Fuji X100 available March 2011 for $1000

I predict, just like the Leica X1

Slow Autofocus
Hard to Focus in Low Light
Short Battery time.
Lens soft at F2 and prone to glare (no deep lens hood)

Conclusion: For that price, it will fail.
I will wait for the reviews before I jump to conclusions! While flare may indeed be a risk if they don't have an optional hood, your other assumptions seem premature.

It occurs to me that you are simply playing the ancient prophesy game: make a prediction and if you are wrong keep quiet and everyone will forget. If by chance you are right, then you tell everyone and claim credit for having amazing insight.
 
This should be better than m4/3 at high isos
It will be interesting to see. Fujifilm have been plugging away at high ISO / high DR designs for a long time.
and the photo ratio is normal: 3:2 instead of that boxy 4:3.
3:2 is only common in sensors derived from the old 135 film format ("35 mm"). I find 4:3 to be a more useful aspect ratio overall, but ideally multi-aspect / same AOV is the best option.
4:3 normal??? Try getting prints done....crop,crop,crop. 3:2 is the way to go for me.
 
Ive never had any trouble getting prints made from ANY aspect ratio. Including 4:3 and 1:1. (My two favorite, but far from exclusive A.R.s) Even from the local corner pharmacy. If there is a little extra whitespace on the edges, I can live with that.

I'm a big believer in cropping for the most effective photo and have no desire to restrict myself to a single aspect ratio.
--

Don't feel too vindicated if I happen to agree with you today. Chances are we will disagree tomorrow. . .

Now that you've judged the quality of my typing, take a look at my photos. . .
http://glenbarrington.smugmug.com/
http://www.jpgmag.com/people/glenbarrington/photos
 
The very compact and rugged K-7 is weatherproof and has many compact lenses to choose from.



w/15mm:



K-5 with up to 51200 iso:

 
That would depend on the intended use, wouldn't it?

Fujifilm FinePix X100
Body Size: 127 x 75 x 54mm
Weight: Unknown

Pentax K-7
Body Size: 131 x 97 x 73mm
Weight: 750g (670g - no battery)

Olympus PEN E-PL1
Body Size: 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (excluding protrusions)
Weight: 334g (296g - no battery)

I'm sure the K-5 and K-7 are very capable cameras, but if someone wants something in a different form factor, it really doesn't matter if it's "a better deal". An E-PL1, 9-18mm, and 45-200mm plus 3 batteries makes about a 1.3kg package, and I'd rather carry that into the backcountry than the equivalent K-7 kit. Someone else may value the digital rangefinder aspect of the X100 over what the K-7 offers. All three are great camera systems, but they're all targeted at different users.
 
it doesn't have a shutter speed dial on the top plate and an aperture control on the lens barrel.

Call me old fashioned, but I like these things to be where I expect them to be when I'm shooting manual exposure.

I couldn't care less about the styling, but proper manual controls are what excite me about the X100.

--
http://www.cybertects.co.uk/
 
shipping date is unclear.
 
it doesn't have a shutter speed dial on the top plate and an aperture control on the lens barrel.

Call me old fashioned, but I like these things to be where I expect them to be when I'm shooting manual exposure.
Just keep in mind that you might expect those controls to be in those locations because you're probably an older photographer. But the reality is that, for the overwhelming majority of photographers and the overwhelming majority of cameras, those controls haven't been in those locations for a very, very long time. And for many of us photographers who did shoot back in the manual focus film camera days, we transitioned away from these older control locations when cameras, in general, migrated away from these old control locations.
 
If it has an in-lens shutter it will also be will be great to use with a small flash.

The other thing that looks interesting are the built in ND filters since that gives you another way besides aperture and speed to control the amount of light reaching the sensor.
  • Chris
Yes, My Canon G3 has a built in 2X ND filter and I found it to be quite useful at times. I've since moved on to an Oly E500 and an Oly E30, but I still get out the G3 when I'm on my motorcycle. I think the X100 would make a great motorcycle accessory.

I too would like to see a Copal style diaphragm shutter on such a camera, few people NEED shutter speeds shorter than 1/1000 of a second, particularly on a 'niche' camera such as this, and it makes control over flash synch very precise.

But I suspect it has a focal plane shutter, if for no other reason than they've probably got a bunch of good, cheap ones laying about and it would enhance the conversion of the body to other uses, other models.

--

Don't feel too vindicated if I happen to agree with you today. Chances are we will disagree tomorrow. . .

Now that you've judged the quality of my typing, take a look at my photos. . .
http://glenbarrington.smugmug.com/
http://www.jpgmag.com/people/glenbarrington/photos
 
Oh, I'm perfectly prepared to accept that.

However, so few smaller cameras these days seem to be designed with any acknowledgement that you're not going to use auto-everything all the time.

Where they do offer manual exposure, you're lucky if you get a single control point and then have to do some kind of mode switching between control of aperture and shutter speed. It's hardly convenient if you want to keep the same EV and adjust both parameters quickly. Just to have two separate controls, wherever they may be, would be a major advantage in my book. I was eyeing the Samsung TL500 earlier in the year for precisely this reason.

Even my 5D requires you to change modes on the back of the camera (in addition to changing over to the 'M' setting) before it recognises that the two different control wheels available will adjust the shutter and aperture separately.

Shutter speed dial on the body and an aperture ring on the lens is a clear and unambiguous separation of the controls - they are managed by different hands.

Anyhow, if Fuji are looking for a niche market for this camera, I'm in it.

BTW, I'm not that old, I'm only 43. :)

--
http://www.cybertects.co.uk/
 
it doesn't have a shutter speed dial on the top plate and an aperture control on the lens barrel.

Call me old fashioned, but I like these things to be where I expect them to be when I'm shooting manual exposure.
As someone using many different manual cameras, Im ready to find adjustment dials right about everywhere. LF lenses have their aperture set with a lever on the shutter and shutter speed with ring on the shutter, as do my 6x9. My TLR has shutter speed on a lever around the lens. My film SLR sets aperture with a ring on the lens, but shutter speed is set using two buttons. I have an XA with aperture set through a straight vertically moving lever on the front of the camera body. Some TLRs are set though wheels. Many SLRs have a shutter speed dial on top. 70s rangefinders have the controls all over the place, on dials, rings, wheels, levers etc.

Modern cameras have found even more ways to do the settings. Dual wheels, single wheel changing function, strange slide-buttons on my NV24, touchscreens, multi-function wheels, hidden in menus etc.

Im just saying that by now there is no "natural" way of controlling cameras. Select something good, with both controls separated and readable and go with that. The X100 seems to have a good approach, separated and easily set dials, readable with or without the camera to the eye.

--
My Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/36164047@N06/
 
Screw an image sacrificing "zoom". At $1000 and a flexible 35mm lens this is the camera I want. A modern day digital Rangefinder. Thank you Fuji. Awesome!
 
Im just saying that by now there is no "natural" way of controlling cameras. Select something good, with both controls separated and readable and go with that. The X100 seems to have a good approach, separated and easily set dials, readable with or without the camera to the eye.
Yep. I too have many film bodies with controls in different places, but it is the clear layout of them (indeed the fact that they exist at all) that I was really on about. You can see instantly how they work and where they are set, which is often not the case with modern cameras.

--
http://www.cybertects.co.uk/
 
Fair enough, but custom size frames are not cheap.
Framing in general is not cheap. And even VERY expensive standardized frames come in standard sizes. (In the US, that pretty much means 26X36, 11X14, 8X10, 5X&, & 4X6 none of which matches camera aspect ratios all that well) A good mat cut to the proper size and fit into a standard frame is about anyone can do.

--

Don't feel too vindicated if I happen to agree with you today. Chances are we will disagree tomorrow. . .

Now that you've judged the quality of my typing, take a look at my photos. . .
http://glenbarrington.smugmug.com/
http://www.jpgmag.com/people/glenbarrington/photos
 
CFynn wrote:

If it has an in-lens shutter it will also be will be great to use with a small flash.

The other thing that looks interesting are the built in ND filters since that gives you another way besides aperture and speed to control the amount of light reaching the sensor.
  • Chris
Yes, My Canon G3 has a built in 2X ND filter and I found it to be quite useful at times. I've since moved on to an Oly E500 and an Oly E30, but I still get out the G3 when I'm on my motorcycle. I think the X100 would make a great motorcycle accessory.

I too would like to see a Copal style diaphragm shutter on such a camera, few people NEED shutter speeds shorter than 1/1000 of a second, particularly on a 'niche' camera such as this, and it makes control over flash synch very precise.

But I suspect it has a focal plane shutter, if for no other reason than they've probably got a bunch of good, cheap ones laying about and it would enhance the conversion of the body to other uses, other models.
--
Don't feel too vindicated if I happen to agree with you today. Chances are we will disagree tomorrow. . .
Now that you've judged the quality of my typing, take a look at my photos. . .
http://glenbarrington.smugmug.com/
http://www.jpgmag.com/people/glenbarrington/photos
Everyone talking about it says the x100 has a leaf shutter.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top