I was starting 25 years ago with an 35 mm foghtlander.
haved a dark room black and white,later i tryed color
with mixed results meaking color pictures was not easy.
used a durst projector and a phillips color lab.
then i was of for some years.
when the digital camera's came out I buyed an 1mil pixel camera from
fuji my furst one,not thad good but i was able to make pictures and print them.
some year later a buyed an olympus point and shoot,not thad great to.
bad pictures and always to dark.
later one a buyed another camera fuji 4900 zoom alot better,but the pictures had an blue color cast.
then i runned on dprevieuw checking for another camera.
I was shocked at furst when I saw the rating of the camera i buyed.
after this point I was sure to not buy an new camera if i thid know everthing about it.
and so i was here buyed an E10 and now I am waiting for my 300-D
I wanted the 300-D becouse of the low noise the pictures have.
And i can tel you the E10 got alot of noise even in good light situations.
but its a verry nice camera,a bit slow for now.
but when i boucht this camera 3 and a hald years a go its was super fast for thad time.
afcours the new camera's are better in pictures and in speed.
but hi 3 years a go my computer look fast,
now my new model is super fast but for how long.
in a few years i got slow again.
so I ordered the 300 D becouse of the good pictures low noise,and speed.
do not get me whrong the E10 is a good camera,but the 300 D is alot better,becouse of the time in a few years i gone tel you the same of the 300 D
sorry for my bad english,I am from belgium.
I think a good camera is when you are happy with the pictures.
and the person begint the camera can only use the tools hi have.
but in my opinium the better the tools the better are the photo's.
afcours the photographer must be good to.
If you buy an piano but can play on it,what is the reason to have an piano.
best regard Claus Marnix.
and because I love gadgets.
I've always loved photography - did a course when I was at college.
Had a Pentax SLR and a number of lenses and my own darkroom at
home. Then left college, got a job, got caught up in the real
world and sold all my gear. Then had children and spent years
taking snapshots with Pentax point and shoots.
I've always been a heavy computer user - had a BBC B many, many
years ago - and when digital became affordable I jumped right in.
Got my first digital camera - an Olympus D490 - cost £500 - but I
was immediately hooked - I loved the immediacy of it all. I went
to Majorca for my summer holiday and took 700 photographs!
My job is managing newspapers and in 2002 I launched a glossy
magazine which is all about the photographs and this got me totally
focussed on the quality of the image.
Bought a Fuji 602 and loved the improvement but the shutter release
lag was such a pain - most of my photographs are of children and
cats (sad I know) - and I kept missing the moment.
I feel a bit of a cheat owning such a great camera as I am a real
amateur and I suppose I could have got by with an advanced point
and shoot but when the 300D came out, just after I had had a good
bonus, I couldn't resist.
And I love it - I love the speed and the images blow me away - even
though mostly when I get a good result it's the camera not me. I
just wish I could work out the low light focussing - then it would
be perfect for me.
Nuala