70-200 VR II F.2.8 +1.4 TC or 300 f4 which do you recommend Pl help!!!

Started Sep 8, 2012 | Discussions
OP stadimiri Regular Member • Posts: 348
Re: Look at the V1 and the FT-1 Adapter

hi
interesting alternative
--
srini

scorpiuspix Regular Member • Posts: 331
Re: 300/4...

That would be my choice. I owned both the 70-200 VRI and 300/4 in previous lifetime. That extra reach is nice on the 300/4 and what a sharp lens. It TC's well with a 1.4TC as well. Just my thoughts for what they're worth...
--
pbase/scorpius

 scorpiuspix's gear list:scorpiuspix's gear list
Nikon D300 Nikon Df Nikon D500
OP stadimiri Regular Member • Posts: 348
Re: 300/4...

hi
thank you very much well i assure you to me the advise s worth a lot
regards
--
srini

Michel F Senior Member • Posts: 2,003
Re: 70-200 VR II F.2.8 +1.4 TC or 300 f4 which do you recommend Pl help!!!

stadimiri wrote:

hi guys

My interest is mainly wild life,birding and landscapes.i shoot with Nikon D300 + nikon 300 f 4+14.tc and 16-85, tokina 11-16 for landscapes

i am seriously considering switching to 70- 200 VR II f2.8 + 1.4 TC instead because
1. better range especially shooting large mammals and large BIF

2.i understand that the IQ of this lens is uperb

Personally I much prefer the images I get with my 70-200 VR II to those produced by my 300mm f/4 AF-S. That being said, I would never consider the 70-200 VR for wildlife or birding. Then again, I'm not to keen on using TC's.

3. VRII is very helpful in my shaking hands

4 i am told that this lens gives great results even with 1.7 TC and the new 2.0 version 3 Tc please advise.

I saw many glowing reviews of the 70-200 VR II with TC 20 III combination which encouraged me to try it out on my own lens. I was sorely disappointed with the results. Don't forget that you are adding many complex glass elements in front of your lens so a performance hit is to be expected (loss of detail, loss of contrast and saturation). You will have to try this combination yourself to decide if that performance loss is acceptable to you.

thanks in advance
regards

srini

-- hide signature --
OP stadimiri Regular Member • Posts: 348
Re: 70-200 VR II F.2.8 +1.4 TC or 300 f4 which do you recommend Pl help!!!

hi michel F
thanks a lot
regards
--
srini

Tidewater Contributing Member • Posts: 792
Re: 70-200 VR II F.2.8 +1.4 TC or 300 f4 which do you recommend Pl help!!!

These were taken recently with the 2.8 70-200. Obviously large slower type birds. The focus was slowed noticeably by the 1.7x when it was used. Not sure about contrast loss. Sharpness loss was not noticed. I am happy to get wing shots like these even though some in the Nature and Wildlife forum are doing as well or better with the 300mm. These were all hand held Nikon d200.

Having the zoom can make or break the shot sometimes even though you only get a second or less to compose.
My DP gallery currently includes all BIFs

OP stadimiri Regular Member • Posts: 348
Re: 70-200 VR II F.2.8 +1.4 TC or 300 f4 which do you recommend Pl help!!!

hi
very nice pics and good sharpness too
srini

gonzalu
gonzalu Forum Pro • Posts: 10,389
You can't alter physics :)

Focal length is a product of distance and magnification. Regardless of the density of the sensor, equivalent is no more a cheat as crop factor... it is NOT true focal magnification. 800mm magnification is what you want optically, not by putting more pixels on target.
--
Manny
http://www.pbase.com/gonzalu/
http://www.thrustimages.com/
FCAS Member - http://fcasmembers.com/

 gonzalu's gear list:gonzalu's gear list
Sony RX100 III Nikon D4S Nikon D7200 Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED +20 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads