Moon shot from tonight

William F Carter

Active member
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Location
Houston, TX, US
I recently picked up a 80-205mm 4.5 OM mount lens for $15 at a local camera shop. They occasionally have OM mount lenses but they are few and far between. Since there isn't much demand in this shop for OM gear the guy decided to throw in a 2X and 3X teleconverter set. I wasn't sure I would really get a chance to use them until tonight when I thought I'd play around and try and capture some moon shots.



So what do you think? Worth the $15?

Any opinions or pointers on capturing better moon shots would be greatly appreciated.
 
Here's a few pointers I've learned from my moon shots, if you really want some sharp, crisp ones to wow friends and family with:

Tripod: essential, because 1mm of movement of the lens at the camera end equates to a big movement at the distance of the moon;
Remote shutter release: almost as essential, to prevent shake described above;

Focus: Better to use autofocus on the moon itself, unless you have the eyesight of a 2-year-old Eagle while looking through the E-series small viewfinders and manual focusing;
Aperture: f/8-f/11 is the agreed upon rule of thumb, for max detail all around;

Moon phase: Full moon is NOT the best time to get pics, since there is very little shadow detail available. Anything noticeably less than full moon will also show craters and mountains on the dark edge of the moon, between the dark and light parts;

Atmosphere: Really makes a big difference! If the stars are twinkling and shimmering, you have a turbulent atmosphere, and may not get good pics of the moon. Best time is early morning (dark) on a cold, still night where the stars are still points, not twinkling. This allows time for any heat from the day to dissipate, making a much calmer atmosphere.

Shoot a lot of pics at the same zoom settings, and pick out the sharpest ones (taken in between moments of atmospheric disturbance). You may get a Wow! pic there.

Also, you can use a free program called Registax, which allows you to stack multiple pics (your sharpest ones) and tweak them into one very much sharper pic. It really brings out an incredible level of detail, much better then any regular sharpening in whatever program you use. In Registax, it's called Wavelet Processing, amazing at what it can do!

If you're really serious about wanting awesome pics, get a telescope and mount your camera to it. But, you should be able to get some pretty good ones with your lens too, and a bit of work afterwards.

Here's one that I took using all of the things mentioned above, except they (multiple pics, stacked & tweaked) were handheld to my telescope's eyepiece.



Hope this helps, and Happy Hunting!

--
Cheers,
Kerbouchard

 
Also, if you shoot in RAW format, you can correct the WB and color later--which you can tell I didn't do on this pic...But I kinda like the brown color, too, looks warmer than a cold gray frozen ball in space... :-)
Nice spot for a picnic!!
--
Cheers,
Kerbouchard

 
What combination did you use? What camera? On a tripod? Is this a
cropped image?

It is a decent photo, but not real great. Focus is critical.

George
http://www.images123.com
The camera is an E-500 and for this shot i used the 80-205 manual focus lens with both the 2X and 3X adapters and the lens at about 150mm. The shot is crop slightly with empty black space removed from each side to make the image look more centered. This was shot from a tripod, ISO 100, F11+stop down effect of the combined teleconverters and a shutter speed of 1/3 of a second I believe.
 
He's using an OM lens so AF is not available.

One neat feature of the E-500 people forget about is MF bracketing. Do the best you can and let the camera take a few bracketed shots around that focus point. Even the focus steps are adjustable I believe.

Also, F7.1 or F8 if fine and you can use a better shutter like 1/100 or so. DOF is not a problem on an object so far away.
 
Nice shot. The moon is a challenging target to get a good photo of. I went through about 500 frames before I got one to print and hang.

I'm surprized you can focus that well with the 2 adapters stacked like that. When I tried to do that with my Zuiko OM 600mm it was impossible to get a good focus for me. But then starting at 600, the 2x is all I need to get the moon full frame.

A big help in getting sharpness on your moon shots would be two things. First increase your shutter speed. I'm sure you noticed how fast the moon moves at that focal length, try to keep them at 1/150th or above. As mentioned already, DOF at 250,000 odd kilometers is not a big issue with a wider aperture. Secondly use the mirror lock up (anti shock) function. A little movement of the camera from the mirror slap can really take out what would be a sharp photo.

Someone mentioned that the cable release is a must and I agree, although with the E500 that isn't an option for you. I don't know how fast the IR remote works but you may want to try that. Perhaps a 3 to 5 second mirror lock up will allow the camera to settle after the finger press and make it a moot point.

Here's the keeper I came up with.

E300
600 OM Zuiko f6.3 at f8 with 2x TC
1/160th
3 second mirror lock up
cable release
ISO 400

This was shot at 4PM, I liked the blue sky rather than the night shots so the moon itself was not that bright. That's why I was forced to bump it to 400ISO.



This is a 16x20 print in my dining room. My family was wowed by it so they have it at that size now as well. Just remember, keep shooting, it requires techical skill and some luck when doing this but the film these days is the right price for doing just that.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top