DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

*ist D is it to old?

Started Mar 31, 2012 | Discussions
taitai Senior Member • Posts: 1,250
*ist D is it to old?

All shot with the 16-45 F4.

Comments are welcome.
--
Thanks itai.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/39871864@N05/

 taitai's gear list:taitai's gear list
Google Pixel 2 XL
Pentax *ist D
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Qwntm Veteran Member • Posts: 6,165
Re: *ist D is it to old?

There is definitely something to be said about the difference between Cmos and CCD sensors...

 Qwntm's gear list:Qwntm's gear list
Fujifilm X100S Pentax K-5 IIs Olympus E-M5 II Sigma 10mm F2.8 EX DC HSM Diagonal Fisheye Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) +8 more
robert james Regular Member • Posts: 274
Re: *ist D is it to old?

I've shot great pics with it. Easiest Pentax dslr to read info in the viewfinder. Great low light pics. Small, compact, well made body. Still a nice dslr.

wideguy New Member • Posts: 15
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Great images! Older just might be better. Thanks for posting, I'm digging my istD out of storage.

P_e_t_e Regular Member • Posts: 388
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Too old for what?
Looks like it still takes very nice pictures.

-- hide signature --

Peter

(unknown member) Veteran Member • Posts: 3,992
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Very nice photos!
Nice compositions, good rendering and colors.

I have to ask though.... aside from mechanical wear, how does age affect camera output? The only thing I can see coming-up is if/when someone would want to move into high resolutions, RAW flexibility or areas such as FPS, video etc. Otherwise, I don't think it really matters what system one uses since they all seem capable of very good IQ.

bnc_skc Regular Member • Posts: 106
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Obviously 6MP just doesn't cut it anymore.
--
bnc
elevatedlens.com

Sinnettc
Sinnettc Veteran Member • Posts: 4,511
Re: *ist D is it to old?

They look good to me. Guess old can still be good.
--
Chris
=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.pbase.com/sinnettc

 Sinnettc's gear list:Sinnettc's gear list
Pentax K20D Pentax Q10 Pentax smc DA* 16-50mm F2.8 ED AL (IF) SDM Pentax smc DA* 50-135mm F2.8 ED (IF) SDM Pentax smc DA* 300mm F4.0 ED (IF) SDM +2 more
brandrx Forum Pro • Posts: 28,337
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Beautiful images. Number two is my favorite. Love it. Thanks for showing.

Cheera.

Ron

-- hide signature --

Ron - 'We don't have time to go take pics this afternoon Carl.'
Carl - 'What do you mean? It will only take 1/1000s.'

'Keep your eyes looking forward. However, glance back now and then to see where you've come from. It will put a smile on your face.' ~ brandrx

mike703 Veteran Member • Posts: 6,715
I agree

brandrx wrote:

Beautiful images. Number two is my favorite. Love it.

Me too... they are all good but no. 2 is a beauty.
Best wishes
--
Mike
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/mikeward

Gerry Winterbourne Forum Pro • Posts: 19,063
John

johnbee wrote:

Very nice photos!
Nice compositions, good rendering and colors.

Very true.

I have to ask though.... aside from mechanical wear, how does age affect camera output? The only thing I can see coming-up is if/when someone would want to move into high resolutions, RAW flexibility or areas such as FPS, video etc. Otherwise, I don't think it really matters what system one uses since they all seem capable of very good IQ.

Age as such makes no difference, of course - it's the technical advances that come over time. In general I don't think these improve the quality of photos; rather, they extend the shootable range.

I sold my DS long ago but when I go back to my DNGs I find shots that are barely acceptable (visible shadow noise) that my K-5 can take at a stroll. But that's relatively rare - most things have pretty similar IQ.

When I bought my K-5 I went through about a year's-worth of K-7 shots and found something like 5% where the K-5 would make a visible difference; and identified cases where I'd stopped with the K-7 because I knew it wasn't up to the job. I haven't done a similar exercise going further back but I'd guess that in most situations the D and DS would produce shots just as good (at normal sizes) as the newest cameras.

-- hide signature --

Gerry

First camera 1953, first Pentax 1985, first DSLR 2006
http://www.pbase.com/gerrywinterbourne

Model Mike Veteran Member • Posts: 3,903
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Congrats, a demo of photographic skill as well as the quality of the splendid Sony sensor.

-- hide signature --
Brentliris Veteran Member • Posts: 4,196
Re: *ist D is it to old?

I enjoyed the series..

Is the *ist D too old? Well I see the image quality is quite good, though dynnamic range on some of the flowers petals doesn't quite seem to cut it.

I'd guess that the K5's has a better viewfinder as well as the LCD on the back is quite alot nicer/easier for chimping critical focus.

I'd guess that sometimes it can be necessaryl to crop an image for this more pixels come in handy.

I'd guess that weathersealing could come in handy especielly if you opt for the 18-135 lens you have a pretty wide range FL range with WR at least.

The sensor maybe be less prone to attracting dust, I think I've seen dust as being a problem on the early DSLR-s

Shutter actuations getting more than 50,000 on my K200D that make's me feel that it's just a matter of time before something goes haywire.

I really like the output of my 10 mpx K200D, but the viewfinder insn't the best, it's shutter is pretty loud for street and dynamic range is very tricky to optimize so all my images on bright days with a subject with white surfaces have to be exporsure compensated, this affects DNR even more..

I'd upgrade now if I were you, if that's what is question is all about. That's what I'm doing, the K5 has the sale price till the end of this day.

I wouldn't mind keeping my K200D running for as long as possible, As backup and as a way too keep CCD senror in my image making arsenal.

Brent
--
Reflections, understandings, discoveries and intimations..

 Brentliris's gear list:Brentliris's gear list
Pentax smc DA* 55mm F1.4 SDM Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Pentax K100D Super Pentax KP +19 more
Peter Budd
Peter Budd Senior Member • Posts: 1,373
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Not to old.

I still took more photo's with my *istD than any other camera.

I look back at them now and am still surpised by the quality of the photo's

-- hide signature --

Peter
GMT

 Peter Budd's gear list:Peter Budd's gear list
Olympus PEN-F OM-1 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm F1.8 Olympus 12-100mm F4.0 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro +5 more
OP taitai Senior Member • Posts: 1,250
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Thank you for all your comments. I am only joking! i use many difrent cameras and i no the difrent. I bought this *ist D+ 16-45 f4 two weeks ago for a song and i am having a lot of fun with it !!! simply FANTASTIC camera.
--
Thanks itai.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/39871864@N05/

 taitai's gear list:taitai's gear list
Google Pixel 2 XL
Lunar Tick New Member • Posts: 10
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Nah - the *istD and 16/45 combination is pretty rubbish - here are a couple of my dismal shots...

steephill Veteran Member • Posts: 9,861
Hot/stuck/dead pixels

Sensors accumulate these as they age. I suspect that the original sensors used in the *istD had more to begin with too. It would have been nice to have the in-camera pixel mapping option which current cameras have. Most decent PP software takes care of it of course, if you shoot RAW.

-- hide signature --
CharlieDIY
CharlieDIY Veteran Member • Posts: 7,120
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Wonderful shots. I started out with Pentax with the *istD. Great camera though my copy underexposed severely. The color rendition, as in your photos, was superb.

-- hide signature --
JNR
JNR Veteran Member • Posts: 4,652
Re: *ist D is it to old?

I guess I will keep mine. Not only does the small form factor come in handy at times, I am not sure that Pentax has put out a camera with this quiet of a shutter since. And, if I want dependable TTL with no preflash reactions in my portraits (as opposed to pTTL), I would have to pull out the *istD.

Besides, its the closest thing to a Polaroid you can have - waiting 20 seconds for processing after snapping off four RAWs.
--
JNR
http://www.jamesrobins.com

 JNR's gear list:JNR's gear list
Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm 50mm F2 R WR Phase One Capture One Pro Pentax K-01 Pentax K-3 +22 more
MikeChip
MikeChip Senior Member • Posts: 2,577
Re: *ist D is it to old?

Absolutely great shots, especially the second one.

Even though I have aK10, K20 and K7 I leave my *istD in the car 24/7/365 and so tend to use it more than any other, I love the results and it is reliable.

The only down sides are the slow write, lack of image stabilization (which I have not found a problem) and dymanic range.

I would not be without it and could not contemplate ever selling it.

Mike
--
http://www.diesneetblog.com/public.html

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads