**Weekly Wildlife Thread: August 28th-Sept 3rd**

Did you teach him to lug all that stuff down the trail? I believe he had a 1D4, 500mm f4, monopod, 1.4x TC draped over his shoulder while hiking the trail at Grant.

BTW, while comparing stuff with 7D vs A77 on imaging resource, the A77 looks equal or better in most cases and I'm thinking with the better AF, it should be scary good for BIF.
LOL!

That A77 sure does look interesting.

I look forward to seeing your images after you guys get your hands on the new toy.
--
Luis
 
It's been a while since I last posted here.

Last Sunday I went on a pelagic trip in San Mateo County waters. Lots of fun and quite a few birds I hadn't seen before (besides on the first pages of the field guides). They are not as colorful as the mainland birds but they are very interesting, especially considering that most of them don't set foot on land unless they are on breeding territory.

It turned out that shooting from a rocking boat was not as easy as I thought... :-)
I must have shot around 700 frames, only to keep 20-30.

Here are my favorite shots. All taken with the 1D MkIV + 300/2.8 (rental) + 2x TC

1. Pink-footed Shearwater - Unlike gulls, shearwaters fly very low and fast.



2. Black-footed Albatross



3. Sabine's Gull



4. Buller's Shearwater



5. Common Murres



6. Rhinoceros Auklet - Distant shot, but I like the horn on the face



7. Wilson's Storm-Petrel - Extra heavy crop and bad shot just to show this species. The bird is just 7.5' and flies like a swallow in open sea.



Cheers,
--
Luis
 
That's not my doing, but he did tell me he ask Santa for a mule for Christmas. LOL
--
Just for fun!

Jim
 
Luis, you are becoming an Audubon, documenting so many species. Looks like you had great weather and your photography is always the best. One thing I find so interesting about pelagic birds is how different they look when not breeding.
 
Nice Jeff. I must say though, I don't normally put gators and Minnesota together . ;-)
--
Just for fun!

Jim
 
What! No chicken wrap?
Cool shots. Something you don't see every day.
--
Just for fun!

Jim
 
Are you kidding? I love that color! That was literally just minutes before sunset and the light was very orange. You were right about the ID though.



--
Just for fun!

Jim
 
Here's a few of my most recent....even though my A230 ain't the greatest as far as resolution is concerned, I've gotten a few lenses over the past month or so that kinda help overcome that limitation. Xmas is comin' up fast however....oooooh, that A65's gonna look sooooo good in my stocking....











 
It's probably a matter of taste. On my laptop the original image had a hotspot on the throat and some small ones on the forehead (with little detail). I tested the RGB colors in Photoshop and the reds were almost clipped (254-255).
The one you just posted looks better somehow. Go figure...
--
Luis
Are you kidding? I love that color! That was literally just minutes before sunset and the light was very orange. You were right about the ID though.



--
Just for fun!

Jim
--
Luis
 
Thanks for commenting. We had the marine layer over us the whole day (11-hour trip). At times the light was a little brighter but overall not a lot to work with.

When I checked the histogram, the dynamic range must have been just a few stops so I had to recover the dark tones in post-processing. :-)

I agree about pelagic birds. From the birds I shot, the difference is most noticeable the murres and the auklet, which I shot in basic and alternate plumage respectively (I hope to get a murre in breeding plumage some day).

I also like the fact that they can filter salt out of the water and that some have a very keen of smell (contrary to most birds that don't have that sense well developed).
Luis, you are becoming an Audubon, documenting so many species. Looks like you had great weather and your photography is always the best. One thing I find so interesting about pelagic birds is how different they look when not breeding.
--
Luis
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top