Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

Started Feb 18, 2011 | Discussions
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Sparkedmind New Member • Posts: 10
Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

I'm thinking of getting a wide angle lens for D7000 to be also compatible with a D40X as well.
Would like to keep the price down if I can so as to buy a few other items.

Choices are
Sigma Lens 10-20mm F/4-5.6 EX DC HSM $719
Sigma Lens 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM $927
Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II LD $705
Sigma Lens 10-20mm F/4-5.6 EX DC HSM $949
Tokina AT-X116PRDXN AT-X PRO DX 11-16mm $749
Tokina Lens AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm f/2.8 $999

Uses will be mainly landsapes and full sky astro shots on a tripod setup

What does everyone use, Anyone have recommendations on the good and bads of each of these? Hoping for a good balance of low distortion at the edges, good focus, low colour abberation, weight and price. All suggestion welcome.

Thanks

jazzman2010 New Member • Posts: 17
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

I have a tokina 11-16mm , love the lens , very sharp and well built , It's very wide and works good on my D90

NineFace Regular Member • Posts: 237
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

I got 11-16mm but just because I want fast lens. I got from ebey around $AU670

watch this might help you!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwmux5UqIZk&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

ps. Sigma got new 8-16mm might be better if you got tripod.

Doctor Wowz Regular Member • Posts: 110
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

These aren't US $ is it? The sigma 10-20 4-5.6 HSM is about $400 in the states (and cheaper on craigslist). I have one of these and it works nicely...with minimal lens flare/chromatic aberration. It takes nice landscapes.

Sparkedmind wrote:

I'm thinking of getting a wide angle lens for D7000 to be also compatible with a D40X as well.
Would like to keep the price down if I can so as to buy a few other items.

Choices are
Sigma Lens 10-20mm F/4-5.6 EX DC HSM $719
Sigma Lens 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM $927
Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II LD $705
Sigma Lens 10-20mm F/4-5.6 EX DC HSM $949
Tokina AT-X116PRDXN AT-X PRO DX 11-16mm $749
Tokina Lens AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm f/2.8 $999

Uses will be mainly landsapes and full sky astro shots on a tripod setup

What does everyone use, Anyone have recommendations on the good and bads of each of these? Hoping for a good balance of low distortion at the edges, good focus, low colour abberation, weight and price. All suggestion welcome.

Thanks

Supardiman Junior Member • Posts: 48
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

Tokina Lens AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm f/2.8 with my nikon D300,sharp...sharp....and sharp...

 Supardiman's gear list:Supardiman's gear list
Fujifilm X100S Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Carl Zeiss Touit 1.8/32 Nikon D300 +1 more
Sparkedmind OP New Member • Posts: 10
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

Thanks for the tips. I think I'm down to choosing between Sigma or Tokina at the moment.

The prices I listed were best I could find on the Australian market, although exchange is 1:1 at the moment. Just thinking warranty issues if I need to return and shipping delays from the US. Wanting the lens for a great country drive soon.

Would love to get the Tokina, but thinking a little about weight, as I take my gear on the plane; two SLR, compact, speedlight, laptop, some charges, hard drive and some reading material and it adds up. Thought maybe the Sigma would save me some price-wise as well, just enough to spend on a variable ND filter and CP filter.

Anymore suggestions greatly appreciated.

Sparkedmind OP New Member • Posts: 10
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

Supardiman, do you find you miss much between 10mm and 11mm, and between 16mm and 18mm?

Supardiman wrote:

Tokina Lens AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm f/2.8 with my nikon D300,sharp...sharp....and sharp...

Sparkedmind OP New Member • Posts: 10
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

How do you find it for low light and night shots (i.e. night sky + foreground)

Doctor Wowz wrote:

These aren't US $ is it? The sigma 10-20 4-5.6 HSM is about $400 in the states (and cheaper on craigslist). I have one of these and it works nicely...with minimal lens flare/chromatic aberration. It takes nice landscapes.

mostro900 Forum Member • Posts: 56
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

Love the Tokina 11-16. Very sharp and although the zoom range isn't huge, it still gets a workout! I do sometimes miss it being a little wider, but 95% of the time it's just great. Just about to head off to Wesminster Abbey and this will be the lens on camera. Great in low light.

Sparkedmind OP New Member • Posts: 10
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

Just realised that the Tokina 11-16mm F/2.8 is actually $759, this might seal the deal assuming its in stock and I can live without those 'mm' on either end. Might need a 18-105/18-200mm Nikkor VR to fill in the higher gap.

kymarto Contributing Member • Posts: 640
Sigma 8-16

The best of the lot. I have owned the Sigma 10-20 4-5.6, Tokina 11-16 and the Sigma 8-16, and have tested the Nikon 10-24 and Tamron 10-24. The 8-16 beats them all, and is the widest to boot.

ianz28 Veteran Member • Posts: 5,382
Re: Sigma 8-16

kymarto wrote:

The best of the lot. I have owned the Sigma 10-20 4-5.6, Tokina 11-16 and the Sigma 8-16, and have tested the Nikon 10-24 and Tamron 10-24. The 8-16 beats them all, and is the widest to boot.

Not that I don't believe you but, I'd love to see some tests to support your assessment.

Do you have tests to support these comments?

I'm honestly curious as an owner of the Tokina 11-16 whether or not I should sell it and buy the 8-16.

Here's a 100% crop from the 11-16 at 16mm and f8 at infinity (image did receive standard sharpening).

 ianz28's gear list:ianz28's gear list
Nikon D200 Nikon D5000 Nikon D7200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D +10 more
ianz28 Veteran Member • Posts: 5,382
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

Sparkedmind wrote:

Would love to get the Tokina, but thinking a little about weight, as I take my gear on the plane; two SLR, compact, speedlight, laptop, some charges, hard drive and some reading material and it adds up. Thought maybe the Sigma would save me some price-wise as well, just enough to spend on a variable ND filter and CP filter.

Anymore suggestions greatly appreciated.

Off topic but to address your concerns.

I often fly with quite the large kit. I have a Lowepro Vertex AW 200 which is almost exactly equal to regulation carry on sizes.

http://products.lowepro.com/product/Vertex-200-AW,2073,16.htm

Assuming no laptop it barely fits under an airline seat which is required on smaller commuter planes, but it also fits fine in the overhead bins on typical commercial airlines.

I generally carry about 8 lenses to include the 80-200 f2.8 and 300 f4 + the D200 & D5000 bodies.

I have flown 6 times with this bag both nationally and internationally and have never been asked to store it in the belly of the plane.

Ian

 ianz28's gear list:ianz28's gear list
Nikon D200 Nikon D5000 Nikon D7200 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D +10 more
Hansa Yindee
Hansa Yindee Veteran Member • Posts: 3,964
Re: Sigma 8-16

.

Have used the Sigma 10-20 F4-5.6 for 2 years now.

Paid $350 US funds/bought from the FM forum, fun lens ..;-)
.
.
--
Jon in Thailand

http://www.flickr.com/photos/af2899/
.

 Hansa Yindee's gear list:Hansa Yindee's gear list
Nikon D50 Nikon D1X Nikon D300 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF +9 more
NYC_LUIS Regular Member • Posts: 198
Re: Sigma 8-16

I am also interested to see some samples for the sigma 8-16. I was also thinking about getting the Tokina 11-16 but now i will wait to see results.

kymarto Contributing Member • Posts: 640
Re: Sigma 8-16

I understand your feeling. I only had the Tokina 11-16 three months before the Sigma came out. I was not happy to spend all that money over again...

First, you can read the review of the 8-16 at photozone, and compare it to their review of the 11-16. Lenstip also has a good review of the 8-16.

This site has a good mouseover comparison:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-8-16mm-f-4.5-5.6-DC-HSM-Lens-Review.aspx

The bottom line is that the lenses have different strengths and weaknesses. If you are interested in the wider end, the Sigma is the better choice, but the Tokina does better at the longer end.

Here are my "real-world" comparisons of the two lenses. First, flare comparison at 11mm (with an extra shot with the Sigma @8mm). Not full-rez:

Here are full-rez comparisons of the two @11mm, and in the second set, one more with the Sigma @8mm:

All photos have been sharpened from RAW, but not corrected for CA.

My feeling is that the Tokina is marginally sharper in the center, but the Sigma takes the corners definitely. It is close, but the extra millies at the wide end make the Sigma my choice.

Here is a rogue's gallery of shots with the Sigma, mostly at 8mm:

You can see why the flare resistance is important to me from the HDR shots. Also, the Sigma is somewhat better with CA, and that can be very important with HDR as well. But if you do mostly low light stuff and use the long end more, the Tokina is probably the better choice. Here are two more with the Sigma @8mm just to see the overall sharpness and distortion:

NYC_LUIS Regular Member • Posts: 198
Re: Sigma 8-16

I am not sure.lol I am not a fan of the first 3 pics. I like the last 5 pics or so.

viking79
viking79 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,137
Re: Sigma 8-16

NYC_LUIS wrote:

I am also interested to see some samples for the sigma 8-16. I was also thinking about getting the Tokina 11-16 but now i will wait to see results.

I would get the Tokina if you want/need f/2.8 and the Sigma if you don't care about f/2.8 but want a wider field of view.

My Sigma 8-16mm was a bit soft in the extreme corners, but very sharp otherwise. I wrote of a review of the lens here:
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=124

Eric
--
I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object
be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it
beautiful. - John Constable (quote)

See my Blog at: http://viking79.blogspot.com/ (Weekly)
Flickr Photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28177041@N03/ (updated daily)
See my PPG Shots: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/erictastad (8/31/09)

 viking79's gear list:viking79's gear list
Sony Alpha 7R Samsung NX1 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 85mm F1.4 ED SSA Samsung NX 60mm F2.8 Macro ED OIS SSA +5 more
Cenk
Cenk Senior Member • Posts: 1,444
Re: Wide angle Sigma/Tamron/Nikkor or Tokina

Sigma 12-24 EX HSM FX is my recommendation for all FX and DX bodies...

 Cenk's gear list:Cenk's gear list
Nikon D700 Nikon D5000 Canon EOS 7D Nikon 1 V1 Canon EOS 70D +22 more
Anders W Forum Pro • Posts: 21,466
Re: Sigma 8-16

viking79 wrote:

NYC_LUIS wrote:

I am also interested to see some samples for the sigma 8-16. I was also thinking about getting the Tokina 11-16 but now i will wait to see results.

I would get the Tokina if you want/need f/2.8 and the Sigma if you don't care about f/2.8 but want a wider field of view.

My Sigma 8-16mm was a bit soft in the extreme corners, but very sharp otherwise. I wrote of a review of the lens here:
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=124

Judging by the comments on your review page as well as other evidence, it seems that the soft corners is a characteristic of your particular specimen, not a general characteristic of the lens. Unfortunately, sample variation is not unusual, especially with wide-angles.

As you can see in the sample pictures that kymarto posted, the Sigma 8-16 does a bit better than the Tokina 11-16 in the corners, even when they are stopped down to the same aperture. This is consistent with other evidence I have seen.

 Anders W's gear list:Anders W's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH +28 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads