Pixel binning on the SD1
Interesting. I notice though that the low resolution shot seems to lose more resolution in the brown chest of drawers than the downsized shot. Possibly a difference in sharpening?
It would be nice to see a long exposure low-light shot rather than a high iso shot for comparison.
Erik Magnuson wrote:
petr marek wrote:
But I´m not sure, if Sigma implemented this function.
Oh, it's implemented; you only have to look at X3F files from supported cameras to see how.
2) The real advantage would be, that binned superpixels with square of the photodiodes area, are more sensitive
Alas with the noise characteristics of current X3 implementations, the improvement is small vs. simply downsizing the image; the most anyone has claimed after testing is about 1 stop for LOW vs. HI downsized.
I think that various RAW image sizes may not be result of really connected photodiodes before the capture, but after the light is captured by the normal pixel array.
Line and pixel skipping would produce significant aliasing artifacts.-- hide signature --
Erik, isn't one stop improvement in dynamic range what one would expect from doubling the pixel linear dimension? That is two by two array halves the resolution and doubles the dynamic range. Hence one stop. Or am I mistaken?
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sunflower Field by GrannyMeg|
from An impressionist piece
|Flag from Staten Island Ferry by wam7|
|Windswept juniper by Kreber|
from Wind power
|SAND SCULPTURE by duskman|
from Landscape - Black and White #4