Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

Started Apr 14, 2012 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Shaun432x Regular Member • Posts: 352
Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

I have read in the forums that Canon are three times the size of Nikon.

If Canon as a company are three times larger than Nikon, why don't they drastically drop their prices on DSLR's and lenses.

Then after a time when Nikon are bust, Canon can up their prices and charge what they want!

 Shaun432x's gear list:Shaun432x's gear list
Nikon Coolpix 990 Nikon Coolpix 8800 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V Nikon D60 +21 more
Major Major Regular Member • Posts: 297
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

Im pretty sure that would be illegal.

 Major Major's gear list:Major Major's gear list
Nikon D800
spbStan
spbStan Senior Member • Posts: 1,927
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?
1

Canon is large because of printers. Nikon's sell well because they are great cameras. For people who know the difference, price is not the only criteria for choosing a camera. Personally I do not seen anything in the Canon line I would be interested in, not even their main product; printers. I don't like to spend all my time trying to fix artifacts, shadow noise and banding.
--
Stan
St Petersburg Russia

u007 Senior Member • Posts: 1,681
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

I'd love to see sales figures, but I would bet that the 5d2 sales beat the d700/d3s and d3X combined by a ratio of 5:1. Canon are plenty popular. Don't let the internet forums delude you!

spbStan wrote:

Canon is large because of printers. Nikon's sell well because they are great cameras. For people who know the difference, price is not the only criteria for choosing a camera. Personally I do not seen anything in the Canon line I would be interested in, not even their main product; printers. I don't like to spend all my time trying to fix artifacts, shadow noise and banding.
--
Stan
St Petersburg Russia

-- hide signature --

My travel photography blog - http://www.frescoglobe.com

Shaun432x OP Regular Member • Posts: 352
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

I too buy Nikon, I much prefer it to Canon.

This idea was just from a business point of view... remove Nikon and Canon would be untouchable.

I see at sporting events on the TV that 70% of the photographers shoot Canon, so somebody must like Canon gear!

 Shaun432x's gear list:Shaun432x's gear list
Nikon Coolpix 990 Nikon Coolpix 8800 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V Nikon D60 +21 more
ScottnLaguna
ScottnLaguna Contributing Member • Posts: 719
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

I am all Nikon for photo gear but use a Canon printer for home output. It's better than HP.

 ScottnLaguna's gear list:ScottnLaguna's gear list
Nikon D300 Nikon D800 Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II
Patco Forum Pro • Posts: 12,333
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

spbStan wrote:

Canon is large because of printers.

That they also sell printers is irrelevant to the fact that Canon sells more cameras than Nikon.

Canon made cameras long before they made printers, and long before Nikon started making cameras.

-- hide signature --

Patco
A photograph is more than a bunch of pixels

michaeladawson Veteran Member • Posts: 9,430
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?
1

ScottnLaguna wrote:

I am all Nikon for photo gear but use a Canon printer for home output. It's better than HP.

I have no doubt Canon printers are better than HP for photography. Are they better than Epson?
--
Mike Dawson

 michaeladawson's gear list:michaeladawson's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 Nikon D200 Nikon D4 Nikon D800 Nikon D800E +21 more
Dan DeLion Contributing Member • Posts: 542
Great Smell

That they also sell printers is irrelevant to the fact that Canon sells more cameras than Nikon.

Canon made cameras long before they made printers, and long before Nikon started making cameras.

And their copier, glass bottle, and perfume businesses must be invaluable when designing their cameras. Great smelling cameras!

 Dan DeLion's gear list:Dan DeLion's gear list
Nikon 200-500mm F5.6E ED VR
RustyKnee Regular Member • Posts: 462
Re: Great Smell

If it weren't for Nikon (or other hypothetical competitor), Canon cameras wouldn't be as good as they are.

Canon users shouldn't wish for Nikon to disappear.

ovrebekk Veteran Member • Posts: 4,249
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

Shaun432x wrote:

I have read in the forums that Canon are three times the size of Nikon.

If Canon as a company are three times larger than Nikon, why don't they drastically drop their prices on DSLR's and lenses.

Then after a time when Nikon are bust, Canon can up their prices and charge what they want!

With all the people invested in Nikon gear they would have to drop their prices for a loong time to have any chance of 'busting' Nikon, and they would lose a lot of money in the process.

I think Canon is better of selling their gear at a higher price, even though they will lose some of the available market to Nikon.

Right now it seems Canon is trying to make inroads into the video market, with several video specific cameras released, and in that market they are facing competition from much bigger vendors than Nikon.

M Lammerse
M Lammerse Forum Pro • Posts: 11,285
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

Shaun432x wrote:

I have read in the forums that Canon are three times the size of Nikon.

Yes, and Nikon is probable three times the size of Fuji (camera divisionally speaking)

If Canon as a company are three times larger than Nikon, why don't they drastically drop their prices on DSLR's and lenses.

Why would you make a division running bad by means of cost/profit ratio? You're stockholders will go mad about it. Drastically running prices down will mean drastically running quality down as well.

As a side note, ever wondered why Leica is still there?
It's not that they make the best camera's in the world

Then after a time when Nikon are bust, Canon can up their prices and charge what they want!

Nah, that will practically never work. and Canon will not even want that to happen for sure. Canon will expand in other parts of the media market more, getting ahead, it will create more money and it will keep your stockholders happy too.
Michel

-- hide signature --
SergioSpain Contributing Member • Posts: 509
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

u007 wrote:

I'd love to see sales figures, but I would bet that the 5d2 sales beat the d700/d3s and d3X combined by a ratio of 5:1. Canon are plenty popular. Don't let the internet forums delude you!

I'll take you up on that bet!

 SergioSpain's gear list:SergioSpain's gear list
Nikon D700 Nikon D4 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/2.8G ED-IF VR +5 more
marike6 Veteran Member • Posts: 5,071
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

u007 wrote:

I'd love to see sales figures, but I would bet that the 5d2 sales beat the d700/d3s and d3X combined by a ratio of 5:1. Canon are plenty popular. Don't let the internet forums delude you!

And Justin Bieber may end up outselling The Beatles and the Rolling Stones put together. Your point? Popularity doesn't mean better, that is for certain. Nikon has been a more illustrious and important brand throughout the history of photography and it's likely there is nothing Canon can do to change that this fact.

Quality always wins out over quantity. Leica is a perfect example of that.

 marike6's gear list:marike6's gear list
Nikon Coolpix P330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Nikon D800 Fujifilm X-E1 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +7 more
marike6 Veteran Member • Posts: 5,071
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

u007 wrote:

I'd love to see sales figures, but I would bet that the 5d2 sales beat the d700/d3s and d3X combined by a ratio of 5:1.

Yet the 5D2 is an inferior camera to each of the Nikon's here. And sales ratio's pulled from thin air don't really prove much.

Canon are plenty popular. Don't let the internet forums delude you!

Popularity is an indicator of what exactly? Marketing? The Twilight Series is one of the most popular movies of all time. Does that make it the best vampire movie, or even a good vampire film?

Canon has been falling behind in recent years because their sensor technology is simply not performing at the highest level. And in entry-level DSLRs, they had a hit in the Rebel/450D/Kiss series, but they've been extremely conservative and have been keeping fairly average sensors around all through their line-up, i.e. all Canon DSLR from 550D to 7D share the same 18 mp CMOS sensor. Nikon's more diversified line-up, with the hugely popular D3100 and the superb D7000 has given Nikon a bit more diversification in their consumer DSLR line-up. And in a few days, Nikon will release the 24 mp D3200 (yet another new sensor) to further up the ante. Ouch.

 marike6's gear list:marike6's gear list
Nikon Coolpix P330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Nikon D800 Fujifilm X-E1 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +7 more
Sal Baker Veteran Member • Posts: 9,567
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

spbStan wrote:

Canon is large because of printers. Nikon's sell well because they are great cameras. For people who know the difference, price is not the only criteria for choosing a camera. Personally I do not seen anything in the Canon line I would be interested in, not even their main product; printers. I don't like to spend all my time trying to fix artifacts, shadow noise and banding.
--

Sure, and Nikon only concentrates on making cameras. How about the newest Nikon FX series...

http://www.nikon.com/products/precision/lineup/fx/index.htm

I'll bet it's hard to get a gallery-quality art print out of one of those things.

Sal

 Sal Baker's gear list:Sal Baker's gear list
Ricoh GR Canon EOS 5D Mark II Fujifilm X-E2 Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM +7 more
ScottnLaguna
ScottnLaguna Contributing Member • Posts: 719
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

michaeladawson wrote:

ScottnLaguna wrote:

I am all Nikon for photo gear but use a Canon printer for home output. It's better than HP.

I have no doubt Canon printers are better than HP for photography. Are they better than Epson?
--
Mike Dawson

I don't know for sure but have heard Epson is best. Too much $ for my needs.

 ScottnLaguna's gear list:ScottnLaguna's gear list
Nikon D300 Nikon D800 Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II
Clark Hampton
Clark Hampton Senior Member • Posts: 2,856
That's illegal and anti competitive

huhuhuhuh

 Clark Hampton's gear list:Clark Hampton's gear list
Nikon D100 Nikon D200 Nikon D800 Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC +4 more
Just a Photographer Senior Member • Posts: 1,368
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

u007 wrote:

I'd love to see sales figures, but I would bet that the 5d2 sales beat the d700/d3s and d3X combined by a ratio of 5:1. Canon are plenty popular. Don't let the internet forums delude you!

That doesn't mean they make the better camera.

I've recently switched and I can tell you that you get a load more camera for the price with Nikon that you get with Canon

 Just a Photographer's gear list:Just a Photographer's gear list
Nikon D4 Nikon D800E Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 56mm F1.2 R +9 more
u007 Senior Member • Posts: 1,681
Re: Why don't Canon make Nikon go bust?

marike6 wrote:

u007 wrote:

I'd love to see sales figures, but I would bet that the 5d2 sales beat the d700/d3s and d3X combined by a ratio of 5:1. Canon are plenty popular. Don't let the internet forums delude you!

And Justin Bieber may end up outselling The Beatles and the Rolling Stones put together. Your point? Popularity doesn't mean better, that is for certain. Nikon has been a more illustrious and important brand throughout the history of photography and it's likely there is nothing Canon can do to change that this fact.

Quality always wins out over quantity. Leica is a perfect example of that.

No need to be defensive! I wouldn't buy a 5d2 either, but it WAS/IS a VERY popular camera. I was simply replying to the guy who said that Canon are big because of printers. And I said that I'm sure the 5d2 outsold all Nikons of the same era. You can't deny that their cameras are very popular.

And for a company, their popularity IS all that matters. If a company becomes unpopular it will die. Leica make great cameras, but I'm pretty sure that Canon and Nikon make more profit.

And yes, Bieber is crap, but he's also a multimillionaire. It doesn't mean he is better, but it does mean that he is successful.

-- hide signature --

My travel photography blog - http://www.frescoglobe.com

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads