135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

Started Jan 8, 2013 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
nevada5
nevada5 Veteran Member • Posts: 9,059
135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I'm considering buying a 135mm lens (to use on my NEX-6). I'm looking at a Pentax M 135 f/3.5 and also a Minolto MD ROKKOR 135 f/3.5.  I know something about the legendary Pentax quality, but not this lens.  And the Minolta 135's are pretty cheap - which makes me concerned.

But I'm not stuck on anything, I have no experience with the Canons or Nikons in this range.

So if you have some knowledge/experience regarding 135mm legacy lenses, feel free to share. Thanks in advance.

-- hide signature --

Hey, it ain't rocket surgery.
Larry
I'm experimenting with Quantum Physics and I just discovered that I can completely destr

 nevada5's gear list:nevada5's gear list
Nikon Coolpix P330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85
Sony Alpha NEX-6
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
clockwork247 Regular Member • Posts: 404
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

nevada5 wrote:

I'm considering buying a 135mm lens (to use on my NEX-6). I'm looking at a Pentax M 135 f/3.5 and also a Minolto MD ROKKOR 135 f/3.5. I know something about the legendary Pentax quality, but not this lens. And the Minolta 135's are pretty cheap - which makes me concerned.

But I'm not stuck on anything, I have no experience with the Canons or Nikons in this range.

So if you have some knowledge/experience regarding 135mm legacy lenses, feel free to share. Thanks in advance.

-- hide signature --

Hey, it ain't rocket surgery.
Larry
I'm experimenting with Quantum Physics and I just discovered that I can completely destr

from what I've heard most if not all 135mm are good.

From what I've seen, the unusual f-stop is more "wanted" for some reason.

for example the f/3.2 lens are more wanted than the f/3.5 version

and the f/2.5 version are more wanted than the f/2.8

but for the most part most manufacture did well with the 135 FL.

 clockwork247's gear list:clockwork247's gear list
Canon EOS-1D Mark II Canon EOS 20D Nikon D70s Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 +9 more
SQLGuy Veteran Member • Posts: 4,447
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I use a Canon FD 135/2.5, also known as a Bell & Howell lens, since it apparently shipped with some special Bell & Howell Canon kit. Anyway, it's heavy as a brick, but I love it. It's also one of the FD lenses on which you can lock the aperture level so that the aperture ring always works, regardless of whether the adapter is in Lock or Open mode. The built-in sliding hood is nice too.

This is one shot I had handy that was taken with it... indoor in a low light arena.

-- hide signature --

Nex-7 with kit lenses, Contax G 35, and a number of legacy lenses (mostly Canon FD)

 SQLGuy's gear list:SQLGuy's gear list
Canon PowerShot G9 Nikon D200 Sony Alpha NEX-7 NEX-5T Sony Alpha 7 II +5 more
lesnapanda Forum Member • Posts: 91
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I've recently bought a Carl Zeiss Jena 135/3.5 (M42 mount) and I'm pretty happy with the results. It is a bit pain in the ass to focus because of my shaky hands (too much coffee or alcohol I guess ). But apart from that it is great. One thing to note is that at 3.5 it is a somewhat dark lens so you need good lightning conditions to use it (I'd say - daylight). Otherwise tripod + long exposure is a must (I have the first nex 5 wich is not so great at ISO higher than 800)

 lesnapanda's gear list:lesnapanda's gear list
Sigma DP2 Merrill Sigma dp0 Quattro Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sony Alpha NEX-3N Sony E 16mm F2.8 Pancake +3 more
dbiela Regular Member • Posts: 159
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

nevada5 wrote:

I'm considering buying a 135mm lens (to use on my NEX-6). I'm looking at a Pentax M 135 f/3.5 and also a Minolto MD ROKKOR 135 f/3.5. I know something about the legendary Pentax quality, but not this lens. And the Minolta 135's are pretty cheap - which makes me concerned.

But I'm not stuck on anything, I have no experience with the Canons or Nikons in this range.

So if you have some knowledge/experience regarding 135mm legacy lenses, feel free to share.

I have been very happy with the Olympus OM 135mm f2.8 lens. I paid about $75 at a local dealer who had it for a few years and wanted it gone. It was in great shape but did not have the rear lens cap or front cap. It shoots great images and is very small compared to some other lenses of the same mm and f stop. I found it to be good at f2.8 and tops out at f5.6. You want to be on the look out for the OM "MC" for multi coded lens

Shot this in Chicago hand held

 dbiela's gear list:dbiela's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-5N NEX5R Sony Alpha a99 Sony Alpha 7R Sony 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* +9 more
Lightshow
Lightshow Veteran Member • Posts: 4,959
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I don't use lenses over 100mm very much, but I do have an R.Topcor 135/3.5 preset that's very sharp, I've heard the RE's are also very sharp.

I was going to get a Canon FD 135 to go with my SSC collection, but they never made one with SSC, the FDn 135's have SSC, and of those I'd get the f2.

 Lightshow's gear list:Lightshow's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony Alpha 7R Leica Elmarit-M 24mm f/2.8 ASPH Leica APO-Summicron-M 90mm f/2 ASPH Voigtlander 15mm F4.5 Super Wide Heliar +8 more
lowincash
lowincash Contributing Member • Posts: 717
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I have the Minolta Rokkor 135mm f2.8 lens. I don't use it much but when I do I love it quite a lot. I used this lens recently when my friend asked me to shoot some pics of him and his gf and dog. I like this lens and it's quite sharp wide open. I might start using this lens more often



-- hide signature --

I only shoot JPEG =]

mkandil Contributing Member • Posts: 573
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I like your photo and like the minolta rokkor 135 f2.8 although i used it once only.but I did not found it sharp when wide open but yours looks really good


md rokkor 135mm. no PP out of camera JPEG

 mkandil's gear list:mkandil's gear list
Sony RX1R Sony Alpha 7R II Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM Sony FE 85mm F1.4 GM Zeiss Batis 18mm F2.8 +1 more
Ronbeau Forum Member • Posts: 90
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I've been using the Canon FD 135/2.5 SC and have been very happy with it.  There's an old thread on this specific lens.  I've never used others though, so can't really compare.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/42413576

 Ronbeau's gear list:Ronbeau's gear list
Sony a6000
Rbbra Regular Member • Posts: 153
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

nevada5 wrote:

I'm considering buying a 135mm lens (to use on my NEX-6). I'm looking at a Pentax M 135 f/3.5 and also a Minolto MD ROKKOR 135 f/3.5. I know something about the legendary Pentax quality, but not this lens. And the Minolta 135's are pretty cheap - which makes me concerned.

But I'm not stuck on anything, I have no experience with the Canons or Nikons in this range.

So if you have some knowledge/experience regarding 135mm legacy lenses, feel free to share. Thanks in advance.

-- hide signature --

Hey, it ain't rocket surgery.
Larry
I'm experimenting with Quantum Physics and I just discovered that I can completely destr

Hello Nevada5,

Leica 135mm Tele Elmar 1:4 is also very good, already at FA and not too expensive second (third etc.) hand. I use it on the Nex 6, it's not a heavy or bulky lens.

Rbbra

mpetersson Regular Member • Posts: 361
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I have the Minolta Rokkor 135mm f3,5, and for the price I don't find anything to complain about. It is slightly soft wide open, but the images sharpen up nicely in post-processing. I got the lens as part of a package with a Rokkor 28mm f2,8 and a Rokkor 50mm f1,7, all are pretty basic lenses but considering all three cost me about 20 USD in total I can't complain, and results are good except from the 28mm. It has serious issues with corner sharpness, but I am suspicious that my copy is flawed.

Anyway, ranting aside you can get the Minolta 135mm dirt cheap and it is a good lens. For the price you could pick one up and try it, if you don't like it you will still have money to spend on another lens. I think you will like it though, mine is silky smooth to focus and the built-in hood is pretty convenient.

 mpetersson's gear list:mpetersson's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony Alpha 7 Sony E 16mm F2.8 Pancake Sony FE 35mm F2.8 Sony FE 55mm F1.8 +2 more
OngT8m Junior Member • Posts: 32
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I owned Vivitar 135mm 2.5, IMO it's quite a decent lens, heavy light reflection and purple. In contrast, you got great bokeh and metal build( a little bit heavy on NEX!). Check out some pictures: I'm shot for fun, not pro photographer though. This lens is shaky if you want to use in low light condition, 1/30 is ok but you have to hold your breath or just set iso to 3200 and above

bzx Regular Member • Posts: 216
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I have this lens, I'm pretty sure there are better 135's than this. Personally I think its sharpness isn't great. But as you said, it's cheap - I got it for 20€.

Pictures below are JPEG Fine straight out of NEX-5, just added a bit of contrast in Preview app.

If you're interested in RAWs or anything, let me know.

f3.5

f8.0

-- hide signature --

t[+]m

 bzx's gear list:bzx's gear list
Fujifilm X100T Sony Alpha NEX-5 Sony E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Sony E 16mm F2.8 Pancake +2 more
GaryW Veteran Member • Posts: 8,293
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

I got a Vivitar 135/2.8 for cheap.  It's pretty good when stopped-down, but at f2.8 it's unusable for most of what I want it for, as everything just glows and it doesn't seem sharp.  (Could be interesting as a soft-filter effect portrait?  I haven't tried that.)  Seems sharp at f4, but then, I have other lenses I can use around that aperture.  I guess I should try a direct comparison, which I haven't, but between the flexible zoom, more modern coatings (should be less PF) and possibly OSS, it might be worth using another lens at f4 to f5.  If I could find an f2.8 lens that was pretty good at f2.8, it might be worth it for certain situations, though.  My a-mount 55-200 is really good at f4, so unless something else is a lot better, it's probably not worth bothering with.  I now have the E-mount 55-210, but it has a smaller max aperture.

-- hide signature --

Gary W.

 GaryW's gear list:GaryW's gear list
Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS Sony E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-V3 Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 Sony Alpha NEX-5 +8 more
Jokica
Jokica Senior Member • Posts: 1,269
Re: 135mm Legacy Lens opinions wanted

Jupiter 37A is great!

 Jokica's gear list:Jokica's gear list
Sony a6000 Sony a77 II Sony 50mm F1.4 Samyang 85mm F1.4 Aspherical IF Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM +2 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads