, publisher, assistants) is drooling over the quality - the prints look amazing at 40" wide. If I didn't know I would have guessed they were taken with a 4x5 film camera.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads