Jettubby
Leading Member
You are really off here man. I think you are inaccurately accusing me of being upset or something.
First I never used the word "crippled". You got that somewhere else.
Second I sure do think it's possible that Nikon would have made the D70 without the Rebel. How do you know that Nikon didn't come up with the budget DSLR idea first and Canon was just the first to produce it? Like you said yourself, they just copied the 10D so it wouldn't take long to put out the Rebel, but only god, Canon, and Nikon know the answer to that question. I don't know for absolute certainty. Do you?
Third I'm not mad or upset. How do you define my emotion with what I wrote? Like I said I love my Rebel and think it's the best digitial I've owned. I'm just making an observation regarding the lack of features that Canon purposely left out. Obviously there's some validity to it as several have posted about this as well. Phil even said it himself, "Almost laughably the majority of the EOS 300D's limitations are 'programmed in', that is they are simply software features which have been disabled." I'm not asking for "freebies", like you make it sound like I'm begging for a free lens or something. hee hee. I'm just saying what they "could" have done is make the 300D better than the 10D by enabling all the features and it would now be more competition to the D70. That's all. I'm not upset, just offering an alternate possibility.
If I were mad or upset I'd type in CAPS or put a lot of these silly things !!!!!! in my post. It's ok Michael, we're just talking here.
First I never used the word "crippled". You got that somewhere else.
Second I sure do think it's possible that Nikon would have made the D70 without the Rebel. How do you know that Nikon didn't come up with the budget DSLR idea first and Canon was just the first to produce it? Like you said yourself, they just copied the 10D so it wouldn't take long to put out the Rebel, but only god, Canon, and Nikon know the answer to that question. I don't know for absolute certainty. Do you?
Third I'm not mad or upset. How do you define my emotion with what I wrote? Like I said I love my Rebel and think it's the best digitial I've owned. I'm just making an observation regarding the lack of features that Canon purposely left out. Obviously there's some validity to it as several have posted about this as well. Phil even said it himself, "Almost laughably the majority of the EOS 300D's limitations are 'programmed in', that is they are simply software features which have been disabled." I'm not asking for "freebies", like you make it sound like I'm begging for a free lens or something. hee hee. I'm just saying what they "could" have done is make the 300D better than the 10D by enabling all the features and it would now be more competition to the D70. That's all. I'm not upset, just offering an alternate possibility.
If I were mad or upset I'd type in CAPS or put a lot of these silly things !!!!!! in my post. It's ok Michael, we're just talking here.
Do you think there would even be a D70 if it weren't for the KissThis has nothing to do with a "mooch" mentality. Let me explain.
There are things that a camera manufacturer does to reduce costs;
IE: plastic body vs. metal, cheaper CCD, etc. These things actually
make it cheaper to manufacturer and therefore Nikon and Canon can
sell the camera for less. Here's the difference; with the exception
of the plastic body and such Nikon made the D70 the best it could
be whereas Canon did not make the Rebel in that respect.
Digital rocking the DSLR world? I'll answer that for you: NO. Nikon
is worse than Canon at giving you your money's worth; and only now
with their D2H being literally obsolete in a few months are Nikon
scrambling to stay viable. If you buy the D70 (I might get one)
Thank Canon NOT Nikon.
They took
Once again Ignorance rears its ugly head. The Rebel D is NOthe 10D conception and disabled features in order to promote the
10D's sales. See the difference?
different than the Film Rebel line. 'Crippled' features to
distinguish it and it's super LOW cost from it's bigger, more
featured brothers. Don't read anymore into were talking X files
here just simple Product Placement.
Nikon did not make the D70 "less"
Canon COULD have done a lot of things. I guess your mad that youof a camera purposely compared to the D100. I think Canon could
have made the 300D better than the 10D for less money and if they
had done that, the D70 would not be such an issue.
are not getting more for FREE, and its embarrassing to witness
here. You should have held out longer. Others drew the line in the
sand knowing that there will be cheaper, better low end DSLR's down
the road. Somehow your behind the curve on that simple truth
present since the first Digicam came to market
Going for the 1D Mark II is a NO BRAINER; simply the best darnLike I said I love my Rebel and it was the only DSLR that I could
afford at the time. I wish they'd have made it the best it could be
for their budget but that was my decision and that's ok. Personally
I'm not complaining but just making an observation. And the next
body I'll buy certainly won't be the older design of the 10D. I'm
going for the 1D Mark II baby!
camera money can buy...IMHO. Now is there a list we have to sign
giving you a little advance notice in order to borrow this from
you...LOL